fix(docs): correct #690 verified trace hash and normative_clearance in evidence section
This commit is contained in:
parent
1a62eca33e
commit
a966806fcb
1 changed files with 7 additions and 6 deletions
|
|
@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ Typed state vocabulary: `verified`, `evidenced`, `inferred`, `undetermined`,
|
|||
the request payload is rejected at the typed schema boundary before evaluation.
|
||||
|
||||
Representative trace hashes:
|
||||
- Verified: `4307277a0f8d8276…` (2 independent evidence items, `normative_clearance: cleared`)
|
||||
- Verified: `1341c27c5906ae52…` (2 independent evidence items, `normative_clearance: unassessable`)
|
||||
- Evidenced: `f9f2e153e66aaba9…` (1 item, below threshold — proposer proposed `verified`)
|
||||
- Inferred: `bc11e858ece14081…` (premise-only evidence — proposer proposed `verified`)
|
||||
- Undetermined: `35b319eb0186be2d…` (off-topic evidence)
|
||||
|
|
@ -447,11 +447,12 @@ Representative trace hashes:
|
|||
|
||||
Run: `python demos/epistemic_truth_state/run_demo.py`
|
||||
|
||||
**Honesty note:** `normative_clearance` is `"unassessable"` on five of six
|
||||
scenarios. The demos do not perform a normative, safety, or ethics clearance pass.
|
||||
This is recorded explicitly in the output. The `deterministic replay` and `identity
|
||||
protection` claims in §4 are substrate properties; the epistemic state demos extend
|
||||
them to claim/action/state authority surfaces not covered in the original paper.
|
||||
**Honesty note:** `normative_clearance` is `"unassessable"` on every non-invalid
|
||||
scenario; the invalid scenario has `null` (no evaluation reached). The demos do not
|
||||
perform a normative, safety, or ethics clearance pass for any scenario. The
|
||||
`deterministic replay` and `identity protection` claims in §4 are substrate
|
||||
properties; the epistemic state demos extend them to claim/action/state authority
|
||||
surfaces not covered in the original paper.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue