fix(docs): correct #690 verified trace hash and normative_clearance in evidence section

This commit is contained in:
Shay 2026-06-11 14:38:24 -07:00
parent 1a62eca33e
commit a966806fcb

View file

@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ Typed state vocabulary: `verified`, `evidenced`, `inferred`, `undetermined`,
the request payload is rejected at the typed schema boundary before evaluation.
Representative trace hashes:
- Verified: `4307277a0f8d8276…` (2 independent evidence items, `normative_clearance: cleared`)
- Verified: `1341c27c5906ae52…` (2 independent evidence items, `normative_clearance: unassessable`)
- Evidenced: `f9f2e153e66aaba9…` (1 item, below threshold — proposer proposed `verified`)
- Inferred: `bc11e858ece14081…` (premise-only evidence — proposer proposed `verified`)
- Undetermined: `35b319eb0186be2d…` (off-topic evidence)
@ -447,11 +447,12 @@ Representative trace hashes:
Run: `python demos/epistemic_truth_state/run_demo.py`
**Honesty note:** `normative_clearance` is `"unassessable"` on five of six
scenarios. The demos do not perform a normative, safety, or ethics clearance pass.
This is recorded explicitly in the output. The `deterministic replay` and `identity
protection` claims in §4 are substrate properties; the epistemic state demos extend
them to claim/action/state authority surfaces not covered in the original paper.
**Honesty note:** `normative_clearance` is `"unassessable"` on every non-invalid
scenario; the invalid scenario has `null` (no evaluation reached). The demos do not
perform a normative, safety, or ethics clearance pass for any scenario. The
`deterministic replay` and `identity protection` claims in §4 are substrate
properties; the epistemic state demos extend them to claim/action/state authority
surfaces not covered in the original paper.
---