The first cross-clause comprehension reading: one actor's quantity changes over
successive clauses ("Sam has 14 apples. He buys 9 more." -> 14 + 9). It is the
safe specialisation of the cross-clause sum that GB-3a refuses wholesale (the
Alice/Tom hazard) — we chain only when (same referent) AND (a licensed change
cue of unambiguous polarity), else refuse.
generate/derivation/accumulate.py — compose_accumulation:
- anchor on clause 1's single quantity; apply +M (gain) / -M (loss) per later
change clause, operand taken in the anchor's unit (accumulation is same-dimension);
routed through the unchanged self-verification gate.
- polarity (ordered, so ambiguous "gives" is resolved not guessed): "more" -> gain;
else unambiguous loss verb -> loss; else gives/gave + to/away -> loss; else
unambiguous gain verb -> gain; else REFUSE.
- referent guard (the ADR-0174 multi-actor hazard's defensive fix, built minimally
in the clean lane — NOT the retired gender-blind resolver): a later clause's
subject token must be a pronoun or the anchor's name; a NEW named subject (Tom)
-> refuse. Pronoun gender/number is not matched; a new name is the only signal.
evals/.../accumulation_runner.py — practice scorer: on a base refusal, attempt
compose_accumulation and gold-check (mirrors search_runner). Sealed: fires only
on already-refused cases, never alters serving.
Measured (sealed practice additive lane): 0 -> 55 correct, wrong unchanged at 1
(the base scorer's pre-existing one; accumulation added 55 correct, 0 wrong). The
36 still-refused are multi-change (GB-3b.2) or unrecognised verbs (vocab growth) —
conservative, never wrong.
Proof obligations (tests fail under the violation): new-named-actor refuses (H1),
no/ambiguous change cue refuses, list anchor refuses, multi-change refuses,
determinism. 136 targeted tests + architectural invariants green; serving 3/47/0
byte-identical (lane-SHA 8/8, claims --check OK).
163 lines
7.2 KiB
Python
163 lines
7.2 KiB
Python
"""ADR-0178 GB-3b.1 — single-referent accumulation chaining.
|
|
|
|
The first cross-clause *comprehension* reading: one actor's quantity changes over
|
|
successive clauses (``Sam has 14 apples. He buys 9 more.`` -> ``14 + 9``). It is
|
|
the safe specialisation of the cross-clause sum that GB-3a's referent guard
|
|
correctly refuses wholesale (the ``Alice has 6 … Tom has 2 …`` hazard): we chain
|
|
across clauses **only** when (a) the later clause stays on the **same referent**
|
|
and (b) it carries a **licensed change cue** whose polarity is unambiguous.
|
|
Otherwise we refuse — the guard is generalised, never weakened.
|
|
|
|
Reading:
|
|
|
|
1. **Anchor** — clause 1 must establish exactly one quantity ``(actor, N, unit)``.
|
|
2. **Change steps** — each later quantity-bearing clause applies ``+ M`` (gain) or
|
|
``- M`` (loss) to the running total, where ``M`` is the clause's single grounded
|
|
quantity, taken **in the anchor's unit** (``9 more`` = 9 more *apples*; the unit
|
|
is inherited from the running total, which is what accumulation means).
|
|
3. **Gate** — the constructed chain runs through the unchanged self-verification
|
|
gate (grounding ∧ cue ∧ unit ∧ completeness ∧ uniqueness). The gate keeps
|
|
wrong=0; this only proposes a structurally-licensed candidate.
|
|
|
|
Polarity (ordered, so the ambiguous ``gives`` is resolved, never guessed):
|
|
|
|
* ``more`` present -> **gain** (covers ``buys/gets/…
|
|
N more`` and ``gives her N more`` — the subject is the recipient);
|
|
* else an unambiguous **loss** verb -> **loss**;
|
|
* else ``gives``/``gave`` with ``to``/``away`` -> **loss** (gives N *to* someone);
|
|
* else an unambiguous **gain** verb -> **gain**;
|
|
* else -> **refuse** (no guessing).
|
|
|
|
Referent guard (wrong=0-critical; the ADR-0174 multi-actor hazard's defensive fix,
|
|
built minimally in the clean lane rather than resurrecting the retired resolver):
|
|
a later clause stays on the anchor's referent iff its **subject token** is a
|
|
pronoun (``He/She/They/…``) or the same name as the anchor's subject. A **new named
|
|
subject** (a different capitalised non-pronoun first token, e.g. ``Tom``) -> refuse.
|
|
Pronoun gender/number is **not** matched (that was the old resolver's trap); a new
|
|
*name* is the only signal, and it triggers refusal, not resolution.
