core/tests/test_articulation_quality_miner.py
Shay 327047ce26 feat(contemplation): Phase 5 — articulation-quality miner closes the loop
Final phase of the articulation arc.  Consumes the per-turn
``PlanMetrics`` + ``ContemplationFinding`` streams produced by
Phases 3 + 4 and aggregates across many turns to emit
SPECULATIVE ``PACK_MUTATION_CANDIDATE`` findings that the operator
reviews via the existing proposal-review-ratify chain.

This is the doctrine-aligned answer to the user's question:

  "Should we... realize a way to score whether it should use what
  it produced towards memory confidence for future use?"

Yes — and it stays inside ADR-0080: read-only, SPECULATIVE-only,
deterministic, no parallel learning path, no autonomous memory
mutation.

What it adds
------------

* New module ``chat/articulation_telemetry.py``:
    - ``ArticulationObservation`` frozen dataclass — per-turn
      bundle of (turn_id, anchor_subject, prompt_hash,
      plan_substrate_hash, metrics, findings).
    - ``format_articulation_observation_jsonl(...)`` — deterministic
      sort-keys JSONL line.
    - ``load_articulation_observations(lines)`` — schema-tolerant
      loader; malformed lines drop without aborting.
    - ``ArticulationObservationSink`` protocol — structurally
      identical to ``TurnEventSink`` but distinct named type so
      consumers can subscribe to one stream without the other.

* New module ``core/contemplation/miners/articulation_quality.py``:
    - ``mine_articulation_observations(observations, paths)`` —
      pure deterministic aggregator with three v1 rules.
    - **recurring_predicate_monotony** — when the same
      (subject, predicate) pair is flagged WEAK_SURFACE in
      >= _MIN_RECURRENCE (default 3) observations, propose
      substrate diversification with non-dominant predicates.
    - **recurring_planner_gap** — when the same subject is
      flagged PLANNER_GAP >= _MIN_RECURRENCE times across modes,
      propose substrate expansion.
    - **low_average_predicate_diversity** — when mean
      ``predicate_diversity_ratio`` < 0.5 across >= _MIN_RECURRENCE
      observations on the same anchor subject, propose
      diversification.

* Runtime wiring (``chat/runtime.py``):
    - New ``ChatRuntime.attach_articulation_sink(sink)`` method.
      Mirrors ``attach_telemetry_sink`` pattern.
    - Emission point at the end of
      ``_maybe_apply_discourse_planner``: when contemplation
      enabled + sink attached + plan engaged, builds an
      ``ArticulationObservation`` and emits one JSONL line.
      Sink errors propagate (fail-fast, no swallowing).
    - Per-runtime ``_articulation_turn_counter`` increments on
      every emission; gives downstream consumers a stable
      sequence index.

Tests
-----

* ``tests/test_articulation_quality_miner.py`` (11 tests):
    - Empty / sub-threshold cases yield no findings.
    - Each of the three rules fires at threshold.
    - Recurring_predicate_monotony separates by subject (no
      cross-subject merging).
    - Recurring_planner_gap collects distinct modes into a
      sorted comma-joined string.
    - Determinism — byte-equal finding IDs across two runs.
    - SPECULATIVE doctrine pin.
    - JSONL round-trip preserves observation identity.

* ``tests/test_articulation_quality_e2e.py`` (7 tests):
    - Sink-detached + contemplation-on → no emission.
    - Sink-attached + contemplation-off → no emission.
    - Engaged turn emits exactly one observation line.
    - BRIEF prompt emits nothing (fast-path).
    - **Full loop** — run compound prompt 3x → 3 observations →
      miner emits PACK_MUTATION_CANDIDATE with subject='truth',
      predicate='recurring_predicate_monotony', object='belongs_to'.
    - Full loop is deterministic (byte-equal finding IDs across
      two complete runs).
    - Every full-loop finding is SPECULATIVE.

Doctrine pins
-------------

| Claim                                | Pinned by                                                |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| SPECULATIVE-only                     | test_all_findings_remain_speculative                     |
| Deterministic across runs            | test_miner_is_deterministic_across_runs                  |
| Full-loop determinism (e2e)          | test_full_loop_is_deterministic_byte_equal_finding_ids   |
| No autonomous mutation               | Sink is append-only; miner outputs ContemplationFinding  |
|                                      | objects only; nothing writes to packs/vault/teaching.    |
| Append-only stream                   | Sink protocol has emit(line: str) and nothing else.      |

Live demo (3 identical compound-prompt turns)
---------------------------------------------

Runtime emits 3 observations.  Offline miner aggregates and emits:

  [pack_mutation_candidate] subject='truth'
      predicate='recurring_predicate_monotony' object='belongs_to'
      evidence_refs: 3 observations
      proposed_action: "diversify substrate for 'truth': across 3
        observations the plan repeatedly over-concentrated on
        predicate 'belongs_to'. Candidates: add teaching chains
        rooted on 'truth' with relations OTHER than 'belongs_to'
        (grounds / requires / reveals / contrasts / precedes /
        follows) so the planner's RELATION selector has more
        variety to draw from."
      epistemic_status: speculative

The system observed its own articulation patterns across many
turns, identified the corpus expansion priority, and emitted a
specific reviewable proposal — without mutating anything.  The
operator decides whether to act on it via the existing review
chain.

