core/docs/runtime_contracts.md
Shay 310793a4ea feat(adr-0024): Phase 2 — honest refusal with typed evidence
Replace plain ValueError at both inner-loop exhaustion sites in
generate/stream.py with InnerLoopExhaustion, a typed ValueError
subclass carrying machine-readable refusal evidence:

  reason            : RefusalReason (INNER_LOOP_EXHAUSTION)
  region_label      : which AdmissibilityRegion blocked
  step_index        : -1 = pre-walk empty intersection;
                      >=0 = in-walk per-step exhaustion
  rejected_attempts : ordered (idx, word, score) triples

Backward-compat by construction: subclassing ValueError preserves
every pre-Phase-2 `except ValueError` handler in chat/runtime.py,
eval lanes, and tests. No edits to chat/runtime.py, field/propagate.py,
algebra/versor.py, or vault/store.py.

Trace path wired:
  - CognitiveTurnResult.refusal_reason (str, default "")
  - compute_trace_hash folds refusal_reason only when non-empty
    -> byte-identical hashes preserved for non-refused turns
  - CognitiveTurnPipeline reads via getattr from ChatResponse and
    forwards into both trace_hash and result construction

Contract documented in docs/runtime_contracts.md §"Refusal contract".

Tests (tests/test_refusal_contract.py — 10 passing):
  - InnerLoopExhaustion isinstance(ValueError) at both raise sites
  - In-walk site carries reason/region_label/step_index>=0/
    rejected_attempts with (int,str,float) triples
  - Pre-walk site uses step_index=-1 sentinel + empty
    rejected_attempts
  - Pre-walk fires even when inner_loop_admissibility=False
  - Trace hash: empty refusal_reason preserves legacy bytes;
    non-empty differs; same inputs are stable

Suite results:
  smoke: 67 passed
  cognition: 121 passed
  runtime: 19 passed
  full: 1024 passed, 2 skipped
  core eval cognition: 13/13, 100% intent accuracy, 100% versor closure

Residual silent path (documented as out-of-scope for Phase 2):
chat/runtime.respond()/arespond() still convert any ValueError to
"" for their public str return contract. So a refused turn today
produces surface == "" with refusal_reason == "" — the typed
evidence is unread between the raise site and the result. The
plumbing on result + trace + pipeline is in place so a future ADR
can wire materialisation (propagate exception to
ChatResponse.refusal_reason, or catch at the pipeline seam) without
re-deriving the contract.

Phase 1 (commit 3940290) and Phase 2 (this commit) were developed
in parallel with disjoint file scope to avoid conflicts.
2026-05-17 14:49:08 -07:00

