The L10 heartbeat (chat/always_on, #747) holds CORE alive over uptime but had no
surface. This adds the read-only Lived Life route that renders the continuous-life
evidence: the heartbeat over uptime + the resume-as-same-life verdict — both halves
of "one continuous life" on one surface.
Persist-first, never recompute engine-owned values:
- chat/always_on: serialize_report + write_lived_life persist a run deterministically
(sorted keys) to engine_state/lived_life.json; run_continuous gains an opt-in
report_path so a real continuous-life run leaves its evidence where the workbench
reads it. closure_ceiling is persisted so the artifact is self-describing.
- workbench/lived_life.py: projection + a fail-closed validate() gate — the wrong=0
analogue for the continuity surface: closure_held/closure_observed/totals/converged
are each re-checked against the per-beat measurements, and resume_status is re-checked
against identity-vs-current-substrate, so a tampered artifact RAISES rather than
rendering a false claim (a beat lying about a breached ceiling, an inflated closure,
a miscounted total, a falsely-claimed resume).
- workbench/readers.lived_life(): reads the artifact, computes the resume verdict from
the persisted identity vs the canonical engine_identity_for_config (fail-soft ->
"unknown", like IdentityContinuity). Honest absence when no run has been persisted.
- GET /lived-life + LivedLife/LivedLifeHeartbeat schemas (snapshot regenerated; the
schema-drift gate proves every field is mirrored in src/types/api.ts).
The resume verdict made felt: would_resume / substrate_changed / unknown IS the L11
reboot guarantee (a reboot recomputes identity and refuses if it differs) — so the
surface shows this life wakes up as ITSELF, not a copy. The per-reboot lineage chain
stays owned by Runs > Identity (honest cross-link).
Frontend: /lived-life route (Evidence section, route count 15 -> 16). Renders the
headline (heartbeats, closure-held-by-construction, learned-while-idle, at-rest, resume
pill), the summary, the heartbeat timeline (closure flat below the ceiling — read, never
repaired), and the resume verdict. Honest absence + ADR-0162 route conformance
(loading/error/empty), fail-closed like Vault/Calibration.
Tests (non-vacuous): 12 backend (every tamper case raises; resume tracks identity vs
substrate; run_continuous(report_path) round-trips a readable+valid artifact) + 4
frontend render tests (recorded life renders; a breached beat shows the warning, never a
false "held"; a changed substrate shows would-refuse, never a false resume; absent shows
honest absence). All workbench Python (167) + affected vitest (167) + tsc + vite build
green; architectural invariants green.
engine_state/lived_life.json is runtime state (gitignored, ADR-0146 pattern).
The 'one continuous life' telos had three built pieces (turn loop, Shape B+ resume,
idle_tick learning) but no process holding the engine alive+learning over uptime. This
adds that heartbeat loop: chat/always_on.run_continuous ticks idle_tick on a cadence so
the engine LIVES and LEARNS even when no one is talking to it, READS (never repairs) the
closure invariant as evidence each beat, and persists so the life survives interruption
and resumes as the SAME life.
Proven by 3 falsifiable soak tests (non-vacuous): lives (closure observed + held, real
field excited, ~7x under the 1e-6 ceiling); learns while idle (Step-D consolidation
DERIVES and STORES member(socrates,mortal) during idle — absent before the heartbeat,
present after); converges (saturated life stops churning); survives interruption as the
SAME life (strict identity guard enforces it on reboot + the consolidated STORED record
survives, not mere re-derivation); never repairs (field byte-identical after the run).
Safety by composition, no new authority: idle_tick stays proposal-only (HITL untouched)
+ sound proof-gated SPECULATIVE session-memory consolidation; closure owned by
algebra/versor.py (heartbeat only reads versor_condition — no hot-path repair).
Adversarial 3-reviewer panel: no-hot-path-repair PASS, wrong=0 PASS; the panel's
proof-quality findings are fixed — removed the tautological identity_continuous claim
(engine identity is config-derived, invariant by construction), reframed the resume test
to prove ACCUMULATED learning survived (stored record, not re-derivation) under the strict
identity guard, surfaced final_checkpoint_ok (no silent swallow), and softened the
docstring (this is the heartbeat LOOP a daemon runs; the daemon shell is a follow-up).
Scope: the reusable loop ships; a production daemon (CLI entry, real cadence, signals)
is a thin follow-up. Purely additive (no existing file touched).
First phase of the domain-general compositional reading layer (the comprehension
coverage wall is composition — docs/analysis/comprehension-coverage-wall-map-2026-06-14.md).
M1 is a pure PARITY refactor on the flagship logic path, no new capability:
- new generate/composition/ package: LogicChainPlan (plan.py) + lower_logic_chain
(lower_logic.py), the is-a chain lowering extracted BYTE-IDENTICALLY from
determine.py::_verify_subsumption.
- _verify_subsumption now builds a plan -> lowers it -> routes through the UNCHANGED
evaluate_entailment gate. The composer proposes structure; the sound ROBDD gate
remains the sole wrong=0 firewall.
- only the logic instantiation ships; no math lowering, no join-op vocabulary
(defer-substrate-vocab-commitment — the chain discriminates on its relational
predicate, an explicit join-op field lands when a second op dispatches on it).
Verification: byte-identical lowering (3-reviewer adversarial panel: byte-parity PASS
char-for-char, wrong=0 PASS — the instance-of-fallacy refusal mutation-proven
load-bearing); 5 new non-vacuous lowering tests; 28 determine/transitive/consolidation
+ 163-test broad sweep (incl. gsm8k serving + ADR-0218) green; cognition eval 100%.
A1 (substrate fix, not UI): en_collapse_anchors_v1 declared only love/peace/justice,
but the logos packs reference covenant_love/shalom/tzedek + heart/soul/breath/holy/time.
