core/tests/test_prompt_diversity_runner.py
Shay 48282eef8d
feat(adr-0084): definitional layer — proposal + substrate (schema/loader/closure) (#64)
* docs(adr-0084): propose definitional layer + prompt-diversity suite

Three companion artifacts proposing the next substantive design step
after ADR-0083:

1. ADR-0084 (Proposed) — Definitional Layer for Lexicon Packs
   Optional `definition` block on pack entries: gloss,
   definitional_atoms, predicates_invited, definition_version,
   provenance.  Pack-level opt-in.  Closure rule: every word in a
   gloss must resolve to a same-pack lemma, another mounted pack's
   lemma, or a primitive in a new `packs/primitives/` pack.
   NO composer change in this ADR (sequenced for ADR-0085) —
   ratify substrate before any consumer depends on it.

2. evals/prompt_diversity/ (Proposed) — companion eval lane
   ~50 cases across question-shape × sophistication × domain,
   measuring three new metrics: response_shape_fit,
   audit_in_surface_rate (quantifies the trust-boundary leak into
   user surfaces), gloss_quote_rate (zero today; rises with future
   gloss-aware composer).  No v1 pass thresholds — the lane
   establishes a baseline distribution so future work has
   something to move.  26 seed cases authored covering all 21
   categories.

3. docs/handoff/ADR-0084-pack-content-brief.md — paste-ready brief
   for a cheaper/faster dev agent to produce the pack content in
   parallel.  Self-contained, 5 sequenced phases (primitives pack
   → extend 9 existing glosses → add to relations/anchors → write
   closure verifier → run safety lanes), explicit don't-touch list
   (no composer / runtime / algebra / Greek+Hebrew packs / schema
   parser), no-LLM-glosses discipline, per-phase acceptance.

Discovery while drafting: 9 packs already carry glosses.jsonl
under language_packs/data/ with a flat schema (78 entries in
en_core_cognition_v1 alone).  The brief reflects that — most
work is extending existing entries, not authoring from scratch.

Strategic context: ADR-0083 raised the *depth* ceiling on chain
composition; ADR-0084 raises the *fidelity* ceiling.  The φ
separation probe (memory: phi-separation-falsified) established
that semantic capability lives in chain composition, not in φ
geometry, so deepening the composer's substrate is the natural
next step.  ADR-0084 → 0085 (gloss-aware composer) → 0086
(predicate licensing at ratification) is the planned sequence.

* feat(adr-0084): substrate — schema parser, primitives loader, closure verifier

Substrate-only code-side for ADR-0084 (Definitional Layer for Lexicon Packs).
No composer touches the new fields yet; consumer integration is ADR-0085.

Schema (additive, default preserves byte-identity)
  - LanguagePackManifest.definitional_layer: bool = False
  - compiler loader propagates the flag from manifest.json

language_packs/definitions.py (new)
  - GlossEntry dataclass: lemma, gloss, pos, definitional_atoms,
    predicates_invited, definition_version, provenance_ids
  - parse_gloss_entry(payload, *, strict) — strict mode enforces ADR-0084
    §Schema validation row-by-row: required keys, typed lists, no
    unknown keys, positive definition_version; lax mode preserves the
    legacy two-field shape for back-compat
  - load_pack_glosses(pack_id, *, strict) with cache + clear hook
  - verify_definitional_closure(pack_id, *, mounted_pack_lemmas,
    primitive_lemmas, strict) returning tuple[ClosureViolation, ...];
    case-insensitive resolution; cycles permitted per ADR

packs/primitives/loader.py (new)
  - Sister loader to packs/safety/ and packs/identity/
  - PrimitivesPack frozen dataclass with .lemmas frozenset
  - Gates: checksum match, kind=='primitives', definitional_layer:true,
    never_auto_mutable:true, pack_id matches dir, primitive_count
    cross-check, duplicate-lemma rejection, path-traversal rejection,
    strict per-entry schema with allow-list
  - DEFAULT_PRIMITIVES_PACK = 'en_semantic_primitives_v1'

tests/test_adr_0084_definitional_substrate.py
  - 38 tests covering strict parser (each required key rejection, unknown
    key rejection, empty predicates_invited allowed, empty
    definitional_atoms rejected, invalid definition_version), lax
    parser back-compat, load_pack_glosses (missing/strict raise/lax
    skip/malformed JSON), closure verifier (same-pack/primitive/mounted/
    unresolved/case-insensitive), primitives loader (every gate), and
    a back-compat check that every shipped pack still ratifies with
    definitional_layer=False

Lanes: smoke 67/0, cognition 120/0/1, teaching 17/0, runtime 19/0,
packs 6/0. Cognition eval byte-identical 100/91.7/100/100.

When the content PR lands (primitives.jsonl + extended glosses.jsonl
under ADR-0084-pack-content-brief.md), the gate catches any closure-rule
violation without further code change.

