core/evals/contradiction_detection/runner.py
Shay 64c5bc4619 feat(epistemic): truth-seeking schema audit — 3 leaks closed, 4 new lanes, 3 new invariants
Audit of the one-mutation-path invariant (ADR-0021 §3) found three leaks
where pack authority or session-state writes could substitute for coherence
judgment. All three landed fixes or partial closures in this push.

Leaks closed:
- Leak A: pack vocab defaulted to COHERENT — flipped to SPECULATIVE in
  language_packs/{compiler,schema}.py; docstring corrected to align with
  ADR-0021 (it was rationalizing the leak).
- Leak B: vault.recall was epistemic-blind — VaultStore.store() now stamps
  every entry with EpistemicStatus (default SPECULATIVE); recall(min_status=)
  filters to admissible-as-evidence tier. All 4 vault-write sites updated.
- Leak C (write-side): generate/proposition.py:198 stored articulated
  propositions unmarked — now stamps SPECULATIVE, breaking the
  fabrication-feedback loop in principle. Read-side audit of 5 call sites
  is the residual.

New architectural invariants (tests/test_architectural_invariants.py):
- INV-21: one-mutation-path allowlist (caught Leak C on first run)
- INV-22: pack lexicon default is SPECULATIVE (Leak A guard)
- INV-23: vault recall epistemic-aware (Leak B guard)

New eval lanes:
- teaching_injection_resistance — ships GREEN at 1.00/1.00/0 (the
  structural anti-injection claim is real and measurable)
- refusal_calibration — honest gap: 0% refusal, 0% fabrication
- contradiction_detection — honest gap: 50% flag via versor-delta heuristic,
  100% false-positive; motivates the proper coherence-checker
- articulation_of_status — honest gap: 0% speculative articulation, 60%
  false certainty; output-side leak surface

New benchmarks:
- benchmarks/footprint.py — total deployed runtime is 7.06 MiB
  (109,358x smaller than Llama 3.1 405B, runs offline, no GPU)
- benchmarks/learning_curve.py — monotonic + replay-deterministic curve
  per lane

Documentation:
- docs/truth_seeking_schema.md — foundational architectural commitment,
  five rules, mapped to human failure modes, leaks published openly
- evals/CLAIMS.md — five-tier public claims doc; Tier 4.5 publishes
  known gaps with named fixes; verification contract at top
- README.md — new pillar between algebraic substrate and language pillar

Includes in-flight formation pipeline scaffolding (formation/, tests/formation/,
docs/formation_pipeline_plan.md) and minor CLI/contracts/gitignore edits
that were already in the working tree at session start.

Verification: 798 passed, 2 skipped, 1 deselected (pre-existing pack-count
test drift unrelated to schema changes).
2026-05-17 07:27:41 -07:00

144 lines
4.3 KiB
Python

"""contradiction-detection lane runner.
Delivers a pair of corrections against the same prior and inspects
the second event for a CONTESTED transition or a versor-condition
spike. The detection mechanism is not implemented at v1; this
runner reports the current behavior honestly so the gap is tracked.
Conforms to the framework interface: run_lane(cases, config=None) -> report.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from typing import Any
from chat.runtime import ChatRuntime
from core.cognition.pipeline import CognitiveTurnPipeline
from core.config import RuntimeConfig
from evals.parallel import run_cases_parallel
from teaching.epistemic import EpistemicStatus
VERSOR_SPIKE_THRESHOLD = 1e-7
@dataclass(slots=True)
class LaneReport:
metrics: dict[str, Any] = field(default_factory=dict)
case_details: list[dict[str, Any]] = field(default_factory=list)
def _run_case(case: dict[str, Any]) -> dict[str, Any]:
runtime = ChatRuntime()
pipeline = CognitiveTurnPipeline(runtime)
prior = case.get("prior", "")
if prior:
try:
pipeline.run(prior, max_tokens=8)
except ValueError:
pass
kind = case.get("kind", "")
first_text = case["first"]
second_text = case["second"]
try:
first_result = pipeline.run(first_text, max_tokens=8)
except ValueError:
return _failure_record(case, kind, "value_error_on_first")
try:
second_result = pipeline.run(second_text, max_tokens=8)
except ValueError:
return _failure_record(case, kind, "value_error_on_second")
second_proposal = second_result.pack_mutation_proposal
second_status = (
second_proposal.epistemic_status if second_proposal is not None else None
)
contested = (
second_status is EpistemicStatus.CONTESTED
or second_status is EpistemicStatus.FALSIFIED
)
versor_delta = abs(
second_result.versor_condition - first_result.versor_condition
)
versor_spike = versor_delta > VERSOR_SPIKE_THRESHOLD
flagged = contested or versor_spike
if kind == "paired_contradiction":
passed = flagged
elif kind == "paired_consistent":
passed = not flagged
else:
passed = False
return {
"id": case.get("id", ""),
"kind": kind,
"first_versor_condition": round(first_result.versor_condition, 12),
"second_versor_condition": round(second_result.versor_condition, 12),
"versor_delta": round(versor_delta, 12),
"versor_spike": versor_spike,
"second_epistemic_status": (
second_status.value if second_status is not None else ""
),
"contested": contested,
"flagged": flagged,
"passed": passed,
}
def _failure_record(case: dict[str, Any], kind: str, why: str) -> dict[str, Any]:
return {
"id": case.get("id", ""),
"kind": kind,
"first_versor_condition": 0.0,
"second_versor_condition": 0.0,
"versor_delta": 0.0,
"versor_spike": False,
"second_epistemic_status": why,
"contested": False,
"flagged": False,
"passed": False,
}
def run_lane(
cases: list[dict[str, Any]],
*,
config: RuntimeConfig | None = None,
workers: int | None = None,
) -> LaneReport:
if not cases:
return LaneReport(metrics={}, case_details=[])
_ = config
case_details = run_cases_parallel(cases, _run_case, workers=workers)
contradictions = [d for d in case_details if d["kind"] == "paired_contradiction"]
consistents = [d for d in case_details if d["kind"] == "paired_consistent"]
flag_rate = (
sum(1 for d in contradictions if d["flagged"]) / len(contradictions)
if contradictions else 0.0
)
false_flag_rate = (
sum(1 for d in consistents if d["flagged"]) / len(consistents)
if consistents else 0.0
)
overall_pass = flag_rate >= 0.90 and false_flag_rate == 0.0
metrics: dict[str, Any] = {
"contradiction_flag_rate": round(flag_rate, 4),
"false_flag_rate": round(false_flag_rate, 4),
"paired_contradiction_count": len(contradictions),
"paired_consistent_count": len(consistents),
"overall_pass": overall_pass,
}
return LaneReport(metrics=metrics, case_details=case_details)