Declare all 8 with their real ADR-0073 provenance (source-concept names where they
exist) and recompute the lexicon checksum. Now every cross_lang.no_english_collapse
edge resolves to a real declared entry — grc_logos_cognition_v1 and he_core_cognition_v1
go from 7 invalid targets to 0 (verdict warning -> unknown; never CLEAR while holonomy
proof is absent). The geometry resolves; the check is NOT suppressed (the LG-1
relation/prefix carve-out stays removed). Test updated to assert real resolution;
invalid-detection branch still covered by the ghost-target fixture.
A2: Identity tab shows the real pack manifest (now fetched via /contents) instead of
an overview projection — the actual passport, data already present.
NOTE (curation follow-up): love (Greek agape collapse) and covenant_love (Hebrew chesed
collapse) may be intentionally distinct per-language anchors or duplicates of one
concept — left both declared rather than gamble on consolidating curated theology.
Backend 25 + frontend 520 tests pass; tsc + build clean.
Measuring the holonomy tri-language resonance (intended for a Studio proof-card)
showed it is NOT a robust proof: the engine's own holonomy_similarity (CGA inner
product) anti-correlates, and the Euclidean 'aligned closer than misaligned'
claim passes only via averaging in the close Hebrew distance + one cherry-picked
negative (1.3% margin) — the aligned Greek clause is itself farther than the
negative, and the verdict flips ±20-55% under other negatives. Decoration, not
proof (CLAUDE.md, Schema-Defined Proof Obligations).
- docs/analysis/holonomy-resonance-proof-not-robust-2026-06-14.md: the rigorous
finding (numbers), why a Holonomy proof tab cannot be built honestly yet
(stays missing_evidence), and bounded research questions.
- Downgrade the two clause-resonance decoration tests to honest tripwires that
assert the true state and fail (pointing to the doc) if the resonance becomes
real. Token-pair cga_inner tests left intact + flagged as a separate, un-audited
claim.
70 holonomy-adjacent tests pass.
Clears the long-standing B4 block: the leeway decision was already made on the
serving path (chat/runtime.py::_surface_estimate has a real LicenseDecision +
the ReachPolicy) and then DISCARDED — never threaded to the result, and the
workbench can't import reliability_gate. This wires it through.
Producer (observational, never authorizing):
- core/cognition/leeway.py: LeewayRecord + build_leeway_record(reach_level,
license_decision) — duck-typed on the decision, zero new cross-package
coupling. Maps to: no decision -> "unknown" (STRICT, no latitude); denied
-> "blocked" (gate consulted, said no); licensed SERVE/PROPOSE widening ->
the real class / theta / "[approximate]" disclosure. "verified" is never
emitted (RESERVED state). source_digest content-addresses the decision
(deterministic, no wall-clock).
- core/cognition/result.py: additive `leeway: LeewayRecord | None = None` on
CognitiveTurnResult.
- core/cognition/pipeline.py: build it at result construction from the data
the runtime ALREADY exposes (response.reach_level +
runtime.last_turn_accrual().license). chat/runtime.py is UNTOUCHED.
- workbench/api.py: _leeway_evidence_from_result maps result.leeway ->
LeewayEvidence (pure projection; no reliability_gate import — firewall
intact). The journal already persists it; the B4a UI (Replay / Proposals /
RightInspector) already renders it — no frontend or schema change needed.
Safety (this touches the serving path, so proven, not asserted):
- trace_hash is a NAMED-field hash (core/cognition/trace.py); `leeway` is not
in it -> byte-identical serving. All provenance/trace tests pass.
- response_governance STRICT stays byte-identical (375 governance/serving/
provenance tests green, incl. the live-wiring + estimation-lane + ADR-0206
seam tests).
- core eval cognition: 13 cases, 100% intent / groundedness / versor closure.
- replay determinism holds (leeway is in CRITICAL_FIELDS; deterministic).
Tests: engine (build_leeway_record: strict/blocked/SERVE/PROPOSE, no "verified",
deterministic digest) + workbench mapping (field-for-field, honest absence,
invalid-enum clamp) + integration (a real turn now carries an honest leeway
record, not the null "No evidence recorded"). 151 workbench/leeway Python + 68
frontend (leeway/replay/proposals/schemaDrift) green; schema-snapshot unchanged.
Docs: gate cleared (b4-leeway-feasibility-gate.md), residue ledger flipped to
implemented, scope brief is b4-leeway-producer-scope-2026-06-13.md.
The "they'd want to use it" first-run surface: a curated narrative that makes
the engine's discipline legible to a newcomer — bring a claim from any model and
watch it get decided, refused, or replayed. Proposer authority ignored.
Honest by construction (the risk with a narrative surface is theater):
- workbench/tour.py determinism_tour() is a curated ordered narrative BOUND to
the real demo registry. Intro (provider-agnostic thesis) → three demo steps
(deductive entailment decides only on engine+oracle agreement; epistemic
truth-state refuses a wrong proposer; proof-carrying promotion ignores
proposer authority) → payoff (replay-to-same-hash + the citable evidence
bundle).
- Each demo step's what_this_proves / what_this_does_not_prove cards and the
demo title are PULLED FROM THE REAL DEMO SPEC — never re-authored — so the
tour can never claim more than the demo it points at.
- A step referencing a missing demo FAILS CLOSED (KeyError), not a dead link.
Tests assert both (cards == spec; phantom demo raises).
Backend: schemas.py DeterminismTour/TourStep; GET /tour. schema-snapshot regen.
Frontend: /tour route registered in the registry (Determinism section, 14
routes; nav/palette/guide counts updated); TourRoute — thesis hero + ordered
step cards with the honesty cards + links to the real demos / replay.
Validation: 140 workbench Python tests incl. tour drift guards; 472/472 frontend
incl. routes/routeConformance/routes.docs (guide↔registry), Shell+palette counts
(14), schemaDrift, and the tour UI test; pnpm build clean; git diff --check
clean. No serving-path imports.
The "they'd want to use it" deliverable: a turn's evidence exported as ONE
deterministic, content-addressed, citable artifact — composing the Phase-C
evidence (pipeline + field) with the trace and the calibration leeway verdict.
