Comprehensive survey of every pack in the tree across five layers
(primitives → language → teaching → policy → selection axes → style)
with per-pack stats, cross-pack lemma overlap, teaching-chain graph
topology, and a ranked top-leverage-gaps list.
Key findings:
* **Layer 4 (selection axes) is the densest by far** — 24 packs
(17 anchor lenses + 7 registers). Greek and Hebrew lens
families are at parity (8 each).
* **Layer 2 (teaching corpora) is the load-bearing thin layer** —
only 41 reviewed chains across 18 subjects, with just 2 intent
shapes covered (CAUSE / VERIFICATION) and 7 connectives total.
No COMPARISON / PROCEDURE / CORRECTION chains exist; those
intents route through pack composers only.
* **Layer 1 EN is solid** — 354 lemmas across 12 mounted packs
with 93% gloss coverage; 24 ungloss'd lemmas remain.
* **Cross-language is structurally present but content-light** —
grc / he micro-packs ship and mount; the bigger
``*_cognition_v1`` siblings ratify but are not in the default
mount; no glosses exist on any non-EN pack.
* **Three drafted ethics packs are unratified** (legal /
research / engineering) — the highest-leverage low-effort gap.
* **Rhetorical-style axis ships substrate only** — one
null-lift pack; ADR-0087 consumer phase pending.
Top-leverage gaps ordered by ratio of unblocked value to effort
are enumerated in §7 of the doc itself. No code lands here.
16 KiB
Pack Inventory — 2026-05-21
A full survey of every pack in the tree, what it covers, what consumes it, and where the system is well-rounded vs. lopsided. Generated by walking language_packs/data/, packs/, teaching/, chat/teaching_grounding.py, and core/config.py.
1. Pack landscape at a glance
Five layers, distinct contracts, distinct lifecycles. The bottom layer is lexicon (what tokens exist); the top layer is style (how surfaces sound).
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ LAYER 5 — Style / rhetorical (substrate only today) │
│ rhetorical_style/ 1 pack [SPARSE — substrate phase] │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ LAYER 4 — Selection axes (orthogonal to truth) │
│ register/ 7 packs [DENSE — fully built out] │
│ anchor_lens/ 17 packs [DENSE — Greek + Hebrew rich] │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ LAYER 3 — Policy (boundary commitments) │
│ identity/ 3 packs [ADEQUATE] │
│ safety/ 1 pack [MINIMAL — sufficient floor] │
│ ethics/ 5 packs [PARTIAL — 2/5 ratified] │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ LAYER 2 — Teaching corpora (reviewed chains) │
│ cognition_chains_v1 22 chains [WIRED] │
│ relations_chains_v1 7 chains [WIRED] │
│ relations_chains_v2 7 chains [WIRED] │
│ cross_pack_chains_v1 5 chains [WIRED, separate path] │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ LAYER 1 — Language packs (lexicon + glosses + alignment) │
│ en_core_* 12 packs, 354 lex / 330 gloss (93%) │
│ en_minimal_v1 220 lex / 0 gloss │
│ grc_* 2 packs (1 mounted) │
│ he_* 2 packs (1 mounted) │
│ en_collapse_anchors_v1 [UNMOUNTED] │
│ en_core_relations_v3 [UNMOUNTED — newer schema] │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ LAYER 0 — Primitives / shared schema │
│ primitives/ 1 pack (en_semantic_primitives_v1) │
│ common/anchors, common/contracts, common/schema │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
2. Layer 1 — Language packs (the lexical foundation)
2.1 English operational base (12 packs, all mounted)
| pack | role | lex | gloss | gloss-cov |
|---|---|---|---|---|
en_core_cognition_v1 |
operational_base v1.2.0 | 85 | 70 | 82% |
en_core_meta_v1 |
operational_base | 73 | 71 | 97% |
en_core_attitude_v1 |
operational_base | 40 | 40 | 100% |
en_core_temporal_v1 |
operational_base | 28 | 28 | 100% |
en_core_action_v1 |
operational_base | 26 | 25 | 96% |
en_core_quantitative_v1 |
operational_base | 24 | 19 | 79% |
en_core_spatial_v1 |
operational_base | 24 | 23 | 95% |
en_core_polarity_v1 |
operational_base | 16 | 16 | 100% |
en_core_causation_v1 |
operational_base | 15 | 15 | 100% |
en_core_relations_v1 |
operational_base (kinship) | 8 | 8 | 100% |
en_core_relations_v2 |
operational_base (kinship+) | 8 | 8 | 100% |
en_core_relations_v3 |
depth_relation | 7 | 7 | 100% |
| TOTAL | 354 | 330 | 93% |
en_minimal_v1 (220 lex, 0 gloss) is the bare-vocabulary substrate — function words and basics; never expected to carry glosses.
