Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Shay
36cb29a693 docs(assessment): Phase 2 — nine layer cards, verified against code not documents
Fills the taxonomy with evidence. Every liveness label re-verified at
8927c563 rather than inherited from the 2026-06-09 system map. Three
inherited claims did not survive, and every one of them came from a
document while every falsification came from reading code.

CORRECTIONS:

- Phase 0 Finding 0-C was WRONG. The L11 always-on process IS BUILT:
  chat/always_on.py::run_continuous, chat/always_on_daemon.py::run_daemon
  (single-instance lock, SIGINT/SIGTERM stop, load-time identity guard),
  CLI `core always-on`. Landed 2026-06-14 — five days AFTER the system-map
  snapshot that declared no forever entrypoint exists. The real finding is
  sharper: built, with a complete falsifiable soak harness, never run to a
  recorded artifact, and enforced by NO SUITE AT ALL.
- CR-1 attention/allocation is not a missing layer but a live undocumented
  one: generate/stream.py:255-263 runs SalienceOperator -> AttentionOperator
  and gates every generation step; use_salience defaults True. It owns the
  ~73%-of-turn hot path and has no ADR, no card, no layer in any ratified
  articulation. (generate/salience.py COMPOSES core.physics.salience — not
  a duplicate; that false lead is recorded, not propagated.)
- CR-2's components exist: DriveGradientMap and ExertionMeter are both
  constructed in chat/runtime.py. DriveGradientMap is NEVER READ — textbook
  decoration by the sabotage test. ExertionMeter runs but feeds telemetry
  only; fatigue gates no decision. The claim survives and sharpens: CORE has
  drive objects and no chooser.

STAGE-COVERAGE AUDIT: 7 of 9 covered; non-text ingest uncovered (59
sensorium modules reach no serving path); the cycle's runner claimed-only.

CROSS-CUTTING: F-1 built-and-off is the dominant pattern (17 flags default
False, only deduction_serving ratified ON) with no register of the set or
what would flip it. F-2 enforcement lags capability — orphaned pins are
undetectable because suite tuples are hand-curated. F-3 formation's
six-boundary trust standard is not applied at M2, the surface facing
untrusted user text. F-4 ADR/code contradictions are load-bearing (the
daemon has no ADR while ADR-0146 rejected the daemon shape; ADR-0252's
"34 surface organs" does not reproduce — 18 found). F-5 what is excellent,
stated plainly: the typed learning boundary, selection-not-rewrite, the
non-hardening invariant, fail-closed lane shapes.

No layer is wrong-solution. Two candidates deferred to Phase 4 with
evidence: Wilson/replay independence in licensing, DriveGradientMap.
2026-07-27 15:45:52 -07:00
Shay
8f2e238dc7 docs(assessment): Phase 1 — layer taxonomy and card schema (the keystone)
Fixes the decomposition Phases 2-3 fill and Phase 4 audits against, per
Pillar I: criteria before judgment. Five decisions recorded explicitly:

- D1 The five unreconciled articulations answer five DIFFERENT questions
  (what for / what happens today / by what mechanism / judged how / built
  where) and become axes of one taxonomy rather than competitors. Functional
  axis = the AGENTS.md north star; structural axis = 7 macro layers (M0
  Substrate, M1 Knowledge & Memory, M2 Afferent, M3 Comprehension &
  Reasoning, M4 Expression & Serving, M5 Learning & Growth, M6 Continuity &
  Process) + 2 cross-cuts (MG Governance, MV Verification), grouping all 33
  system-map zones with straddles recorded honestly. Mind-physics blueprint
  dispositioned element-by-element (identity/compositional/renderer =
  superseded by stronger implementations; Allocation Physics and
  DriveGradientMap = orphans -> Candidate Register).
- D2 System-map schema EXTENDED, not replaced: 7-value liveness kept;
  four missing dimensions added as orthogonal fields — evidence (with
  would-fail-if-absent sabotage bit), capacity (designed/measured/ceilings),
  design-vs-build split, fitness (6-value: fit/strained/misplaced/
  wrong-solution/superseded-in-place/undetermined). Liveness ⊥ fitness:
  the 34 organs are live-serving + superseded-in-place, a state no merged
  enum could express.
- D3 Completeness criteria fixed: coverage = evidence-bearing ownership of
  a functional stage; deferred-with-ruling ≠ missing; pins must run.
- D4 Candidate Register: CR-1 attention/allocation (the ~73%-of-turn-time
  hot path has no owner), CR-2 agenda/drive (mechanisms without a chooser;
  L10 risks landing as a heartbeat with nothing to want), CR-3 efferent
  action (needs an explicit deferred-vs-out-of-telos ruling), CR-4 temporal
  self-location (determinism vs lived time, undesigned). Considered-and-not-
  registered recorded (sociality, affect, embodiment, self-governance-as-
  layer) so the boundary is visibly examined.
- D5 Assessment output is COMMITTED (reviewable, versioned, visible);
  system map stays local as a regeneratable navigation index. Staleness
  handled by verified_at SHA stamps on every card.

Phase 2 work order: nine layer cards, priority M6 > M3 > M4 > M5; re-verify
every map liveness label; run the stage-coverage audit with evidence; the
four zero-subsystem zones scoped honestly and queued first for Phase 3.
2026-07-27 15:28:42 -07:00
Shay
9267506a42 docs(assessment): Phase 0 — ground truth, corpus triage, and the Phase 1 handoff
Opens the holistic macro→micro assessment of CORE's cognitive-cycle design
and implementation fulfillment. Read-only; no runtime behavior changes.

Method is governed by docs/conceptualizing_engineering_mastery.md (committed
here because the assessment cites it as its method): Semantic Rigor,
Mechanical Sympathy, Third Door; delete before optimizing; automate last.

Phase 0 findings:

- 0-A CORE carries FIVE unreconciled macro articulations of its own cognitive
  cycle (AGENTS.md north star; AGENTS.md live path; the 2026-05-12 draft
  three-physics-layer blueprint; ratified ADR-0252's five paradigm stages; the
  system map's 10-band L0-L11 layering). The blueprint's allocation/attention
  layer (Salience/Attention/Inhibition) exists in no other articulation.
- 0-B .system-map/ is the best existing macro→micro artifact and is 48 days
  stale, gitignored/local-only, and carries four zero-subsystem zones — three
  of which sit on the serving path.
- 0-C ADR-0252 §5 — the experiment gating the governing paradigm's build — has
  never returned a verdict (two unmerged rnd/ worktrees). The 34 surface organs
  the ADR diagnoses as the error keep serving. L10 blocks all 7 OPEN W-* items;
  field + T1 vault are discarded on exit, so "one continuous life" is today
  many short lives sharing a checkpoint.
- 0-D No live gap register: docs/gaps.md is 26/26 closed, the liveness ratchet
  is L10-blocked and stale, docs/analysis/ is a chronological archive.
- 0-E 333 ADRs, flat numbering, status not reliably machine-extractable;
  INDEX-by-domain is 21 files behind; the Blueprint reserved 0254-0261 for
  intents never materialised while those numbers were minted for other work.
- 0-F Measured: CGA is ~73% of turn time via cga_inner/geometric_product
  (~34k calls/turn), NOT versor_condition (0.22%). Rust backend off by default,
  parity question open and blocked. MLX in no runtime path.
- 0-G The 2026-07-25 verification precedent falsified ~1/3 of an external
  blueprint's items by reading code — the bar for every downstream phase.

Phase 1 receives the system map's 17-field proto schema and 7-value liveness
vocabulary, plus the four dimensions it lacks (evidence pointer, capacity,
design-vs-built, fitness judgment) and five decisions to make explicitly.

PR #138's fabrication findings are recorded as measured-and-pinned, held for
ADR + ratification — never re-discovered, never fixed here.
2026-07-27 15:19:54 -07:00