Backend (read-only, no engine execution):
- schemas.py: EvidenceBundle.
- workbench/evidence_bundle.py: build_evidence_bundle(entry) assembles a turn
journal entry into the bundle and computes bundle_digest. The digest
content-addresses the DETERMINISTIC cognitive evidence only — journal
position + wall-clock (turn_id, journal_digest, replay_reproducer,
generated_from) are carried for provenance but EXCLUDED, so the same turn
content reproduces the same digest regardless of journal position.
- api.py: GET /trace/{turn_id}/bundle. schema-snapshot.json regenerated.
The bundle carries a replay *reproducer* command (how to verify) rather than a
live-run replay, so the artifact itself stays deterministic — verification is
the consumer's step: re-run the prompt sealed, confirm trace_hash, recompute the
bundle, check the digest.
Frontend:
- types/api.ts EvidenceBundle; client/query hook; Trace route **Bundle** tab —
citable digest, "what this proves / does not prove" honesty note, the
reproducer, and a deterministic JSON download (Blob anchor, leak-safe).
Validation: 135 workbench Python tests incl. non-vacuous bundle guards (digest
reproducible, journal-position/wall-clock excluded, any evidence change flips
the digest, missing Phase-C evidence honest); 468/468 frontend incl. schemaDrift
+ the citable-download bundle test; pnpm build clean; git diff --check clean. No
serving-path imports.
C2-a surfaced contemplation runs but rendered each scene as a flat JSON dump —
outputs, not process. C2-b makes the loop legible: every scene is now a typed
stage in the canonical ADR-0172 arc.
Reader-first (no theater):
- schemas.py: ContemplationScene gains a typed loop projection — stage_role
(cold_attempt | engine_enrichment | engine_proposal | operator_ratifies |
grounded | other) plus the connective ids (proposal_id, candidate_id,
proposal_state, grounding_source). New ContemplationStageRole Literal.
- readers.py: _contemplation_scenes derives stage_role from the scene id
(closed set, "other" fallback) and pulls the connective ids out of the raw
detail. schema-snapshot.json regenerated.
UI:
- ContemplationRoute: the run detail now renders the arc as a staged process —
"attempt → enrich → propose → ratify → grounded" with named stage roles,
cold→grounded bookends (surfaces pulled out of before/after), the connective
ids as evidence, and the raw detail tucked into a collapsible (not lost).
Honest wrinkle (surfaced, not faked): the fixture proposals do NOT resolve in
the live proposal log (source_kinds exemplar_corpus/operator, none
contemplation), so the proposal id is shown as evidence but is intentionally
NOT a clickable cross-route link — a dead link would be theater. Live
Proposals/Calibration navigation is deferred to reader-verified linking once
real contemplation proposals reach the log.
Validation: 128 workbench Python tests + new reader-projection tests (canonical
arc → roles, unknown → "other", id extraction, detail preserved); 466/466
frontend incl. schemaDrift + the staged-process / no-dead-link test; pnpm build
clean; git diff --check clean. No serving-path imports.
Makes the CL(4,1) field geometry legible, honestly. The engine owns the field;
this surfaces ONLY the exact scalar invariants it computes — never the raw
multivector — so the workbench shows "this is the geometry, it's exact, it
can't fake coherence" without a decorative blob or any motion.
Persist-first (the C3 gating work was Python, not React): the honest scalars
were computed live per turn but discarded. Now captured per turn into the
journal so a read-only surface has real evidence.
Backend:
- workbench/field_evidence.py: FieldEvidence computed from the engine result —
exact versor_condition, field_valid (vs the 1e-6 ceiling), a content-
addressed field_digest (sha256 of the engine-canonical array bytes), and
cga_inner(before, after) as the exact transition value. Raw field bytes
never cross the boundary: only floats + digests. validate() is fail-closed —
field_valid can never disagree with versor_condition vs the ceiling (the
wrong=0 analogue for the geometry). No engine math re-implemented
(versor_condition / cga_inner imported from algebra; bytes via array_codec).
- workbench/schemas.py: FieldEvidence dataclass; field_evidence on
ChatTurnResult + TurnJournalEntrySchema. schema-snapshot.json regenerated.
- workbench/journal.py + api.py: persisted at from_chat_turn; first-class read
endpoint GET /trace/{turn_id}/field (trace facet, consistent with /pipeline).
- workbench/replay.py: field_evidence classified CRITICAL — replay now also
proves field determinism (digest + scalars must match on re-execution).
Frontend:
- types/api.ts FieldEvidence + field_evidence passthrough; client/query hook;
FieldInvariantCard (measured value vs ceiling, cga_inner transition, digests;
honest missing_evidence; no blob, no motion); Trace route Field tab.
Honest-empty for pre-widening journal rows (missing_evidence). Deferred:
cross-turn field-coherence trends, session-level field persistence.
Validation: 138 workbench/practice Python tests (incl. non-vacuous field guards
+ replay field-determinism); 465/465 frontend incl. schemaDrift; pnpm build
clean; git diff --check clean. No generate.derivation / reliability_gate /
stream / field.propagate / vault.store imports.
Lands the Phase C "make cognition legible" slice plus Phase A residue, all
backend-reader-first over real engine data (no theater, read-only doctrine
intact, zero serving-path imports).
C1-a — Cognitive pipeline record (persistence-first, per #729 worthiness edit):
- workbench/pipeline_record.py: curated CognitivePipelineRecord over the real
CognitiveTurnResult (input → intent → proposition_graph → articulation_target
→ realizer → walk_telemetry → trace_hash). Raw field multivectors are
DELIBERATELY excluded; _assert_no_raw_field_payload recursively rejects raw
field keys, and validate_pipeline_record fails closed on missing/duplicate
stages, non-recorded status, or dangling edges — the UI can never receive a
partial record that claims to be complete.
- test_workbench_pipeline_record.py: non-vacuous guards — missing stage,
monkeypatched new required stage, and injected raw {"F": [...]} each raise.
