core/generate/proof_chain/verb.py
Shay 44e78aa438 feat(generalization): curriculum-grounded serving — exams answered from ratified curriculum (ADR-0262)
Phase 2 of the generalization arc, implementing the plan's §4
curriculum-entailment gold contract. "Does force cause acceleration?" is
answered from the ratified physics chain corpus and nothing else; "Does
gravity cause acceleration?" is declined because gravity is in no pack
CORE has been taught; "Does force cause motion?" is unsettled even though
the curriculum contains both links, because nothing ratified says
causation composes.

Path (flag-gated, default off): closed question grammar -> subject routing
by ratified vocabulary -> family-scoped premise compilation from reviewed,
pack-resident chains -> the SAME argument bands (ADR-0260/0261) -> the
ROBDD engine. Zero subject-specific decision code: physics differs from
philosophy only in which rows load.

Epistemology enforced mechanically, not by convention:
- gold is a function of (curriculum, question); cases pin chain ids and
  the runner FAILS a case whose pinned chain is absent or unratified;
- untaught => UNKNOWN, never "no" (open-world; silence is not denial);
- an independent oracle (own loader, ratification predicate, family table,
  agreement rules, verdict rule) re-derives every gold — it disagreed once,
  on "entropy reveals energy" vs "entropy causes energy", and the ORACLE
  was the side that was wrong;
- anti-recall probes are a lane GUARD: a split without >=3 true-but-untaught
  probes refuses to run.

Findings recorded rather than worked around (ADR-0262 §5):
- every curriculum band is UNEARNED and every answer is hedged. A band needs
  n>=657 with a real outcome mix; physics teaches 7 causal + 9 modal
  relations, so at most 16 questions in the subject can ever be ENTAILED.
  A balanced band needs ~219 taught relations per subject×family — a ~25x
  gap that only ratified curriculum content closes. Phase 2's blocker is
  curriculum volume, not machinery.
- REFUTED is unreachable from present corpora (every chain is positive).
- there is NO biology domain-chain corpus; the biology OOD lane measures
  fluency, not truth. The four subjects with ratified chains and mounted
  packs are physics, mathematics_logic, systems_software,
  philosophy_theology — the composer serves all four.

[Verification]: curriculum lane 32/32 wrong=0 with 5 anti-recall probes and
all three contract guards passing; tests/test_curriculum_serve.py 20 passed;
core test --suite deductive 252 passed; lane pinned as curriculum_serve_v1.
2026-07-24 14:38:08 -07:00

530 lines
22 KiB
Python

"""Verb-predicate argument reader — Band v5-VP (ADR-0260).
Reads deductive arguments whose facts are VERB sentences — "All philosophers
teach. Socrates is a philosopher. Therefore Socrates teaches." — by extending
Band v3-MEM's per-individual propositional lowering with a second atom family:
one opaque minted atom per *(individual, verb-lemma-group, object-term)*
triple, alongside v3-MEM's *(individual, class-group)* membership atoms, in
ONE shared atom space. A verb universal ("all C <verb> [obj]", "no C <verb>
[obj]") instantiates at every named individual as ``mem(i,C) -> [~]verb(i)``,
so a membership fact minted by the copula reading can discharge a verb rule —
the fusion this band exists for. The same verified ROBDD engine decides.
Why this is sound (ADR-0260 §3): identical to ADR-0258 §3's argument.
Universal instantiation at named individuals is truth-preserving in every
first-order model; each *(verb-group, object-term)* pair is one opaque unary
predicate over the same named-individual domain, so ENTAILED / REFUTED /
inconsistent verdicts over the lowered premises hold in every model of the
original argument. Completeness within the fragment lifts the same way: a
propositional countermodel becomes a first-order countermodel whose domain is
exactly the named individuals. The ONE semantic identification added over
v3-MEM is third-person-singular agreement — a universal's base verb form
("teach") and a singular fact's 3sg form ("teaches") are identified iff
related by a CLOSED relation: a verb-specific irregular table (consulted
first, sole authority for its tokens) else the three regular suffix rules
(``+s``, ``+es`` after sibilants, ``y↔ies``). NOUN morphology is deliberately
NOT reused for verbs — the noun table would misroute forms like "lives"
(noun: life; verb: live). Anything the relation cannot relate stays distinct:
under-linking costs coverage, never soundness. Object terms link by exact
token identity only.
