Audit of the one-mutation-path invariant (ADR-0021 §3) found three leaks
where pack authority or session-state writes could substitute for coherence
judgment. All three landed fixes or partial closures in this push.
Leaks closed:
- Leak A: pack vocab defaulted to COHERENT — flipped to SPECULATIVE in
language_packs/{compiler,schema}.py; docstring corrected to align with
ADR-0021 (it was rationalizing the leak).
- Leak B: vault.recall was epistemic-blind — VaultStore.store() now stamps
every entry with EpistemicStatus (default SPECULATIVE); recall(min_status=)
filters to admissible-as-evidence tier. All 4 vault-write sites updated.
- Leak C (write-side): generate/proposition.py:198 stored articulated
propositions unmarked — now stamps SPECULATIVE, breaking the
fabrication-feedback loop in principle. Read-side audit of 5 call sites
is the residual.
New architectural invariants (tests/test_architectural_invariants.py):
- INV-21: one-mutation-path allowlist (caught Leak C on first run)
- INV-22: pack lexicon default is SPECULATIVE (Leak A guard)
- INV-23: vault recall epistemic-aware (Leak B guard)
New eval lanes:
- teaching_injection_resistance — ships GREEN at 1.00/1.00/0 (the
structural anti-injection claim is real and measurable)
- refusal_calibration — honest gap: 0% refusal, 0% fabrication
- contradiction_detection — honest gap: 50% flag via versor-delta heuristic,
100% false-positive; motivates the proper coherence-checker
- articulation_of_status — honest gap: 0% speculative articulation, 60%
false certainty; output-side leak surface
New benchmarks:
- benchmarks/footprint.py — total deployed runtime is 7.06 MiB
(109,358x smaller than Llama 3.1 405B, runs offline, no GPU)
- benchmarks/learning_curve.py — monotonic + replay-deterministic curve
per lane
Documentation:
- docs/truth_seeking_schema.md — foundational architectural commitment,
five rules, mapped to human failure modes, leaks published openly
- evals/CLAIMS.md — five-tier public claims doc; Tier 4.5 publishes
known gaps with named fixes; verification contract at top
- README.md — new pillar between algebraic substrate and language pillar
Includes in-flight formation pipeline scaffolding (formation/, tests/formation/,
docs/formation_pipeline_plan.md) and minor CLI/contracts/gitignore edits
that were already in the working tree at session start.
Verification: 798 passed, 2 skipped, 1 deselected (pre-existing pack-count
test drift unrelated to schema changes).
9.5 KiB
Runtime Contracts
This document freezes the runtime contracts used by chat, telemetry, memory, and future teaching work. It exists to prevent contract drift between tests, runtime code, and future cognitive pipeline work.
Field invariant
CORE state is a versor field. Runtime code must preserve the core closure contract:
versor_condition(F) < 1e-6
If a propagation path violates this invariant, fix the operator path or the explicit closure boundary that owns the transition. Do not hide violations by changing tests or silently downgrading the invariant.
ChatResponse contract
ChatResponse.surface- The selected user-facing response. This is the exact string returned by
ChatRuntime.respond()and should match what the user receives. ChatResponse.walk_surface- The manifold/token-walk evidence surface. It is trace evidence for what the field traversal produced. It is not necessarily the user-facing response.
ChatResponse.articulation_surface- The proposition/realizer surface. This is the structured linguistic realization of the current proposition or proposition graph.
Current selection policy:
surface = articulation_surface (when no unknown-domain gate fired)
surface = _UNKNOWN_DOMAIN_SURFACE (when the gate fired)
walk_surface = retained telemetry/evidence (always)
Unknown-domain gate honour
When vault/decompose.py::UnknownDomainGate fires, ChatRuntime returns
the safety stub _UNKNOWN_DOMAIN_SURFACE ("I don't have field
coordinates for that yet.") and vault_hits == 0.
CognitiveTurnPipeline honours that stub: the user-facing surface
remains the gate's response and is not overridden by the realizer's
fallback articulation. The realizer's surface always survives in
walk_surface as evidence — only the user-facing selection is
gated. This closes evals/calibration/gaps.md Finding 2.
Future realizer work may change the selection policy, but must update this document and the contract tests in the same PR.
TurnEvent contract
TurnEvent.surface- Exact emitted user-facing response for the turn.
TurnEvent.walk_surface- Exact manifold/token-walk evidence surface for the turn.
TurnEvent.articulation_surface- Exact proposition/realizer surface for the turn.
TurnEvent.vault_hits- Actual count of recall hits applied during generation. Never hardcode this.
TurnEvent.flagged- Mirrors
IdentityScore.flaggedfor filtering and trace inspection.
Identity contract
Identity checks are telemetry/gating signals. A flagged identity score must not silently erase useful generation unless an explicit hard-block policy is configured and tested.
Canonical call style:
IdentityCheck().check(trajectory, manifold)
Legacy constructor injection:
IdentityCheck(manifold=manifold).check(trajectory)
is supported temporarily and emits DeprecationWarning. New code must not use
it.
Memory and teaching contract
Session memory can be immediate and local to the running context.
Reviewed memory must be explicit: user corrections or teaching examples become reviewed memory only through the reviewed teaching loop.
Pack mutation is proposal-only until reviewed. Runtime correction capture must not directly rewrite language packs, frames, identity axes, or operator code.
Identity manifold mutation by user prompt or correction is forbidden.
