core/evals/compositionality/runner.py
Shay 819c8b81ac feat(phase3): compositionality, multi-step-reasoning, introspection, cross-domain-transfer v1
Spreads the four remaining Phase 3 lanes to map the full reasoning-
depth surface alongside inference-closure (already landed at e509e0d).
Each lane is a v1 honest probe per the roadmap; engineering work
follows once the full surface is visible.

Results across all five Phase 3 lanes:

  lane                      split        primary signal  foundation
  inference-closure         public/v1    0.0             1.0 / 1.0
  inference-closure         holdouts/v1  0.0             1.0 / 1.0
  compositionality          public/v1   0.0625 (1/16)   1.0 / 1.0
  compositionality          holdouts/v1  0.0             1.0 / 1.0
  multi-step-reasoning      public/v1    0.0             1.0 / 1.0
  multi-step-reasoning      holdouts/v1  0.0             1.0 / 1.0
  introspection             public/v1    0.0 (no api)    n/a
  introspection             holdouts/v1  0.0             n/a
  cross-domain-transfer     public/v1    0.0             1.0 / 1.0
  cross-domain-transfer     holdouts/v1  0.0             1.0 / 1.0

Foundation guarantees (storage + replay) intact across every lane
that has them. The reasoning-depth signal is uniformly zero. The
five lanes triangulate four architectural gaps:

  Gap 1. generate/graph_planner.py has no transitive composition.
  Gap 2. field/propagate.py has no derivable-but-not-asserted recall.
  Gap 3. core/cognition/explain.py module does not exist.
  Gap 4. no structural-pattern recogniser (cross-subdomain transfer).

Gaps 1, 2, 4 cluster on the same code surface and may close together
as a single bounded PR. Gap 3 is independent module-creation work.

Lane scaffolding mirrors inference-closure (contract.md, runner.py,
dev + public/v1 + holdouts/v1 cases.jsonl, baselines/v1_structural_zero.json,
gaps.md). All runners are parallel-safe and use the standard
run_lane(cases, *, config, workers) interface.

Per-lane gaps.md records the engineering shape for v2 plus future
directions worth not forgetting:
  - compositionality/gaps.md: metaphor is compositionality with
    selective property transfer; building it is correctly downstream
    of closing this lane.
  - cross-domain-transfer/gaps.md: metaphor + narrative as
    cross-domain operators; narrative requires the Agency open-scope
    decision to pin first.
  - introspection/gaps.md: explain API is also the substrate for
    first-person narrative self-account.

Recommended v2 sequence in docs/PROGRESS.md:
  1. Pin Agency + Tool-use open-scope decisions (deadline: before
     Phase 3 engineering).
  2. Engineer Gaps 1 + 2 as one bounded PR.
  3. Engineer Gap 3 independently.
  4. Re-author cross-domain-transfer v2 with matched-control
     contract refinement.

Phase 3 v1 exit: 0/5 lanes passing, which is the expected v1 floor.
CLI suites smoke / cognition / teaching pass; no regression on
Phase 2.
2026-05-16 14:48:36 -07:00

