# Third-Door Blueprint Fidelity Ledger **Status:** authoritative gap analysis for the ADR-0238/0239/0240 skeleton (PR #15). **Audience:** whoever implements the Third Door *for real*. **Verdict in one line:** what landed is a **safe, off-serving namesake scaffold** — it adopts the blueprints' vocabulary and file layout and makes its own tests green, but it does **not** implement the mathematics the two source blueprints specify. This document details every gap precisely enough to close it. > This replaces the "absolute mastery / single right solution" framing of the original landing (Mastery Report / PR #14 body). The blueprints are the rigorous artifact; the code is the loose one. That is the honest inversion of the landing claim. --- ## 0. Source-of-truth artifacts | Artifact | Role | |---|---| | `CORE ASI Super-Blueprint_ Third-Door Horizon.docx` (mirror: `docs/research/CORE-ASI-Super-Blueprint-Third-Door-Horizon.md`) | Specifies signature-aware PCA (§2.1), Cartan–Iwasawa (§2.2), GoldTether scale harmonization (§2.3), Conformal Procrustes (§3.1), Surprise (§3.2), grade-5 pseudoscalar invariant (§3.3). **"Super §x"** below. | | `CORE Advanced AGI_ASI R&D Blueprint (Revised).docx` | Specifies blade induction (§2.1), trajectory invariants + zero-fabrication (§2.2), GoldTether-modulated transition surface + α control law (§2.3), ADR-DAG embedding (§2.4), bootstrapping (§5). **"R&D §x"** below. | | `docs/adr/ADR-0241-wave-field-driven-hyperbolic-atlas-and-resonant-cognition.md` | Wave-field substrate \(\psi\): unitary propagation, spectral leakage, polar analogy, chiral charge. **"ADR-0241"** below. | | `docs/analysis/core_ha_unification_and_deprecation_plan.md` | Deprecate standalone `core_ha` pointwise atlas; absorb into wave + energy + GoldTether + CRDT vault. | | `core/physics/{goldtether,dynamic_manifold,surprise,biography,temporal_gate,self_authorship}.py` | The landed Third-Door code (pointwise). Wave module: `wave_manifold.py` (Proposed). | | `tests/test_adr_023{8,9}_*.py`, `test_adr_0240_*.py` | Landed Third-Door tests (see §7 for why green ≠ faithful historically). | | `tests/test_adr_0241_wave_manifold.py` | Wave-field behavioral contract (RED until Slice 1 GREEN). | | `tests/test_third_door_blueprint_fidelity.py` | The living gap ledger (this document, executable). | **Containment fact (why this is safe to land):** nothing in serving / runtime / cognition imports `core.physics.*` — only the package `__init__`, the eval harness, and tests. `chat/runtime.py` is untouched on this branch. The autonomy `decide()` is fail-closed and never `AUTONOMOUS` in `SERVE`. The self-authorship miner is proposal-only and never writes the vault. None of the defects below can reach the `wrong=0` serving path. --- ## 1. Scorecard | # | Operator | Blueprint | Fidelity | Issue | |---|---|---|---|---| | 1 | Signature-aware PCA | Super §2.1 / R&D §2.1 | 🟢 faithful (one untested add-on) | — | | 2 | Cartan–Iwasawa decomposition | Super §2.2 | 🟢 faithful (null-point peel + Spin remainder) | #16 | | 3 | Conformal Procrustes | Super §3.1 | 🟢 faithful (Kabsch + field conjugacy) | #17 | | 4 | GoldTether residual + α law | Super §2.3, R&D §2.3/§5 | 🟢 residual+α + bootstrap gates + principal-axis prune (#24+#18) | #18 | | 5 | Grade-5 pseudoscalar invariant | Super §3.3 | ⚪ RETIRED — vacuous in odd-dim Cl(4,1) | #19 (closed) | | 6 | Surprise residual operator | Super §3.2 | 🟢 math + DiscoveryCandidate wiring landed (#26 + #31) | #20 | | 7 | Trajectory invariants + zero-fabrication | R&D §2.2 | 🟢 Python geometry surface (`trajectory_invariants.py`) | #21 | | 8 | ADR-DAG conformal embedding | R&D §2.4 | 🟢 Python surface (`core/adr/validator.py`) | #21 | | W1 | WaveManifold unitary / sandwich step | ADR-0241 §2 | 🟢 | ADR-0241 | | W2 | Spectral leakage surprise | ADR-0241 §2.4B | 🟢 subsumed into `surprise_residual` | ADR-0241 | | W3 | Wave