First Wave M / Phase B piece (GATING): read-only backend that makes the
calibrated-learning / serving-discipline loop inspectable — 'the engine
earns the right to guess', ADR-0175.
The workbench computes NONE of these numbers:
- GET /calibration/classes — per-class gold-tether view from the persisted
practice arena ledger (evals/gsm8k_math/practice/v1/report.json per_class).
Each class's reliability_floor is the engine's own one-sided Wilson
conservative_floor (via ClassTally.reliability); PROPOSE (θ=0.85) / SERVE
(θ=0.99) license verdicts come from core.reliability_gate.license_for.
Failures-first ordering. A test proves the reader's floor equals a direct
conservative_floor() call — no re-implementation.
- GET /serving/metrics — the live correct/refused/wrong counts read unchanged
from the committed train_sample + holdout_dev report.json (currently
4/46/0 and 5/495/0 — wrong=0). Never re-runs a lane.
Honest current state: the committed practice ledger's three classes
(additive/divisive/multiplicative) are all below N_MIN=10, so none has
earned a license yet — the reader shows exactly that, no fake green light.
- workbench/calibration.py: pure readers; imports core.reliability_gate;
EvidenceUnavailableError -> 501 (fail-closed) when the artifact is absent.
- schemas + TS mirrors (CalibrationClass, ServingMetrics); both snapshots
regenerated (deterministic); both drift gates pass.
- trust boundary: read-only over committed artifacts + engine-owned
derivation; no execution, no mutation, no license ever changed.
Verified: 30 Python tests (incl. the no-reimplementation proof + fail-closed),
390 vitest, both schema drift gates, snapshots deterministic.
Replaces the W-026 501 stub. Re-executes a journaled prompt in a sealed
fresh runtime (ChatRuntime(no_load_state=True): no checkpoint load, no
checkpoint write, no proposal lineage) and compares the envelope
leaf-by-leaf against the recorded TurnJournalEntry.
Design correction vs the scoping doc (amended in-doc): journaled turns
each ran in a fresh ChatRuntime(), never one continuous session, so
genesis-PREFIX replay would manufacture spurious divergence; shipped
basis is sealed_fresh_runtime_single_turn (O(1)). origin_state:
"unrecorded" — the journal does not record whether the original turn's
runtime loaded a checkpoint, so divergence is reported as nondeterminism
OR origin-state influence, never disambiguated.
- workbench/replay.py: pure comparison + injected executor; every
TurnJournalEntry field classified critical/informational exactly once
(exhaustiveness enforced by test)
- api.py: route wiring under _CHAT_TURN_LOCK; runtime failure -> 500
runtime_unavailable, no comparison may be fabricated
- schemas: additive TurnReplayComparison/TurnReplayDivergence (W-026
artifact-keyed pair retires with the frontend Replay Moment PR)
- tests: 10 obligations incl. tamper-prompt, tamper-leaf precision,
no-execution-no-comparison, no-trace (journal + engine_state bytes),
wall-clock tolerance, sealed-construction proof
- snapshot regenerated; NOT_YET_MIRRORED debt entries for the two new
classes (mirrors land with the frontend PR)
- api-contract-v1.md § Replay rewritten for the turn-keyed shape
Append-only JSONL journal records the exact ChatTurnResult envelope returned by /chat/turn with stable turn_id, trace_hash, all three surfaces, verdicts, and deterministic journal_digest.
GET /trace/turns and GET /trace/{turn_id} serve journal evidence for the Trace route frontend. Read model only; no teaching, pack, or journal-owned engine_state mutation.
Local deterministic demo exposing the formal entailment substrate as its
own public authority: the proposer's verdict/confidence/proof are data
only; CORE recomputes propositional entailment through the pinned ROBDD
engine (generate.proof_chain.entail.evaluate_entailment_with_trace),
independently cross-checks with the deductive lane's code-disjoint
truth-table oracle (evals.deductive_logic.oracle.oracle_entailment), and
serves entailed/refuted/unknown only when both procedures agree —
refusing on inconsistent premises (no vacuous entailment), out-of-regime
input (by design, before grammar), a distinct-atom regime bound (honors
the brute-force oracle's small-atom contract), and engine/oracle
disagreement (test-only fault injection, defensive refusal).
Seven committed scenarios with byte-pinned expected artifacts; 38 tests
covering recursive schema closure, output-smuggling-before-evaluation,
proposer-garbage byte-invariance in both directions, oracle module
disjointness, trace-hash folding of trace + oracle verdict, runner
hardening, and INV-21/24/29 discipline of the demo files.
