From a966806fcb1957e0b710b887e2da902fb607365f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shay Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 14:38:24 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] fix(docs): correct #690 verified trace hash and normative_clearance in evidence section --- docs/position_paper.md | 13 +++++++------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/position_paper.md b/docs/position_paper.md index 5537a4f7..e41e0187 100644 --- a/docs/position_paper.md +++ b/docs/position_paper.md @@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ Typed state vocabulary: `verified`, `evidenced`, `inferred`, `undetermined`, the request payload is rejected at the typed schema boundary before evaluation. Representative trace hashes: -- Verified: `4307277a0f8d8276…` (2 independent evidence items, `normative_clearance: cleared`) +- Verified: `1341c27c5906ae52…` (2 independent evidence items, `normative_clearance: unassessable`) - Evidenced: `f9f2e153e66aaba9…` (1 item, below threshold — proposer proposed `verified`) - Inferred: `bc11e858ece14081…` (premise-only evidence — proposer proposed `verified`) - Undetermined: `35b319eb0186be2d…` (off-topic evidence) @@ -447,11 +447,12 @@ Representative trace hashes: Run: `python demos/epistemic_truth_state/run_demo.py` -**Honesty note:** `normative_clearance` is `"unassessable"` on five of six -scenarios. The demos do not perform a normative, safety, or ethics clearance pass. -This is recorded explicitly in the output. The `deterministic replay` and `identity -protection` claims in §4 are substrate properties; the epistemic state demos extend -them to claim/action/state authority surfaces not covered in the original paper. +**Honesty note:** `normative_clearance` is `"unassessable"` on every non-invalid +scenario; the invalid scenario has `null` (no evaluation reached). The demos do not +perform a normative, safety, or ethics clearance pass for any scenario. The +`deterministic replay` and `identity protection` claims in §4 are substrate +properties; the epistemic state demos extend them to claim/action/state authority +surfaces not covered in the original paper. ---