polar + multi-pair conjugacy | ADR-0241 §2.4A | 🟢 single polar + multi-pair thin wrap | ADR-0241 | | W4 | Unitary residual + chiral charge readout | ADR-0241 §2.4C–D | 🟢 (Q structural 0 in real Cl(4,1); see §12) | ADR-0241 / #18 | | W5 | Biography resonant lock-in | ADR-0241 + ADR-0240 | 🟢 unitary lock-in + mode registry / resonant_recall; durable holographic vault store deferred | ADR-0241 | | W6 | `core_ha` deprecation / absorption | deprecation plan | 🟢 no live tree + hygiene pin | ADR-0241 | | — | Biography holonomy | (ADR-0240; not in blueprints) | 🟢 sound (pointwise) | — | | — | Temporal admissibility gate | (ADR-0240; not in blueprints) | 🟢 sound | — | | — | Self-authorship miner | (ADR-0240; not in blueprints) | 🟢 sound (proposal-only) | — | --- ## 2. Cartan–Iwasawa decomposition — 🟢 faithful (#16) ### Blueprint spec (Super §2.2) Factor a conformal versor `V = R·T·D` by acting on the conformal null points `n_o` (origin) and `n∞` (infinity). Explicitly "mathematically exact, non-iterative, guarantees perfect decomposition": 1. **Dilation** — `V n∞ Ṽ = λ² n∞`; `λ = √|V n∞ Ṽ|`; `D = exp(log(λ)·e_o∧e∞)`; peel: `V' = V·D⁻¹`. 2. **Translation** — `V' n_o Ṽ' = n_o + a + ½a²n∞`; recover `a ∈ ℝ³` by projecting the Euclidean vector part; `T = exp(½ a∧e∞)`; peel: `R = V'·T⁻¹`. 3. **Rotor** — the remainder `R` satisfies `R Ṙ = 1`, `R n_o Ṙ = n_o`, `R n∞ Ṙ = n∞`. ### What landed (`dynamic_manifold.py::cartan_iwasawa_factorize`) Null-point peel via `algebra.null_point.recover_dilation` / `recover_translation` (right-peel D then T for reconstruction order `R·T·D`). **Strict** construction-boundary close (rescale true versors only — never seed-to-rotor fabrications). On `NullPointRecoveryError` (non-similarity — e.g. multi-plane products that do not fix `n∞`) fall through to honest **remainder-as-rotor**: `R=V`, `T=I`, `D=I`. Peel path that fails reconstruction residual falls back to Spin remainder. Every returned factor is closed (`versor_condition < 1e-6`); non-versor input raises `ValueError` (fail-closed). No grade-projection fabrication of R/D seeds. **Dual-correction follow-on:** `rotor_power` now implements exact null-bivector power `(a+B)^α = a^α + α a^{α-1} B` so `dual_correction_slerp` no longer silently zeros the translation leg. ### Acceptance (pinned) - Composed multi-plane versors never raise; residual `‖R·T·D − V‖ < 1e-6` (often ~0 for Spin remainder). - Pure similarities `V = R_euc·T·D` peel with residual < 1e-6 **and** peel-content pins (nontrivial D with recovered scale, nontrivial T, `R·T ≈ V·D⁻¹`). - Pure dilator / translator / identity round-trip with factor-content asserts (not residual alone). - `test_cartan_iwasawa_should_reconstruct_composed_motion` passes (xfail removed). - Translator half-slerp: `dual_correction_slerp(I, translator([2,0,0]), 0.5)` recovers displacement `[1,0,0]`. --- ## 3. Conformal Procrustes — 🟢 faithful (#17) ### Blueprint spec (Super §3.1) Two fields `F_A`, `F_B` are structurally analogous iff a single versor `V` maps one to the other under the sandwich `V·F_A·Ṽ = F_B`. Solve as a metric-aware **Kabsch on null-vector point sets** `P={p_i}`, `Q={q_i}`: `K = Σ p_i q_iᵀ η` → signature-aware SVD `K = UΣVᵀ` → `R = V Uᵀ`; translation + dilation from null-cone centroids. Verified by margin `|V·F_A·Ṽ − F_B| < ε_analogy`. Enables zero-shot transport of `F_A`'s solution path to `F_B`. ### What landed (`dynamic_manifold.py::conformal_procrustes`) - **(5,K) path**: dehomogenize (`w=e5−e4`), Umeyama scale + Kabsch `R` with `det=+1`, `t = μ_y − s R μ_x`, assemble `V = T(t)·D(s)·R` via `null_point.translator/dilator` + `so3_matrix_to_rotor`, return grade-1 sandwich adjoint `M` (5×5) with **weight-normalized** residual (dilation changes homogeneous weight; Euclidean images still match to ~1e-15). - **Null-point 32-lists**: extract (5,K), Kabsch, return **V32** with sandwich