Verification
------------

  pytest test_articulation_quality_miner.py       11/11 pass
  pytest test_articulation_quality_e2e.py          7/7 pass
  pytest test_plan_metrics*.py                    18/18 pass (Phase 4)
  pytest test_plan_contemplation*.py              17/17 pass (Phase 3)
  pytest test_discourse_planner_*.py              99/99 pass
  pytest test_articulation_demo.py                 all claims supported
  pytest test_narrative_example_intents.py         pass
  core test --suite smoke                         67/67 pass
  core test --suite runtime                       19/19 pass

The articulation arc is complete.  Future work documented in
``docs/sessions/SESSION-2026-05-21-articulation-arc.md`` §8:
connective rotation, generalised pronoun selection, doctrine-gated
plan revision, Phase 2.5 mid-sentence reflection.  None blocking.
2026-05-21 10:55:39 -07:00

307 lines
11 KiB
Python

"""Phase 5 — articulation-quality miner unit tests.
Tests ``core.contemplation.miners.articulation_quality.
mine_articulation_observations`` against synthetic observations:
* Empty stream → no findings
* Single observation → no findings (threshold not met)
* recurring_predicate_monotony — fires at >= _MIN_RECURRENCE
* recurring_planner_gap — fires at >= _MIN_RECURRENCE
* low_average_predicate_diversity — fires when mean < threshold
* Determinism: byte-equal finding IDs across two runs
* All emitted findings stay SPECULATIVE
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import pytest
from chat.articulation_telemetry import (
ArticulationObservation,
format_articulation_observation_jsonl,
load_articulation_observations,
)
from core.contemplation.miners.articulation_quality import (
mine_articulation_observations,
)
from core.contemplation.schema import FindingKind
from teaching.epistemic import EpistemicStatus
def _obs(
*,
turn_id: int = 0,
anchor: str = "truth",
prompt_h: str = "p0000000000000000",
plan_h: str = "s0000000000000000",
metrics: dict | None = None,
findings: tuple[dict, ...] = (),
) -> ArticulationObservation:
return ArticulationObservation(
turn_id=turn_id,
anchor_subject=anchor,
prompt_hash=prompt_h,
plan_substrate_hash=plan_h,
metrics=metrics or {
"move_count": 4,
"fact_bearing_count": 4,
"anchor_count": 1,
"support_count": 1,
"relation_count": 1,
"transition_count": 1,
"closure_count": 0,
"unique_predicates": 4,
"unique_subjects": 1,
"unique_sources": 2,
"topic_shift_count": 0,
"pronominalization_opportunities": 3,
"predicate_diversity_ratio": 1.0,
"subject_focus_ratio": 1.0,
},
findings=findings,
)
def _weak_surface_finding(
subject: str, predicate: str,
) -> dict[str, str | None]:
return {
"kind": FindingKind.WEAK_SURFACE.value,
"subject": subject,
"predicate": "predicate_repeats_in_plan",
"object": predicate,
}
def _planner_gap_finding(
subject: str, mode: str = "explain",
) -> dict[str, str | None]:
return {
"kind": FindingKind.PLANNER_GAP.value,
"subject": subject,
"predicate": "anchor_only_depth",
"object": mode,
}
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Trivial cases
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_empty_stream_yields_no_findings() -> None:
assert mine_articulation_observations(observations=()) == ()
def test_below_threshold_recurrence_yields_no_findings() -> None:
"""Two ``WEAK_SURFACE`` observations is below the default
``_MIN_RECURRENCE = 3`` — nothing should fire."""
observations = (
_obs(turn_id=0, findings=(_weak_surface_finding("truth", "belongs_to"),)),
_obs(turn_id=1, findings=(_weak_surface_finding("truth", "belongs_to"),)),
)
findings = mine_articulation_observations(observations=observations)
assert findings == ()
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Rule: recurring_predicate_monotony
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_recurring_predicate_monotony_fires_at_threshold() -> None:
observations = tuple(
_obs(turn_id=i, findings=(_weak_surface_finding("truth", "belongs_to"),))
for i in range(3)
)
findings = mine_articulation_observations(observations=observations)
matching = [
f for f in findings
if f.predicate == "recurring_predicate_monotony"
]
assert len(matching) == 1
f = matching[0]
assert f.kind is FindingKind.PACK_MUTATION_CANDIDATE
assert f.subject == "truth"
assert f.object == "belongs_to"
assert "diversify substrate" in f.proposed_action
assert f.epistemic_status is EpistemicStatus.SPECULATIVE
def test_recurring_predicate_monotony_separates_by_subject() -> None:
"""Two different subjects each above threshold → two separate
findings, not one merged finding."""
observations = (
*(
_obs(turn_id=i, anchor="truth",
findings=(_weak_surface_finding("truth", "belongs_to"),))
for i in range(3)
),
*(
_obs(turn_id=i + 100, anchor="memory",
findings=(_weak_surface_finding("memory", "requires"),))
for i in range(3)
),
)
findings = mine_articulation_observations(observations=observations)
matching = [
f for f in findings
if f.predicate == "recurring_predicate_monotony"
]
assert len(matching) == 2