Segmentation is scope-tight by design: without a lexicon there is no sound
way to split an arbitrary copula-free token run into subject/verb/object, so
this band reads EXACTLY ``<name> <verb>``, ``<name> <verb> <object>``, their
``does not`` negations, the sentential-not prefix, and universals
``all|every|each|no [the] <class> <verb> [<object>]`` — single-token name,
class, verb, and object. Everything longer or differently shaped refuses,
typed. Copula sentences delegate VERBATIM to v3-MEM's own ``_parse_singular``
/ ``_parse_universal`` (membership facts and is-a universals coexist with
verb sentences in one argument). Connective composition with verb leaves is a
deliberate scope-out (ADR-0260 §5) — any connective token refuses.
Tried strictly AFTER Bands v1 / v1b / v2-EN / v3-MEM / v4-CM (a fallback
tier) — pure widening; every previously-served argument is served
byte-identically. (v2-EN decides pure verb-fact restatements as opaque
clause-atoms already — soundly — so every argument that reaches this band
contains a quantifier lead, an is-a shape, or unnormalized negation that made
the earlier bands refuse.) Refusal-first, closed reason vocabulary:
``empty``, ``question_sentence``, ``no_conclusion``,
``multiple_conclusions``, ``conclusion_not_last``, ``no_premises``,
``empty_side``, ``quantifier_out_of_band``, ``bare_plural_out_of_band``,
``definite_description_out_of_band``, ``relative_clause_out_of_band``,
``universal_conclusion_out_of_band``, ``mixed_structure_out_of_band``,
``internal_negation_unread``, ``sentence_shape_out_of_band``,
``tense_out_of_band``, ``structural_leak``, ``too_many_premises``,
``too_many_atoms``.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
from dataclasses import dataclass
# The v2-EN sentence splitter and tokenizer are reused VERBATIM (one
# normalization discipline across every argument band), and v3-MEM's singular/
# universal copula parsers, token-run guard, noun-morphology linker, and
# sibilant set are reused VERBATIM — deliberate private-name imports inside
# the proof_chain package, same precedent as generate.proof_chain.member and
# generate.proof_chain.cond_member.
from generate.proof_chain.english import _SENTENCE_RE, _tokenize
from generate.proof_chain.member import (
_A_LEADS,
_COPULA_FORMS,
_E_LEAD,
_QUANTIFIER_TOKENS,
_SENTENTIAL_NOT,
_SIBILANT_ENDINGS,
_Singular,
_Universal,
_check_run,
_forms_link,
_parse_singular,
_parse_universal,
)
from generate.proof_chain.member import _Reject as _MemberReject
from generate.proof_chain.shape import (
EN_VERB_CHAIN,
EN_VERB_FACT,
EN_VERB_NEGATIVE,
EN_VERB_UNIVERSAL,
)
#: Connective structure this band does not compose (a future band fuses the
#: v2-EN/v4-CM connective grammar with verb sentences — ADR-0260 §5).
_CONNECTIVES = frozenset({"if", "then", "or", "and", "either"})
#: Auxiliary/determiner tokens that can never BE the verb or object of an
#: in-band sentence. ``does`` is consumed only by the exact ``does not``
#: negation shape; ``did not`` is past tense (a scope-out); bare ``do not``
#: with a singular subject is not an in-band agreement pattern.
_ARTICLES = frozenset({"a", "an", "the"})
_AUXILIARIES = frozenset({"do", "does", "did"})
#: Closed irregular 3sg table (3sg form → base). Consulted BEFORE the regular
#: suffix rules; table membership makes it the sole authority for that token.