residual. - **Field conjugacy** (non-null 32-vecs): stacked linear `W F_A − F_B W = 0` nullspace candidates + multiplicative Lie GN on Spin; residual is **sandwich** (`versor_apply`), not left-composition. `word_transition_rotor` averaging **deleted** from this path. - Analogical harness fixture learns from probe null-point clouds under a known similarity (no longer I→I). ### Acceptance (pinned) - Multiplane `F_B = versor_apply(W, F_A)` → sandwich residual < 1e-5. - Known rotation / full similarity (s,R,t) clouds → residual < 1e-6, mapped points match. - Null-point list of 32-vecs → sandwich residual < 1e-6. --- ## 4. GoldTether residual + α control law — 🟡 partial (#18) ### Blueprint spec (Super §2.3, R&D §2.3/§5) - **Residual (scale-harmonized — Super §2.3, the blueprint's stated mission #1):** `R = w·(‖F·F̃−1‖/ε_drift) + (1−w)·(min_{I∈𝓘_gold} ‖F−I‖ / ‖F‖_F)`, `w=0.5`, `ε_drift=1e-6`. Both terms scaled to `[0, O(1)]` so drift isn't masked by the raw O(1) L2 distance. - **α control law (R&D §2.3):** `α(t) = Φ(R; R_floor, R_critical)` — a smooth-step of the **instantaneous** residual. `α=0` (autonomous) when `R < R_floor`; linear ramp in between; `α=1` (full human override / fail-closed) when `R > R_critical`. α is the *constraint weight*; the supervised transition is the Cartan–Iwasawa factor-wise slerp of §2.3. - **Bootstrapping (R&D §5):** `𝓘_gold` primed with `n_o, n∞, 1`; audit-passed replay-deterministic state versors promoted into it by signed review vote (ADR-0092); decay/pruning to principal axes. ### What landed (`goldtether.py`) — residual+α path (#24) - `coherence_residual(F)` remains the fail-closed **closure** gate (dual-checked unit residual). - `gold_invariants` seeded with identity + `n_o` + `n∞` (`_primal_gold_invariants`). - `goldtether_residual(F)` = scale-harmonized two-term residual (drift/ε + dist-to-gold / ‖F‖). - `alpha_constraint(F, mode=…)` = `Φ(R_gt; r_floor, r_critical)` composed with earned-autonomy floor; **SERVE always α=1**. - `supervised_transition` / `supervised_blend` on the Spin geodesic (`word_transition_rotor` + `rotor_power`). - `promote_gold_invariant(..., authorized=True)` is **caller-gated** (no self-authorize); `prune_gold_invariants` is a size bound retaining the three primals — **not** full principal-axis decay. ### Bootstrap / prune (#18 — landed) - `GoldPromotionProof` + `promote_gold_invariant(..., proof=, require_proof=)`: proposal-only without `authorized=True`; live **closure drift** gate (not geo-to-gold); refuses non-closed / high-drift even when authorized; never trusts proof fields as truth. - `promotion_eligible(F)`: closed ∧ drift ≤ ε_drift (does not self-authorize). - `prune_gold_invariants(mode="fifo"|"principal_axes")`: primals immovable; PCA ranks non-primals by principal-subspace energy (differs from last-N FIFO); `max_size < 3` clamped. - Unitary residual path still via wave (`measure_unitary_residual`); SERVE never autonomous. ### Explicit non-goals still open - Full signed ADR-0092 *reviewer service* wiring (physics stays caller-gated only). - Durable vault-backed gold set (session monitor field only). --- ## 5. Grade-5 pseudoscalar invariant — ⚪ RETIRED as vacuous (#19) > **Resolution (2026-07-12):** three-agent R&D convergence (Opus 4.8 / Grok-4.5-HEAVY / GPT-5.6-Terra), ratified. The §3.3 gate is not "missing" — it is **mathematically vacuous in odd-dimensional Cl(4,1)** and cannot be built as specified. Issue #19 is closed. The namesake was removed from `goldtether.py` in the same change (see "What changed" below). ### Blueprint spec (Super §3.3) The pseudoscalar `I₅ = e1∧e2∧e3∧e4∧e5` is the orientation of CORE's integrity. Every transition `F' = V·F·Ṽ` must preserve pseudoscalar sign **and** magnitude: `⟨F'·F̃'⟩₅ = ⟨F·F̃⟩₅`. Any optimization / contemplation promotion / autonomous self-authorship that would flip `sgn(I₅)` is **blocked at the boundary**. Called "the ultimate mathematical anchor for alignment." ### Why it is vacuous (the proof that retired it) The spec presumes a spacetime-like even-dimensional intuition. CORE's algebra is Cl(4,1) — **odd** total dimension (5) — where the grade-5 pseudoscalar behaves degenerately for exactly the quantities the gate inspects: 1. **`I₅` is central.