254 lines
12 KiB
Markdown

# Runtime Contracts
This document freezes the runtime contracts used by chat, telemetry, memory,
and future teaching work. It exists to prevent contract drift between tests,
runtime code, and future cognitive pipeline work.
## Field invariant
CORE state is a versor field. Runtime code must preserve the core closure
contract:
```text
versor_condition(F) < 1e-6
```
If a propagation path violates this invariant, fix the operator path or the
explicit closure boundary that owns the transition. Do not hide violations by
changing tests or silently downgrading the invariant.
## ChatResponse contract
`ChatResponse.surface`
: The selected user-facing response. This is the exact string returned by
`ChatRuntime.respond()` and should match what the user receives.
`ChatResponse.walk_surface`
: The manifold/token-walk evidence surface. It is trace evidence for what the
field traversal produced. It is not necessarily the user-facing response.
`ChatResponse.articulation_surface`
: The proposition/realizer surface. This is the structured linguistic
realization of the current proposition or proposition graph.
Current selection policy:
```text
surface = articulation_surface (when no unknown-domain gate fired)
surface = _UNKNOWN_DOMAIN_SURFACE (when the gate fired)
walk_surface = retained telemetry/evidence (always)
```
### Unknown-domain gate honour
When `vault/decompose.py::UnknownDomainGate` fires, ChatRuntime returns
the safety stub `_UNKNOWN_DOMAIN_SURFACE` ("I don't have field
coordinates for that yet.") and `vault_hits == 0`.
`CognitiveTurnPipeline` honours that stub: the user-facing `surface`
remains the gate's response and is *not* overridden by the realizer's
fallback articulation. The realizer's surface always survives in
`walk_surface` as evidence — only the user-facing selection is
gated. This closes `evals/calibration/gaps.md` Finding 2.
Future realizer work may change the selection policy, but must update this
document and the contract tests in the same PR.
### Refusal contract (ADR-0024 Phase 2)
When the inner-loop admissibility check leaves no admissible destination
for the next step, the generation walk in `generate/stream.py` raises
`generate.exhaustion.InnerLoopExhaustion`, a typed subclass of
`ValueError` carrying:
```text
reason : RefusalReason (machine-readable taxonomy)
region_label : str (which AdmissibilityRegion blocked)
step_index : int (-1 = pre-walk empty intersection;
>=0 = in-walk per-step exhaustion)
rejected_attempts : tuple[(int, str, float), ...] (per-step evidence)
```
Reason codes are minimal in Phase 2: a single `INNER_LOOP_EXHAUSTION`
covers both raise sites. Phase 4 (rotor-frame admissibility, ADR-0025)
is expected to add a second reason for rotor exhaustion.
`CognitiveTurnResult.refusal_reason` carries the stable string value of
the `RefusalReason` when a turn refuses, and the empty string otherwise.
`compute_trace_hash` folds `refusal_reason` into the payload only when
non-empty, preserving byte-identical hashes for non-refused turns
relative to pre-Phase-2 (determinism invariant). When the field is
non-empty, it becomes load-bearing in replay equality.
Backward compatibility: `InnerLoopExhaustion` is a `ValueError`, so
every pre-Phase-2 `except ValueError` handler in `chat/runtime.py`,
eval lanes, and tests continues to catch it without modification.
Residual silent path (out of scope for Phase 2, future ADR):
`ChatRuntime.respond()` and `arespond()` still convert any `ValueError`
to the empty string for their public `str` return contract, so a real
turn that refuses today produces `surface == ""` with
`refusal_reason == ""` — the typed evidence is unread between the
raise site and the result. The plumbing on `CognitiveTurnResult`,
`compute_trace_hash`, and `CognitiveTurnPipeline` is in place so a
future ADR can wire materialisation (e.g. propagate the typed
exception to `ChatResponse.refusal_reason` or catch at the pipeline
seam) without re-deriving the contract.
## TurnEvent contract
`TurnEvent.surface`
: Exact emitted user-facing response for the turn.
`TurnEvent.walk_surface`
: Exact manifold/token-walk evidence surface for the turn.
`TurnEvent.articulation_surface`
: Exact proposition/realizer surface for the turn.
`TurnEvent.vault_hits`
: Actual count of recall hits applied during generation. Never hardcode this.
`TurnEvent.flagged`
: Mirrors `IdentityScore.flagged` for filtering and trace inspection.
## Identity contract
Identity checks are telemetry/gating signals. A flagged identity score must not
silently erase useful generation unless an explicit hard-block policy is
configured and tested.
Canonical call style:
```python
IdentityCheck().check(trajectory, manifold)
```
Legacy constructor injection:
```python
IdentityCheck(manifold=manifold).check(trajectory)
```
is supported temporarily and emits `DeprecationWarning`. New code must not use
it.
## Memory and teaching contract
Session memory can be immediate and local to the running context.
Reviewed memory must be explicit: user corrections or teaching examples become
reviewed memory only through the reviewed teaching loop.
Pack mutation is proposal-only until reviewed. Runtime correction capture must
not directly rewrite language packs, frames, identity axes, or operator code.
Identity manifold mutation by user prompt or correction is forbidden.
## Testing policy
Tests should protect load-bearing behavior:
- versor closure
- deterministic replay
- runtime response/telemetry contracts
- memory correctness
- identity protection
- teaching/correction safety
- articulation contract
Avoid tests that preserve stale constructors, private helper shapes, or exact
