core/docs/workbench
Shay 175e9d4d10 docs(workbench): strengthen B3.5 D2 to runner-reproducibility; record C1-a persistence-first constraint
Two corrections from this session's source verification:

- B3.5 D2 (calibration artifact): coherence between report.json and
  ratification_queue.json is necessary but NOT sufficient. The 95/50/5 earned
  state is a fossil from the disabled resolve_pooled scorer (queue committed in
  b82897a0); no current runner reproduces it (main()=6/44/0, candidate-graph
  practice=0/1/149). Acceptance now requires report.json be byte-reproducible
  by a documented deterministic runner pass; copying numbers between artifacts
  is inadmissible. Three routes named (honest-floor now, earn-it-for-real
  follow-up, defer).

- C1 (cognitive pipeline visualizer): corrected the false "reader-first over
  existing telemetry" framing. Verified the journal persists only ~12 surface
  fields of CognitiveTurnResult's ~25; no /trace/{id}/pipeline endpoint. C1-a's
  real first deliverable is a persistence change: a curated
  CognitivePipelineRecord (never the raw field_state multivectors — O(n^2)
  cost), a runtime-contract update, and a non-vacuous fail-closed test.
2026-06-13 07:20:23 -07:00
..
acceptance-gates.md docs(workbench): reconcile mutation doctrine with admitted corridors 2026-06-12 06:50:26 -07:00
api-contract-v1.md feat(workbench): sealed single-turn replay backend — GET /replay/{turn_id} (Wave R3) 2026-06-12 17:15:39 -07:00
core-logos-studio-plan.md docs(workbench): capture CORE-Logos Studio plan 2026-06-13 03:41:10 -07:00
core-workbench-v1-blueprint.md
data-shapes-v1.md feat(workbench): add R2 backend read substrate 2026-06-12 12:49:41 -07:00
design-system.md feat(workbench-ui): design system v1 scaffold (ADR-0162 Branch 1) (#295) 2026-05-26 11:33:27 -07:00
implementation-plan.md docs(workbench): reconcile mutation doctrine with admitted corridors 2026-06-12 06:50:26 -07:00
proposal-artifact-substrate-v1.md docs(workbench): define proposal artifact substrate v1 2026-06-13 03:38:06 -07:00
README.md docs(workbench): index consolidation and CORE-Logos plans 2026-06-13 03:41:30 -07:00
ui-component-map.md
wave-1-evidence-spine.md docs(workbench): Wave R mastery revamp plan + R0/R1 dispatch brief pack 2026-06-12 10:02:46 -07:00
wave-m-consolidation-b3.5.md docs(workbench): strengthen B3.5 D2 to runner-reproducibility; record C1-a persistence-first constraint 2026-06-13 07:20:23 -07:00
wave-M-worthiness.md docs(workbench): strengthen B3.5 D2 to runner-reproducibility; record C1-a persistence-first constraint 2026-06-13 07:20:23 -07:00
wave-R-mastery-revamp.md docs(workbench): R0a CI path filter includes the workflow file itself 2026-06-12 10:29:29 -07:00

CORE Workbench v1

CORE Workbench is the first dedicated operator/auditor UI for CORE.

It is intentionally designed as:

  • a cognition observatory,
  • replay debugger,
  • proposal review workstation,
  • deterministic eval console,
  • and audit surface.

It is NOT intended to be a generic chatbot shell.