** In odd dimension the pseudoscalar commutes with every element, so for *any* versor `V` (including odd reflections, where `V·Ṽ = ±1`), the sandwich collapses: `V·I₅·Ṽ = I₅·(V·Ṽ) = ±I₅`. Orientation is invariant by construction — there is no map in the versor group that flips it, so there is nothing to "block." 2. **Field-state versors are even ⇒ `F[31] ≡ 0`.** Every state the monitor sees is built by the sanctioned constructors (`make_rotor_from_angle`, `word_transition_rotor`, geometric products thereof) which live in the **even subalgebra**. The grade-5 (odd) coefficient of an even multivector is identically zero. Reading `F[31]` returns a structural `0.0`, always. 3. **The gated quantity is identically zero.** For an even unit versor, `F·F̃ = 1` (a scalar), so `⟨F·F̃⟩₅ = 0` for the source **and** the target of every transition. The gate `⟨F'·F̃'⟩₅ = ⟨F·F̃⟩₅` compares `0 == 0`. It can never fire. 4. **The "even-versor parity gate" fix is also vacuous.** The natural repair — "reject any transition that injects odd-grade mass" — was *invalidated in the same review*: the even subalgebra is closed under the sandwich, so odd-grade mass `≡ 0` on every value the sanctioned path can produce. Parity guards nothing a versor could reach. (Empirically confirmed: on a composed 5-plane field versor, `‖⟨F·F̃⟩₅‖ = 0`, and total odd-grade mass `= 0`.) The single **real** residual gap in this neighborhood is unrelated to grade-5: `algebra/versor.py::versor_condition` *accepts* an odd reflection such as `e1` (returns `0.0`), i.e. it gates "is a unit versor," not "is an even/orientation-preserving versor." That is a boundary-hardening concern about **admitting odd generators at all**, not about a grade-5 transition invariant, and it is out of scope for #19. ### What changed (this PR) The namesake was removed, not left masking an absence: - Deleted `_PSEUDOSCALAR_IDX` and every `F[31]` read (the dead `ps` history element and `CoherenceResidual.pseudoscalar`, both structural zeros). - Renamed the telemetry channel `pseudoscalar_floor → autonomy_floor` (it was always `self.floor`, the earned-autonomy ceiling — never a pseudoscalar). - Bumped the telemetry schema `goldtether_coherence_v1 → v2` (the shape changed: key renamed, dead `ps` dropped). - Updated the module/class docstrings to state the retirement inline. ### Where the integrity-anchor role actually lives (subsumption) The alignment intent behind §3.3 is real and is **already carried, non-vacuously**, by three built mechanisms: 1. **Versor closure** — `versor_condition(F') < 1e-6` is enforced on every transition (`supervised_blend` raises on breach). This is the genuine "the state stayed on the group" gate, checked at ~1e-13 over a 100k-step walk (see `project-l10-closure-by-construction`). 2. **GoldTether harmonized residual + α control (#24)** — drift term + distance-to-`𝓘_gold` + `α = Φ(R)`, the actual alignment-pressure signal, replacing the vacuous orientation check with a metric one that *can* move. 3. **Biography / identity holonomy (ADR-0240 + `engine_identity`)** — order-sensitive trajectory encoding + content-derived identity lineage: the "same continuous life, no confabulated self" anchor. This is where a *real* topological integrity invariant lives. Grade-5 objects remain non-vacuous **only in the incidence layer** (5-blades as conformal geometric objects under meet/join in `algebra/cga.py`), never as a transition/promotion gate. ### Reusable meta-criterion (the session's key output) > **"Would this gate ever fire on a value produced by the sanctioned construction path? If no → it is a namesake gate, not an anchor."