formatting that is not part of a documented contract.
## Epistemic surface (ADR-0021)
CORE exposes a typed `epistemic_status` on the teaching and lexicon
surfaces. The status is a **position in the revision graph**, not a
source-trust tier:
| Status | Meaning |
|---------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| `COHERENT` | Fits current field geometry; no incoherence with reviewed claims detected at admission. |
| `CONTESTED` | Incoherent with at least one reviewed claim; review pending; not load-bearing. |
| `SPECULATIVE` | Proposed; not yet reviewed for coherence; admissible only as a candidate. |
| `FALSIFIED` | Incoherent under accumulated evidence; eligible for Stage-3 inversion; retained. |
### Non-hardening invariant
No reviewed claim or proposition-graph edge ever becomes unrevisable.
No `final`, `frozen`, `axiom`, or `permanent` flag exists or may be
added on the runtime data model. The closest such property in the
architecture is the *mathematical* closure check
`versor_condition(F) < 1e-6` — never an epistemic seal on a claim.
The invariant is enforced by `tests/test_epistemic_invariants.py`.
### Curator review rule
`epistemic_status` transitions are computed from coherence with the
existing reviewed field — not asserted by source authority. At v1 the
judgment is curator-mediated, with one rule:
> The curator's only admissible reasoning is *geometric*: does the
> claim cohere with already-reviewed claims, or does it produce
> incoherence? Source credentials, popularity, or institutional
> position must not be invoked as justification.
### Schema surfaces
| Surface | Field | Default at creation |
|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------|
| `teaching.PackMutationProposal` | `epistemic_status: EpistemicStatus` | `SPECULATIVE` |
| `teaching.ReviewedTeachingExample` | `epistemic_status: EpistemicStatus` | `SPECULATIVE` |
| `language_packs.schema.LexicalEntry` | `epistemic_status: str` | `"coherent"` (seed) |
| `core.cognition.trace.compute_trace_hash` | `teaching_epistemic_status: str` | `""` if no proposal |
Promotion of a proposal's status uses the immutable updater
`PackMutationProposal.with_status(...)` — original is never mutated.
The status of the load-bearing proposal in a turn is folded into
`trace_hash` so replay detects when a downstream surface was produced
under a different epistemic frame than at the time of recall.
## Test organization target
Future test moves should follow this taxonomy:
| Area | Destination |
|---|---|
| versor closure, holonomy, motors, null cone, energy physics | `tests/algebra/` or `tests/physics/` |
| chat runtime, config, async runtime, identity gate telemetry | `tests/runtime/` |
| articulation, proposition, surface assembly, future pipeline | `tests/cognition/` |
| correction capture, reviewed memory, consolidation | `tests/teaching/` |
| language pack loading and seed pack invariants | `tests/packs/` |
Do not reorganize tests as a standalone churn PR unless it directly reduces
contract ambiguity or unlocks a cognitive subsystem.
## Formation trust boundaries
The Formation Pipeline (see `docs/formation_pipeline_plan.md`) introduces six
trust boundaries between the world and the manifold. Every boundary has a
content-addressed input and output; every rejection produces an audit record.
No silent failures.
| # | Boundary | Input | Output | Trust contract |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mining → Smelting | URLs / files | `OreBundle` | Untrusted text in; untrusted entries out. No code execution from sources; no dynamic imports; source URLs sandboxed; SHA-256 captured per entry. |
| 2 | Smelting → Forge | `OreBundle` + extracted candidates | `Candidate*` lists | Untrusted candidates in. The Forge is the *only* validator. Identity-override patterns and path-traversal in source SHAs are rejected at the Forge, not here. |
| 3 | Forge → Compose | `Candidate*` lists | `ValidatedTripleSet` | Every candidate runs through `teaching.relation_parse.parse_triple`, identity-axis screening, source allow-list, pack collision check, and the cross-reference rule. Output entries carry `EpistemicStatus.SPECULATIVE`. No pack mutation. |
| 4 | Compose → Compile/Run | `ValidatedTripleSet` | `CourseYAML``FormationPlan` | Deterministic, byte-stable composition. No mutation of the language pack manifest. |
| 5 | Run → Ratify | `FormationPlan` | `list[CognitiveTurnResult]` | The runner is a thin shim over `CognitiveTurnPipeline.run()`. It cannot invent operators; it can only invoke existing ones. Hard-halts on `versor_condition(F) >= 1e-6`. No identity-manifold mutation, ever. |
| 6 | Ratify → Promote | `MasteryReport` (self-sealed) | reviewed teaching apply | Promotion requires a self-sealed `MasteryReport` whose SHA verifies, whose prerequisites are present in the `MasteredCoursesIndex`, and whose triples are submitted through `teaching/review.py` — the existing reviewed apply path. ADR-0021's "one mutation path" invariant is preserved. |
Content-addressing rules (binding across the whole pipeline):
- All hashed payloads are canonical JSON (sorted keys, tight separators,
UTF-8, no NaN/Infinity). Floats are forbidden in hashed payloads; encode
numerics as strings or integers.
- `MasteryReport.report_sha256` is self-sealing: SHA over the payload with
`report_sha256` blanked, then written back into the field. Verifiers
reverse the process.
- No pickle. Pickle defeats replay determinism and is a code-execution
surface.
See `formation/hashing.py`, `formation/cache.py`, and `formation/forge.py`
for the implementation of each rule.