Two-pass hardening of the #690 demo so no epistemic state is proposer-mintable:
Pass 1 (sealed corpus, from the reconciliation pass):
- evidence items are references only (evidence_id + content_sha256) resolved
against a committed content-addressed corpus (evidence_corpus.json)
- support derived from committed subject/predicate match; independence from
distinct provenance_root values; proposer support/independence labels are
rejected by the closed schema
- evidence-strength taxonomy (substrate-capability vs interface-contract) in
PUBLIC-DEMO-ROADMAP / DEMO-PACKAGING-CHECKLIST; position-paper refinements
Pass 2 (entailment-decided inference, closes a live false-status hazard):
- the merged inferred leg required only that premise IDs resolve — a claim
with no support citing one unrelated record as a premise was assigned
'inferred' (empirically confirmed). inferred is now decided by
generate.proof_chain.entail (sound+complete ROBDD) over resolved corpus
premises, cross-checked against the independent truth-table oracle
(evals.deductive_logic.oracle, no shared code); proof keys + oracle verdict
in the trace; disagreement => defensive refusal; refutation => contradicted
- committed adversarial scenario unrelated-premise-still-undetermined proves
the attack now lands on undetermined
- corpus seal (corpus_sha256) pinned into every evaluated trace; scope
refusals no longer consult the corpus; corpus cache hands out copies;
claim subject/predicate constrained to atom-compatible snake_case
- .gitignore: private packet dir, agent worktrees, tooling artifacts
Validation: 30 demo tests; 96 across all three demo suites; 7/7 scenarios
double-run byte-identical; 61 architectural invariants green.
Local deterministic public evidence for the ratified PCCP capability:
proposer submits claim + proof candidate + status/confidence garbage; CORE
ignores proposer authority, fresh-reads curator-certified store state,
recomputes the proof under the pinned engine, and promotes/refuses only
through VaultStore.apply_certified_promotion. The trace proves the decision.
- demos/proof_carrying_promotion/{schema.json,authority.py,run_demo.py}:
closed recursive schema (output fields unsuppliable at the root), the REAL
decider (teaching.proof_promotion.certify_promotion) and the REAL owner —
no demo-local promotion reimplementation. The local arena is rebuilt via
VaultStore.from_dict over dict-literal metadata: demos/ is scanned by
INV-21/INV-24/INV-29, and the demo adds no vault writer, no recall site,
and no status-transition site (proven in tests with the invariants' own
detectors).
- 8 fixtures + pinned expected artifacts: entailed-promotes,
proposer-status-ignored, non-coherent-premise, uncertified-reading,
tampered-certificate (fails byte replay), stale-premise-status (same
honest certificate digest as the promoting run — live state is what
differs), non-sequitur, invalid-state-smuggling (rejected before
evaluation, authority_evaluated=false, null digest).
- Hardened runner per the #688/#690 pattern: default out/ dir, unsafe
output roots refused, --write-expected explicit, double-run byte-identity
enforced per fixture, scenario pass/fail summary.
- tests/test_proof_carrying_promotion_demo.py (26): expected-artifact
conformance, tamper detection, proposer-garbage decision-invariance (incl.
on the promotable setup), refused-cases-mutate-nothing, REFUTED-never-
demotes, trace-hash folds certificate digest, forbidden-import/call scan
(incl. uuid/random/time), INV-21/INV-29 allowlists pinned unchanged, no
named-company/strategy terms.
No runtime turn integration; promotion remains SPECULATIVE->COHERENT only;
README carries the full honesty ledger.
The ratified capability, through the existing mutation owner only:
- teaching/proof_promotion.py — pure decider. Fresh-reads every premise AND
the claim from the store (claim_entry_index; forms never proposer-supplied),
strict status compares (no parse-defaulting), reading_certified must be the
boolean True, engine certification via the pinned deductive engine,
proposer_payload accepted and provably never read (del before use; poisoned-
mapping test), certificate digest emitted for D4 trace-hash folding. Zero
mutation; zero vault.store calls; zero status writes (proven with the
INV-21/INV-29 detectors themselves).
- vault/store.py::apply_certified_promotion — the single transition site.
Independently re-verifies: byte-for-byte replay under DEDUCTIVE_ENGINE_PIN,
promotion_positive, live claim form/reading/status cross-checks, live
premise form/reading/status cross-checks (staleness refuses). Fabricated or
tampered certificates flip nothing; authority is live store state plus
recomputation, never the artifact.
- generate/proof_chain/engine_pin.py — DEDUCTIVE_ENGINE_PIN mirrors the
deductive_logic_v1 lane SHA; sync pinned by AST test against
scripts/verify_lane_shas.py.
- Consistency fix found in lookback: both promotion sites now stamp
epistemic_state alongside epistemic_status (the ADR-0148 site left the
stored state tag stale; recall recomputed it, but the stored key lied).
Obligations: all six strict-xfail markers retired and live (O1/O2
strengthened to prove the transition through the vault owner); the
module-existence pin deleted per its own docstring; the two remaining
honesty pins kept. INV-21 allowlist unchanged; INV-29 allowlist unchanged
({vault/store.py}); INV-29's 29c visibility floor raised 2 -> 3 to cover the
new site.
No runtime turn path calls promotion; the deterministic demo is PR D.
Validation: new suite 49 passed; obligations 8 passed (0 xfail remaining);
invariants 66 passed; certificate 27 passed; 0148 6 passed; epistemic 20
passed; smoke files green; lane SHAs verified.