#: Deliberately verb-specific — the noun table (member.py) would misroute
#: forms like "lives" (noun: life; verb: live).
_VERB_IRREGULAR_3SG: dict[str, str] = {
"has": "have",
"goes": "go",
"does": "do",
}
_VERB_TABLE_TOKENS = frozenset(_VERB_IRREGULAR_3SG) | frozenset(
_VERB_IRREGULAR_3SG.values()
)
#: Honesty caps — beyond these the argument is refused, never truncated.
#: ``MAX_ATOMS`` counts minted atoms of BOTH families, so instantiation
#: fan-out is capped exactly where it multiplies.
MAX_PREMISE_SENTENCES = 16
MAX_ATOMS = 24
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class VerbArgument:
"""A successfully-read verb-predicate argument, engine-ready.
Same shape as ``MemberArgument``: ``premise_formulas``/``query_formula``
are propositional formula strings over minted atom ids; ``atoms[i]``
displays the fact behind ``a{i}`` (``individual : class`` for membership
atoms, ``individual : verb [object]`` for verb atoms).
"""
premise_formulas: tuple[str, ...]
query_formula: str
premise_texts: tuple[str, ...]
query_text: str
band: str
atoms: tuple[str, ...]
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class VerbRefusal:
"""A typed refusal — the argument is not honestly readable by this band."""
reason: str
detail: str = ""
class _Reject(Exception):
def __init__(self, reason: str, detail: str = "") -> None:
super().__init__(reason)
self.refusal = VerbRefusal(reason, detail)
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class _VerbFact:
"""``<NAME> <verb3sg> [<object>]`` (optionally ``does not`` / sentential-
not negated) — a verb literal about one individual."""
ind: tuple[str, ...]
verb: str
obj: str | None
negated: bool
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class _VerbUniversal:
"""``all|every|each|no [the] <class> <verb> [<object>]`` — instantiated
per individual at lowering time as ``mem(i, class) -> [~]verb(i)``.
``negative`` marks the E-form (``no``)."""
subject: tuple[str, ...]
verb: str
obj: str | None
negative: bool
_Record = _Singular | _Universal | _VerbFact | _VerbUniversal
def _verb_tokens_link(a: str, b: str) -> bool:
"""True iff single tokens *a* and *b* are agreement forms of one verb
lemma under the closed relation (irregular table first, then the three
regular 3sg suffix rules)."""
if a == b:
return True
if a in _VERB_TABLE_TOKENS or b in _VERB_TABLE_TOKENS:
return _VERB_IRREGULAR_3SG.get(a) == b or _VERB_IRREGULAR_3SG.get(b) == a
short, long_ = (a, b) if len(a) <= len(b) else (b, a)
if long_ == short + "s" and not short.endswith(_SIBILANT_ENDINGS):
return True
if long_ == short + "es" and short.endswith(_SIBILANT_ENDINGS):
return True
if short.endswith("y") and long_ == short[:-1] + "ies":
return True
return False
def _check_verb_token(tok: str, detail: str) -> None:
"""Guard the verb slot: the shared opaque-run guard plus the aux/article
exclusions (an auxiliary or determiner is never an in-band verb lemma)."""
_check_run((tok,), detail)
if tok in _ARTICLES or tok in _AUXILIARIES:
raise _Reject("sentence_shape_out_of_band", detail)
def _check_term_token(tok: str, detail: str) -> None:
"""Guard a name/object slot: the shared opaque-run guard plus a dangling-
determiner check."""