|
|
|
|
Sealed (no ``chat/`` import); deterministic; refuse-preferring.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
import re
|
|
from typing import Final
|
|
|
|
from generate.derivation.clauses import segment_clauses
|
|
from generate.derivation.extract import extract_quantities
|
|
from generate.derivation.model import GroundedDerivation, Quantity, Step
|
|
from generate.derivation.verify import Resolution, select_self_verified
|
|
from generate.math_roundtrip import _tokens
|
|
|
|
# Closed change-cue lexeme sets (ADR-0165: lexemes, not grammar templates; refined
|
|
# by the CP ledger, not asserted complete). Sorted use keeps cue selection stable.
|
|
_GAIN_VERBS: Final[frozenset[str]] = frozenset(
|
|
{
|
|
"buys", "bought", "gets", "got", "finds", "found", "picks", "picked",
|
|
"earns", "earned", "receives", "received", "collects", "collected",
|
|
"wins", "won", "makes", "made", "gains", "gained", "adds", "added",
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
_LOSS_VERBS: Final[frozenset[str]] = frozenset(
|
|
{
|
|
"loses", "lost", "spends", "spent", "uses", "used", "eats", "ate",
|
|
"sells", "sold", "donates", "donated", "drops", "dropped", "removes",
|
|
"removed", "breaks", "broke",
|
|
}
|
|
)
|
|
_PRONOUNS: Final[frozenset[str]] = frozenset(
|
|
{"he", "she", "they", "it", "him", "her", "them", "his", "hers", "its", "their", "we", "i", "you"}
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
_WORD_RE: Final[re.Pattern[str]] = re.compile(r"[A-Za-z]+")
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _subject_token(clause: str) -> str | None:
|
|
"""The clause's leading word token (its surface subject), or None if wordless."""
|
|
match = _WORD_RE.search(clause)
|
|
return match.group(0) if match is not None else None
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _same_referent(clause: str, anchor_subject: str | None) -> bool:
|
|
"""True iff ``clause`` does not introduce a new *named* subject.
|
|
|
|
Conservative: a leading pronoun continues the referent; a leading token equal
|
|
to the anchor's subject continues it; any other capitalised (named) leading
|
|
token is a *new actor* and breaks the referent (-> caller refuses).
|
|
"""
|
|
subject = _subject_token(clause)
|
|
if subject is None:
|
|
return True # wordless fragment carries no new actor
|
|
if subject.lower() in _PRONOUNS:
|
|
return True
|
|
if anchor_subject is not None and subject == anchor_subject:
|
|
return True
|
|
# A new capitalised, non-pronoun leading token is a new named actor.
|
|
return not subject[:1].isupper()
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _polarity(clause: str) -> int | None:
|
|
"""+1 (gain), -1 (loss), or None (ambiguous / no licensed change cue -> refuse)."""
|
|
tokens = set(_tokens(clause))
|
|
if "more" in tokens:
|
|
return +1
|
|
loss = bool(_LOSS_VERBS & tokens)
|
|
gain = bool(_GAIN_VERBS & tokens)
|
|
gives = "gives" in tokens or "gave" in tokens
|
|
directional = "to" in tokens or "away" in tokens
|
|
if loss and not gain:
|
|
return -1
|
|
if gives and directional and not gain and not loss:
|
|
return -1
|
|
if gain and not loss:
|
|
return +1
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _cue(clause: str, polarity: int) -> str:
|
|
"""A grounded cue lexeme present in the clause (for the gate's cue check)."""
|
|
tokens = set(_tokens(clause))
|
|
if "more" in tokens and polarity > 0:
|
|
return "more"
|
|
verbs = _GAIN_VERBS if polarity > 0 else _LOSS_VERBS
|
|
present = sorted(verbs & tokens)
|
|
if present:
|
|
return present[0]
|
|
return "gives" # the only remaining licensed loss path (gives … to/away)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def compose_accumulation(problem_text: str) -> Resolution | None:
|
|
"""GB-3b.1 composer — single-referent gain/loss accumulation. Refuse-preferring."""
|
|
clauses = segment_clauses(problem_text)
|
|
quantity_clauses = [c for c in clauses if extract_quantities(c)]
|
|
if len(quantity_clauses) < 2:
|
|
return None
|
|
|
|
anchor_clause, *change_clauses = quantity_clauses
|
|
anchor_quantities = extract_quantities(anchor_clause)
|
|
if len(anchor_quantities) != 1:
|
|
return None # the anchor must establish exactly one quantity (GB-3b.1 scope)
|
|
start = anchor_quantities[0]
|
|
anchor_subject = _subject_token(anchor_clause)
|
|
|
|
steps: list[Step] = []
|
|
for clause in change_clauses:
|
|
if not _same_referent(clause, anchor_subject):
|
|
return None # new named actor -> referent hazard -> refuse
|
|
change_quantities = extract_quantities(clause)
|
|
if len(change_quantities) != 1:
|
|
return None # one change per clause (multi-change is GB-3b.2)
|
|
polarity = _polarity(clause)
|
|
if polarity is None:
|
|
return None # no unambiguous licensed change cue -> refuse
|
|
change = change_quantities[0]
|
|
# The change is in the running total's dimension ("9 more" = 9 more apples).
|
|
operand = Quantity(value=change.value, unit=start.unit, source_token=change.source_token)
|
|
op = "add" if polarity > 0 else "subtract"
|
|
steps.append(Step(op=op, operand=operand, cue=_cue(clause, polarity)))
|
|
|
|
if not steps:
|
|
return None
|
|
derivation = GroundedDerivation(start=start, steps=tuple(steps))
|
|
return select_self_verified([derivation], problem_text, target_units=())
|