Pure evidence substrate for proof-carrying coherence promotion. No
promotion, no vault import, no status transition, no teaching-path
change; ADR-0218 stays Proposed.
- generate/proof_chain/certificate.py: frozen PromotionCertificate
(version/claim_form/premise ids+forms+statuses/entailment_trace/
engine_pin/decision/reason, canonical_json with sort_keys+compact
separators); build_certificate runs evaluate_entailment_with_trace
over entry_id-sorted premises; verify_certificate rebuilds from the
embedded forms and accepts iff byte-identical — tampered forms/claim/
trace/decision/reason/ordering/version all fail replay, structural
breakage fails closed as malformed_certificate.
- promotion_positive is necessary-not-sufficient: entailed over a
non-empty all-coherent recorded premise set; REFUTED/UNKNOWN/REFUSED
verify as themselves but are never positive; zero-premise tautology
certificates fail-closed non-positive in v1.
- engine_pin is recorded provenance; pin tampering is caught only via
caller-supplied expected_engine_pin (P3 must pass the lane SHA) —
limit pinned by dedicated tests.
- entail.py: docstring-only fix removing the incorrect ADR-0206
attribution (numbering collision); now cites ADR-0218. Zero behavior
change. generate_claims.py:74 still carries the label (serving-frozen
surface, flagged for follow-up).
- No xfail markers retire: every PR-A obligation binds to the P3
promoter, which must not exist before ratification. The certificate-
shaped halves of O1/O7 are proven for real in
tests/test_proof_chain_certificate.py (27 tests). ADR phasing bullet
and obligations docstring record the reconciliation.
Validation: certificate 27 passed; obligations 3 passed + 6 xfailed;
architectural invariants 61 passed (INV-21/INV-29 green, allowlists
unchanged); entail/builder/rules 61 passed; smoke files 95 passed.
INV-29 is the load-bearing contribution of #693, so its detector must match
its claim. The assignment-only scan missed common write indirections; the
widened _status_transition_writes (renamed from _status_assignment_targets)
now also catches:
- m.update({"epistemic_status": ...}) / update(epistemic_status=...) /
update(**{...}) / update(dict(epistemic_status=...))
- m.setdefault("epistemic_status", ...)
- bound and unbound __setitem__ with the literal key
- setattr(entry, "epistemic_status", ...)
- writes hidden in tuple-unpacking assignment targets
29b now proves all 13 shapes are flagged (per-shape, so one regression names
itself); new 29b' proves reads, other keys, and dict-literal construction do
NOT flag (false positives would train reflexive allowlisting). Honest scope
note added: variable keys / exec / C-level aliasing are statically
undetectable and belong to review.
Pre-scan confirmed zero production call-shape writes exist, so the widened
detector flags nothing new; ALLOWED_STATUS_TRANSITION_SITES stays
{"vault/store.py"}. No runtime change; ADR-0218 still Proposed.
Validation:
- tests/test_architectural_invariants.py: 61 passed
- tests/test_proof_carrying_promotion_obligations.py: 3 passed, 6 xfailed
PR A of the stack specified by docs/issues/proof-carrying-coherence-promotion.md.
No runtime change; no promotion behavior; ADR-0218 is Proposed, not ratified.
- ADR-0218 (Proposed): rulings the issue Section 9 demands — extend the
existing mutation owner (policy decides in teaching/proof_promotion.py at
P3, only vault/store.py mutates), reading stays curator-certified in the
first cut, exact fail-closed admissibility predicate, certificate folds
into trace_hash. Records two substrate corrections: proof_chain Phase 2
(2.1-2.4) is already implemented, and ADR-0148 already automates an
energy-arm promotion.
- INV-29 (passing): epistemic-status transition sites are allowlisted.
ADR-0148's in-place promotion proved INV-21's AST scan cannot see
status transitions (they are not store() calls) — the boundary the
issue calls highest-risk did not actually cover the riskiest shape.
Allowlist pinned to {vault/store.py} BEFORE any promoter exists;
detector mutation-proven non-vacuous (29b/29c).
- Obligations O1-O5, O7 as strict xfail (executable spec; ImportError today;
strict=True forces the P3 PR to retire markers and pass for real) + three
honesty pins that flip red if promotion is wired without review.
Validation (worktree off main@187b008b, python -m pytest):
- tests/test_proof_carrying_promotion_obligations.py: 3 passed, 6 xfailed
- tests/test_architectural_invariants.py: 60 passed (56 prior + 4 INV-29)
- smoke file set: 94 passed
- proof_chain/entail/binding-graph/ADR-0148 set: 84 passed
- epistemic/teaching set: 40 passed
- scripts/verify_lane_shas.py: 8/9 pinned lanes match incl. deductive_logic_v1;
public_demo missed on the known env wall-clock budget flake (47.6s > 30s),
pre-existing and unrelated (diff is docs+tests only).