Document Index

Doctrine

  • ../decisions/ADR-0160-core-workbench-v1.md

Defines:

  • product doctrine
  • trust boundaries
  • architecture direction
  • module scope
  • acceptance criteria

UX Blueprint

  • core-workbench-v1-blueprint.md

Defines:

  • visual philosophy
  • interaction model
  • module behavior
  • navigation
  • replay/proposal/eval UX

Implementation Plan

  • implementation-plan.md

Defines:

  • W-026 through W-031
  • phase sequencing
  • backend/frontend constraints
  • release criteria

API Contract

  • api-contract-v1.md

Defines:

  • read-only endpoint surface
  • request/response envelopes
  • mutation boundaries
  • runtime/trace/proposal/eval/replay routes

Data Shapes

  • data-shapes-v1.md

Defines:

  • typed UI-facing shapes
  • proposal structures
  • replay structures
  • artifact references
  • trust badges

Proposal Artifact Substrate

  • proposal-artifact-substrate-v1.md

Defines:

  • the universal proposal artifact envelope
  • subject-specific proposal adapters
  • proposal-only vs ratification-enabled capability levels
  • safety, validation, affected-artifact, and checksum-impact report shapes
  • the migration path for math, cognition, CORE-Logos, packs, and future modalities

Wave M Consolidation / B3.5

  • wave-m-consolidation-b3.5.md

Defines:

  • the route-registry unification plan
  • calibration as a first-class evidence subject
  • the B4 leeway-feasibility gate
  • the UI/UX guide requirement
  • the Phase A residue ledger before further complexity

CORE-Logos Studio

  • core-logos-studio-plan.md

Defines:

  • the /logos Studio route concept
  • pack identity, lexicon, glosses, morphology, alignment, holonomy, safety, and patch-forge tabs
  • CORE-Logos evidence subjects
  • read-only readers and proposal-only draft endpoint direction
  • the handler-family admission sequence for future ratification

UI Component Map

  • ui-component-map.md

Defines:

  • page layout
  • navigation structure
  • shared components
  • trace drawer structure
  • proposal/eval/replay modules

Acceptance Gates

  • acceptance-gates.md

Defines:

  • implementation gates
  • red flags
  • release conditions
  • mutation restrictions

Core Principles

Replay before persuasion

The UI should make replay evidence more important than aesthetic persuasion.

Calm by default

The interface should remain quiet and precise.

Progressive disclosure

The system should become more transparent the deeper an operator inspects.

Proposal is not ratification

The UI must preserve ADR-0057 review doctrine.

Read-only first

The first workbench phases prioritize visibility and auditability before any mutation capability.


Current Status

The planning package is merged on main via 404e694 (docs(workbench): CORE Workbench v1 planning architecture (ADR-0160)).

The prototype branch feat/w026-workbench-readonly-api is superseded and must not be used as the implementation base. It mixed W-026 with frontend and trace work, added auth and web-framework dependencies before the local read-only boundary was proven, and included placeholder replay/trace behavior that could be mistaken for evidence.

The next accepted implementation starts clean from main with W-026 only: dataclass schemas, repo-root-constrained readers, a standard-library local HTTP API, and route/read-model tests. W-027 and later phases build on that boundary after it is accepted.


W-026 Local Runbook

Start the read-only local API:

core workbench api

Verify liveness:

curl http://127.0.0.1:8765/health

Inspect each W-026 endpoint family:

curl http://127.0.0.1:8765/runtime/status
curl http://127.0.0.1:8765/artifacts
curl http://127.0.0.1:8765/artifacts/evals/contemplation_quality/contract.md
curl http://127.0.0.1:8765/proposals
curl http://127.0.0.1:8765/evals
curl http://127.0.0.1:8765/evals/contemplation_quality
curl -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8765/evals/run \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"lane":"contemplation_quality","version":"v1","split":"public"}'

Bind to a different local port:

core workbench api --port 9000

Non-local binds require an explicit operator flag:

core workbench api --host 0.0.0.0 --allow-nonlocal-bind

Initial Work Queue

Work Item Goal
W-026 Read-only API
W-027 Frontend shell
W-028 Chat + trace drawer
W-029 Proposal queue
W-030 Eval center
W-031 Replay theater

Guiding Question

The correct operator reaction to the workbench should be:

“Wait… I can actually inspect and replay the cognition.”

not:

“Cool chatbot.”