core/evals/learning_loop/run_demo.py
Shay 8f1903e8e7
chore(evals): contracts + bench json + Lane B viewer + chart + audit + demo schema (#62)
* chore(evals, cli): contract standardization + bench --json stdout cleanliness

End-of-session shippability pass.  Three concrete fixes:

1. core/cli.py — bench --json no longer pollutes stdout
   Several bench paths call scripts.run_pulse.run_pulse which prints
   verbose [pulse] traces unconditionally to stdout, breaking jq /
   programmatic consumers of --json output.

   New _bench_stdout_guard() redirects stdout → stderr for the
   duration of the bench run when --json is set.  Operator still sees
   the pulse trace (on stderr), but --json consumers get a clean JSON
   document on stdout.  Applied to all four bench paths: cost,
   articulation, default suite, and --suite all.

   Verified: core bench --suite determinism --json now produces
   parseable JSON; human path still shows 1140 [pulse] lines.

2. evals/{frontier_compare,realizer_guard}/contract.md (new)
   core/contemplation/contract.md (new)

   Each new contract follows the established pattern (37 contracts
   already exist under evals/<lane>/contract.md):

     - What it measures
     - Why it matters (structural win)
     - How to run
     - How to read the output
     - Pass criteria table
     - When it has failed and why
     - Runner / module layout

   Coverage:
     - frontier_compare: both Lane A (CORE-only suites) and Lane B
       (cross-provider prompt_battery) with explicit guardrails
       against mixing — operator asks for the wrong lane combination,
       runner exits 2 with helpful error.
     - realizer_guard: C1/C2 articulation safety boundary — synthetic
       illegal candidates rejected directly by check_surface AND
       former-bug runtime prompts now produce legal articulations.
     - contemplation (ADR-0080): not under evals/ since it's runtime
       infrastructure that consumes eval reports — contract lives at
       core/contemplation/contract.md.  Documents the read-only +
       SPECULATIVE-only + deterministic-replay invariants and the
       shared DiscoveryCandidateSink plumbing convergence (ADR-0080).

3. evals/CLAIMS.md — Tier 2 rows added

   - frontier_compare Lane A: determinism.primary_score, max_versor_condition
   - frontier_compare Lane B: prompt_battery.primary_score (CORE adapter),
     cross-provider artifact persistence
   - realizer_guard: all_claims_supported
   - contemplation: SPECULATIVE-only invariant, deterministic replay,
     additive sink path, no pack mutation (all CI-pinned by tests)

Verification
------------
$ core test --suite smoke -q
67 passed in 27.22s    (no regression)

$ uv run pytest -q tests/test_contemplation_loop.py \
    tests/test_contemplation_pipeline_convergence.py \
    tests/test_frontier_compare_cross_provider.py
27 passed in 4.87s

$ core bench --suite determinism --json 2>/dev/null | jq .results[0].passed
true        (was: JSONDecodeError on prior [pulse] pollution)

* feat(evals/ui): report viewer renders Lane B cross-provider + pass-rate chart

Stop-hook caught that #62 only covered contracts — the 929-line
report_viewer.html was never audited against the new cross-provider
report shape from #61.  Two real gaps:

1. Lane-aware observation drawer
   The drawer hardcoded Lane A (CORE-native) fields: surface,
   grounding_source, anchor_lens_mode_label, versor_condition.
   Lane B (cross-provider) observations carry different fields:
   provider, model, elapsed_ms, error_type, error_message.

   Loading a cross-provider report rendered only the surface row
   with empty `grounding` — the provider + model + timing data
   was unreachable without expanding "Show raw JSON".

   Fix: detect Lane B (presence of `obs.provider`) and render the
   appropriate field set.  Lane A still renders identically (now
   also surfaces trace_hash + register_id when present, which were
   silently buried in the raw JSON before).

2. Pass-rate chart per suite
   The summary strip showed one aggregate Primary % across all
   suites, with no way to see WHICH suite is dragging the score.
   Multi-suite runs (e.g. --suite all) had to expand each panel
   individually to find the failing one.

   Fix: new .passrate-chart element below the summary strip,
   one horizontal bar per suite showing passed/total.  All-pass =
   solid green, all-fail = solid red, partial = green/red split
   at the pass fraction.  CSS only — no new dependencies.

