- ADR-0108 Status: Proposed -> Accepted - README index row updated to Accepted - 'Current frontier' rewritten with the ranked Proposed-ADR list mandated by ADR-0108 \xc2\xa7Decision; removes the now-false 'No ADR currently sits in a "Proposed but unimplemented" state' sentence - Open candidate directions (no-ADR-yet) section retained for the multi-reviewer governance frontier item from ADR-0105
147 lines
5.4 KiB
Markdown
147 lines
5.4 KiB
Markdown
# ADR-0108 — Proposed-ADR Sequencing Post-ADR-0105
|
|
|
|
**Status:** Accepted
|
|
**Date:** 2026-05-22
|
|
**Author:** CORE agents + reviewers
|
|
**Relates to:** ADR-0080, ADR-0084, ADR-0087, ADR-0106
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
After ADR-0105, the ADR index carries four Proposed-but-not-Accepted ADRs:
|
|
|
|
| ADR | Proposed | Origin |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| ADR-0080 | 2026-05-20 | Contemplation loop (self-interrogation, read-only Phase 1) |
|
|
| ADR-0084 | 2026-05-20 | Definitional layer for lexicon packs (optional per-entry block) |
|
|
| ADR-0087 | 2026-05-20 | Rhetorical style as a third substantive selection axis |
|
|
| ADR-0106 | 2026-05-22 | Expert-demo promotion contract |
|
|
|
|
Three of these (0080 / 0084 / 0087) were proposed in a single 2026-05-20
|
|
session and have not advanced. The frontier work since that day went into
|
|
the ADR-0091→0105 evidence-governed domain chain (a different axis), so
|
|
the stall is *orthogonal scope*, not contradiction or rejection.
|
|
|
|
`docs/decisions/README.md` currently states "No ADR currently sits in a
|
|
'Proposed but unimplemented' state." That sentence is no longer true and
|
|
the README will need updating once this sequencing decision is accepted.
|
|
|
|
Without an explicit sequencing decision, three things happen:
|
|
|
|
1. The Proposed-ADR list grows without external legibility.
|
|
2. Reviewers cannot tell *intent to land* from *intent to defer* from
|
|
*intent to withdraw*.
|
|
3. Future "what's next?" questions re-derive sequencing on every read,
|
|
which is wasted work and drifts over time.
|
|
|
|
ADR-0108 makes the sequencing decision explicit, durable, and revisable.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Decision
|
|
|
|
### 1. Priority order
|
|
|
|
The four currently-Proposed ADRs are sequenced as follows:
|
|
|
|
1. **ADR-0106 — Expert-Demo Promotion Contract.** *Highest priority.*
|
|
Domain-legibility: the four `reasoning-capable` ratifications overstate
|
|
what the system has demonstrated until `expert_demo` has a real
|
|
contract. Implementation PR follows acceptance.
|
|
|
|
2. **ADR-0107 — `mathematics_logic` expert-demo promotion (reserved).**
|
|
First worked promotion against the ADR-0106 contract. Smallest
|
|
expert-demo proof surface across the four ratified domains.
|
|
|
|
3. **ADR-0080 — Contemplation Loop.** *Next-most-load-bearing.* Converts
|
|
gap-finding from human-driven to system-emitted-and-reviewed.
|
|
Phase 1 is intentionally read-only and `SPECULATIVE`-only. Unlocks
|
|
curriculum growth speed.
|
|
|
|
4. **ADR-0084 — Definitional Layer.** *Deferred pending ADR-0107.* The
|
|
definitional block is content-shaped; its value surfaces during a
|
|
worked expert promotion when definitional depth becomes a bottleneck.
|
|
Holding it Proposed avoids premature schema commitment.
|
|
|
|
5. **ADR-0087 — Rhetorical Style Axis.** *Lowest current priority.*
|
|
Register + anchor-lens already demonstrate the orthogonality pattern
|
|
ADR-0087 generalizes. No active pull from a downstream consumer.
|
|
Stays Proposed until a concrete consumer ADR motivates it.
|
|
|
|
### 2. No withdrawals
|
|
|
|
This ADR withdraws none of 0080 / 0084 / 0087. Each remains Proposed and
|
|
intact. Sequencing ≠ rejection.
|
|
|
|
### 3. Sequencing is revisable
|
|
|
|
Acceptance of ADR-0108 does not freeze the order. The order is the
|
|
*current* best guess; new evidence (a worked promotion that hits a
|
|
definitional bottleneck, a downstream rhetorical-style consumer landing,
|
|
an unanticipated capability gap) updates the order by a follow-up ADR.
|
|
|
|
### 4. README discipline
|
|
|
|
The README "Current frontier" section MUST list every Proposed ADR with
|
|
its sequencing rank and one-line rationale, so outside readers can see
|
|
intent without reading every ADR body. The sentence "No ADR currently
|
|
sits in a 'Proposed but unimplemented' state" is removed when this ADR
|
|
lands and is replaced with the sequenced Proposed-ADR list.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Invariants
|
|
|
|
### `proposed_adr_index_complete`
|
|
|
|
Every ADR with `Status: Proposed` in `docs/decisions/` must appear in the
|
|
README "Current frontier" sequencing list. A Proposed ADR absent from the
|
|
sequencing list is a documentation drift bug.
|
|
|
|
### `no_silent_withdrawal`
|
|
|
|
A Proposed ADR may move to `Withdrawn` only by a successor ADR that
|
|
explicitly cites it. No silent deletion.
|
|
|
|
### `sequencing_is_revisable`
|
|
|
|
Acceptance of ADR-0108 does not lock the order. A subsequent ADR may
|
|
re-rank Proposed ADRs by citing this one and stating the trigger.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Acceptance evidence
|
|
|
|
Accepted when the following land together:
|
|
|
|
- README "Current frontier" updated to:
|
|
- remove the "No ADR currently sits in a 'Proposed but unimplemented'
|
|
state" claim
|
|
- add the ranked Proposed-ADR list with one-line rationales matching
|
|
§Decision
|
|
- this ADR's status flipped to Accepted
|
|
- no body content of ADR-0080 / 0084 / 0087 / 0106 is modified by this PR
|
|
(sequencing is a meta-decision, not a content edit)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Consequences
|
|
|
|
- "What's next?" becomes a one-screen read on `docs/decisions/README.md`
|
|
rather than a four-file scan plus reasoning.
|
|
- Reviewers can act on Proposed ADRs in declared order without
|
|
cross-checking session memory.
|
|
- Proposed ADRs that genuinely no longer fit get a documented exit via
|
|
a successor ADR rather than disappearing from the index.
|
|
- Future "candidate frontier" bullets in the README become the on-ramp
|
|
to a new Proposed ADR, with this sequencing list as their next stop.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Out of scope
|
|
|
|
- This ADR does not implement any of the four Proposed ADRs.
|
|
- This ADR does not modify ADR-0080 / 0084 / 0087 / 0106 bodies.
|
|
- Multi-reviewer governance (the open ADR-0105 candidate frontier item)
|
|
is orthogonal and remains future work.
|