** This diagnostic is what killed §3.3, and it should be applied to every remaining `§-N` claim before any implementation effort is spent. Acceptance for #19 is therefore **negative**: no gate is built; the namesake is gone; the intent is shown to be subsumed. --- ## 6. Surprise residual operator — 🟢 math + DiscoveryCandidate wiring (#20 closed) > **Resolution (2026-07-12):** the two operator-math defects are fixed (#26) — exact metric-orthogonal projection and reconciled productivity polarity. > > **Resolution (2026-07-14, PR #31 / issue #30):** high surprise now raises a proposal-only `DiscoveryCandidate` (`trigger=high_surprise`) into the existing discovery sink stream. Contemplation consumes that JSONL unchanged. No vault/self-install; physics never imports teaching. ### Blueprint spec (Super §3.2) `S(x) = x − proj_{B_union}(x)`, where `proj_B(x) = (x·B)·B⁻¹` is the **geometric blade contraction**. `|S(x)|²` measures the epistemic frontier; high surprise (`> γ`) raises a `DiscoveryCandidate` in the contemplation loop (self-directed learning). ### The defects (as landed) 1. Projection was **Euclidean Gram-Schmidt on flat 32-coefficient vectors** — metric-blind: it ignored the (+,+,+,+,−) signature and the blade grade structure, so "inside the admissible span" was judged by the wrong geometry. (The 5-vec path already used η.) 2. `dual_operator`: `productive = proc_r <= thr and sur_norm >= 0.0` — the second conjunct is **always true**, so surprise never gated. 3. Not wired: nothing raises a `DiscoveryCandidate`. ### What changed (this PR) - **Exact metric-orthogonal projection.** `surprise_residual` now solves the metric normal equations `G c = r` (`G_ij = ⟨b_i,b_j⟩`, `r_i = ⟨b_i,x⟩`) via `lstsq`, under `cga_inner` (32-vec) / η (5-vec). The residual magnitude is the reversion (metric) norm, and grade-support containment is asserted (fail-closed on leakage). - **Fail-closed on a metric-degenerate span.** Typed `SurpriseResidualError` when `rank(G) < rank(B)` — a null direction with no reciprocal (e.g. a lone `n_o`). *Refinement over the original "rank(G) < k" spec:* mere linear dependence among **non-null** columns is ADMITTED (`lstsq` projects onto the actual span), so a merely-redundant live basis (`[1, source]`, which the analogical-transfer harness can produce) is not spuriously refused, the non-degenerate null-pair `{n_o, n_∞}` is admitted, and only a lone `n_o` is refused. This is what the geometry — not column-vector algebra — actually requires. - **Reconciled productivity polarity.** `productive` (and `transfer_accepted`) now both mean **productive TRANSFER = low Procrustes ∧ low surprise** (a structural match found AND the query inside the admissible span). This **corrects** §6's earlier "high surprise ∧ low procrustes = productive" phrasing, which conflated *transfer* with *discovery*: HIGH surprise is a **discovery** signal, not a productive transfer, and routes to the (split-out) `DiscoveryCandidate` path. - Tests: `tests/test_adr_0239_surprise_metric_projection.py` — metric-vs-Euclidean divergence (the load-bearing proof), null refusal, null-pair admission, redundant-basis admission, in/out-of-span, grade purity, polarity, determinism. ### Wiring landed (PR #31 / issue #30) — acceptance High surprise routes to a proposal-only `DiscoveryCandidate`: - Physics (`dual_operator` / `dual_procrustes_surprise`) sets `discovery_eligible` when `sur_norm > γ` and transfer is not productive (`is_discovery_eligible`; default `γ = 0.35`). **No teaching import** in `core.physics.surprise`. - Teaching factory: `candidate_from_surprise_dual` / `emit_surprise_discovery` produce `trigger=high_surprise`, `review_state=unreviewed`, `domain=math`. Opt-in `DiscoveryCandidateSink` emit (same stream contemplation