Implements ADR-0182's first win on top of EX-6 (#473). The distractor-quantity confuser 0014 misfired (20x3x5=300) because a blunt product-of-all was the *unique* self-verifying reading: the completeness clause forces the distractor into it, and no rival reading existed to trigger the wrong=0 disagreement rule. No tight cue rule separates it from the legitimate cross-unit products (`for` licenses both the 0014 distractor AND the correct train-0021 product) -- that is the deferred cue-precision problem. So instead of a reactive patch, let the disagreement rule do the refusing. Mechanism (sealed lane; chat/ does not import these -> serving 3/47/0 frozen): - verify.classify_derivation: a derivation is `complete` (commit-eligible), `exempt` (verified but for an isolated-foreign unused quantity -> commit- INELIGIBLE), or None. Refactored self_verifies into _base_reasons + _unused_quantities so the two share logic and cannot drift (behavior identical; 385 derivation tests + smoke 67 green). - accumulate.accumulation_candidates: exposes the ungated readings, incl. a distractor-skip reading that drops an isolated-foreign quantity from a multi- quantity change clause (20+5=25). compose_accumulation is byte-identical (drop_isolated_foreign=False + the same gate). - search.multiplicative_candidates / multistep.candidate_chains: ungated candidates. - pool.resolve_pooled: pools every composer's readings; disagreement -> refuse; a single answer commits only if a `complete` candidate produced it (exempt-only -> refuse, so the commit-path completeness guarantee from ADR-0175 is untouched). - confuser runner: _engine_answer now delegates to resolve_pooled (the prior first-composer-wins order could not notice it held two incompatible readings). Result (the microscope): - confuser wrong 5 -> 2. distractor 0014 refuses (product 300 vs additive 25); BONUS: both disguised-polarity cases (0001/0003) refuse -- the spurious "buys X for N coins" product disagrees with the accumulation reading. Remaining wrong: 0016 (distractor in the anchor clause -> needs anchor-skip, separate step) and 0020 (temporal-scope). pair-tells 4 -> 1. - genuine positives still 7 solved, 0 wrong. - train_sample 3/47/0 and practice 3/47/0 byte-identical (they call compose_accumulation/search directly -- unchanged -- not the pool). - smoke 67, architectural invariants 40, lane-SHA freeze 8/8. Tests: - test_adr_0182_pool.py: classify (complete/exempt/None incl. narrow-exemption edges) + resolve_pooled, with the wrong=0 obligation test_exempt_only_never_commits (a distractor with no multiplicative cue must refuse, not commit 25 -- fails loudly if the exemption is made commit-eligible). - test_adr_0163_f2_confusers.py: baseline tightened wrong 5->2, pair_tells 4->1; new test_distractor_0014_refuses_via_pooling + test_disguised_polarity_does_not_misfire. Stacked on #473 (EX-6); merge #473 first. 0016 + the remaining wrongs are follow-ups.
69 lines
2 KiB
Python
69 lines
2 KiB
Python
"""ADR-0175 Phase 3 — grounded derivation search + self-verification gate.
|
|
|
|
Phase 3a (this surface): the self-verification gate — grounded operands ∧
|
|
grounded operation cues ∧ unit consistency ∧ uniqueness. The wrong=0-critical
|
|
guard that keeps the (Phase 3b) bounded search honest.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
from generate.derivation.clauses import (
|
|
ClauseResult,
|
|
clause_local_results,
|
|
segment_clauses,
|
|
)
|
|
from generate.derivation.accumulate import accumulation_candidates, compose_accumulation
|
|
from generate.derivation.compose import compose_sequential
|
|
from generate.derivation.comparatives import (
|
|
ComparativeScalar,
|
|
comparative_step,
|
|
extract_comparative_scalars,
|
|
)
|
|
from generate.derivation.extract import extract_quantities
|
|
from generate.derivation.model import GroundedDerivation, Quantity, Step, VALID_OPS
|
|
from generate.derivation.multistep import candidate_chains, search_chain
|
|
from generate.derivation.pool import pooled_candidates, resolve_pooled
|
|
from generate.derivation.search import (
|
|
MULTIPLICATIVE_CUES,
|
|
multiplicative_candidates,
|
|
search_multiplicative,
|
|
)
|
|
from generate.derivation.target import Target, extract_target
|
|
from generate.derivation.verify import (
|
|
Resolution,
|
|
SelfVerification,
|
|
classify_derivation,
|
|
select_self_verified,
|
|
self_verifies,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
__all__ = [
|
|
"ClauseResult",
|
|
"ComparativeScalar",
|
|
"GroundedDerivation",
|
|
"MULTIPLICATIVE_CUES",
|
|
"Quantity",
|
|
"Resolution",
|
|
"SelfVerification",
|
|
"Step",
|
|
"Target",
|
|
"VALID_OPS",
|
|
"accumulation_candidates",
|
|
"candidate_chains",
|
|
"classify_derivation",
|
|
"clause_local_results",
|
|
"compose_accumulation",
|
|
"compose_sequential",
|
|
"comparative_step",
|
|
"extract_comparative_scalars",
|
|
"extract_quantities",
|
|
"extract_target",
|
|
"multiplicative_candidates",
|
|
"pooled_candidates",
|
|
"resolve_pooled",
|
|
"search_chain",
|
|
"search_multiplicative",
|
|
"segment_clauses",
|
|
"select_self_verified",
|
|
"self_verifies",
|
|
]
|