C2-a — Contemplation as a process: /contemplation route over real persisted
contemplation/runs/*.json (glob reader; honest-empty when absent).
C4-a — Identity continuity (L10/L11): RunDetail.identity_continuity + Runs
Identity tab, sourced from the real core.engine_identity (engine_identity /
parent_engine_identity lineage relation, re-derived to verify).
Demo Theater: renders backend-owned proof-promotion + entailment DAGs.
Phase A residue: density preference wired end-to-end (settings → shell → tokens);
cross-route consistency touch-ups.
Infra: local API CORS now echoes only validated 127.0.0.1/localhost origins
(hostname-checked, not arbitrary reflection) so Vite fallback ports work.
Route chunk-split keeps the build warning-free.
Cleanup: corrected the stale ADR-0175 practice-lane assertions (build_report is
6 correct / 0 wrong / 44 refused after the current serving lane; wrong=0 held)
and the two registry-derived count tests (LeftNav + CommandPalette 12 → 13 for
the new Contemplation route).
Docs: runtime_contracts.md (pipeline-record contract), UI-UX-GUIDE,
api-contract-v1, data-shapes-v1, wave-M-worthiness, phase-a-residue-ledger.
Validation: 106 workbench/practice Python tests green (incl. wrong=0 lane +
pipeline-record fail-closed guards); 459/459 frontend; pnpm build clean;
git diff --check clean. No generate.derivation / reliability_gate / stream /
field.propagate / vault.store imports.
Completes the Wave M B3.5 consolidation slice (b–e), built on #728.
B3.5-b — calibration as a first-class evidence subject (`calibration_class`,
address `calibration:<class_name>`): RightInspector projection + Evidence
Chain Rail semantics (serving-discipline evidence, not runtime truth).
B3.5-c / B4a — nullable `LeewayEvidence` read model threaded through turn,
replay, cognition-proposal, and math-proposal surfaces, with a shared
absence-honest card. B4 is gated correctly: the tuple exists in typed data but
no producer populates it, so the card renders absence (verified: no non-null
producer in workbench/core/chat).
B3.5-d/e — UI-UX-GUIDE.md, b4-leeway-feasibility-gate.md, phase-a-residue-ledger.md.
Practice artifact — earn-it-for-real (runner-reproducible). The committed
`report.json` (additive earns PROPOSE @0.861, 95/5/50) is now emitted by a
deterministic runner rather than copied from the queue. `propose_runner`
gains `regenerate_practice_artifacts()`, which runs ONE sealed `resolve_pooled`
practice pass and writes BOTH report.json (the per-class ledger the calibration
reader consumes) and ratification_queue.json — two projections of one ledger,
coherent by construction and byte-reproducible. `runner.main()` delegates to
it (lazy import, no cycle), so both entry points produce the identical pair.
This closes the gap where a hand-copied report.json agreed with the queue but
no runner produced it. `resolve_pooled` is the aggressive sealed PROPOSE-regime
scorer (proposal-only/HITL, unsafe for serving, legitimate for
attempt-and-eliminate); wrong=5 is the sealed-practice learning signal, NOT the
serving wrong=0. No serving/derivation/reliability_gate source touched; the
practice lane is not in the serving-frozen SHA gate.
Validated:
- python -m pytest tests/test_workbench_{calibration,journal,replay,schemas}.py -> 31 passed
- python -m pytest tests/ -k "workbench or propose or learning_arena or practice"
-> 190 passed (3 failing tests in test_adr_0175_phase2_practice_lane.py are
PRE-EXISTING reds on clean origin/main: stale 4/0/46 assertions on build_report,
which this change does not touch)
- report.json + ratification_queue.json: deterministic (run1==run2) and
reproduced byte-identically by both `python -m ...runner` and `...propose_runner`
- pnpm build green; 144 UI tests across calibration/leeway/evidence/replay/
doctrine-gates/routes-docs-drift all pass
First Wave M / Phase B piece (GATING): read-only backend that makes the
calibrated-learning / serving-discipline loop inspectable — 'the engine
earns the right to guess', ADR-0175.
The workbench computes NONE of these numbers:
- GET /calibration/classes — per-class gold-tether view from the persisted
practice arena ledger (evals/gsm8k_math/practice/v1/report.json per_class).
Each class's reliability_floor is the engine's own one-sided Wilson
conservative_floor (via ClassTally.reliability); PROPOSE (θ=0.85) / SERVE
(θ=0.99) license verdicts come from core.reliability_gate.license_for.
Failures-first ordering. A test proves the reader's floor equals a direct
conservative_floor() call — no re-implementation.
- GET /serving/metrics — the live correct/refused/wrong counts read unchanged
from the committed train_sample + holdout_dev report.json (currently
4/46/0 and 5/495/0 — wrong=0). Never re-runs a lane.
Honest current state: the committed practice ledger's three classes
(additive/divisive/multiplicative) are all below N_MIN=10, so none has
earned a license yet — the reader shows exactly that, no fake green light.
- workbench/calibration.py: pure readers; imports core.reliability_gate;
EvidenceUnavailableError -> 501 (fail-closed) when the artifact is absent.
- schemas + TS mirrors (CalibrationClass, ServingMetrics); both snapshots
regenerated (deterministic); both drift gates pass.
- trust boundary: read-only over committed artifacts + engine-owned
derivation; no execution, no mutation, no license ever changed.
Verified: 30 Python tests (incl. the no-reimplementation proof + fail-closed),
390 vitest, both schema drift gates, snapshots deterministic.
Replaces the W-026 501 stub. Re-executes a journaled prompt in a sealed
fresh runtime (ChatRuntime(no_load_state=True): no checkpoint load, no
checkpoint write, no proposal lineage) and compares the envelope
leaf-by-leaf against the recorded TurnJournalEntry.
Design correction vs the scoping doc (amended in-doc): journaled turns
each ran in a fresh ChatRuntime(), never one continuous session, so
genesis-PREFIX replay would manufacture spurious divergence; shipped
basis is sealed_fresh_runtime_single_turn (O(1)). origin_state:
"unrecorded" — the journal does not record whether the original turn's
runtime loaded a checkpoint, so divergence is reported as nondeterminism
OR origin-state influence, never disambiguated.
