core/docs/assessment
Claude 339bfd3776
docs(plans,assessment): fourth-audit triage — the faithful §2 reader exists, dark
Cross-examined a six-fault red-team audit against the source at a4f567f0.
Three faults stale or mis-attributed, one already executed, one already ruled,
one superseded the same day — but it is the best-anchored external audit of the
four, and chasing its claims caught a hole in G-24's own sweep.

THE FIND: core/semantic_primitives/ + generate/linguistic_pipeline/ implement
ADR-0252 §2 faithfully — typed Container/ConservationLaw/DimensionalType
primitives, layer_a_english surface extraction, and field_integration.py
(51 geometric refs): constraints embedded as conformal points / COMPOSED
ROTORS with versor_condition + GoldTether closure. Nothing on the serving
side calls it. F-B amended: two readers exist — the inverted one serves,
the faithful one is dark.

Also verified: W-007's "architecturally blocked" claim is stale by two months
(ADR-0146 committed the L10 shape 2026-05-25; the daemon landed 18e25580;
the DerivedRecognizer step is BUILT at pipeline.py:211 behind
recognition_grounded_graph=False). The audit reasoned from the
substrate-liveness ratchet — the instrument PR-3 marked historical this same
day. H-9's mechanism, demonstrated on an external auditor.

Adopted from the audit: the H2 non-collapse criterion (the §5 add-vs-subtract
minimal pair must show non-zero relational contrast under operator
composition) joins the Phase-1 pre-registration verbatim; the use_salience
ruling moves ahead of Phase 3's serving evals.

The pattern, named once in the plan §2b: linguistic_pipeline, the ADR-0144
recognizer step, and relation_compiler are three instances of one class —
correct mechanisms built dark behind unruled flags while enumerative stopgaps
serve. The flag register's §3a hesitancy cluster is the same disease seen
flag-side. CORE's failure mode is not "never built"; it is transition windows
that never close. Phase 2 now begins from the dark-bridge inventory rather
than from new code — "less machinery" made concrete.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Wcw2pnMBwyvmNyQg4uPEt4
2026-07-28 17:22:40 +00:00
..
10-layer-cards fix(tests,claims): G-22 — main was red, and CLAIMS.md was publishing evidence that no longer existed 2026-07-28 05:25:28 +00:00
20-component-cards docs(assessment): re-stamp the eight cards this arc touched, and post the board 2026-07-28 04:36:13 +00:00
00-scope-and-method.md docs(assessment): Phase 4 — the gap register and the hindrance audit 2026-07-27 16:04:22 -07:00
01-phase0-ground-truth.md
02-layer-taxonomy.md feat(wave-1): retire the dead instruments, delete the aliases nobody calls (PR-3, PR-3b, R-7) 2026-07-28 05:40:45 +00:00
03-card-schema.md docs(assessment): Phase 1 — layer taxonomy and card schema (the keystone) 2026-07-27 15:28:42 -07:00
04-phase2-findings.md docs(assessment): Phase 2 — nine layer cards, verified against code not documents 2026-07-27 15:45:52 -07:00
05-phase3-findings.md docs(assessment): Phase 3 — component descent; the correction chain continues into code 2026-07-27 15:57:36 -07:00
30-gap-register.md docs(plans,assessment): G-24 — the perception diagnosis, and the Perception Arc plan 2026-07-28 17:02:53 +00:00
31-hindrance-audit.md docs(plans,assessment): fourth-audit triage — the faithful §2 reader exists, dark 2026-07-28 17:22:40 +00:00
40-assessment.md feat(rnd): ADR-0252 §5 run to a verdict — NO-GO, and the two prior GOs are void 2026-07-28 02:55:31 +00:00
50-execution-plan.md docs(plans,assessment): G-24 — the perception diagnosis, and the Perception Arc plan 2026-07-28 17:02:53 +00:00
50-rulings.md docs(specs): the four posture statements — and R-11's measurement dissolves its own question 2026-07-28 08:26:48 +00:00
README.md docs(specs): the four posture statements — and R-11's measurement dissolves its own question 2026-07-28 08:26:48 +00:00

docs/assessment/ — The Holistic Macro→Micro Assessment (2026-07-27)

A read-only, evidence-bearing assessment of CORE's cognitive-cycle design versus implementation fulfillment, conducted under docs/conceptualizing_engineering_mastery.md at forgejo/main @ 8927c563. Phases 05 change no runtime behavior, fix no defect, and decide nothing — they produce evidence and judgments for ruling. Phase 6 adds the execution plan built on them and the ruling packet they require.

Start here: 40-assessment.md — the synthesis (the verdict, the five frontiers, the recommended attack order). Then 50-execution-plan.md for what follows from it, and 50-rulings.md for what is waiting on a decision. The registers rank the work; the cards are the evidence base.