3. SUITE_PREAMBLES gains the prompt_battery entry so the sidebar
   shows the "side-by-side surface evidence across providers"
   description when loading a Lane B report.

Verified
--------
- Brace/paren/div balance unchanged (308/308 / 380/380 / 54/54)
- One <script> tag pair preserved
- Generated a real Lane B report via
  `python -m evals.frontier_compare --provider core --suite prompt_battery`
  for visual confirmation

Out of scope (noted for future PR)
----------------------------------
Sampled 3 `core demo` targets:
- register-tour: clean schema (all_claims_supported, claims, grid)
- audit-tour: both scene_1_* keys AND an empty scenes:[] array — inconsistent
- anti-regression: no all_claims_supported key, uses all_gates_held instead

Demo schema standardization deserves its own PR — operator tooling
would benefit from a uniform top-level success field across demos.

* docs(evals) + chore(demos): systematic audit + uniform success field

Stop-hook caught two real gaps after the contract+UI PR:
- demos had divergent success-field names (all_gates_held vs
  learning_loop_closed vs claim_supported vs nested claims_supported)
- no systematic look at the 48 eval directories had been done

Both addressed concretely; remaining work captured in audit doc
rather than vaguely deferred.

1. Demo schema standardization — uniform all_claims_supported field
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All 9 ``core demo`` targets now emit a top-level
``all_claims_supported: bool`` field.  Existing per-demo fields
(``all_gates_held``, ``learning_loop_closed``, ``claim_supported``,
nested ``claims_supported``) are preserved for backwards compat —
the new field is an alias derived from the demo's existing success
signal, not a replacement.

Operator tooling and the CI gate can now target
``all_claims_supported`` without knowing each demo's idiomatic
field name.

Files touched:
- evals/anti_regression/run_demo.py — adds AND of all_gates_held +
  active_corpus_byte_identical
- evals/learning_loop/run_demo.py — adds AND of learning_loop_closed +
  active_corpus_byte_identical
- scripts/publish_pack_measurements.py — adds AND of the three
  entries in the nested claims_supported dict
- evals/long_context_cost/comparison_runner.py — adds alias for
  claim_supported (singular)

The 5 demos already using ``all_claims_supported`` (audit-tour,
register-tour, anchor-lens-tour, orthogonality-tour, articulation)
are unchanged.

Verified across all 9 demos:
  audit-tour              : True
  register-tour           : True
  anchor-lens-tour        : True
  orthogonality-tour      : True
  pack-measurements       : True   ← new alias
  anti-regression         : True   ← new alias
  learning-loop           : True   ← new alias
  articulation            : True
  long-context-comparison : True   ← new alias

2. docs/EVAL_AUDIT_2026-05-20.md — systematic 48-lane audit
------------------------------------------------------------
Replaces the "future PR" deferral with a concrete document.

Contains:
- Method (what was inspected for each lane).
- Summary (40/48 have contract.md; 18/48 have saved results;
  empty results/ ≠ broken — most lanes regenerate on demand).
- Cross-provider relevance triage:
    * 9 lanes are cross-provider-relevant and could benefit
      from the prompt_battery-style adapter pattern (cognition,
      english_fluency_ood, hebrew_fluency, koine_greek_fluency,
      grammatical_coverage, inference_closure, multi_step_reasoning,
      discourse_paragraph, foundational_*_ood, etc.).
    * 29 lanes are CORE-only by design (versor closure, anchor
      lens, identity divergence, provenance, etc.) — wiring
      providers would be category-erroneous.
- Demo schema standardization status (this PR closes that).
- UI/UX coverage matrix.
- 5 concrete follow-up items, each focused enough for a single
  PR, none requiring architectural change.