already consumes). **Never** vault/store/self-install. - Tests: `tests/test_third_door_surprise_discovery_wiring.py` + dual suite. No remaining #20 follow-up. --- ## 7. Signature-aware PCA — 🟢 faithful (one untested add-on) ### Blueprint spec (Super §2.1 / R&D §2.1) `A = XXᵀ/k`; `M = ηA`; `eig(M)`; sort by `Re(λ)` desc; real eigenvectors; Minkowski Gram-Schmidt to a pseudo-orthonormal basis on the (4,1) null cone. (R&D §2.1 phrases it as the generalized problem `Av = λ η v`.) ### What landed (`dynamic_manifold.py::signature_aware_pca`) Exactly this, minus `scipy` (uses `np.linalg.eig` on `M = ηA` — the Super §2.1 alternative formulation; correct and dependency-free). **Plus** a null-retention branch that keeps genuine null axes instead of skipping them ("Terra + Grok mastery fix"). ### The one wrinkle The null add-on is **untested**: `test_signature_aware_pca_keeps_nulls` classifies `n_null = 0` in its own scenario and only asserts `total == 4` + enum-ness. The branch that gives the fix its name never demonstrably fires. Low severity; add a scenario that actually produces a retained null axis. --- ## 8. Sound modules not in the blueprints — 🟢 `biography.py` (delegates to `algebra.holonomy.holonomy_encode`; refuses empty trajectories — "no confabulated self"; order-sensitive; reconstruct == integrate), `temporal_gate.py` (a clean typed `ADMIT/NOT_YET/REFUSE` predicate — no geometry despite the "wisdom as geometry" docstring), and `self_authorship.py` (proposal-only, `SPECULATIVE`-stamped, no vault import — test-enforced; catches the Procrustes `ValueError` and records it) are the healthiest modules **because they delegate to real primitives or stay pure instead of reinventing geometry.** They are ADR-0240 additions, not specified in either blueprint. --- ## 9. Trajectory invariants + ADR-DAG — 🟢 Python surfaces (#21) > **Landed (2026-07-14):** geometry-first Python authorities. Rust Ring-1 port remains optional acceleration, not a second truth. ### Trajectory invariants (R&D §2.2 → `core/physics/trajectory_invariants.py`) - Relative holonomy `H = V_i · reverse(V_{i+1})` - Divergence `D = Σ log(1 + ‖H reverse(H) − 1‖) · Δt`; bound `D < ε_trajectory` - Energy boundary `E_exertion ≤ κ · E_sensory` - Zero-fabrication: empty / short / non-closed steps refused - Tests: `tests/test_third_door_trajectory_invariants.py` ### ADR-DAG conformal embedding (R&D §2.4 → `core/adr/validator.py`) - `Ψ(M)`: SHA-256 → 10×3-byte → `c_k ∈ [−1,1]` → planes 6..15 → simple-bivector project - Master blade = successive wedge of load-bearing ADR embeddings - Proposal drift = `‖B_p ∧ A_master‖` - Does **not** parallel `core/abi/geometric_delta_validator.py` (that validates GeometricDelta ABI envelopes) - Tests: `tests/test_third_door_adr_dag_embedding.py` --- ## 10. Why "34/34 green" did not catch any of this The landed suite measures properties that hold **by construction**, not spec-fidelity: - **Tautologies:** `residual >= 0`, `reconstruction_residual >= 0` (norms are non-negative). - **Closure-only:** `versor_condition(out) < 1e-6` proves the output is *a* unit versor, not the *correct* one. §4's blend passes closure at ~1e-16 while being a no-op. - **Trivial regime:** every geometry test feeds `identity` + a single-plane `make_rotor_from_angle` — the one input class where `rotor_power` doesn't hit its non-simple-bivector identity fallback. - **One vacuous test:** §3's identity→identity Procrustes. The lesson: closure is necessary, not sufficient. Fidelity tests must feed **composed** versors and assert **behavioral** properties (interpolation moves; reconstruction matches; transport lands on target). --- ## 11. Reproduction From a checkout of this branch (worktree on `PYTHONPATH`): ```bash # Fidelity ledger (2 characterizations pass, 2 spec tests xfail): python -m pytest tests/test_third_door_blueprint_fidelity.py -v -rx # Blend