core/evals/fabrication_control/cases/holdout.jsonl
Shay 5cad0a4b72
feat(capability): ADR-0110 promote mathematics_logic to expert_demo (#118)
First worked expert-demo promotion under the ADR-0106 + ADR-0109
contract. Math is now the first domain at expert_demo=true.

Signed claim (docs/reviewers.yaml):
  domain_id: mathematics_logic
  evidence_lanes: [elementary_mathematics_ood, inference_closure,
                   fabrication_control]
  evidence_revision: adr-0110:reviewed:2026-05-22
  signed_by: shay-j
  claim_digest: 94d74781e103854230c1a71590e4df2287f5d2e87832f1c29b8ec4618853c04b

Evidence (all three lanes, public + holdout):
  elementary_mathematics_ood: accuracy=1.0 (117/117 public, 39/39 holdout)
  inference_closure: all_pass_rate=1.0, replay_determinism=1.0,
                     overall_pass=True (20 public, 12 holdout)
  fabrication_control: by-class refusals 3/3/3, fabricated=0
                       (9 public, 9 holdout)

Infrastructure bridges (not contract changes):
- cases_plaintext.jsonl dev-mode fallback files for
  elementary_mathematics_ood + inference_closure (ADR-0105 pattern)
- 9 new holdout cases for fabrication_control across all three
  refusal classes (phantom_endpoint / cross_pack_non_bridge /
  sibling_collapse)
- core/capability/reporting.py: _fetch_lane_split folds top-level
  by_class into metrics so refusal_shape sees a canonical layout

Tests:
- tests/test_adr_0110_math_expert_demo.py: 4 invariant tests
  (math_expert_demo_holds, signed_claim_present, replay_digest_
  byte_equality, other_domains_unaffected)
- tests/test_adr_0107_deferral.py retired (deferral resolved)
- tests/test_expert_demo_contract.py: production-ledger test
  rewritten as 'every promoted domain has signed claim' (load-
  bearing invariant preserved)
- tests/test_capability_reports.py: math row asserted at
  expert-demo (was reasoning-capable)

Ledger state:
  systems_software: reasoning-capable
  mathematics_logic: EXPERT-DEMO   <- new
  physics: reasoning-capable
  hebrew_greek_textual_reasoning: reasoning-capable
  philosophy_theology: reasoning-capable

README updated. ADR-0107 referenced as resolved by this ADR.
CLAIMS.md regenerated. ADR-0106 / ADR-0109 contract unchanged.
2026-05-22 12:59:23 -07:00

9 lines
1.5 KiB
JSON

{"id": "fab_hld_a1", "class": "phantom_endpoint", "prompt": "Does quibix support flarnel?", "expected_grounding_source": ["oov", "none"], "expected_outcome": "refusal"}
{"id": "fab_hld_a2", "class": "phantom_endpoint", "prompt": "What does borgle reveal?", "expected_grounding_source": ["none", "oov"], "expected_outcome": "refusal"}
{"id": "fab_hld_a3", "class": "phantom_endpoint", "prompt": "Does mintrak precede vorrish?", "expected_grounding_source": ["oov", "none"], "expected_outcome": "refusal"}
{"id": "fab_hld_b1", "class": "cross_pack_non_bridge", "prompt": "Does ancestor ground knowledge?", "expected_grounding_source": ["none"], "expected_outcome": "refusal"}
{"id": "fab_hld_b2", "class": "cross_pack_non_bridge", "prompt": "Can sibling cause inference?", "expected_grounding_source": ["none"], "expected_outcome": "refusal"}
{"id": "fab_hld_b3", "class": "cross_pack_non_bridge", "prompt": "Does spouse ground inference?", "expected_grounding_source": ["none"], "expected_outcome": "refusal"}
{"id": "fab_hld_c1", "class": "sibling_collapse", "prompt": "Is judgment the same as knowledge?", "expected_grounding_source": ["none"], "expected_outcome": "refusal"}
{"id": "fab_hld_c2", "class": "sibling_collapse", "prompt": "Is reveal equivalent to disclose?", "expected_grounding_source": ["none"], "expected_outcome": "refusal"}
{"id": "fab_hld_c3", "class": "sibling_collapse", "prompt": "Is principle the same as cause?", "expected_grounding_source": ["none"], "expected_outcome": "refusal"}