- workbench/replay.py: pure comparison + injected executor; every
TurnJournalEntry field classified critical/informational exactly once
(exhaustiveness enforced by test)
- api.py: route wiring under _CHAT_TURN_LOCK; runtime failure -> 500
runtime_unavailable, no comparison may be fabricated
- schemas: additive TurnReplayComparison/TurnReplayDivergence (W-026
artifact-keyed pair retires with the frontend Replay Moment PR)
- tests: 10 obligations incl. tamper-prompt, tamper-leaf precision,
no-execution-no-comparison, no-trace (journal + engine_state bytes),
wall-clock tolerance, sealed-construction proof
- snapshot regenerated; NOT_YET_MIRRORED debt entries for the two new
classes (mirrors land with the frontend PR)
- api-contract-v1.md § Replay rewritten for the turn-keyed shape
Append-only JSONL journal records the exact ChatTurnResult envelope returned by /chat/turn with stable turn_id, trace_hash, all three surfaces, verdicts, and deterministic journal_digest.
GET /trace/turns and GET /trace/{turn_id} serve journal evidence for the Trace route frontend. Read model only; no teaching, pack, or journal-owned engine_state mutation.
Local deterministic demo exposing the formal entailment substrate as its
own public authority: the proposer's verdict/confidence/proof are data
only; CORE recomputes propositional entailment through the pinned ROBDD
engine (generate.proof_chain.entail.evaluate_entailment_with_trace),
independently cross-checks with the deductive lane's code-disjoint
truth-table oracle (evals.deductive_logic.oracle.oracle_entailment), and
serves entailed/refuted/unknown only when both procedures agree —
refusing on inconsistent premises (no vacuous entailment), out-of-regime
input (by design, before grammar), a distinct-atom regime bound (honors
the brute-force oracle's small-atom contract), and engine/oracle
disagreement (test-only fault injection, defensive refusal).
Seven committed scenarios with byte-pinned expected artifacts; 38 tests
covering recursive schema closure, output-smuggling-before-evaluation,
proposer-garbage byte-invariance in both directions, oracle module
disjointness, trace-hash folding of trace + oracle verdict, runner
hardening, and INV-21/24/29 discipline of the demo files.
Two-pass hardening of the #690 demo so no epistemic state is proposer-mintable:
Pass 1 (sealed corpus, from the reconciliation pass):
- evidence items are references only (evidence_id + content_sha256) resolved
against a committed content-addressed corpus (evidence_corpus.json)
- support derived from committed subject/predicate match; independence from
distinct provenance_root values; proposer support/independence labels are
rejected by the closed schema
- evidence-strength taxonomy (substrate-capability vs interface-contract) in
PUBLIC-DEMO-ROADMAP / DEMO-PACKAGING-CHECKLIST; position-paper refinements
Pass 2 (entailment-decided inference, closes a live false-status hazard):
- the merged inferred leg required only that premise IDs resolve — a claim
with no support citing one unrelated record as a premise was assigned
'inferred' (empirically confirmed). inferred is now decided by
generate.proof_chain.entail (sound+complete ROBDD) over resolved corpus
premises, cross-checked against the independent truth-table oracle
(evals.deductive_logic.oracle, no shared code); proof keys + oracle verdict
in the trace; disagreement => defensive refusal; refutation => contradicted
- committed adversarial scenario unrelated-premise-still-undetermined proves
the attack now lands on undetermined
- corpus seal (corpus_sha256) pinned into every evaluated trace; scope
refusals no longer consult the corpus; corpus cache hands out copies;
claim subject/predicate constrained to atom-compatible snake_case
- .gitignore: private packet dir, agent worktrees, tooling artifacts
Validation: 30 demo tests; 96 across all three demo suites; 7/7 scenarios
double-run byte-identical; 61 architectural invariants green.
Local deterministic public evidence for the ratified PCCP capability:
proposer submits claim + proof candidate + status/confidence garbage; CORE
ignores proposer authority, fresh-reads curator-certified store state,
recomputes the proof under the pinned engine, and promotes/refuses only
through VaultStore.apply_certified_promotion. The trace proves the decision.
- demos/proof_carrying_promotion/{schema.json,authority.py,run_demo.py}:
closed recursive schema (output fields unsuppliable at the root), the REAL
decider (teaching.proof_promotion.certify_promotion) and the REAL owner —
no demo-local promotion reimplementation. The local arena is rebuilt via
VaultStore.from_dict over dict-literal metadata: demos/ is scanned by
INV-21/INV-24/INV-29, and the demo adds no vault writer, no recall site,
and no status-transition site (proven in tests with the invariants' own
detectors).
- 8 fixtures + pinned expected artifacts: entailed-promotes,
proposer-status-ignored, non-coherent-premise, uncertified-reading,
tampered-certificate (fails byte replay), stale-premise-status (same
honest certificate digest as the promoting run — live state is what
differs), non-sequitur, invalid-state-smuggling (rejected before
evaluation, authority_evaluated=false, null digest).
- Hardened runner per the #688/#690 pattern: default out/ dir, unsafe
output roots refused, --write-expected explicit, double-run byte-identity
enforced per fixture, scenario pass/fail summary.
- tests/test_proof_carrying_promotion_demo.py (26): expected-artifact
conformance, tamper detection, proposer-garbage decision-invariance (incl.
on the promotable setup), refused-cases-mutate-nothing, REFUTED-never-
demotes, trace-hash folds certificate digest, forbidden-import/call scan
(incl. uuid/random/time), INV-21/INV-29 allowlists pinned unchanged, no
named-company/strategy terms.
No runtime turn integration; promotion remains SPECULATIVE->COHERENT only;
README carries the full honesty ledger.