This demo assigns epistemic truth-state only and runs no normative/
safety/ethics clearance pass, so it has no basis to positively clear
a claim. Drop the verified->cleared mapping: verified now reports
normative_clearance=unassessable like every other non-invalid output.
Updates authority.py, regenerates the affected expected trace hashes,
tightens the test (verified asserts unassessable) and adds an invariant
test that no non-invalid output is ever cleared, and corrects the README
honesty ledger.
A model-style proposer submits a claim, evidence bundle, and optional
bounded-inference block; CORE alone assigns the typed epistemic state
drawn from the canonical core.epistemic_state taxonomy (no parallel
enum) and emits a deterministic, replayable evidence artifact.
The proposer cannot set assigned_state, status, trace_hash,
authority_path, evidence_ledger, or normative_clearance: the closed
recursive schema rejects any root-level injection before state
evaluation runs, and proposer-supplied proposed_state/trace_hash are
recorded as ignored and never read.
Adds closed schema, six fixtures, pinned expected artifacts, a
double-run byte-identical runner with hardened output-dir policy, and a
22-test suite. No network, subprocess, eval/exec, model API, or side
effects beyond demo output.
A narrow, auditable proof path for the hybrid-mode boundary: a
Claude/Fable-style System 1 proposer submits an MCP-shaped tool call
(core.semantic_derivation.verify); CORE re-derives via the ADR-0184
derivation lane, keeps sole acceptance authority, refuses or asks when
it cannot honestly answer, and emits a deterministic replay/provenance
trace for every decision.
Boundary properties (each pinned by a failing-if-removed test):
- the proposer has no commit path: additionalProperties:false schema,
and the demo modules import nothing from generate.* (AST-scanned with
a planted-bypass self-test) — the lane is consumed only through the
ADR-0184 S4b audited trace facade;
- 'verified' requires pool commit AND clean commit-law/faithfulness
audits AND a gold-audited envelope.json entry AND byte-match to the
pinned derivation trace (measured: 118 of the off-serving pool's 231
corpus commits disagree with lane gold, so a bare pool commit is
never served — scenario s4 shows the refusal on a commit that even
matches gold);
- the ask leg is the real Q1 stack (router -> limitation -> Q1-D
producer -> carried handle -> gated serving), dark by default,
tamper-fail-closed on the content hash;
- authority_path names only consulted authorities; responses are
deterministic (double-run byte-identical) and pinned under expected/.
No serving/runtime change; no CLAIMS/metrics/telemetry/lane-pin
movement; no network or Anthropic API dependency (System 1 payloads are
clearly-labeled static fixtures).
ADR-0184 S4b — the replay/provenance equivalence boundary, the
precondition for any semantic-primary path. After #685 the in-repo
legacy path delegates to the semantic boundary, so old-vs-new is
vacuous; the durable reference is a pinned canonical trace artifact
(evals/gsm8k_math/equivalence/v1/, 937 problems) whose authority is
the #684/#685 cross-tree differentials (documented provenance chain).
- state/provenance.py: replay_is_faithful — the replay bridge's law as
a checkable structural property (no verify/pool import; covered by
the #685 authority scan).
- equivalence/trace.py: canonical traces (worlds, candidates, order,
multiplicity, classifications, resolutions) + authority_violations
re-deriving the pool commit law from trace content.
- scripts/verify_semantic_equivalence.py: check / --update gate
mirroring verify_lane_shas.py.
- tests/test_adr_0184_s4b_replay_equivalence.py: full-corpus live-vs-
pinned equality, corpus-wide authority + faithfulness, and 17
single-mutation non-vacuity proofs.
Pure additions; verify.py/pool.py untouched; no serving, CLAIMS,
metrics, or lane pins moved.
ADR-0184 §7 S4: add generate/derivation/state/source.py — the single
boundary through which semantic-ledger worlds become pool candidates —
and swap pool.py's accumulation source to semantic_state_candidates().
accumulate.py keeps its public surfaces as thin compatibility wrappers
(ADR-0184 §10). Byte-identical over the 937-problem differential;
verify.py / pool.py remain the sole commit authority (structural
no-authority-import scan over state/, non-vacuous).
Also: docs/analysis design note for the S3–S5 boundary stack, and a
drive-by ruff F541 fix in r1_reconstruction.py (rf->r, zero behavior).
Compare resolved canonical Path values, not raw string spellings, when
detecting a question_path / proposal_path collision. A relative
proposal_path and an absolute question_path that name the same file now
fail closed with reason "path_collision" instead of resolving.
Adds a regression test for the absolute-vs-relative same-file collision
and keeps the existing exact-string collision test. The new test is
non-vacuous: it fails under the prior raw-string comparison.
Scope: ask_handle.py seam + its test only. No runtime.py, CLAIMS,
metrics, telemetry, schema, or lane-pin changes.
ADR-0184 S1 (state/bind.py, state/change.py) landed the reusable referent and
change-cue helpers. S2 adds the first explicit state-transition substrate and
routes both accumulation readings through it:
- state/model.py frozen SET/GAIN/LOSS transition model over one entity/unit
StateKey, with structural validation (closed op set; unit is a
str with "" = unitless, mirroring the extractor's Quantity.unit
contract; entity optional, mirroring leading_subject_token).