_check_run((tok,), detail)
if tok in _ARTICLES:
raise _Reject("sentence_shape_out_of_band", detail)
def _parse_verb_fact(toks: list[str], detail: str) -> _VerbFact:
"""``<name> <verb> [<obj>]`` / ``<name> does not <verb> [<obj>]``."""
negated = False
if len(toks) >= 3 and toks[1] in _AUXILIARIES and toks[2] == "not":
if toks[1] == "did":
raise _Reject("tense_out_of_band", detail)
if toks[1] == "do":
raise _Reject("sentence_shape_out_of_band", detail)
negated = True
toks = [toks[0], *toks[3:]]
if any(t == "not" or t.endswith("n't") for t in toks):
raise _Reject("internal_negation_unread", detail)
if len(toks) < 2 or len(toks) > 3:
raise _Reject("sentence_shape_out_of_band", detail)
name, verb = toks[0], toks[1]
obj = toks[2] if len(toks) == 3 else None
_check_term_token(name, detail)
_check_verb_token(verb, detail)
if obj is not None:
_check_term_token(obj, detail)
return _VerbFact((name,), verb, obj, negated)
def _parse_verb_universal(toks: list[str], detail: str) -> _VerbUniversal:
"""``all|every|each|no [the] <class> <verb> [<obj>]`` — no copula form."""
negative = toks[0] == _E_LEAD
rest = toks[1:]
if rest and rest[0] == "the": # "all the dogs bark" — determiner, dropped
rest = rest[1:]
if any(t == "not" or t.endswith("n't") for t in rest):
# "All men do not teach" — scope-ambiguous (¬∀ vs ∀¬); the E-form
# ("no …") is the unambiguous spelling this band reads.
raise _Reject("internal_negation_unread", detail)
if any(t == "did" for t in rest):
raise _Reject("tense_out_of_band", detail)
if len(rest) < 2 or len(rest) > 3:
raise _Reject("sentence_shape_out_of_band", detail)
cls, verb = rest[0], rest[1]
obj = rest[2] if len(rest) == 3 else None
_check_term_token(cls, detail)
_check_verb_token(verb, detail)
if obj is not None:
_check_term_token(obj, detail)
return _VerbUniversal((cls,), verb, obj, negative)
def _parse_fact(toks: list[str], detail: str) -> _Singular | _VerbFact:
"""A non-universal sentence: sentential-not unwraps first (its prefix
contains a copula, so it must be checked before copula routing); then a
copula routes to v3-MEM's own singular parser (membership fact), else the
verb-fact grammar."""
if tuple(toks[: len(_SENTENTIAL_NOT)]) == _SENTENTIAL_NOT:
inner = _parse_fact(toks[len(_SENTENTIAL_NOT) :], detail)
if isinstance(inner, _Singular):
return _Singular(inner.ind, inner.cls, negated=not inner.negated)
return _VerbFact(inner.ind, inner.verb, inner.obj, negated=not inner.negated)
if not toks:
raise _Reject("empty_side", detail)
if any(t in _COPULA_FORMS for t in toks):
return _parse_singular(toks, detail)
return _parse_verb_fact(toks, detail)
def _parse_sentence(toks: list[str], detail: str) -> _Record:
if any(t in _CONNECTIVES for t in toks):
raise _Reject("mixed_structure_out_of_band", detail)
head = toks[0]
if head in _A_LEADS or head == _E_LEAD:
if any(t in ("is", "are") for t in toks):
return _parse_universal(toks, detail) # is-a universal (v3-MEM's)
return _parse_verb_universal(toks, detail)
if head in _QUANTIFIER_TOKENS:
raise _Reject("quantifier_out_of_band", detail)
return _parse_fact(toks, detail)
def read_verb_argument(text: str) -> VerbArgument | VerbRefusal:
"""Read *text* as a verb-predicate argument, or refuse (typed).
Deterministic and pure: same text → same ``VerbArgument``. The conclusion
is the final sentence, the sole "therefore"-led one, and must be a
singular fact (membership or verb); every earlier sentence is a premise.
Lowering is two-pass exactly as v3-MEM's — sentences parse first, THEN
individuals / class-groups / verb-groups are collected, THEN atoms mint
and universals instantiate at every named individual — with premise
formulas emitted in sentence order.
