core/docs/adr/ADR-0221-codeowners-review-topology.md
Shay 54e6bfc0d0
docs: reorganize docs landscape
Implements the 4-phase documentation reorganization master plan.

- Consolidation: Merged brief/, handoff/, planning/, and decisions/ into briefs/, handoffs/, plans/, and adr/ respectively (101 ADRs relocated)
- Root Cleanup: Relocated HANDOFF-gpt55-*.md and key top-level docs (runtime_contracts.md, etc.) to canonical folders. Added superseded alerts.
- Indices & Navigation: Created docs/README.md navigation document, docs/sessions/README.md index, docs/adr/README.md index
- Note: Also includes prior commit adding ADR-0200+ corpus hygiene governance (ADR-0225, dependency map, backfilled cross-references)
2026-06-30 16:59:36 -07:00

123 lines
6 KiB
Markdown

# ADR-0221 — Branch protection for a solo-maintainer public repo (required-checks-only)
Status: accepted (applied 2026-06-15)
Date: 2026-06-15
Relates: PR #699 (original `main` branch protection), ADR-0220 / #772 (the PR that
surfaced the deadlock), `.github/CODEOWNERS`
> Repo-governance decision, not an engine-architecture one. No runtime code
> changes. It records *why* `main` is protected with required status checks only —
> no required approvals, no required code-owner review — and explicitly warns
> future agents not to "fix" this by re-adding a human-review gate.
## Context — the deadlock that prompted this
`main` was protected (PR #699) with:
```
required_approving_review_count: 1
require_code_owner_reviews: true
.github/CODEOWNERS: * @AssetOverflow
required status checks: verify pinned lane SHAs, smoke, Sourcery
```
The repo is **public but has a single maintainer**, and every PR is authored by
`@AssetOverflow` (the owner/agent token). GitHub forbids a PR author from
approving their own PR, so the required approval could **never** be collected:
`reviewDecision` was permanently `REVIEW_REQUIRED`, `mergeStateStatus` `BLOCKED`,
and the only way to merge anything — even an all-green PR — was an `--admin`
override. Observed on #772 (2026-06-15), which had to be admin-merged.
## The misconception this ADR corrects
The required review was assumed to be the boundary that keeps non-maintainers
from merging. **It is not.** Merging into any branch — protected or not —
requires repository **write access**. The public are not collaborators, so they
can open PRs from forks but can **never** merge them. Public-exclusion is
provided entirely by the collaborator/write-access model.
So the `required_approving_review_count: 1` + `require_code_owner_reviews: true`
pair added **zero** exclusion. All it did was create an unsatisfiable
self-approval gate that forced `--admin` on every merge — silently normalizing
the exact bypass the protection was meant to discourage.
## Decision
Protect `main` with **required status checks only**:
```
require a pull request before merging: true # so CI runs on every change
required_approving_review_count: 0
require_code_owner_reviews: false
required status checks (strict): verify pinned lane SHAs, smoke, Sourcery
enforce_admins: false # a real emergency break-glass remains
restrict who can push: none # write-access already gates merge
```
`.github/CODEOWNERS` (`* @AssetOverflow`) is retained as **advisory only** — with
`require_code_owner_reviews: false` it auto-requests review / assigns ownership
but does not gate merges.
### Why this is the correct shape here
- The real quality gate is **CI** (pinned-lane SHAs + smoke + the pre-push diff),
per the repo's pre-push-verification doctrine. That gate is fully preserved.
- A GitHub approval from the *sole* maintainer on their *own* PR is impossible
and semantically empty; requiring it only blocks the legitimate merger.
- Result: the maintainer/agents open a PR → CI must go green → **merge normally**.
No approval, **no `--admin`**, no second account. The public still cannot merge.
## DO NOT re-add (explicit guard for future agents)
Do **not** re-introduce `required_approving_review_count >= 1` or
`require_code_owner_reviews: true` believing it adds a security boundary. It does
**not** — write access already excludes the public — and it re-creates the
self-approval deadlock that re-normalizes `--admin`. If a genuine second-party
review is ever wanted, it requires provisioning a **real** second write-capable
reviewer (a distinct human/account) **first**; never impose a self-approval
requirement on a single-identity repo.
## Applied
2026-06-15, via:
```bash
gh api -X PATCH repos/AssetOverflow/core/branches/main/protection/required_pull_request_reviews \
-F required_approving_review_count=0 -F require_code_owner_reviews=false
```
Before → after: `required_approvals 1 → 0`, `require_code_owner_reviews true →
false`. Required status checks unchanged. This governance PR is the first merged
through the now-working normal path — its own clean merge is the proof.
## Break-glass log (auditable, not precedent)
- **#772 — 2026-06-15** — admin-merged as a one-time exception under the old
deadlocked config (all checks green; only unmet requirement was an
impossible self-approval). Authorized. **Not precedent.** With this ADR's
config, routine `--admin` is retired.
## What this does NOT change
- No engine/runtime code. Required status checks unchanged.
- PR C (the ADR-0220 identity/provenance hash split) stays blocked on ADR-0220
ratification — independent of this governance fix.
## Consequences
- Approval-free, check-gated normal merges for the maintainer/agents.
- `--admin` retired for routine work (emergency break-glass still available via
`enforce_admins: false`).
- If collaborators are added later and merges should be restricted to specific
accounts, enable **"Restrict who can push"** (the `restrictions` list) — that is
the correct lever, **not** required reviews.
## Governance Cross-Reference (ADR-0225)
This late-corpus ADR is governed by [ADR-0225](./ADR-0225-adr-corpus-hygiene.md):
- Safety boundaries: changes must preserve ADR-0027/0028/0029 identity and safety-pack boundaries; no identity, safety, or policy mutation is implied unless explicitly reviewed.
- Versor closure: runtime field paths must preserve `versor_condition(F) < 1e-6`; this ADR does not authorize hidden normalization or hot-path drift repair.
- Reconstruction-over-storage: evidence must remain reconstructive and content-addressed rather than duplicating opaque state.
- Replay-equivalence: serving, teaching, promotion, or checkpoint changes require a named deterministic replay / byte-equivalence gate.
- Mutation standing: any durable corpus, pack, policy, or epistemic-status mutation remains reviewed, proposal-only until accepted, or proof-carrying as applicable.