Regenerated reports
-------------------
evals/long_context_cost/results/comparison_v1.json and
evals/results/phase2_pack_measurements.json now contain the new
all_claims_supported field (auto-regenerated when validating the
schema change).

evals/frontier_compare/results/sample_core_promptbattery.json
added as a reference Lane B report so the new viewer always has
something to load on first open.
2026-05-20 13:53:13 -07:00

487 lines
19 KiB
Python

"""Learning-loop demo — CORE learning a new chain from a cold turn.
The thesis (the demo's headline claim):
> CORE, asked a question it cannot ground, emits structured evidence
> that a reviewed chain would have helped. An operator authors a
> proposal from that evidence. The replay-equivalence gate confirms
> the chain would not regress the cognition lane. The operator
> accepts. The **same prompt now produces a deterministic
> teaching-grounded surface** — and CORE will produce that same
> surface for that prompt every time, replayably, with full
> provenance back to the operator's accept.
No LLM provider has this loop. Continuous pre-training is the
nearest analog and is fundamentally different: opaque gradient
updates over uncurated data without per-fact provenance, without
operator review, without a replay-equivalence gate, without an
audit trail that lets you ask "why did the model say this today
that it would not have said yesterday?"
Five scenes, each on a real ``ChatRuntime`` against the live active
corpus. The active corpus file bytes are byte-identical pre/post —
the demo writes only to a transient corpus, then swaps ``_CORPUS_PATH``
to that transient for the "after" turn. The same swap pattern the
replay-equivalence gate uses (``teaching.replay._swap_corpus_path``).
S1. Cold turn. The runtime cannot ground the prompt.
S2. Discovery emission. A ``DiscoveryCandidate`` is emitted to the
attached sink — structured evidence, not a mutation.
S3. Operator-authored proposal. A complete proposal is built from
the candidate's structure plus operator-provided connective /
object / corpus-evidence pointer. The replay-equivalence gate
runs (real ``teaching.replay.run_replay_equivalence``) and
confirms no regression.
S4. Operator accept against a *transient* corpus. The active corpus
on disk is untouched; the accepted chain is written to a tmp
file. Audit + runtime both honour the transient corpus.
S5. Same prompt, now teaching-grounded. The deterministic
teaching-grounded surface contains the new chain's subject /
connective / object. Identical for any replay of the same
prompt against the same corpus state.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import shutil
import tempfile
from dataclasses import dataclass
from pathlib import Path
from typing import Any
from chat import teaching_grounding as _tg
from chat.runtime import ChatRuntime
from teaching.discovery import DiscoveryCandidate, EvidencePointer
from teaching.proposals import (
ProposalLog,
accept_proposal,
propose_from_candidate,
)
# The single prompt that drives every scene. CAUSE intent, subject
# ``narrative`` — pack-resident lemma but no ``(narrative, cause)``
# chain in the active corpus today, guaranteeing the cold-turn path.
#
# History: the original demo used ``thought`` as the cold subject; the
# cognition saturation v2 curriculum unit (commit ``a0edbb4``) added
# ``cause_thought_reveals_meaning`` to the active corpus, so the
# (thought, cause) cell is no longer cold. ``narrative`` is the new
# cold exemplar — same thematic shape, same connective + object.
_DEMO_PROMPT: str = "Why does narrative exist?"
_DEMO_SUBJECT: str = "narrative"
# Operator-authored proposal payload. The (narrative, cause) cell is
# unoccupied; the operator proposes the chain
# narrative reveals meaning
# affirming evidence is the existing corpus chain
# cause_creation_reveals_meaning (creation reveals meaning)
# both endpoints are pack-resident.
_OPERATOR_CONNECTIVE: str = "reveals"
_OPERATOR_OBJECT: str = "meaning"
_OPERATOR_EVIDENCE_REF: str = "cause_creation_reveals_meaning"
_VERBOSE = True
def _say(*args: Any, **kwargs: Any) -> None:
if _VERBOSE:
print(*args, **kwargs)
def _print_header(title: str, claim: str) -> None:
_say()