* feat(evals): prompt_diversity lane runner — measurement instrument for ADR-0084+

Implements the runner against the existing contract.md + 26-case v1
public split.  Lane auto-discovered by evals.framework via the standard
contract + runner convention.

Runner (evals/prompt_diversity/runner.py)
  - run_lane(cases, *, config, workers) -> LaneReport
  - 5 metrics: intent_accuracy, versor_closure_rate (carried over from
    cognition), plus the three new lane-specific metrics —
    response_shape_fit, audit_in_surface_rate, gloss_quote_rate
  - breakdown dict groups by (question_shape, sophistication, domain)
    per contract §How to read the output
  - mirrors evals.cognition.runner's parallel worker pattern

Per-shape classifier (deliberately substring/regex-simple at v1)
  - predicate_identity, explanation, sequence, two_subject_contrast,
    narrative, honest_disclosure
  - Unknown shape => neutral pass (don't penalise new categories)

Audit-leak detector
  - trust-boundary preamble markers (teaching-grounded (, pack-grounded
    (, No session evidence yet.)
  - dotted semantic-domain tag regex (cognition.illumination, etc.)

Gloss-quote detector
  - resolves expected_terms via chat.pack_resolver.resolve_gloss
  - 4-token contiguous-window match against surface (high-confidence
    "gloss actually quoted", not "shared one common word")

Tests (tests/test_prompt_diversity_runner.py — 23)
  - shape classifier parametrized over the six expected_shape values
  - audit-leak detector parametrized over preamble + tag + clean cases
  - end-to-end on v1 public:
      * versor_closure_rate == 1.0 (only v1 pass threshold per contract)
      * every metric in [0, 1]
      * breakdown groups present with the four per-cell metrics
      * diversity gate: >=5 question shapes, >=3 domains
        (defends against future regressions that collapse the suite
         back to a cognition-shaped fixture)

v1/public baseline (26 cases)
  intent_accuracy      : 65.4%   (contract predicted 70-85%)
  versor_closure_rate  : 100.0%  (only v1 pass threshold)  PASS
  response_shape_fit   : 53.8%   (contract predicted low)
  audit_in_surface_rate: 42.3%   (contract predicted ~100%)
  gloss_quote_rate     :  7.7%   (contract predicted 0%)

Three baseline surprises worth noting in the report (NOT failures —
the v1 lane is explicitly there to establish the distribution):

  - audit_in_surface_rate at 42% (not 100%) means the chain-walk leak
    fires on ~11/26; the other 15 are honest-disclosure cases that
    emit no audit envelope.  Sharpens the future surface-vs-envelope
    ADR's actual target: grounded surfaces specifically.
  - response_shape_fit at 54% (not "low") — classifier likely has
    false positives on the ", which " cause-marker.  Worth tightening
    once we have an ADR-0085 baseline to compare against.
  - intent_accuracy at 65% (below predicted 70-85%) — classifier dips
    harder on adversarial/cross-pack than expected.  Real gap.

All five smoke/cognition/teaching/runtime/packs lanes still green;
core eval cognition byte-identical 100/91.7/100/100.

* feat(packs): ADR-0084 pack content (primitives + extend glosses + closure verifier) (#65)

* feat(packs): ADR-0084 pack content

* feat(packs): repair ADR-0084 definitional content

* test(adr-0084): adjust substrate manifest tests for post-#65 content reality

PR #65 flipped definitional_layer:true on 13 English packs (9 core +
4 relations + collapse-anchors).  The substrate's previous test
test_existing_packs_unchanged asserted that en_core_cognition_v1 +
en_core_relations_v1 still had definitional_layer:False — which was
the right pre-content invariant but is wrong post-content.

Replace it with two complementary tests that hold against real content:

  - test_non_opted_packs_default_false:
      pins that packs that DIDN'T flip the flag (en_minimal_v1,
      he_core_cognition_v1, grc_logos_cognition_v1) still surface
      definitional_layer=False through the loader.  Defends against
      a future change accidentally flipping the flag on a non-opted
      pack.

  - test_opted_packs_carry_flag:
      pins that packs that DID flip the flag (en_core_cognition_v1,
      en_core_relations_v1) surface definitional_layer=True through
      the loader.  Proves the substrate's manifest-field propagation
      works against real ratified content, not just fixture packs.

Net: +1 test, same intent (substrate ratifies the manifest field
correctly), now with real-content coverage on both sides of the gate.