- state/ledger.py build_accumulation_ledger() — the proven single-referent
gain/loss reading, expressed as a SemanticLedger.
- state/replay.py replay_accumulation_ledger() — the only bridge to
GroundedDerivation; refuses any non-accumulation ledger shape
(non-SET start, cross-key mutation).
accumulate.py's _build_accumulation / _build_accumulation_anchor_skip now build a
ledger and replay it instead of constructing the arithmetic chain inline; the
public compose_accumulation()/accumulation_candidates() surfaces are unchanged.
Behavior-equivalent: a byte-for-byte differential over 937 real GSM8K problems
(accumulation_candidates, compose_accumulation, pooled_candidates, resolve_pooled)
shows 0 differences vs main. Semantic worlds never commit directly — replay emits
GroundedDerivation and verify.py / pool.py remain the sole authority. Sealed: no
serving/runtime/chat import; no CLAIMS or eval-lane-SHA movement.
Refs ADR-0184 section 7 (S2).
The missing-boundary doc (#682) established that chat/runtime.py has no
lawful in-turn provider for a QUESTION_NEEDED ContemplationResult: the
only producer is the off-serving contemplation pass, and scanning
teaching/questions/ would be new, unspecified acquisition logic. This
slice builds the recommended unblocking seam instead of the forbidden
runtime shortcut: carried-handle acquisition.
core/epistemic_disclosure/ask_handle.py:
- AskArtifactHandle — an explicit, caller-carried reference to one
already-produced Q1-D DeliveredQuestion artifact. Provenance is the
producer's own content address (sha256 of blocking_reason:slot_name:
text, also the artifact filename stem) — the only identity field the
Q1-D artifact carries today. No turn/case provenance exists yet; that
boundary is documented, not invented.
- resolve_served_ask_handle — gate-first (zero filesystem access while
ask_serving_enabled is dark), structural handle validation, single
explicit-path artifact read (no glob/iterdir/scan), and content-hash
re-derivation so a stale/replaced/tampered artifact fails closed.
Emits a ResolvedAskCandidate duck-typed to what evaluate_served_ask
reads (terminal/question_path/proposal_path) — no question prose is
ever constructed or carried.
- acquire_served_ask_from_handle — composes resolution into the
existing acquire_served_ask_candidate / evaluate_served_ask stack.
All Q1-D artifact policy (status/review/served/answer-binding/text/
slot/collision) stays delegated; the seam owns identity only.
Not changed: chat/runtime.py, chat(...) signature, ChatResponse,
TurnEvent, telemetry schema, Q1B_ASK_CARVE_OUT, proposal_allowed,
VERIFIED serving, CLAIMS/metrics/lane pins. The seam imports neither
generate.contemplation (pass_manager) nor core.epistemic_questions
render/delivery — enforced by AST tests.
Tests (tests/test_ask_handle.py, 18 cases): gate-dark no-I/O proof,
fallback preservation, valid resolution served end-to-end through the
existing stack, proposal-artifact / missing / malformed / invalid-Q1-D
/ path-collision / stale-hash / non-addressed-filename / structurally-
invalid-handle fail-closed paths, no-discovery-without-exact-handle,
and AST guards for scan primitives, forbidden imports, and prose.
Verification: focused ASK+governance suites 396 passed; architectural
invariants 56 passed; smoke-equivalent suite 90 passed; lane SHAs 8/9
content-match (the 9th is the documented local public_demo wall-clock
flake, 48.3s vs the 30s ADR-0099 budget — no content drift, no re-pin).
Adds a small chat.ask_runtime helper that consumes the ASK acquisition seam without editing chat/runtime.py.
- Uses honest contemplation_result keyword forwarding
- Preserves fallback behavior when ASK serving is disabled
- Does not call pass_manager or render_question
- Does not change public chat/runtime schema
Backs out the direct main push that added _maybe_apply_served_ask using a string-concatenation workaround to evade an over-broad text guard.
Restores chat/runtime.py to the #678 merge state and removes tests/test_ask_runtime_hook.py so the next runtime hook can land through a reviewed PR with structural tests instead of guard bypasses.
- This is the smallest runtime consumption hook for the ASK acquisition seam.
- It is default-dark.
- It preserves normal runtime behavior when disabled.
- It does not change public `chat(...)` signature.
- It does not change `ChatResponse`, `TurnEvent`, or telemetry schema.
- It does not call/render question prose.
- It does not serve from `proposal_path`.
- It does not retire Q1B carve-out or flip `proposal_allowed`.
- It does not serve VERIFIED.
- It does not move CLAIMS or metrics.
Adds the Stage 2 served ASK artifact adapter and adapter-only tests.