_say("" * 72)
_say(f" {title}")
_say("" * 72)
_say(f" CLAIM: {claim}")
_say()
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Sinks + helpers
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
class _BufferSink:
"""Discovery candidate sink that retains every emitted line."""
def __init__(self) -> None:
self.lines: list[str] = []
def emit(self, line: str) -> None:
self.lines.append(line)
def _active_bytes() -> bytes:
return _tg._CORPUS_PATH.read_bytes() if _tg._CORPUS_PATH.exists() else b""
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Scene outputs
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class SceneResult:
scene: str
claim: str
detail: dict[str, Any]
def as_dict(self) -> dict[str, Any]:
return {"scene": self.scene, "claim": self.claim, "detail": self.detail}
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class DemoReport:
prompt: str
before_surface: str
before_grounding_source: str
after_surface: str
after_grounding_source: str
scenes: tuple[SceneResult, ...]
learning_loop_closed: bool
active_corpus_byte_identical: bool
def as_dict(self) -> dict[str, Any]:
# ``all_claims_supported`` is the canonical cross-demo success
# field — see anti_regression/run_demo.py for the convention.
return {
"prompt": self.prompt,
"before": {
"surface": self.before_surface,
"grounding_source": self.before_grounding_source,
},
"after": {
"surface": self.after_surface,
"grounding_source": self.after_grounding_source,
},
"scenes": [s.as_dict() for s in self.scenes],
"learning_loop_closed": self.learning_loop_closed,
"active_corpus_byte_identical": self.active_corpus_byte_identical,
"all_claims_supported": (
self.learning_loop_closed
and self.active_corpus_byte_identical
),
}
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Scenes
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def _scene1_cold_turn(rt: ChatRuntime, sink: _BufferSink) -> tuple[SceneResult, Any]:
_print_header(
"S1. Cold turn — runtime cannot ground the prompt",
"Active corpus has no (thought, cause) chain. The runtime "
"falls through to the universal insufficient-grounding "
"disclosure. Identity / safety / ethics gates still run.",
)
response = rt.chat(_DEMO_PROMPT)
_say(f" prompt : {_DEMO_PROMPT}")
_say(f" surface : {response.surface}")
_say(f" grounding_source : {response.grounding_source}")
_say(f" discovery candidates : {len(sink.lines)} (emitted post-turn)")
return SceneResult(
scene="S1_cold_turn",
claim="No teaching chain for (thought, cause) — runtime returns the disclosure.",
detail={
"prompt": _DEMO_PROMPT,
"surface": response.surface,
"grounding_source": response.grounding_source,
"discovery_candidates_emitted": len(sink.lines),
},
), response
def _scene2_discovery_emission(sink: _BufferSink) -> tuple[SceneResult, dict[str, Any]]:
_print_header(
"S2. Discovery candidate — structured evidence, not a mutation",
"The runtime emits a DiscoveryCandidate (ADR-0055 Phase B) "
"documenting that a reviewed (thought, cause) chain WOULD have "
"grounded this turn. Contemplation (ADR-0056 Phase C1) "
"enriches with pack/corpus evidence pointers. Active corpus "
"is byte-identical — emission writes to the sink only.",
)
if not sink.lines:
raise RuntimeError("expected at least one discovery candidate from S1")
import json as _json
payload = _json.loads(sink.lines[0])
_say(f" candidate_id : {payload['candidate_id'][:16]}")
_say(f" trigger : {payload['trigger']}")
_say(f" proposed_chain : {payload['proposed_chain']}")
_say(f" polarity : {payload['polarity']}")
_say(f" claim_domain : {payload['claim_domain']}")
_say(f" pack_consistent : {payload['pack_consistent']}")
_say(f" boundary_clean : {payload['boundary_clean']}")
_say(f" evidence (pack-only) : "
f"{[e for e in payload['evidence']]}")
return SceneResult(
scene="S2_discovery_emission",
claim=(
"DiscoveryCandidate is structured evidence: it never mutates "
"the active corpus. Phase C is the only path to mutation."
),
detail={
"candidate_id": payload["candidate_id"],
"proposed_chain": payload["proposed_chain"],
"polarity": payload["polarity"],
"evidence": payload["evidence"],
},
), payload
def _scene3_propose(log_path: Path, candidate_id: str) -> tuple[SceneResult, Any]:
_print_header(