The ratified capability, through the existing mutation owner only:
- teaching/proof_promotion.py — pure decider. Fresh-reads every premise AND
the claim from the store (claim_entry_index; forms never proposer-supplied),
strict status compares (no parse-defaulting), reading_certified must be the
boolean True, engine certification via the pinned deductive engine,
proposer_payload accepted and provably never read (del before use; poisoned-
mapping test), certificate digest emitted for D4 trace-hash folding. Zero
mutation; zero vault.store calls; zero status writes (proven with the
INV-21/INV-29 detectors themselves).
- vault/store.py::apply_certified_promotion — the single transition site.
Independently re-verifies: byte-for-byte replay under DEDUCTIVE_ENGINE_PIN,
promotion_positive, live claim form/reading/status cross-checks, live
premise form/reading/status cross-checks (staleness refuses). Fabricated or
tampered certificates flip nothing; authority is live store state plus
recomputation, never the artifact.
- generate/proof_chain/engine_pin.py — DEDUCTIVE_ENGINE_PIN mirrors the
deductive_logic_v1 lane SHA; sync pinned by AST test against
scripts/verify_lane_shas.py.
- Consistency fix found in lookback: both promotion sites now stamp
epistemic_state alongside epistemic_status (the ADR-0148 site left the
stored state tag stale; recall recomputed it, but the stored key lied).
Obligations: all six strict-xfail markers retired and live (O1/O2
strengthened to prove the transition through the vault owner); the
module-existence pin deleted per its own docstring; the two remaining
honesty pins kept. INV-21 allowlist unchanged; INV-29 allowlist unchanged
({vault/store.py}); INV-29's 29c visibility floor raised 2 -> 3 to cover the
new site.
No runtime turn path calls promotion; the deterministic demo is PR D.
Validation: new suite 49 passed; obligations 8 passed (0 xfail remaining);
invariants 66 passed; certificate 27 passed; 0148 6 passed; epistemic 20
passed; smoke files green; lane SHAs verified.
Pure evidence substrate for proof-carrying coherence promotion. No
promotion, no vault import, no status transition, no teaching-path
change; ADR-0218 stays Proposed.
- generate/proof_chain/certificate.py: frozen PromotionCertificate
(version/claim_form/premise ids+forms+statuses/entailment_trace/
engine_pin/decision/reason, canonical_json with sort_keys+compact
separators); build_certificate runs evaluate_entailment_with_trace
over entry_id-sorted premises; verify_certificate rebuilds from the
embedded forms and accepts iff byte-identical — tampered forms/claim/
trace/decision/reason/ordering/version all fail replay, structural
breakage fails closed as malformed_certificate.
- promotion_positive is necessary-not-sufficient: entailed over a
non-empty all-coherent recorded premise set; REFUTED/UNKNOWN/REFUSED
verify as themselves but are never positive; zero-premise tautology
certificates fail-closed non-positive in v1.
- engine_pin is recorded provenance; pin tampering is caught only via
caller-supplied expected_engine_pin (P3 must pass the lane SHA) —
limit pinned by dedicated tests.
- entail.py: docstring-only fix removing the incorrect ADR-0206
attribution (numbering collision); now cites ADR-0218. Zero behavior
change. generate_claims.py:74 still carries the label (serving-frozen
surface, flagged for follow-up).
- No xfail markers retire: every PR-A obligation binds to the P3
promoter, which must not exist before ratification. The certificate-
shaped halves of O1/O7 are proven for real in
tests/test_proof_chain_certificate.py (27 tests). ADR phasing bullet
and obligations docstring record the reconciliation.
Validation: certificate 27 passed; obligations 3 passed + 6 xfailed;
architectural invariants 61 passed (INV-21/INV-29 green, allowlists
unchanged); entail/builder/rules 61 passed; smoke files 95 passed.
INV-29 is the load-bearing contribution of #693, so its detector must match
its claim. The assignment-only scan missed common write indirections; the
widened _status_transition_writes (renamed from _status_assignment_targets)
now also catches:
- m.update({"epistemic_status": ...}) / update(epistemic_status=...) /
update(**{...}) / update(dict(epistemic_status=...))
- m.setdefault("epistemic_status", ...)
- bound and unbound __setitem__ with the literal key
- setattr(entry, "epistemic_status", ...)
- writes hidden in tuple-unpacking assignment targets
29b now proves all 13 shapes are flagged (per-shape, so one regression names
itself); new 29b' proves reads, other keys, and dict-literal construction do
NOT flag (false positives would train reflexive allowlisting). Honest scope
note added: variable keys / exec / C-level aliasing are statically
undetectable and belong to review.
Pre-scan confirmed zero production call-shape writes exist, so the widened
detector flags nothing new; ALLOWED_STATUS_TRANSITION_SITES stays
{"vault/store.py"}. No runtime change; ADR-0218 still Proposed.
Validation:
- tests/test_architectural_invariants.py: 61 passed
- tests/test_proof_carrying_promotion_obligations.py: 3 passed, 6 xfailed
PR A of the stack specified by docs/issues/proof-carrying-coherence-promotion.md.
No runtime change; no promotion behavior; ADR-0218 is Proposed, not ratified.
- ADR-0218 (Proposed): rulings the issue Section 9 demands — extend the
existing mutation owner (policy decides in teaching/proof_promotion.py at
P3, only vault/store.py mutates), reading stays curator-certified in the
first cut, exact fail-closed admissibility predicate, certificate folds
into trace_hash. Records two substrate corrections: proof_chain Phase 2
(2.1-2.4) is already implemented, and ADR-0148 already automates an
energy-arm promotion.
- INV-29 (passing): epistemic-status transition sites are allowlisted.
ADR-0148's in-place promotion proved INV-21's AST scan cannot see
status transitions (they are not store() calls) — the boundary the
issue calls highest-risk did not actually cover the riskiest shape.
Allowlist pinned to {vault/store.py} BEFORE any promoter exists;
detector mutation-proven non-vacuous (29b/29c).