"""
if not text or not text.strip():
return VerbRefusal("empty")
sentences = [
(m.group(1), m.group(2)) for m in _SENTENCE_RE.finditer(text) if m.group(1).strip()
]
if not sentences:
return VerbRefusal("empty")
premises: list[_Record] = []
premise_texts: list[str] = []
conclusion: _Singular | _VerbFact | None = None
query_text: str | None = None
try:
for idx, (body, terminator) in enumerate(sentences):
if terminator == "?":
raise _Reject("question_sentence", body)
toks = _tokenize(body)
if not toks:
continue
if toks[0] == "therefore":
if conclusion is not None:
raise _Reject("multiple_conclusions", body)
if idx != len(sentences) - 1:
raise _Reject("conclusion_not_last", body)
rest = toks[1:]
if not rest:
raise _Reject("empty_side", body)
if any(t in _CONNECTIVES for t in rest):
raise _Reject("mixed_structure_out_of_band", body)
if rest[0] in _A_LEADS or rest[0] == _E_LEAD:
raise _Reject("universal_conclusion_out_of_band", body)
if rest[0] in _QUANTIFIER_TOKENS:
raise _Reject("quantifier_out_of_band", body)
conclusion = _parse_fact(rest, body)
query_text = " ".join(rest)
continue
if len(premises) >= MAX_PREMISE_SENTENCES:
raise _Reject("too_many_premises", body)
premises.append(_parse_sentence(toks, body))
premise_texts.append(" ".join(toks))
if conclusion is None or query_text is None:
return VerbRefusal("no_conclusion")
if not premises:
return VerbRefusal("no_premises")
records: list[_Record] = [*premises, conclusion]
# Every argument this band DECIDES contains at least one verb
# construct — a pure-copula argument is v3-MEM/v4-CM territory (and
# only ever reaches here when those bands refused it, in which case
# the delegated parsers above raised the same typed refusal already;
# this check is a defensive closure of that invariant).
if not any(isinstance(r, (_VerbFact, _VerbUniversal)) for r in records):
raise _Reject("sentence_shape_out_of_band", "no verb predicate read")
# --- lowering (ADR-0260 §2): v3-MEM's two-pass scheme, two families --
individuals: list[tuple[str, ...]] = []
for rec in records:
if isinstance(rec, (_Singular, _VerbFact)) and rec.ind not in individuals:
individuals.append(rec.ind)
# Class groups — the SAME closed noun-morphology relation as v3-MEM.
cls_group_of: dict[tuple[str, ...], int] = {}
cls_reps: list[tuple[str, ...]] = []
for rec in records:
forms: list[tuple[str, ...]] = []
if isinstance(rec, _Singular):
forms = [rec.cls]
elif isinstance(rec, _Universal):
forms = [rec.subject, rec.predicate]
elif isinstance(rec, _VerbUniversal):
forms = [rec.subject]
for form in forms:
if form in cls_group_of:
continue
for gi, rep in enumerate(cls_reps):
if _forms_link(form, rep):
cls_group_of[form] = gi
break
else:
cls_group_of[form] = len(cls_reps)
cls_reps.append(form)