Cross-pack lemma overlap. 98 of 466 unique EN lemmas live in more than one pack (~21%). Every duplicate today pairs a domain pack against en_minimal_v1 (e.g. above is in both en_core_spatial_v1 and en_minimal_v1). The resolver's first-match-wins rule (ADR-0063) makes this safe but means en_minimal_v1 is currently shadowed for any of those 98 lemmas. Not a bug, but worth noting — en_minimal_v1 is the historical baseline and could be trimmed to just the lemmas no other pack carries.
2.2 Non-English packs (depth_relation / depth_root)
| pack | lang | lex | align | morph | mounted? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
grc_logos_micro_v1 |
grc | 11 | 9 | 11 | ✓ |
grc_logos_cognition_v1 |
grc | 29 | 23 | 29 | ✗ |
he_logos_micro_v1 |
he | 9 | 11 | 9 | ✓ |
he_core_cognition_v1 |
he | 23 | 11 | 23 | ✗ |
The mounted-by-default pair (*_micro_v1) is the deliberately-minimal seam-test set (ADR-0073). The bigger *_cognition_v1 packs exist and ratify, but core/config.py doesn't pull them — either intentional (depth_relation/depth_root packs are loaded by the lens system separately) or a wiring gap. Worth confirming.
No glosses on any non-EN pack. Greek and Hebrew packs carry alignment edges (cross-language equivalence) and morphology, but not the explanatory glosses that drive ADR-0085's gloss-aware CAUSE composer. If core eval cognition ever runs with output_language=grc, the gloss path silently no-ops.
2.3 Orphaned / not-yet-mounted packs
en_collapse_anchors_v1— collapse_anchor role, 3 lex / 3 gloss. Lens-specialization pack; not loaded by the default mount.en_core_relations_v3—depth_relationrole, 7 lex / 7 gloss. Newer schema than v1/v2.grc_logos_cognition_v1,he_core_cognition_v1— see §2.2.
3. Layer 2 — Teaching corpora (the reviewed-knowledge layer)
| corpus | chains | distinct subjects | distinct objects | wired by |
|---|---|---|---|---|
cognition_chains_v1 |
22 | 18 | 13 | TEACHING_CORPORA |
relations_chains_v1 |
7 | 5 | 6 | TEACHING_CORPORA |
relations_chains_v2 |
7 | 5 | 6 | TEACHING_CORPORA |
cross_pack_chains_v1 |
5 | 4 | 4 | chat.cross_pack_grounding (separate path) |
| TOTAL reviewed | 41 |
Intent shapes covered. Every chain is either cause (28) or verification (13). No comparison, procedure, or correction chains exist yet — those intents route through pack composers, not the teaching corpus.
Predicate / connective vocabulary. Only seven distinct connectives across 41 chains: requires (14), reveals (8), grounds (8), precedes (5), follows (4), orders (1), supports (1). The CAUSE/VERIFICATION lane is well-served; everything else is unreachable through teaching grounding.
Topology.
out-degree leaders (radiate outward):
3 family
2 truth | wisdom | understanding | parent
1 light | knowledge | memory | correction | creation | ...
in-degree leaders (well-grounded sinks):
4 knowledge
3 evidence | understanding | parent
2 truth | meaning | memory
Source-only nodes (a subject in some chain, never an object): analogy, correction, creation, grandparent, inference, light, question, thought.
Sink-only nodes: grandchild, relation.