164 lines
5.6 KiB
Python

"""compositionality eval lane runner.
For each case: teach the premises, probe a (relation, entity) pair
that was never directly taught, score whether the response surface
or walk surface references the expected composed token.
Conforms to the framework interface: run_lane(cases, config=None) -> report.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import re
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from typing import Any
from chat.runtime import ChatRuntime
from core.cognition.pipeline import CognitiveTurnPipeline
from core.config import RuntimeConfig
from evals.parallel import run_cases_parallel
@dataclass(slots=True)
class LaneReport:
metrics: dict[str, Any] = field(default_factory=dict)
case_details: list[dict[str, Any]] = field(default_factory=list)
_TOKEN_BOUND = re.compile(r"\b([a-z][a-z'\-]*)\b")
def _tokens(text: str) -> set[str]:
return set(_TOKEN_BOUND.findall((text or "").lower()))
def _hit(text: str, candidates: list[str]) -> bool:
if not text:
return False
toks = _tokens(text)
return any(c.lower() in toks for c in candidates)
def _run_sequence(premises: list[str], probe: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
runtime = ChatRuntime()
pipeline = CognitiveTurnPipeline(runtime)
proposals = 0
for premise in premises:
try:
r = pipeline.run(premise, max_tokens=8)
except ValueError:
continue
if r.pack_mutation_proposal is not None:
proposals += 1
try:
probe_result = pipeline.run(probe, max_tokens=8)
except ValueError:
return {
"surface": "",
"walk_surface": "",
"trace_hash": "",
"vault_hits": 0,
"proposals": proposals,
}
return {
"surface": probe_result.surface or "",
"articulation_surface": probe_result.articulation_surface or "",
"walk_surface": probe_result.walk_surface or "",
"trace_hash": probe_result.trace_hash,
"vault_hits": int(probe_result.vault_hits),
"proposals": proposals,
}
def _no_taught_pair_leakage(case: dict[str, Any]) -> bool:
"""Author-time invariant: probe expectation is not a verbatim premise."""
for expected in case.get("expected_entailment_tokens", []):
target = str(expected).lower()
probe = str(case.get("probe", "")).lower()
# The leakage check is structural: the probe entity is in premises
# (expected) but the target must not appear together with the probe
# entity in a single premise. Heuristic: target must not appear in
# any premise that also contains the first noun of the probe.
# For v1 we apply a simpler check — verify the (probe_entity, target)
# pair does not co-occur in any premise.
probe_tokens = _tokens(probe)
for premise in case.get("premises", []):
ptokens = _tokens(premise)
if target in ptokens and probe_tokens & ptokens:
return False
return True
def _run_case(case: dict[str, Any]) -> dict[str, Any]:
premises: list[str] = list(case.get("premises", []))
probe: str = case["probe"]
entailments: list[str] = list(case.get("expected_entailment_tokens", []))
expected_proposals = int(case.get("expected_proposals", len(premises) // 2))
first = _run_sequence(premises, probe)
second = _run_sequence(premises, probe)
surface_blob = " ".join([
first["surface"], first.get("articulation_surface", ""), first["walk_surface"]
])
comp_hit = _hit(surface_blob, entailments)
premises_stored = first["proposals"] >= expected_proposals
replay_pass = (
bool(first["trace_hash"])
and first["trace_hash"] == second["trace_hash"]
and first["vault_hits"] == second["vault_hits"]
and first["proposals"] == second["proposals"]
)
leakage_clean = _no_taught_pair_leakage(case)
passed = comp_hit and premises_stored and replay_pass
return {
"id": case.get("id", ""),
"pattern": case.get("pattern", ""),
"entailment_tokens": entailments,
"vault_hits": first["vault_hits"],
"trace_hash": first["trace_hash"],
"trace_hash_replay": second["trace_hash"],
"proposals": first["proposals"],
"expected_proposals": expected_proposals,
"compositional_hit": comp_hit,
"premises_stored_pass": premises_stored,
"replay_pass": replay_pass,
"leakage_clean": leakage_clean,
"passed": passed,
}
def run_lane(
cases: list[dict[str, Any]],
*,
config: RuntimeConfig | None = None,
workers: int | None = None,
) -> LaneReport:
if not cases:
return LaneReport(metrics={}, case_details=[])
_ = config
case_details = run_cases_parallel(cases, _run_case, workers=workers)
total = len(case_details)
comp = sum(1 for d in case_details if d["compositional_hit"]) / total
stored = sum(1 for d in case_details if d["premises_stored_pass"]) / total
replay = sum(1 for d in case_details if d["replay_pass"]) / total
overall = sum(1 for d in case_details if d["passed"]) / total
leakage = sum(1 for d in case_details if d["leakage_clean"]) / total
overall_pass = comp >= 0.50 and stored >= 0.95 and replay >= 0.95
metrics: dict[str, Any] = {
"compositional_recall_rate": round(comp, 4),
"premises_stored_rate": round(stored, 4),
"replay_determinism": round(replay, 4),
"no_leakage_rate": round(leakage, 4),
"all_pass_rate": round(overall, 4),
"case_count": total,
"overall_pass": overall_pass,
}
return LaneReport(metrics=metrics, case_details=case_details)