# Verb groups — the closed verb-agreement relation (this band's one
# new semantic identification).
verb_group_of: dict[str, int] = {}
verb_reps: list[str] = []
for rec in records:
if not isinstance(rec, (_VerbFact, _VerbUniversal)):
continue
form = rec.verb
if form in verb_group_of:
continue
for gi, rep in enumerate(verb_reps):
if _verb_tokens_link(form, rep):
verb_group_of[form] = gi
break
else:
verb_group_of[form] = len(verb_reps)
verb_reps.append(form)
mint: dict[tuple, str] = {}
atom_display: list[str] = []
def _mint(key: tuple, display: str, detail: str) -> str:
if key not in mint:
if len(atom_display) >= MAX_ATOMS:
raise _Reject("too_many_atoms", detail)
mint[key] = f"a{len(atom_display)}"
atom_display.append(display)
return mint[key]
def mem_atom(ind_idx: int, group: int, detail: str) -> str:
return _mint(
("mem", ind_idx, group),
f"{' '.join(individuals[ind_idx])} : {' '.join(cls_reps[group])}",
detail,
)
def verb_atom(ind_idx: int, group: int, obj: str | None, detail: str) -> str:
shown = verb_reps[group] if obj is None else f"{verb_reps[group]} {obj}"
return _mint(
("verb", ind_idx, group, obj),
f"{' '.join(individuals[ind_idx])} : {shown}",
detail,
)
premise_formulas: list[str] = []
for rec, body_text in zip(premises, premise_texts):
if isinstance(rec, _Singular):
atom = mem_atom(
individuals.index(rec.ind), cls_group_of[rec.cls], body_text
)
premise_formulas.append(f"~({atom})" if rec.negated else atom)
elif isinstance(rec, _VerbFact):
atom = verb_atom(
individuals.index(rec.ind),
verb_group_of[rec.verb],
rec.obj,
body_text,
)
premise_formulas.append(f"~({atom})" if rec.negated else atom)
elif isinstance(rec, _Universal):
for ind_idx in range(len(individuals)):
antecedent = mem_atom(ind_idx, cls_group_of[rec.subject], body_text)
consequent = mem_atom(ind_idx, cls_group_of[rec.predicate], body_text)
premise_formulas.append(
f"({antecedent}) -> (~({consequent}))"
if rec.negative
else f"({antecedent}) -> ({consequent})"
)
else: # _VerbUniversal
for ind_idx in range(len(individuals)):
antecedent = mem_atom(ind_idx, cls_group_of[rec.subject], body_text)
consequent = verb_atom(
ind_idx, verb_group_of[rec.verb], rec.obj, body_text
)
premise_formulas.append(
f"({antecedent}) -> (~({consequent}))"
if rec.negative
else f"({antecedent}) -> ({consequent})"
)
if isinstance(conclusion, _Singular):
query_atom = mem_atom(
individuals.index(conclusion.ind),
cls_group_of[conclusion.cls],
query_text,
)
else:
query_atom = verb_atom(
individuals.index(conclusion.ind),
verb_group_of[conclusion.verb],
conclusion.obj,
query_text,
)
query_formula = f"~({query_atom})" if conclusion.negated else query_atom
except (_Reject, _MemberReject) as rej:
# ``_parse_singular``/``_parse_universal`` are v3-MEM's own functions,
# reused verbatim — their failures raise v3-MEM's OWN ``_Reject``
# class (same shape, different identity), so both are caught here and
# normalized to THIS band's refusal type (the v4-CM lesson).
return VerbRefusal(rej.refusal.reason, rej.refusal.detail)
universals = [r for r in premises if isinstance(r, (_Universal, _VerbUniversal))]
if any(
(isinstance(u, _Universal) and u.negative)
or (isinstance(u, _VerbUniversal) and u.negative)
for u in universals
):
band = EN_VERB_NEGATIVE
elif len(universals) >= 2:
band = EN_VERB_CHAIN
elif len(universals) == 1:
band = EN_VERB_UNIVERSAL
else:
band = EN_VERB_FACT
return VerbArgument(
premise_formulas=tuple(premise_formulas),
query_formula=query_formula,
premise_texts=tuple(premise_texts),
query_text=query_text,
band=band,
atoms=tuple(atom_display),
)
def verb_forms_link(a: str, b: str) -> bool:
"""Public view of this band's closed verb-agreement relation.
Exported so paths OUTSIDE the proof_chain package (the curriculum
composer, ADR-0262) can normalize a base form against a stated
third-person form using the SAME closed table and suffix rules the reader
uses — one agreement authority, not two.
"""
return _verb_tokens_link(a, b)
__all__ = [
"MAX_ATOMS",
"MAX_PREMISE_SENTENCES",
"VerbArgument",
"VerbRefusal",
"read_verb_argument",
"verb_forms_link",
]