This shape says: knowledge is the most-grounded concept (4 distinct chains terminate there), family is the most-radiant (3 distinct chains start there), and there is no terminal sink that lacks its own grounding chain except grandchild and relation — meaning the cognition graph is roughly well-connected internally, but does not yet bridge between the cognition and relations domains at chain level (the cross-pack work in cross_pack_chains_v1 is 5 chains attempting exactly that bridge).
4. Layer 3 — Policy packs
4.1 Identity (3 packs, all ratified)
default_general_v1, generosity_first_v1, precision_first_v1. Adequate floor — every domain has at least one identity stance available. Could grow: domain-specific identities (e.g. an academic-tutor identity, a clinical-clinician identity) would slot in here.
4.2 Safety (1 pack, ratified)
core_safety_axes_v1 is the sole safety pack and is fail-closed at startup. Per ADR-0029 this is intentional — safety should not have multiple competing definitions in production. Adequate.
4.3 Ethics (5 packs, 2 ratified)
| pack | ratified |
|---|---|
default_general_ethics_v1 |
✓ |
medical_clinical_ethics_v1 |
✓ |
legal_ethics_v1 |
✗ |
research_ethics_v1 |
✗ |
engineering_ethics_v1 |
✗ |
Three drafted domain-ethics packs exist but lack the companion .mastery_report.json self-seal — they cannot load in production until ratified. Highest-leverage Layer 3 gap.
5. Layer 4 — Selection axes (the orthogonal dimensions)
5.1 Register (7 packs, all ratified)
default_neutral_v1 ← null-lift baseline (ADR-0072 invariant)
terse_v1 ← compression
convivial_v1 ← warmth + seeded variation (ADR-0071)
precise_v1
formal_v1
pedagogical_v1
socratic_v1
This axis is well-built-out. Seven distinct registers covering compression, warmth, precision, formality, teaching, and dialectic. Holds trace_hash constant — surfaces vary, truth path does not.
5.2 Anchor-lens (17 packs, all ratified)
default_unanchored_v1 ← null-lift baseline (ADR-0073d invariant)
grc_* (8): aletheia, arche, epignosis, episteme, logos, sophia, synesis, zoe
he_* (8): chayyim, chesed, chokmah, dabar, emet, logos, shalom, tzedek
This axis is the richest in the system by pack count. It deliberately moves trace_hash (opposite invariant from register). Greek and Hebrew are at parity — 8 distinguishing-concept lenses each. The thesis behind this density (ADR-0073 → ADR-0073d) is that the substantive axis of variation is genuinely 16-dimensional, and trying to collapse it into English semantics is the load-bearing failure mode this system is designed to refuse.
5.3 Rhetorical-style (1 pack — substrate phase)
default_unstyled_v1 ← only pack today; no composer consumes it
ADR-0087 substrate ships the loader and a single null-pack; the content phase (additional packs) is the next step. The newest axis; deliberately sparse today.
6. Coverage matrix — strength / weakness summary
| dimension | strong | weak / missing |
|---|---|---|
| EN vocabulary breadth | 12 domain packs, 354 lemmas, 93% gloss coverage | en_core_cognition_v1 is at 82% (15 ungloss'd lemmas); en_core_quantitative_v1 at 79% (5 ungloss'd) |
| EN domain breadth | 47 unique top-level semantic-domain prefixes; cognition (291) / meta (146) / attitude (80) lead | biology (7), semantics (7), memory (10), logic (5) are thin |
| Cross-language | Greek + Hebrew at parity (8 lenses each on the lens axis) | Neither language has glosses; both micro-packs are tiny (≤11 lex); the bigger *_cognition_v1 siblings are unmounted |
| Teaching chains | 41 reviewed chains; well-connected internally; knowledge has 4 incoming grounding edges |
Only 2 intent shapes covered (CAUSE, VERIFICATION); 7 connectives total; no COMPARISON / PROCEDURE / CORRECTION chains; only 5 cross-pack chains |
| Identity | 3 ratified general stances | Domain-specific identities absent |
| Safety | Floor pack ratified and fail-closed | Intentionally singular |
| Ethics | 2 ratified packs (general + medical) | 3 drafted packs (legal / research / engineering) not yet ratified |