All 62 ADR-0084 substrate + prompt-diversity tests pass.
2026-05-20 15:25:25 -07:00

155 lines
6.6 KiB
Python

"""Prompt-diversity lane runner — contract pins.
Pins the v1 contract surface so future composer changes (ADR-0085) and
surface-vs-envelope work cannot silently break the measurement
instrument the contract is built around.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import json
from pathlib import Path
import pytest
from evals.framework import get_lane, run_lane
from evals.prompt_diversity.runner import (
_classify_response_shape,
_surface_has_audit_leak,
)
_PUBLIC_V1 = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "evals" / "prompt_diversity" / "public" / "v1" / "cases.jsonl"
def _load_public_cases() -> list[dict]:
return [json.loads(line) for line in _PUBLIC_V1.read_text().splitlines() if line.strip()]
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
# Shape classifier
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
class TestShapeClassifier:
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"surface,expected_shape,want",
[
("Knowledge is justified true belief.", "predicate_identity", True),
("light reveals truth, which grounds knowledge", "explanation", True),
("First, observe. Then, infer.", "sequence", True),
("wisdom contrasts with judgment", "two_subject_contrast", True),
("No session evidence yet.", "honest_disclosure", True),
("knowledge, evidence, inference", "narrative", True),
# Mismatch direction — chain-walk shape miscast as definition
("light reveals truth, which grounds knowledge", "predicate_identity", False),
],
)
def test_shape_classifier(self, surface: str, expected_shape: str, want: bool) -> None:
assert _classify_response_shape(surface, expected_shape) is want
def test_unknown_shape_defaults_pass(self) -> None:
# Neutral pass for unknown shapes — protects against new
# categories being penalised before the classifier is taught.
assert _classify_response_shape("any text", "brand_new_shape") is True
def test_empty_surface_fails(self) -> None:
assert _classify_response_shape("", "predicate_identity") is False
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
# Audit-leak detector
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
class TestAuditLeak:
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"surface,is_leak",
[
("light — teaching-grounded (cognition_chains_v1): ...", True),
("light — pack-grounded (en_core_cognition_v1): ...", True),
("No session evidence yet.", True),
# Bare semantic-domain tag in user surface
("cognition.illumination", True),
("logos.core; cognition.truth.", True),
# Clean user-facing surfaces
("Light is the medium by which what exists becomes visible.", False),
("Knowledge requires evidence.", False),
("", False),
],
)
def test_leak_detection(self, surface: str, is_leak: bool) -> None:
assert _surface_has_audit_leak(surface) is is_leak
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
# End-to-end run on the v1 public split
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------- #
class TestPublicV1:
"""Pins the v1 contract surface against the public split.
The lane has NO numeric pass thresholds at v1 by design (the
contract is explicit about this). The ONLY hard gate is
``versor_closure_rate == 1.00``. Everything else is baseline
distribution we measure against, not score for.
"""
@pytest.fixture(scope="class")
def lane_result(self) -> object:
lane = get_lane("prompt_diversity")
return run_lane(lane, version="v1", split="public")
def test_lane_discoverable(self) -> None:
lane = get_lane("prompt_diversity")
assert "v1" in lane.versions
def test_all_cases_run(self, lane_result) -> None: # type: ignore[no-untyped-def]
cases = _load_public_cases()
assert lane_result.metrics["total"] == len(cases)
assert len(lane_result.case_details) == len(cases)
def test_versor_closure_invariant(self, lane_result) -> None: # type: ignore[no-untyped-def]
# The only numeric pass threshold at v1. Per ADR / contract:
# the algebra invariant must hold for every case the pipeline
# accepts.
assert lane_result.metrics["versor_closure_rate"] == 1.0
def test_all_metrics_in_unit_interval(self, lane_result) -> None: # type: ignore[no-untyped-def]
for key in (
"intent_accuracy",
"versor_closure_rate",
"response_shape_fit",
"audit_in_surface_rate",
"gloss_quote_rate",
):
value = lane_result.metrics[key]
assert 0.0 <= value <= 1.0, f"{key} out of unit interval: {value}"
def test_breakdown_groups_present(self, lane_result) -> None: # type: ignore[no-untyped-def]
# Per-cell breakdown by (question_shape, sophistication, domain)
# — the contract's "how to read the output" instructs callers
# to look at distributions, not just aggregates.
breakdown = lane_result.metrics["breakdown"]
assert isinstance(breakdown, dict)
assert breakdown, "breakdown is empty — runner did not aggregate cells"
# Every cell must carry the four moveable per-cell metrics.
for shape_cells in breakdown.values():
for soph_cells in shape_cells.values():
for cell in soph_cells.values():
assert {"n", "intent_accuracy", "response_shape_fit", "audit_in_surface_rate", "gloss_quote_rate"} <= cell.keys()
def test_baseline_diversity(self, lane_result) -> None: # type: ignore[no-untyped-def]
# The lane's STATED failure mode (contract §When it has failed
# and why): "if the distribution looks identical to the
# cognition lane (i.e. the suite isn't actually diverse)".
# Concretely: at least 5 distinct question_shape values and
# at least 3 distinct domain values must appear in the case
# details — otherwise the suite is overfitting the same way
# the cognition lane does.
details = lane_result.case_details
shapes = {d["question_shape"] for d in details}
domains = {d["domain"] for d in details}
assert len(shapes) >= 5, f"only {len(shapes)} question shapes — suite is not diverse"
assert len(domains) >= 3, f"only {len(domains)} domains — suite is not diverse"