- Validates Q1-D DeliveredQuestion artifacts before ASK eligibility
- Uses ask_serving_enabled as a default-dark gate
- Uses the disclosure bus disposition mapping
- Fails closed to fallback surface/disposition on invalid artifacts
- Does not wire chat/runtime, telemetry, TurnEvent, ChatResponse, CLAIMS, or metrics
- Does not retire Q1B_ASK_CARVE_OUT or flip proposal_allowed
Adds dedicated ContemplationResult.question_path for off-serving ASK artifacts and stops storing QUESTION_NEEDED question paths in proposal_path. Proposal artifacts remain under proposal_path. No chat/runtime wiring, served ASK surface, Q1B carve-out retirement, registry flip, or CLAIMS/metric movement.
Adds off-serving pass_manager integration for ASK delivery through deliver_ask behind explicit exercise_ask. Preserves boundary-first ordering, writes question artifacts to the question sink via question_root, avoids double delivery, and keeps chat/runtime, served ASK, Q1B carve-out, registry, CLAIMS, and metrics untouched.
Adds explicit default-false RuntimeConfig ask_serving_enabled and verified_serving_enabled fields while preserving default-dark helper behavior. Includes focused ASK/VERIFIED gate tests and cross-gate independence coverage. No pass_manager wiring, runtime wiring, verify.py wiring, served behavior, or CLAIMS/metric movement.
Adds a default-dark verified_serving_enabled helper with focused tests. The helper is unwired: no runtime integration, no verify.py wiring, no eval producer imports, no served VERIFIED behavior, and no CLAIMS/metric movement.
Adds a default-dark ask_serving_enabled helper with focused tests. The helper is unwired: no pass_manager integration, no runtime surface, no carve-out retirement, and no served question text.
Per review: 'proposal-only' described the Q1-D sink/artifact in two docstrings,
conflating two distinct lanes. A question is an intake request, not a capability
proposal; question_only is its own lane. The analogy to the proposal emitter is
structural (toothless, review-gated, never served), never semantic. Tighten the
sink/artifact docstrings and rename the sink test to *question_only* to match
_QUESTION_STATUS. No behavior change — docstrings + one test name only.
The fourth and final Q1 rung: route the Q1-C rendered question onto the
contemplation bus as the QUESTION_NEEDED tenant (sibling of PROPOSAL_EMITTED),
off-serving. Consumes render_question VERBATIM — Q1-D constructs no prose, so the
Q1-C grounded-rendering wrong=0 guard is never bypassed by a second surface.
- generate/contemplation/findings.py: add Terminal.QUESTION_NEEDED.
- core/epistemic_disclosure/limitation.py: ask_question's home terminal is now
QUESTION_NEEDED, making terminal_for_action total (all six actions map onto
shipped terminals — the consolidation proof is now complete, not 'five of six').
- core/epistemic_questions/delivery.py: DeliveredQuestion (proposal-only artifact,
cannot wrap an unrenderable question / cannot be served / answer_binding reserved
None — illegal states unrepresentable), DeliveryOutcome, deliver_ask, the
teaching/questions sink emitter, and AnswerBinding (reserved for Q2).
Rulings honored:
- D1: off-serving only — no served surface, no ask_serving_enabled, no chat wiring.
- D2: an unrenderable ASK falls back to the family's standing disposition
(PROPOSAL_EMITTED if it still proposes, else NO_PROGRESS) — never a contentless
QUESTION_NEEDED. Enforced twice: in deliver_ask and structurally in __post_init__.
- D3: Q1B_ASK_CARVE_OUT untouched — registry keeps proposal_allowed=True; both
signals coexist off-serving so no operational signal is lost.
- D4: sink under teaching/questions/ (sibling of teaching/proposals/).
- D5: strictly single-slot — multi-slot is unrenderable, takes the D2 fallback.
Tests: 16 delivery tests (happy path verbatim, both D2 fallback branches,
structural guards, idempotent sink, off-serving AST) + updated the two limitation
consolidation tests for the now-total terminal map. smoke 90/0, affected suites
128/0.
The template asserts 'one more value is still needed' (exactly one). Rendering
the first of several missing slots and ignoring the rest makes that claim
subtly false. Refuse multi-slot assessments with multi_slot_not_supported
(slot=None) rather than render-first-drop-rest; one-question-per-slot fan-out
is a later rung. Replaces the now-contradicting first-of-many test with a
test that pins the honest refusal.
Add core/epistemic_questions/ — the renderer rung of the ASK spine.
render_question(LimitationAssessment) -> EpistemicQuestion turns ASK typed
residue into a user-facing question or an explicit question_unrenderable verdict.
Render only: no bus delivery, no served disposition, no serving (that is Q1-D).
Policy (scoping §2 / session §1.5.7 wrong=0 invariant): a question may name a
problem entity only if it appears verbatim in grounded_terms. Two substrate facts
force a generic-structural policy today: grounded_terms is empty everywhere (the
readers do not yet emit verbatim evidence), and a *missing* slot's referent is by
definition absent from the trace. So the renderer:
- renders a generic question whose only variable content is a controlled English
phrase for the slot's expected_unit_or_type, from a closed audited map;
- never surfaces slot_name or binding_target (snake_case), never prettifies an
identifier into a natural-language entity, never names a problem entity;
- degrades unmapped types to question_unrenderable (renderability_gap) rather
than dumping raw snake_case;
- single-slot (first slot only); non-ASK / zero-slot -> unrenderable;
- post-render fabrication guard re-checks every token is closed-vocab scaffold or
grounded (defense in depth).
