238 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
238 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
# CORE Authority Substrate Outreach Plan
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 2026-06-11
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Mission
|
|
|
|
Prepare CORE for serious engagement with:
|
|
|
|
1. Anthropic
|
|
2. xAI
|
|
3. Tesla
|
|
4. SpaceX-adjacent AI organizations
|
|
5. Frontier-model safety researchers
|
|
6. Infrastructure and agent-platform teams
|
|
|
|
The goal is not marketing.
|
|
|
|
The goal is to demonstrate that:
|
|
|
|
- stochastic intelligence does not require stochastic authority
|
|
- frontier models can remain semantic engines
|
|
- deterministic authority boundaries can govern verification, refusal, ASK, tool use, and future embodied actions
|
|
- replayable traces provide auditable evidence of the decision path
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Core Thesis
|
|
|
|
CORE is not competing with frontier models.
|
|
|
|
CORE is a deterministic authority substrate.
|
|
|
|
The model proposes.
|
|
|
|
The substrate decides.
|
|
|
|
The trace proves.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Current Demonstrated State
|
|
|
|
## PR #684
|
|
|
|
Semantic-state ledger reland.
|
|
|
|
Proves:
|
|
|
|
- semantic-state representation separated from authority surfaces
|
|
- behavior-preserving refactor
|
|
- verifier/pool remain sole commit authority
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## PR #685
|
|
|
|
Candidate-source boundary.
|
|
|
|
Proves:
|
|
|
|
- ledger-to-candidate generation isolated behind a formal boundary
|
|
- future semantic-state work can proceed without authority leakage
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## PR #686
|
|
|
|
Replay/provenance equivalence harness.
|
|
|
|
Proves:
|
|
|
|
- 937-problem canonical trace artifact
|
|
- replay-faithfulness checks
|
|
- authority-violation detection
|
|
- durable equivalence evidence
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## PR #687
|
|
|
|
Claude-to-CORE Hybrid Verification Demo.
|
|
|
|
Proves:
|
|
|
|
- model proposal can be separated from authority
|
|
- verified / refused / ask / invalid outcomes
|
|
- deterministic artifact validation
|
|
- tamper-sensitive behavior
|
|
- no proposer execution authority
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Outreach Tracks
|
|
|
|
## Track A — Anthropic
|
|
|
|
Focus:
|
|
|
|
- safety
|
|
- trust
|
|
- MCP
|
|
- agent reliability
|
|
- authority boundaries
|
|
- auditable traces
|
|
|
|
Deliverables:
|
|
|
|
- executive summary
|
|
- updated deck
|
|
- hybrid verification demo packet
|
|
- research paper
|
|
- objections and responses
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Track B — xAI
|
|
|
|
Focus:
|
|
|
|
- truth-seeking AI
|
|
- epistemic states
|
|
- deterministic verification
|
|
- local authority boundaries
|
|
|
|
Deliverables:
|
|
|
|
- xAI one-pager
|
|
- truth-seeking framing memo
|
|
- epistemic-state demo roadmap
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Track C — Tesla / Embodied Systems
|
|
|
|
Focus:
|
|
|
|
- embodied authority
|
|
- local execution authority
|
|
- deterministic action gating
|
|
- replayable transitions
|
|
|
|
Deliverables:
|
|
|
|
- embodied-authority research memo
|
|
- simulation-only authority demo
|
|
- transition-admission model
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Demo Roadmap
|
|
|
|
Completed:
|
|
|
|
- Hybrid Verification Demo (#687)
|
|
|
|
Planned:
|
|
|
|
1. Tool Authority Demo
|
|
2. Embodied Authority Simulation Demo
|
|
3. SaaS-Control / On-Prem-Authority Demo
|
|
4. Domain Admission Demo
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Research Roadmap
|
|
|
|
1. Authority substrates
|
|
2. Tool authority
|
|
3. Epistemic-state systems
|
|
4. Embodied authority
|
|
5. Distributed authority boundaries
|
|
6. Human-in-the-loop authority transitions
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Documentation Roadmap
|
|
|
|
1. Executive summary
|
|
2. Research paper v0.2
|
|
3. Demo evidence packet
|
|
4. Security architecture update
|
|
5. Anthropic packet
|
|
6. xAI packet
|
|
7. Embodied authority memo
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Model Allocation Strategy
|
|
|
|
Fable:
|
|
|
|
- architecture
|
|
- red-team review
|
|
- multimodal planning
|
|
- embodied authority design
|
|
|
|
Sonnet:
|
|
|
|
- implementation
|
|
- documentation
|
|
- reviews
|
|
- verification
|
|
|
|
Opus:
|
|
|
|
- audits
|
|
- deep reviews
|
|
- merge recommendations
|
|
|
|
ChatGPT:
|
|
|
|
- strategy
|
|
- packet shaping
|
|
- outreach framing
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Success Criteria
|
|
|
|
Anthropic:
|
|
|
|
- technical review conversation
|
|
- partnership exploration
|
|
- research discussion
|
|
|
|
xAI:
|
|
|
|
- technical review
|
|
- truth-seeking discussion
|
|
- embodied-authority interest
|
|
|
|
Research:
|
|
|
|
- arXiv-quality paper
|
|
- reproducible demos
|
|
- auditable artifacts
|