"S3. Operator-authored proposal — replay-equivalence gate runs",
"From the discovery candidate's evidence, the operator authors "
"a complete chain: narrative reveals meaning. Affirming evidence "
"is the existing corpus chain cause_creation_reveals_meaning. "
"The real replay gate (teaching.replay.run_replay_equivalence) "
"runs the cognition public split twice — active corpus vs. "
"transient-with-appended-chain — and reports no regression.",
)
# Construct the operator-augmented candidate. This is the operator
# contribution: connective, object, and an affirming-source evidence
# pointer to a corpus chain that already encodes the relevant
# semantic shape.
augmented = DiscoveryCandidate(
candidate_id=candidate_id,
proposed_chain={
"subject": _DEMO_SUBJECT, "intent": "cause",
"connective": _OPERATOR_CONNECTIVE,
"object": _OPERATOR_OBJECT,
},
trigger="would_have_grounded",
source_turn_trace="",
pack_consistent=True,
boundary_clean=True,
polarity="affirms",
claim_domain="factual",
evidence=(
EvidencePointer(
source="corpus",
ref=_OPERATOR_EVIDENCE_REF,
polarity="affirms",
epistemic_status="coherent",
),
),
)
log = ProposalLog(log_path)
proposal = propose_from_candidate(augmented, log=log)
rec = log.find(proposal.proposal_id) or {}
ev = rec.get("replay_evidence") or {}
_say(f" proposal_id : {proposal.proposal_id}")
_say(f" proposed_chain : {proposal.proposed_chain}")
_say(f" evidence (corpus ref) : {_OPERATOR_EVIDENCE_REF}")
_say(f" replay baseline : {ev.get('baseline')}")
_say(f" replay candidate : {ev.get('candidate')}")
_say(f" regressed_metrics : {ev.get('regressed_metrics')}")
_say(f" replay_equivalent : {ev.get('replay_equivalent')}")
_say(f" state : {rec.get('state')}")
if rec.get("state") != "pending":
raise RuntimeError(
f"expected pending state but got {rec.get('state')!r}; "
f"regressed metrics: {ev.get('regressed_metrics')}"
)
return SceneResult(
scene="S3_propose_replay_pass",
claim=(
"Real replay gate confirms no metric regression — the "
"proposal moves to pending. Operator --accept still required."
),
detail={
"proposal_id": proposal.proposal_id,
"proposed_chain": proposal.proposed_chain,
"replay_evidence": ev,
"state": rec.get("state"),
},
), proposal
def _scene4_accept_against_transient(
log_path: Path,
proposal_id: str,
) -> tuple[SceneResult, Path]:
_print_header(
"S4. Operator accept — transient corpus, active corpus untouched",
"accept_proposal writes one JSONL line to a TRANSIENT corpus "
"(copy of active + new chain). The active corpus file bytes "
"are byte-identical pre/post. Provenance on the new entry: "
"adr-0057:discovery_promoted:<review_date>.",
)
log = ProposalLog(log_path)
tmp_dir = Path(tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="learning_loop_demo_"))
transient = tmp_dir / "cognition_chains_v1.jsonl"
if _tg._CORPUS_PATH.exists():
shutil.copyfile(_tg._CORPUS_PATH, transient)
else:
transient.write_text("", encoding="utf-8")
active_before = _active_bytes()
transient_lines_before = len(transient.read_text(encoding="utf-8").splitlines())
chain_id = accept_proposal(
proposal_id,
log=log,
corpus_path=transient,
review_date="2026-05-18",
operator_note="learning-loop demo (transient corpus only)",
)
active_after = _active_bytes()
transient_lines_after = len(transient.read_text(encoding="utf-8").splitlines())
_say(f" appended chain_id : {chain_id}")
_say(f" transient corpus path : {transient}")
_say(f" transient lines before : {transient_lines_before}")
_say(f" transient lines after : {transient_lines_after}")
_say(f" active corpus byte-eq : {active_before == active_after}")
if active_before != active_after:
raise RuntimeError(
"demo invariant broken: accept_proposal mutated the active corpus"
)
return SceneResult(
scene="S4_accept_against_transient",
claim=(
"accept_proposal is the sole corpus-write surface. Pointing "
"it at a transient path leaves the active corpus byte-identical."
),
detail={
"chain_id": chain_id,
"transient_corpus": str(transient),
"transient_lines_before": transient_lines_before,
"transient_lines_after": transient_lines_after,
"active_corpus_byte_identical": active_before == active_after,
},
), transient
def _scene5_replay_now_grounded(transient: Path) -> SceneResult:
_print_header(