Off-serving: imports no generate.derivation / core.reliability_gate (AST-tested).
Tests: 9/9 green; smoke 90/0.
Adds bound_slots_digest as a distinct VerificationProof obligation before any serving wiring. Keeps the VERIFIED lane off-serving while separating derivation, stated-slot binding, and back-substitution.
Reclassify missing_total_count / missing_weighted_total in the limitation layer
from (capability_gap, emit_proposal) to (missing_information, ask_question) —
the user CAN state the total, so these are missing data, not capability gaps.
Add typed ASK residue (MissingSlot, grounded_terms) on LimitationAssessment;
defaults to empty so existing P0-1 callers continue to work.
Q1B_ASK_CARVE_OUT: the shipped failure_family REGISTRY still flags both as
proposal_allowed=True so existing consumers (proposal pile, contemplation
pass_manager) keep emitting proposal artifacts until Q1-C/Q1-D wires ASK
delivery. Flipping the registry flag before ASK is served would create a
no-proposal/no-question dead zone — a capability-regression window with no
compensating intake. The carve-out is named, enumerated, and explicit; once
ASK delivery is live the REGISTRY flag flips and the carve-out retires.
Wrong=0 invariant on residue (scoping §2): MissingSlot carries family-typed
structural identifiers only (snake_case); grounded_terms is verbatim text from
ComprehensionAttempt.evidence SourceSpanLinks — never fabricated from family
or refusal_reason. Today classify_* leaves evidence empty for refusals, so
grounded_terms is empty everywhere; the wiring is ready for the residue
upgrade to readers later.
Off-serving: limitation.py imports no generate.derivation / core.reliability_gate
(AST-guarded by test_limitation_module_is_off_serving). No renderer, no bus
delivery — those are Q1-C/Q1-D.
Tests:
tests/test_limitation_assessment.py — 39 passing
+ test_proposal_allowed_iff_emit_proposal_with_q1b_ask_carveout (amended INV-A)
+ test_missing_{total,weighted}_count_limitation_is_ask_oriented
+ test_q1b_ask_carveout_is_explicit_and_enumerated
+ test_registry_proposal_allowed_preserved_until_ask_delivery
+ test_no_signal_loss_before_question_bus_is_serving (live pass_manager check)
+ test_missing_{total,weighted}_count_has_typed_missing_slot_residue
+ test_grounded_terms_populated_only_from_evidence_spans
+ test_residue_never_contains_ungrounded_terms
+ test_residue_empty_for_non_ask_attempts
+ test_missing_slots_default_empty_for_non_ask_families
+ test_missing_slot_keys_are_subset_of_ask_families
+ test_limitation_module_is_off_serving (AST guard)
Suites:
tests/test_epistemic_*.py, test_disclosure_claim.py, test_served_disposition.py,
test_verified_contract.py, test_failure_family.py, test_failure_proposal.py,
test_r3_router_contemplation.py, test_proposal_review_*.py,
test_idle_proposal_review.py — 135 passing
core test --suite smoke -q — 90 passing
The first consumer of the P1-A VERIFIED contract. Given an R2 problem (prose) +
the INDEPENDENTLY hand-authored gold SETUP, it builds a VerificationProof and runs it
through the contract. NOT a serving-time VERIFIED producer: it depends on the eval-lane
gold setup (off-serving only), cannot move any serving metric, cannot emit served
[verified]. Serving-time independence (a non-gold second reader) is a separate, larger
rung, explicitly deferred.
evals/constraint_oracle/verified_producer.py (placed in evals/, not core/, to avoid a
backwards core->evals import: it needs the reader+solver (generate), the canonical
signature + gold (evals), and the contract (core) — clean direction evals->core+generate):
- verify_r2(text, gold_setup) -> R2VerificationOutcome.
- Two independent reads: primary = read_constraint_problem(text) (lineage
constraint_reader_v1); independent = the gold-authored setup (lineage
constraint_gold_author_v1). Convergence = equal constraint_setup_signature digests
(the SAME function for both reads). The gold ANSWER never enters — only the gold
STRUCTURE, through the signature.
- A wrong reader structure diverges from the gold-authored structure -> reads_disagree
-> NOT_VERIFIED (the poison). Reader refusal -> no proof + a limitation. Solver
boundary -> boundary_clear False -> NOT_VERIFIED. VERIFIED state/claim reached ONLY
via disclosure_for_verification.
On the real r2_gold lane (13 records): VERIFIED=7 (exactly the 7 'solved'),
NOT_VERIFIED=6 (3 solver_refuses + 3 reader_refuses) — wrong=0.
