Workstream 1 fourth pack. Closes the common-action verb gap. Prior
packs covered reasoning (cognition), speech/perception (meta), and
adjectives (attitude); this pack covers what an agent *does*.
Pack composition (26 VERB entries):
action.doing.perform do perform execute carry conduct
action.doing.make make
action.doing.achieve achieve accomplish
action.creating.originate create build form produce generate develop
action.changing.transform change transform
action.moving.translate move
action.moving.depart_arrive go come
action.moving.transfer send receive
action.possessing.acquire get take
action.possessing.transfer give
action.possessing.retain keep
action.possessing.deploy use
Files:
language_packs/data/en_core_action_v1/
lexicon.jsonl — 26 entries, SHA-256 checksum-sealed
manifest.json — operational_base / D0
chat/pack_resolver.py
Appended to DEFAULT_RESOLVABLE_PACK_IDS after temporal.
core/config.py
Added to RuntimeConfig.input_packs default mount.
tests/test_en_core_action_v1_pack.py
11 contract tests covering load / POS / namespace / no-collision /
contiguous-ids / mounted-by-default / resolver-order / routing /
prior-pack invariance.
tests/test_procedure_surface.py
Swapped two test fixtures from "do stuff" to "fix bugs". ``do``
is now correctly pack-resident in en_core_action_v1 (semantically
correct — "How do I do stuff?" should ground on ``do``), so the
"no pack lemma exists" contract needed a fixture where both verb
and noun are genuinely OOV. ``fix bugs`` satisfies this across
all 7 mounted packs.
Authoring:
Three parallel subagents — doing / creating / moving+possessing.
Strict exemplar + forbidden-lemma list against all 6 prior packs.
Verification:
Cognition eval byte-identical on both splits (100/100/91.7/100 and
100/100/83.3/100).
All 70 pack tests pass (cognition + meta + attitude + temporal +
action + quant tests run together).
Live composer probes confirm every action lemma surfaces
deterministically from en_core_action_v1.
191 lines
8.2 KiB
Python
191 lines
8.2 KiB
Python
"""ADR-0061 — PROCEDURE intent routes to pack-grounded surface.
|
|
|
|
Pre-ADR-0061, ``PROCEDURE`` intent had no pack-grounded composer:
|
|
every ``"How do I X?"`` question fell through to the universal
|
|
disclosure even when ``X`` was a pack-resident lemma. This closed
|
|
``procedure_define_010`` ("How do I define a concept?") as a
|
|
surface-and-term holdout miss and ``procedure_verify_034``
|
|
("How do I verify a claim?") as a surface miss.
|
|
|
|
ADR-0061 adds ``pack_grounded_procedure_surface(subject_text)``:
|
|
extracts the **last** pack-resident lemma from the verb-phrase
|
|
subject (deliberately: procedure verb → topic, last is the topic)
|
|
and emits a deterministic acknowledgement surface that grounds
|
|
the topic in pack semantic_domains and notes explicitly that
|
|
step-by-step guidance is not yet ratified.
|
|
|
|
These tests pin:
|
|
|
|
- Extraction picks the last pack-resident lemma (not the first).
|
|
- Stopwords ``be`` / ``have`` are skipped.
|
|
- Verbs (``define``, ``verify``, ``correct``, ``learn``) are NOT
|
|
stopworded — when the verb is the only pack-resident lemma,
|
|
the verb is the topic by elimination.
|
|
- Surface is deterministic.
|
|
- Surface preserves the trust-boundary clause about
|
|
not-yet-ratified guidance.
|
|
- Returns ``None`` when no pack lemma is found (so the universal
|
|
disclosure still fires for fully-unknown procedure utterances).
|
|
- Live ``ChatRuntime`` routes ``procedure_define_010`` through
|
|
this composer and the surface contains ``concept``.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
from chat.pack_grounding import (
|
|
PACK_ID,
|
|
_extract_procedure_topic_lemma,
|
|
pack_grounded_procedure_surface,
|
|
)
|
|
from chat.runtime import ChatRuntime
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# Topic-lemma extraction (last-wins on procedure subjects)
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_extract_picks_last_pack_lemma() -> None:
|
|
"""For verb-phrase subjects the topic is the object — last
|
|
pack-resident lemma wins."""
|
|
assert _extract_procedure_topic_lemma("define a concept") == "concept"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_extract_returns_verb_when_only_pack_lemma() -> None:
|
|
"""When the verb is the only pack-resident lemma (object is OOV
|
|
or filler), the verb is the topic by elimination — preserves
|
|
coverage on procedure utterances with non-pack objects."""
|
|
# ``hypothesis`` is genuinely OOV across cognition/meta/relations.
|
|
# Pre-en_core_meta_v1 the canonical example was "verify a claim",
|
|
# but ``claim`` now resolves via the meta pack (meta.speech_act.claim),
|
|
# so the object-first selector would correctly pick ``claim`` over
|
|
# ``verify`` for that utterance. Use ``hypothesis`` to keep the
|
|
# verb-fallback contract isolated from pack-coverage changes.
|
|
assert _extract_procedure_topic_lemma("verify a hypothesis") == "verify"
|
|
assert _extract_procedure_topic_lemma("correct an error") == "correct"
|
|
assert _extract_procedure_topic_lemma("learn this") == "learn"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_extract_skips_dialogue_fillers() -> None:
|
|
"""``be`` and ``have`` are pack-resident but stopworded."""