File / dir Phase What it is
00-scope-and-method.md Charter, method, rules of engagement, phase/executor table
01-phase0-ground-truth.md 0 Corpus triage, the five unreconciled articulations, system-map recovery
02-layer-taxonomy.md 1 The two-axis taxonomy: 7 macro layers + 2 cross-cuts over 33 zones; the Candidate Register (CR-1…4); completeness criteria
03-card-schema.md 1 The card metadata schema: liveness ⊥ fitness, design ⊥ build, sabotage-tested evidence, verified_at stamps
10-layer-cards/ 2 Nine layer cards (M0M6, MG, MV), every liveness label re-verified against code
04-phase2-findings.md 2 Stage-coverage audit; corrections to Phase 0; findings F-1…F-5
20-component-cards/ 3 Eight component cards: the four zero-subsystem zones + always-on, derivation organs, surface selection, attention
05-phase3-findings.md 3 Corrections C-1…C-5; findings F-6…F-10; the consolidated Phase-4 seed list
30-gap-register.md 4 The live gap register — 23 entries (G-21, G-22, G-23 added during execution), 4 tiers, each with evidence + deciding authority; supersedes docs/gaps.md and the substrate-liveness ratchet per R-7
31-hindrance-audit.md 4 Fourteen hindrances with fitness verdicts and better homes; seventeen candidates examined and cleared — five in Phase 4, six in the first 2026-07-28 external-assessment triage, six in the second (of which one, the pack/domain seam, survived as G-23)
40-assessment.md 5 The synthesis
50-execution-plan.md 6 The execution plan — five waves + five frontier tracks over every G/H entry, with the dependency gates and the risks. §0 carries nine corrections to the assessment found while sizing and executing it; §2.1 carries the adopted ruling docket and its execution order
50-rulings.md 6 The ruling packet — R-1…R-14, each with evidence, options, a recommendation, and the exact diff that follows from each choice. RULED 2026-07-28: twelve adopted, R-10 and R-14 stricken, §5 NO-GO ratified. Carries the standing delegation under which residual sub-questions are decided, and marks each ruling EXECUTED as it lands
../specs/postures.md The posture statements (R-1/R-5/R-6/R-11) — efferent-action deferral, the identity-enforcement discrimination bar, non-text-ingest deferral, each with the criterion that would change it; plus P-4, the interim fabrication gate withdrawn because measurement dissolved its premise
../specs/flag_register.md The flag register (PR-5, R-3 + R-4) — all 32 RuntimeConfig booleans by class, governing ADR, and what evidence flips it; profiles as the unit of decision; §5 indexes every declared table in the repository and the pin that makes each true

Maintenance contract (from §8 of the synthesis): a card whose verified_at falls behind a load-bearing arc is testimony, not evidence. Update cards when their subsystems move, or this directory becomes the next dead instrument it was built to replace.

Execution status (2026-07-28). Phases 06 produced the evidence; the arc that followed executed everything needing no ruling, Wave 0 closed (twelve rulings adopted, two stricken, the §5 NO-GO ratified), and the entire adopted docket is now executed in its corrected order — R-7 → R-12 → R-3+R-4 → R-9+R-2 → R-13 → R-8 → R-1/R-5/R-6/R-11. Landed: Track A's §5 verdict (pre-registered), PR-1, PR-3+PR-3b, PR-4 (+pin 3), PR-4b, PR-5, PR-6, PR-7, PR-9, PR-11, PR-12, PR-14, R-12's ADR amendments, the posture statements, and five defect fixes (H-13, H-8e, G-22, G-23, plus pin 3's own union blind spot).

Closed: G-5…G-12, G-15, G-17, G-19, G-22, H-1, H-6, H-7, H-8 (all five instances), H-11, H-13. Added: N-8, N-9, G-21, G-22, G-23, H-13, H-14. Wave 4's F-6 half-gate is lifted. The gate is now four steps (smoke + warmed_session + deductive + teaching).

Three results worth reading before the registers. (1) ADR-0252 §5 returned NO-GO against a pre-registered criterion — the geometric structure-mapper is refuted for its embedding class, and §6's organ-retirement condition was amended because a NO-GO made it unsatisfiable as written. (2) Served capability shrank on purpose: the Wilson re-count took deduction from 25 licensed shape-bands to 4, and the curriculum outcome-mix rule dissolved the four licences N-5 predicted — in both cases wrong stayed 0, so no answer changed, only the claim attached to it. (3) R-11's instrumentation dissolved its own question: nothing is syntactically outside the verified inventory, because one of the 19 constructions matches any string — so the fabrications are mis-reads of admissible surfaces, and the fabrication ADR inherits the boundary question.

What remains is the next arc, not this one — see 50-execution-plan.md §Status and §2.1.

Standing note: the PR #138 fabrication findings appear throughout as measured & pinned, fix held for ADR + ratification — recorded, never re-discovered, never fixed here, per explicit instruction.