by_subject = {f.subject: f for f in matching}
assert "truth" in by_subject and by_subject["truth"].object == "belongs_to"
assert "memory" in by_subject and by_subject["memory"].object == "requires"
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Rule: recurring_planner_gap
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_recurring_planner_gap_fires_at_threshold() -> None:
observations = tuple(
_obs(turn_id=i, anchor="rare_lemma",
findings=(_planner_gap_finding("rare_lemma", "explain"),))
for i in range(3)
)
findings = mine_articulation_observations(observations=observations)
matching = [
f for f in findings
if f.predicate == "recurring_planner_gap"
]
assert len(matching) == 1
assert matching[0].subject == "rare_lemma"
assert "widen substrate" in matching[0].proposed_action
def test_recurring_planner_gap_collects_distinct_modes() -> None:
"""When the same subject hits PLANNER_GAP across different modes,
the finding's ``object`` lists all of them, sorted."""
observations = (
_obs(turn_id=0, anchor="rare",
findings=(_planner_gap_finding("rare", "explain"),)),
_obs(turn_id=1, anchor="rare",
findings=(_planner_gap_finding("rare", "paragraph"),)),
_obs(turn_id=2, anchor="rare",
findings=(_planner_gap_finding("rare", "example"),)),
)
findings = mine_articulation_observations(observations=observations)
matching = [
f for f in findings if f.predicate == "recurring_planner_gap"
]
assert len(matching) == 1
assert matching[0].object == "example,explain,paragraph"
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Rule: low_average_predicate_diversity
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_low_average_predicate_diversity_fires_below_threshold() -> None:
low_metrics = dict(
move_count=6, fact_bearing_count=6,
anchor_count=1, support_count=2, relation_count=2,
transition_count=1, closure_count=0,
unique_predicates=2, unique_subjects=1, unique_sources=1,
topic_shift_count=0, pronominalization_opportunities=5,
predicate_diversity_ratio=2.0 / 6.0, # 0.333 — well below 0.5
subject_focus_ratio=1.0,
)
observations = tuple(
_obs(turn_id=i, anchor="truth", metrics=low_metrics)
for i in range(3)
)
findings = mine_articulation_observations(observations=observations)
matching = [
f for f in findings
if f.predicate == "low_average_predicate_diversity"
]
assert len(matching) == 1
f = matching[0]
assert f.kind is FindingKind.PACK_MUTATION_CANDIDATE
assert f.subject == "truth"
# object is the average ratio as a string, formatted to 3 decimals
assert f.object is not None
assert float(f.object) == pytest.approx(2.0 / 6.0, abs=1e-3)
def test_low_average_predicate_diversity_skips_when_above_threshold() -> None:
high_metrics = dict(
move_count=4, fact_bearing_count=4,
anchor_count=1, support_count=1, relation_count=2,
transition_count=0, closure_count=0,
unique_predicates=4, unique_subjects=1, unique_sources=2,
topic_shift_count=0, pronominalization_opportunities=3,
predicate_diversity_ratio=1.0,
subject_focus_ratio=1.0,
)
observations = tuple(
_obs(turn_id=i, anchor="truth", metrics=high_metrics)
for i in range(5)
)
findings = mine_articulation_observations(observations=observations)
assert not [
f for f in findings
if f.predicate == "low_average_predicate_diversity"
]
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Determinism
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_miner_is_deterministic_across_runs() -> None:
observations = tuple(
_obs(turn_id=i, findings=(_weak_surface_finding("truth", "belongs_to"),))
for i in range(3)
)
a = mine_articulation_observations(observations=observations)
b = mine_articulation_observations(observations=observations)
assert tuple(f.finding_id for f in a) == tuple(f.finding_id for f in b)
assert tuple(f.substrate_hash for f in a) == tuple(f.substrate_hash for f in b)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# SPECULATIVE doctrine pin
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_all_findings_remain_speculative() -> None:
observations = (
*(
_obs(turn_id=i,
findings=(_weak_surface_finding("truth", "belongs_to"),))
for i in range(3)
),
*(
_obs(turn_id=i + 100, anchor="rare",
findings=(_planner_gap_finding("rare", "explain"),))
for i in range(3)
),
)
findings = mine_articulation_observations(observations=observations)
assert findings # at least the two recurring rules fired
for f in findings:
assert f.epistemic_status is EpistemicStatus.SPECULATIVE
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Round-trip via JSONL
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def test_jsonl_round_trip_preserves_observation_identity() -> None:
original = _obs(
turn_id=42,
anchor="truth",
findings=(_weak_surface_finding("truth", "belongs_to"),),
)
line = format_articulation_observation_jsonl(original)
[recovered] = load_articulation_observations([line])
assert recovered.turn_id == original.turn_id
assert recovered.anchor_subject == original.anchor_subject
assert recovered.metrics == original.metrics
assert recovered.findings == original.findings