|
|
assert _extract_procedure_topic_lemma("be a teacher") is None # 'teacher' is OOV
|
|
assert _extract_procedure_topic_lemma("have knowledge") == "knowledge"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_extract_none_when_no_pack_lemma() -> None:
|
|
assert _extract_procedure_topic_lemma("") is None
|
|
assert _extract_procedure_topic_lemma(None) is None # type: ignore[arg-type]
|
|
# Pre-en_core_action_v1 the canonical fixture was "do stuff", but
|
|
# ``do`` now resolves via en_core_action_v1 (action.doing.perform).
|
|
# Use a genuinely-OOV verb+noun pair to preserve the original
|
|
# contract: when no pack-resident lemma exists, return None.
|
|
assert _extract_procedure_topic_lemma("fix bugs") is None
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_extract_strips_punctuation() -> None:
|
|
assert _extract_procedure_topic_lemma("define, a concept.") == "concept"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_extract_is_case_insensitive() -> None:
|
|
assert _extract_procedure_topic_lemma("DEFINE A CONCEPT") == "concept"
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# Surface composition
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_surface_contains_topic_lemma() -> None:
|
|
surface = pack_grounded_procedure_surface("define a concept")
|
|
assert surface is not None
|
|
assert "concept" in surface
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_surface_contains_topic_domains() -> None:
|
|
"""Pack-grounded: the topic lemma's top semantic_domains are
|
|
surfaced verbatim — no rewording."""
|
|
from chat.pack_grounding import _pack_index
|
|
concept_domains = _pack_index().get("concept", ())
|
|
assert concept_domains, "test fixture: 'concept' must be a pack lemma"
|
|
|
|
surface = pack_grounded_procedure_surface("define a concept")
|
|
assert surface is not None
|
|
assert any(d in surface for d in concept_domains[:2])
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_surface_contains_pack_id() -> None:
|
|
surface = pack_grounded_procedure_surface("define a concept")
|
|
assert surface is not None
|
|
assert PACK_ID in surface
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_surface_preserves_not_yet_ratified_clause() -> None:
|
|
"""Trust-boundary label: procedure guidance is not yet ratified.
|
|
Must appear in every surface emitted by this composer."""
|
|
surface = pack_grounded_procedure_surface("define a concept")
|
|
assert surface is not None
|
|
assert "not yet ratified" in surface
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_surface_returns_none_for_no_pack_lemma() -> None:
|
|
"""A procedure subject with no pack-resident lemma falls
|
|
through to the universal disclosure — preserves the honesty
|
|
contract for fully-unknown procedures."""
|
|
assert pack_grounded_procedure_surface("") is None
|
|
# ``do`` is now pack-resident in en_core_action_v1; use a verb+noun
|
|
# pair where both terms are genuinely OOV across all mounted packs.
|
|
assert pack_grounded_procedure_surface("fix bugs") is None
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_surface_is_deterministic() -> None:
|
|
a = pack_grounded_procedure_surface("define a concept")
|
|
b = pack_grounded_procedure_surface("define a concept")
|
|
assert a == b
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# End-to-end through ChatRuntime
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_procedure_define_010_now_emits_concept() -> None:
|
|
"""The exact holdout case this ADR targets:
|
|
`procedure_define_010` ("How do I define a concept?") expected
|
|
``term=['concept']`` and was missing it pre-ADR-0061. Through
|
|
the live runtime, the surface must now contain ``concept``."""
|
|
rt = ChatRuntime()
|
|
response = rt.chat("How do I define a concept?")
|
|
assert response.grounding_source == "pack"
|
|
assert "concept" in response.surface.lower()
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_procedure_with_no_pack_lemma_routes_to_oov_invitation() -> None:
|
|
"""ADR-0065 / P2.1 — a procedure utterance with no pack-resident
|
|
lemma now routes to the OOV invitation surface (names the unknown
|
|
topic, points at PackMutationProposal path) instead of the flat
|
|
universal disclosure. No surface fabrication: the invitation
|
|
only references the OOV token and the mounted-pack list."""
|
|
rt = ChatRuntime()
|
|
# ``fix`` and ``bugs`` are genuinely OOV across all mounted packs
|
|
# (``do`` is now pack-resident in en_core_action_v1, so the prior
|
|
# fixture "how do I do stuff?" would extract ``do`` and ground).
|
|
response = rt.chat("How do I fix bugs?")
|
|
# Either UNKNOWN-intent → "none", or PROCEDURE-intent on OOV
|
|
# subject → "oov" invitation. Both honour the no-fabrication
|
|
# contract; the surface text differs by intent classification.
|
|
assert response.grounding_source in {"oov", "none"}
|
|
if response.grounding_source == "oov":
|
|
assert "PackMutationProposal" in response.surface
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_procedure_verify_an_oov_object_falls_back_to_verb() -> None:
|
|
"""When the object is OOV but the verb is pack-resident, the
|
|
procedure composer surfaces the verb — keeps surface_groundedness
|
|
coverage on utterances whose object is not yet packed.
|
|
|
|
``hypothesis`` is genuinely OOV across cognition/meta/relations.
|
|
"""
|
|
rt = ChatRuntime()
|
|
response = rt.chat("How do I verify a hypothesis?")
|
|
assert response.grounding_source == "pack"
|
|
assert "verify" in response.surface.lower()
|