| Register | 7 ratified packs spanning compression → warmth → formality → dialectic | None |
| Anchor-lens | 17 ratified packs; Greek + Hebrew at parity; trace-hash-moving axis | Latin / Sanskrit / Arabic lenses absent (an analogous Arabic axis would extend the same pattern) |
| Rhetorical-style | Substrate ships | Content packs absent — only the null-lift baseline exists |
7. Top-leverage gaps (ordered by ratio of unblocked value to effort)
-
Ratify the three drafted ethics packs (
legal_ethics_v1,research_ethics_v1,engineering_ethics_v1). Effort: low (companion.mastery_report.jsonself-seal generation). Unblocks: domain-ethics composition in production for legal / research / engineering workflows. -
Wire
grc_logos_cognition_v1+he_core_cognition_v1into the default mount (or document why they're held back). Effort: one-line additions tocore/config.pyinput_packs. Unblocks: substantially more Greek + Hebrew lexical surface area for the anchor-lens system to actually distinguish on. -
Add glosses to
grc_*andhe_*packs. Effort: medium (content authorship — needs Greek/Hebrew literacy). Unblocks: ADR-0085 gloss-aware CAUSE composer works in non-English output, instead of silently no-op'ing. -
Add COMPARISON / PROCEDURE / CORRECTION teaching chains. Effort: medium (4–10 chains per intent). Unblocks: the teaching-grounded surface composer fires on intents beyond CAUSE/VERIFICATION (today those intents route through pack composers only — no reviewed-knowledge layer feeds them).
-
Ship at least one rhetorical-style content pack (the consumer ADR for ADR-0087). Effort: medium (content + composer-consumer wiring). Unblocks: the third orthogonal axis (after register and anchor-lens) actually does anything.
-
Fill the 24 ungloss'd EN lemmas (15 in
en_core_cognition_v1, 5 inen_core_quantitative_v1, plus stragglers in spatial / action). Effort: very low (content authorship in English). Unblocks: ADR-0085 fluency lift covers 100% of the EN cognition path instead of 93%. -
Trim or rescope
en_minimal_v1(98 lemmas shadowed by domain packs; first-match-wins makes them dead today). Effort: low. Unblocks: nothing user-visible, but the pack inventory becomes honest about which entry resolves a given lemma.
8. Architectural observation: the "well-rounded" question
The system is disproportionately deep on its orthogonal axes (17 anchor lenses + 7 registers = 24 substantive selection packs) vs. its grounded-knowledge layer (41 reviewed chains, 2 intent shapes, 7 connectives). That's not a bug per se — the audit's Finding 4 (compound intent) and Finding 2 (grounded realizer) both name exactly this asymmetry: the truth path is the lightest-developed substrate, and the selection / variation axes are the heaviest. The seven shipped PRs from the 2026-05-20 audit (#76 → #83) all add to the truth path; the next natural batch is widening the teaching corpora and ratifying the drafted ethics packs to keep the layers in proportion.
The five layers in order of build-out (heaviest → lightest):
Layer 4 (selection axes) ████████████████████████ 24 packs
Layer 1 (language: EN domain) ████████████ 12 packs / 354 lex
Layer 3 (policy) █████████ 9 packs (4 unratified)
Layer 2 (teaching corpora) ████ 41 chains / 4 corpora
Layer 1 (language: grc + he) ██ 4 packs
Layer 5 (rhetorical style) ▎ 1 pack (substrate only)
Layer 2 is the load-bearing thin layer. Every grounded surface the system emits today routes through either a pack composer (Layer 1) or a teaching chain (Layer 2); Layer 1 covers cold-start lookups, Layer 2 covers reviewed multi-hop reasoning. With only 41 chains across 18 distinct subjects, the multi-hop ceiling is structurally close. The audit's ground_graph wiring (PR #83 substrate, ADR-0088 Phase A pending) and Finding 4's compound dispatch (PR #82 substrate, ADR-0089 Phase C2 pending) are the right next moves on the truth path — but they will only stretch as far as Layer 2's coverage permits. Doubling Layer 2 to ~80 chains, with at least 8–10 chains per intent shape, is the single most-leveraged content move.