core/docs/curriculum
Shay a0edbb4bdb curriculum(cognition-saturation-v2): seven reviewed chains; pack coverage 14→21
Second curriculum unit through the production operator surfaces.
Pure saturation — no cognition-lane lift expected (the eval splits
test fixed 32 cases that don't overlap with this unit's subjects),
but the live-prompt grounding surface expands materially: seven
prompts that previously fell through to disclosure now route to
deterministic teaching-grounded surfaces.

Three coherent clusters:

  A. Cognition-source
     cause_thought_reveals_meaning
     cause_question_reveals_understanding
     cause_recall_reveals_memory

  B. Conceptual structure (bidirectional)
     cause_definition_grounds_concept
     verification_concept_requires_definition

  C. Semantic content
     cause_meaning_grounds_understanding
     cause_analogy_reveals_relation

All pack-consistent (subject + object in en_core_cognition_v1),
canonical predicates (reveals / grounds / requires), each opens a
previously-empty (subject, intent) cell.

Replay-equivalence gate reported replay_equivalent=True for all
seven proposals (public cognition lane byte-identical pre/post
every accept).

Cognition lane:
  public  : intent 100% / surface 100% / term 91.7% / versor 100%   (unchanged)
  holdout : intent 100% / surface 100% / term 83.3% / versor 100%   (unchanged)

Saturation lift is visible at the live-prompt level, not at the
eval level:

  Why does thought exist?              → [teaching] thought reveals meaning (...)
  Why does a question exist?           → [teaching] question reveals understanding (...)
  Why does definition exist?           → [teaching] definition grounds concept (...)
  Why does meaning exist?              → [teaching] meaning grounds understanding (...)
  Why does an analogy exist?           → [teaching] analogy reveals relation (...)
  Does a concept require definition?   → [teaching] concept requires definition (...)
  Why does recall exist?               → [teaching] recall reveals memory (...)

Why saturation matters: the cognition pack has 78 lemmas; we've
now covered ~21 (subject, intent) cells of the hundreds available.
Without saturation, prompts outside the 32 fixed eval cases are
coin-flips between vault recall and disclosure.  Saturation moves
marginal prompts to deterministic teaching-grounded surfaces — the
foundation the composed-surface ADR (next) will compose over.

- teaching/cognition_chains/cognition_chains_v1.jsonl — 15 → 22 lines
  (7 appends).  Active set: 14 → 21 chains.
- teaching/proposals/proposals.jsonl — 7 new (created → replay →
  transition → accepted_corpus_append) event sequences appended.
- docs/curriculum/cognition_saturation_v2.md — full curriculum log:
  cluster rationale, live-prompt lift, operator-wall-time profile,
  saturation-state-of-the-pack.

Lanes (regression check):
  core test --suite smoke           67 passed
  core test --suite cognition      121 passed
  core test --suite teaching        17 passed

The non-negotiable field invariant (versor_condition < 1e-6) is
unaffected: this is corpus growth only; no code path changed.
2026-05-18 14:29:30 -07:00
..
cognition_saturation_v2.md curriculum(cognition-saturation-v2): seven reviewed chains; pack coverage 14→21 2026-05-18 14:29:30 -07:00
epistemology_v1.md curriculum(epistemology-v1): five reviewed chains; holdout term_capture +4.2pp 2026-05-18 14:02:37 -07:00