11 tests: integration over real gold (verifies >=1, never on divergence); all 7 solved
verify; the poison (divergent independent read -> reads_disagree); reader-refusal -> no
proof + limitation; solver-boundary -> not verified; distinct/named lineages; the
sanctioned route; all digests populated; gold answer structurally cannot enter; off-serving.
NOTE (bound_slots_digest): the P1-A VerificationProof (merged, unchanged per scope) has
no bound_slots_digest field; the "bound to stated quantities" obligation is carried by
derivation_digest (hashed over the canonical constraints + solution). Flag to extend.
Off-serving; smoke 90/0.
Defines what it MEANS for a result to earn DisclosureClaim.VERIFIED /
EpistemicState.VERIFIED — the soundness≠correctness gate the whole VERIFIED lane
rests on. Contract ONLY: no producer, no reader, no solver, no serving, no
verify.py, no verified_serving_enabled, no claim emission in any serving path.
core/epistemic_disclosure/verified_contract.py:
- VerificationObligation — the declarative contract (4 load-bearing flags);
VERIFICATION_OBLIGATION is fully strict.
- VerificationProof — the replayable proof SHAPE P1-B+ will fill (two reads kept
separate: distinct lineages for independence, matching digests for convergence).
- evaluate_verification(proof, *, limitation, obligation) -> VerificationResult —
refuse-preferring: VERIFIED only if EVERY obligation survives.
- disclosure_for_verification(result) — the ONLY sanctioned route to
(EpistemicState.VERIFIED, DisclosureClaim.VERIFIED); anything else -> UNDETERMINED/NONE.
The mechanism that makes the lane safe: VERIFIED requires TWO INDEPENDENT reads
(distinct lineages) that CONVERGE on one canonical structure. A faithful solve of a
WRONG read is caught because the independent read disagrees (back-substitution alone
cannot catch a read error); "same answer twice" is rejected as not independent.
Neither gold-agreement nor no-refusal nor a second solver over one read can verify.
15 tests, all non-vacuous. THE central test rejects a faithful solve of a wrong read;
one proves the wrong-read obligation is load-bearing (relax it -> poison slips the
check); the full chain composes proof -> contract -> (VERIFIED, VERIFIED) -> P0-3
DISCLOSE, and the poison degrades to COMMIT. Off-serving; smoke 90/0.
The third axis of the bus: choose_served_disposition composes
EpistemicState × LimitationAssessment × DisclosureClaim → ServedDisposition.
Pure mapping — no rendering, no bus behaviour, no verify.py, no govern_response
mutation. Nothing consumes it yet.
core/epistemic_disclosure/disposition.py:
- ServedDisposition(str, Enum): commit | disclose | ask | propose | report |
explain | refuse | step_aside.
- choose_served_disposition(*, epistemic_state, limitation, disclosure_claim=NONE):
a blocking limitation dominates (its resolution_action -> ask/propose/report/
explain/refuse/step_aside; scope_boundary -> EXPLAIN, NOT a hard REFUSE);
otherwise the disclosure claim + state pick the serve mode.
The Phase-1 VERIFIED guard (load-bearing): a DisclosureClaim.VERIFIED discloses
ONLY when EpistemicState.VERIFIED backs it; an unbacked verified claim degrades to
a plain COMMIT — never served as verified before the producer exists.
30 tests: the load-bearing rules via REAL P0-1 assessments; the VERIFIED guard
parametrized across all 14 non-VERIFIED states; limitation-dominates-claim;
answer-action fall-through; totality over both axes; off-serving. Smoke 90/0.
A served response carries two ORTHOGONAL governance properties: ReachLevel (how
far past grounded fact it reaches) and DisclosureClaim (the epistemic claim it
makes about its own truth status). "verified" is NOT a reach level — it is a
proof-state claim. Keeping the axes separate is the locked Stage-2 decision (no
ReachLevel.VERIFIED; a proven answer never inherits an [approximate] surface).
core/epistemic_disclosure/disclosure_claim.py:
- DisclosureClaim(str, Enum): none | verified | approximate | proposal_only.
Default = none. str-valued for stable serialization (EpistemicState convention).
- Discipline "no claim without a producer": every member has a real (APPROXIMATE
= cognition Step E; PROPOSAL_ONLY = teaching/proposals) or imminent (VERIFIED =
Phase 1 target) emitter. PROVEN and ESTIMATED are intentionally ABSENT — nothing
emits them; ESTIMATED is a future split of APPROXIMATE, added only when a real
estimator producer exists (docs-note only).
Also folds the P0-1 review nit: _KIND_TO_STATE / _ACTION_TO_TERMINAL tightened
from dict[str, ...] to their Literal key types.
9 tests, non-vacuous: default is NONE; verified is not a ReachLevel (structural);
claim axis disjoint from ResolutionAction; PROVEN and ESTIMATED absent; exactly the
approved four; str-enum serialization; module imports nothing (off-serving).
No bus behaviour, no ServedDisposition mapping (that is P0-3). Off-serving; smoke
green (90 passed) locally.