Testing policy
Tests should protect load-bearing behavior:
- versor closure
- deterministic replay
- runtime response/telemetry contracts
- memory correctness
- identity protection
- teaching/correction safety
- articulation contract
Avoid tests that preserve stale constructors, private helper shapes, or exact formatting that is not part of a documented contract.
Epistemic surface (ADR-0021)
CORE exposes a typed epistemic_status on the teaching and lexicon
surfaces. The status is a position in the revision graph, not a
source-trust tier:
| Status | Meaning |
|---|---|
COHERENT |
Fits current field geometry; no incoherence with reviewed claims detected at admission. |
CONTESTED |
Incoherent with at least one reviewed claim; review pending; not load-bearing. |
SPECULATIVE |
Proposed; not yet reviewed for coherence; admissible only as a candidate. |
FALSIFIED |
Incoherent under accumulated evidence; eligible for Stage-3 inversion; retained. |
Non-hardening invariant
No reviewed claim or proposition-graph edge ever becomes unrevisable.
No final, frozen, axiom, or permanent flag exists or may be
added on the runtime data model. The closest such property in the
architecture is the mathematical closure check
versor_condition(F) < 1e-6 — never an epistemic seal on a claim.
The invariant is enforced by tests/test_epistemic_invariants.py.
Curator review rule
epistemic_status transitions are computed from coherence with the
existing reviewed field — not asserted by source authority. At v1 the
judgment is curator-mediated, with one rule:
The curator's only admissible reasoning is geometric: does the claim cohere with already-reviewed claims, or does it produce incoherence? Source credentials, popularity, or institutional position must not be invoked as justification.
Schema surfaces
| Surface | Field | Default at creation |
|---|---|---|
teaching.PackMutationProposal |
epistemic_status: EpistemicStatus |
SPECULATIVE |
teaching.ReviewedTeachingExample |
epistemic_status: EpistemicStatus |
SPECULATIVE |
language_packs.schema.LexicalEntry |
epistemic_status: str |
"coherent" (seed) |
core.cognition.trace.compute_trace_hash |
teaching_epistemic_status: str |
"" if no proposal |
Promotion of a proposal's status uses the immutable updater
PackMutationProposal.with_status(...) — original is never mutated.
The status of the load-bearing proposal in a turn is folded into
trace_hash so replay detects when a downstream surface was produced
under a different epistemic frame than at the time of recall.
Test organization target
Future test moves should follow this taxonomy:
| Area | Destination |
|---|---|
| versor closure, holonomy, motors, null cone, energy physics | tests/algebra/ or tests/physics/ |
| chat runtime, config, async runtime, identity gate telemetry | tests/runtime/ |
| articulation, proposition, surface assembly, future pipeline | tests/cognition/ |
| correction capture, reviewed memory, consolidation | tests/teaching/ |
| language pack loading and seed pack invariants | tests/packs/ |
Do not reorganize tests as a standalone churn PR unless it directly reduces contract ambiguity or unlocks a cognitive subsystem.
Formation trust boundaries
The Formation Pipeline (see docs/formation_pipeline_plan.md) introduces six
trust boundaries between the world and the manifold. Every boundary has a
content-addressed input and output; every rejection produces an audit record.
No silent failures.
| # | Boundary | Input | Output | Trust contract |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mining → Smelting | URLs / files | OreBundle |
Untrusted text in; untrusted entries out. No code execution from sources; no dynamic imports; source URLs sandboxed; SHA-256 captured per entry. |
| 2 | Smelting → Forge | OreBundle + extracted candidates |
Candidate* lists |
Untrusted candidates in. The Forge is the only validator. Identity-override patterns and path-traversal in source SHAs are rejected at the Forge, not here. |
| 3 | Forge → Compose | Candidate* lists |
ValidatedTripleSet |
Every candidate runs through teaching.relation_parse.parse_triple, identity-axis screening, source allow-list, pack collision check, and the cross-reference rule. Output entries carry EpistemicStatus.SPECULATIVE. No pack mutation. |
| 4 | Compose → Compile/Run | ValidatedTripleSet |
CourseYAML → FormationPlan |
Deterministic, byte-stable composition. No mutation of the language pack manifest. |
| 5 | Run → Ratify | FormationPlan |
list[CognitiveTurnResult] |
The runner is a thin shim over CognitiveTurnPipeline.run(). It cannot invent operators; it can only invoke existing ones. Hard-halts on versor_condition(F) >= 1e-6. No identity-manifold mutation, ever. |
| 6 | Ratify → Promote | MasteryReport (self-sealed) |
reviewed teaching apply | Promotion requires a self-sealed MasteryReport whose SHA verifies, whose prerequisites are present in the MasteredCoursesIndex, and whose triples are submitted through teaching/review.py — the existing reviewed apply path. ADR-0021's "one mutation path" invariant is preserved. |
Content-addressing rules (binding across the whole pipeline):
- All hashed payloads are canonical JSON (sorted keys, tight separators, UTF-8, no NaN/Infinity). Floats are forbidden in hashed payloads; encode numerics as strings or integers.
MasteryReport.report_sha256is self-sealing: SHA over the payload withreport_sha256blanked, then written back into the field. Verifiers reverse the process.- No pickle. Pickle defeats replay determinism and is a code-execution surface.
See formation/hashing.py, formation/cache.py, and formation/forge.py
for the implementation of each rule.