"S5. Same prompt — now deterministically teaching-grounded",
"With the runtime's corpus path swapped to the transient corpus, "
"the same prompt now returns a teaching-grounded surface "
"containing the operator-accepted chain: "
"narrative reveals meaning. Identical bytes for any replay of "
"the same prompt against this corpus state.",
)
# ADR-0064 — the cognition corpus is one of several registered
# teaching corpora; surface composers now consult
# ``_all_chains_index`` instead of ``_corpus_index`` alone. We
# rewrite the registry entry's path for the duration of the swap
# and clear every teaching cache so the aggregator re-reads the
# transient corpus.
real_path = _tg._CORPUS_PATH
original_specs = _tg.TEACHING_CORPORA
swapped_specs = tuple(
_tg.TeachingCorpusSpec(
corpus_id=s.corpus_id,
path=transient if s.corpus_id == _tg.TEACHING_CORPUS_ID else s.path,
pack_id=s.pack_id,
)
for s in original_specs
)
try:
_tg._CORPUS_PATH = transient # type: ignore[assignment]
_tg.TEACHING_CORPORA = swapped_specs # type: ignore[misc]
_tg.clear_teaching_caches()
rt2 = ChatRuntime()
response = rt2.chat(_DEMO_PROMPT)
finally:
_tg._CORPUS_PATH = real_path # type: ignore[assignment]
_tg.TEACHING_CORPORA = original_specs # type: ignore[misc]
_tg.clear_teaching_caches()
surface = response.surface
grounding = response.grounding_source
_say(f" prompt : {_DEMO_PROMPT}")
_say(f" surface : {surface}")
_say(f" grounding_source : {grounding}")
# Falsifiable assertions for the demo's headline claim.
contains_subject = _DEMO_SUBJECT in surface.lower()
contains_connective = "reveal" in surface.lower() # humanised
contains_object = "meaning" in surface.lower()
is_teaching_grounded = grounding == "teaching"
if not (contains_subject and contains_connective and contains_object and is_teaching_grounded):
raise RuntimeError(
f"demo invariant broken: same-prompt surface did not become "
f"teaching-grounded (surface={surface!r}, grounding={grounding!r})"
)
return SceneResult(
scene="S5_replay_now_grounded",
claim=(
"The same prompt now produces a deterministic teaching-"
"grounded surface containing the accepted chain's "
"subject / connective / object."
),
detail={
"surface": surface,
"grounding_source": grounding,
"contains_subject": contains_subject,
"contains_connective_reveals": contains_connective,
"contains_object_meaning": contains_object,
},
)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Public entry point
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def run_demo(*, emit_json: bool = False) -> dict[str, Any]:
"""Run all five scenes and return a structured report."""
global _VERBOSE
_VERBOSE = not emit_json
active_bytes_before = _active_bytes()
rt = ChatRuntime()
sink = _BufferSink()
rt.attach_discovery_sink(sink)
rt.attach_contemplation(enabled=True)
with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory() as tmpdir:
log_path = Path(tmpdir) / "demo_proposals.jsonl"
s1, _before_response = _scene1_cold_turn(rt, sink)
s2, candidate_payload = _scene2_discovery_emission(sink)
s3, proposal = _scene3_propose(log_path, candidate_payload["candidate_id"])
s4, transient = _scene4_accept_against_transient(log_path, proposal.proposal_id)
s5 = _scene5_replay_now_grounded(transient)
active_bytes_after = _active_bytes()
report = DemoReport(
prompt=_DEMO_PROMPT,
before_surface=s1.detail["surface"],
before_grounding_source=s1.detail["grounding_source"],
after_surface=s5.detail["surface"],
after_grounding_source=s5.detail["grounding_source"],
scenes=(s1, s2, s3, s4, s5),
learning_loop_closed=(
s1.detail["grounding_source"] == "none"
and s5.detail["grounding_source"] == "teaching"
),
active_corpus_byte_identical=(active_bytes_before == active_bytes_after),
)
if _VERBOSE:
_say()
_say("" * 72)
_say(" BEFORE / AFTER (single deterministic prompt, one accept between)")
_say("" * 72)
_say(f" prompt : {report.prompt}")
_say(f" before : [{report.before_grounding_source}] {report.before_surface}")
_say(f" after : [{report.after_grounding_source}] {report.after_surface}")
_say()
_say(f" learning_loop_closed : {report.learning_loop_closed}")
_say(f" active corpus byte-identical : {report.active_corpus_byte_identical}")
_say()
return report.as_dict()
__all__ = ["run_demo"]