- Obligations O1-O5, O7 as strict xfail (executable spec; ImportError today;
strict=True forces the P3 PR to retire markers and pass for real) + three
honesty pins that flip red if promotion is wired without review.
Validation (worktree off main@187b008b, python -m pytest):
- tests/test_proof_carrying_promotion_obligations.py: 3 passed, 6 xfailed
- tests/test_architectural_invariants.py: 60 passed (56 prior + 4 INV-29)
- smoke file set: 94 passed
- proof_chain/entail/binding-graph/ADR-0148 set: 84 passed
- epistemic/teaching set: 40 passed
- scripts/verify_lane_shas.py: 8/9 pinned lanes match incl. deductive_logic_v1;
public_demo missed on the known env wall-clock budget flake (47.6s > 30s),
pre-existing and unrelated (diff is docs+tests only).
This demo assigns epistemic truth-state only and runs no normative/
safety/ethics clearance pass, so it has no basis to positively clear
a claim. Drop the verified->cleared mapping: verified now reports
normative_clearance=unassessable like every other non-invalid output.
Updates authority.py, regenerates the affected expected trace hashes,
tightens the test (verified asserts unassessable) and adds an invariant
test that no non-invalid output is ever cleared, and corrects the README
honesty ledger.
A model-style proposer submits a claim, evidence bundle, and optional
bounded-inference block; CORE alone assigns the typed epistemic state
drawn from the canonical core.epistemic_state taxonomy (no parallel
enum) and emits a deterministic, replayable evidence artifact.
The proposer cannot set assigned_state, status, trace_hash,
authority_path, evidence_ledger, or normative_clearance: the closed
recursive schema rejects any root-level injection before state
evaluation runs, and proposer-supplied proposed_state/trace_hash are
recorded as ignored and never read.
Adds closed schema, six fixtures, pinned expected artifacts, a
double-run byte-identical runner with hardened output-dir policy, and a
22-test suite. No network, subprocess, eval/exec, model API, or side
effects beyond demo output.
A narrow, auditable proof path for the hybrid-mode boundary: a
Claude/Fable-style System 1 proposer submits an MCP-shaped tool call
(core.semantic_derivation.verify); CORE re-derives via the ADR-0184
derivation lane, keeps sole acceptance authority, refuses or asks when
it cannot honestly answer, and emits a deterministic replay/provenance
trace for every decision.
Boundary properties (each pinned by a failing-if-removed test):
- the proposer has no commit path: additionalProperties:false schema,
and the demo modules import nothing from generate.* (AST-scanned with
a planted-bypass self-test) — the lane is consumed only through the
ADR-0184 S4b audited trace facade;
- 'verified' requires pool commit AND clean commit-law/faithfulness
audits AND a gold-audited envelope.json entry AND byte-match to the
pinned derivation trace (measured: 118 of the off-serving pool's 231
corpus commits disagree with lane gold, so a bare pool commit is
never served — scenario s4 shows the refusal on a commit that even
matches gold);
- the ask leg is the real Q1 stack (router -> limitation -> Q1-D
producer -> carried handle -> gated serving), dark by default,
tamper-fail-closed on the content hash;
- authority_path names only consulted authorities; responses are
deterministic (double-run byte-identical) and pinned under expected/.
No serving/runtime change; no CLAIMS/metrics/telemetry/lane-pin
movement; no network or Anthropic API dependency (System 1 payloads are
clearly-labeled static fixtures).
ADR-0184 S4b — the replay/provenance equivalence boundary, the
precondition for any semantic-primary path. After #685 the in-repo
legacy path delegates to the semantic boundary, so old-vs-new is
vacuous; the durable reference is a pinned canonical trace artifact
(evals/gsm8k_math/equivalence/v1/, 937 problems) whose authority is
the #684/#685 cross-tree differentials (documented provenance chain).
- state/provenance.py: replay_is_faithful — the replay bridge's law as
a checkable structural property (no verify/pool import; covered by
the #685 authority scan).
- equivalence/trace.py: canonical traces (worlds, candidates, order,
multiplicity, classifications, resolutions) + authority_violations
re-deriving the pool commit law from trace content.
- scripts/verify_semantic_equivalence.py: check / --update gate
mirroring verify_lane_shas.py.
- tests/test_adr_0184_s4b_replay_equivalence.py: full-corpus live-vs-
pinned equality, corpus-wide authority + faithfulness, and 17
single-mutation non-vacuity proofs.
Pure additions; verify.py/pool.py untouched; no serving, CLAIMS,
metrics, or lane pins moved.
ADR-0184 §7 S4: add generate/derivation/state/source.py — the single
boundary through which semantic-ledger worlds become pool candidates —
and swap pool.py's accumulation source to semantic_state_candidates().
accumulate.py keeps its public surfaces as thin compatibility wrappers
(ADR-0184 §10). Byte-identical over the 937-problem differential;
verify.py / pool.py remain the sole commit authority (structural
no-authority-import scan over state/, non-vacuous).
Also: docs/analysis design note for the S3–S5 boundary stack, and a
drive-by ruff F541 fix in r1_reconstruction.py (rf->r, zero behavior).
Compare resolved canonical Path values, not raw string spellings, when
detecting a question_path / proposal_path collision. A relative
proposal_path and an absolute question_path that name the same file now
fail closed with reason "path_collision" instead of resolving.
Adds a regression test for the absolute-vs-relative same-file collision
and keeps the existing exact-string collision test. The new test is
non-vacuous: it fails under the prior raw-string comparison.
Scope: ask_handle.py seam + its test only. No runtime.py, CLAIMS,
metrics, telemetry, schema, or lane-pin changes.
ADR-0184 S1 (state/bind.py, state/change.py) landed the reusable referent and
change-cue helpers. S2 adds the first explicit state-transition substrate and
routes both accumulation readings through it:
- state/model.py frozen SET/GAIN/LOSS transition model over one entity/unit
StateKey, with structural validation (closed op set; unit is a
str with "" = unitless, mirroring the extractor's Quantity.unit
contract; entity optional, mirroring leading_subject_token).
- state/ledger.py build_accumulation_ledger() — the proven single-referent
gain/loss reading, expressed as a SemanticLedger.
- state/replay.py replay_accumulation_ledger() — the only bridge to
GroundedDerivation; refuses any non-accumulation ledger shape
(non-SET start, cross-key mutation).
accumulate.py's _build_accumulation / _build_accumulation_anchor_skip now build a
ledger and replay it instead of constructing the arithmetic chain inline; the
public compose_accumulation()/accumulation_candidates() surfaces are unchanged.
Behavior-equivalent: a byte-for-byte differential over 937 real GSM8K problems
(accumulation_candidates, compose_accumulation, pooled_candidates, resolve_pooled)
shows 0 differences vs main. Semantic worlds never commit directly — replay emits
GroundedDerivation and verify.py / pool.py remain the sole authority. Sealed: no
serving/runtime/chat import; no CLAIMS or eval-lane-SHA movement.
Refs ADR-0184 section 7 (S2).
The missing-boundary doc (#682) established that chat/runtime.py has no
lawful in-turn provider for a QUESTION_NEEDED ContemplationResult: the
only producer is the off-serving contemplation pass, and scanning
teaching/questions/ would be new, unspecified acquisition logic. This
slice builds the recommended unblocking seam instead of the forbidden
runtime shortcut: carried-handle acquisition.
core/epistemic_disclosure/ask_handle.py:
- AskArtifactHandle — an explicit, caller-carried reference to one
already-produced Q1-D DeliveredQuestion artifact. Provenance is the
producer's own content address (sha256 of blocking_reason:slot_name:
text, also the artifact filename stem) — the only identity field the
Q1-D artifact carries today. No turn/case provenance exists yet; that
boundary is documented, not invented.
- resolve_served_ask_handle — gate-first (zero filesystem access while
ask_serving_enabled is dark), structural handle validation, single
explicit-path artifact read (no glob/iterdir/scan), and content-hash
re-derivation so a stale/replaced/tampered artifact fails closed.
Emits a ResolvedAskCandidate duck-typed to what evaluate_served_ask
reads (terminal/question_path/proposal_path) — no question prose is
ever constructed or carried.
- acquire_served_ask_from_handle — composes resolution into the
existing acquire_served_ask_candidate / evaluate_served_ask stack.
All Q1-D artifact policy (status/review/served/answer-binding/text/
slot/collision) stays delegated; the seam owns identity only.
Not changed: chat/runtime.py, chat(...) signature, ChatResponse,
TurnEvent, telemetry schema, Q1B_ASK_CARVE_OUT, proposal_allowed,
VERIFIED serving, CLAIMS/metrics/lane pins. The seam imports neither
generate.contemplation (pass_manager) nor core.epistemic_questions
render/delivery — enforced by AST tests.
Tests (tests/test_ask_handle.py, 18 cases): gate-dark no-I/O proof,
fallback preservation, valid resolution served end-to-end through the
existing stack, proposal-artifact / missing / malformed / invalid-Q1-D
/ path-collision / stale-hash / non-addressed-filename / structurally-
invalid-handle fail-closed paths, no-discovery-without-exact-handle,
and AST guards for scan primitives, forbidden imports, and prose.
Verification: focused ASK+governance suites 396 passed; architectural
invariants 56 passed; smoke-equivalent suite 90 passed; lane SHAs 8/9
content-match (the 9th is the documented local public_demo wall-clock
flake, 48.3s vs the 30s ADR-0099 budget — no content drift, no re-pin).
Adds a small chat.ask_runtime helper that consumes the ASK acquisition seam without editing chat/runtime.py.
- Uses honest contemplation_result keyword forwarding
- Preserves fallback behavior when ASK serving is disabled
- Does not call pass_manager or render_question
- Does not change public chat/runtime schema
Backs out the direct main push that added _maybe_apply_served_ask using a string-concatenation workaround to evade an over-broad text guard.
Restores chat/runtime.py to the #678 merge state and removes tests/test_ask_runtime_hook.py so the next runtime hook can land through a reviewed PR with structural tests instead of guard bypasses.
- This is the smallest runtime consumption hook for the ASK acquisition seam.
- It is default-dark.
- It preserves normal runtime behavior when disabled.
- It does not change public `chat(...)` signature.
- It does not change `ChatResponse`, `TurnEvent`, or telemetry schema.
- It does not call/render question prose.
- It does not serve from `proposal_path`.
- It does not retire Q1B carve-out or flip `proposal_allowed`.
- It does not serve VERIFIED.
- It does not move CLAIMS or metrics.
Adds the Stage 2 served ASK artifact adapter and adapter-only tests.
- Validates Q1-D DeliveredQuestion artifacts before ASK eligibility
- Uses ask_serving_enabled as a default-dark gate
- Uses the disclosure bus disposition mapping
- Fails closed to fallback surface/disposition on invalid artifacts
- Does not wire chat/runtime, telemetry, TurnEvent, ChatResponse, CLAIMS, or metrics
- Does not retire Q1B_ASK_CARVE_OUT or flip proposal_allowed
Adds dedicated ContemplationResult.question_path for off-serving ASK artifacts and stops storing QUESTION_NEEDED question paths in proposal_path. Proposal artifacts remain under proposal_path. No chat/runtime wiring, served ASK surface, Q1B carve-out retirement, registry flip, or CLAIMS/metric movement.
Adds off-serving pass_manager integration for ASK delivery through deliver_ask behind explicit exercise_ask. Preserves boundary-first ordering, writes question artifacts to the question sink via question_root, avoids double delivery, and keeps chat/runtime, served ASK, Q1B carve-out, registry, CLAIMS, and metrics untouched.
Adds explicit default-false RuntimeConfig ask_serving_enabled and verified_serving_enabled fields while preserving default-dark helper behavior. Includes focused ASK/VERIFIED gate tests and cross-gate independence coverage. No pass_manager wiring, runtime wiring, verify.py wiring, served behavior, or CLAIMS/metric movement.