degeneration on a composed pair (interior alpha == source): python - <<'PY' import numpy as np from algebra.cl41 import geometric_product from algebra.rotor import make_rotor_from_angle from core.physics.goldtether import GoldTetherMonitor def _id(): v=np.zeros(32); v[0]=1.0; return v def comp(planes,s): v=_id() for k,i in enumerate(planes): v=geometric_product(v, make_rotor_from_angle(0.3+0.13*k+0.05*s, bivector_idx=i)) return v A,B=comp((6,7,8,10,11),1.0),comp((6,7,8,10,11),2.0) for a in (0.25,0.5,0.75): o=GoldTetherMonitor().supervised_blend(A,B,a) print(a, "||o-A|| =", float(np.linalg.norm(o-A))) # -> 0.0 (no-op) PY ``` --- ## 12. Wave-field substrate (ADR-0241) — 🟢 complete on this branch > **Status (2026-07-14):** ADR-0241 + `core_ha` deprecation plan + `wave_manifold.py` > + Slice-2 operator subsumption + Slice-3 multi-pair thin wrap / resonant recall > on `feat/third-door-wave-field-substrate`. Suite > `tests/test_adr_0241_wave_manifold.py` is **GREEN**. Third-Door operators > **delegate into** wave primitives (no parallel residual/projection path). > Off-serving containment preserved. ### Spec (ADR-0241) — contract - Continuous multivector wave-field \(\psi \in Cl(4,1)\) (32-coeff) under Cartan/Procrustes, Surprise, GoldTether, Biography. - **Transport pin:** multivector fields → sandwich \(R\psi\widetilde{R}\); spinor/chiral → left multiply \(R\psi\). No silent mix. - Spectral leakage = metric proj onto resonant modes (definite Euclidean energy after metric-exact proj). - Unitary residual \(\|\psi\widetilde{\psi}-1\|_F\) dual-checked. Chiral \(\langle\psi I\widetilde{\psi}\rangle_0\) structurally ~0 in real Cl(4,1) (honest; #19 family). - Standing-wave registry + `resonant_recall` (session-local; not vault). - `core_ha` standalone atlas: **deprecated** (no live tree; hygiene pin). ### Acceptance (behavioral — GREEN) | Pin | Status | |-----|--------| | Unitary / sandwich step residual \(< 10^{-6}\) | 🟢 | | Spectral leakage zero on-span / positive off-span / metric-exact | 🟢 | | Wave polar recovers known sandwich rotor | 🟢 | | Multi-pair `wave_field_conjugacy` + Procrustes sequence path | 🟢 | | Chiral conserved under left \(R\); even versor ~0 | 🟢 | | Resonant recall picks registered mode; empty refused | 🟢 | | Surprise / GoldTether / biography delegate to wave | 🟢 | | No teaching import in `wave_manifold`; no `core_ha` package | 🟢 | | Serve path not wired to wave (containment) | 🟢 (by design) | ### Subsumption map (Slice 2–3) | Operator | Delegation | |----------|------------| | `surprise_residual` (32-vec) | `WaveManifold.compute_spectral_leakage` | | `conformal_procrustes` single non-null pair | `wave_analogical_polar` | | `conformal_procrustes` multi non-null pairs | `wave_field_conjugacy` (thin wrap) | | Null-point / (5,K) clouds | Kabsch retained (compatibility) | | `coherence_residual` / GoldTether drift | `measure_unitary_residual` (+ chiral term) | | `integrate_biography` | unitary lock-in + mode register + resonant_recall; encode `holonomy_encode` | ### Deferred (explicit, not namesake green) - Durable holographic memory **vault store** (CRDT-backed standing-wave spectrum) — session registry only today. - Rust/MLX acceleration of exp-map / cross-spectral (ADR-0235 later). - Full ADR-0092 reviewer-service integration (promote remains caller-gated). - Optional Rust Ring-1 port of trajectory invariants (Python is authority today). --- ## 13. Tracked follow-ups | Gap | Issue | |---|---| | Real Cartan–Iwasawa via `n_o`/`n∞` — 🟢 done (null-point peel + Spin remainder) | #16 (closed via #29) | | Kabsch-conformal Procrustes on point sets — 🟢 done | #17 (closed via #29) | | GoldTether gold-set + harmonized residual + α=Φ(R) + bootstrap/prune — 🟢 | #18 | | Grade-5 pseudoscalar preservation gate — ⚪ RETIRED (vacuous; see §5) | #19 (closed) | | Surprise: metric projection + productivity polarity + DiscoveryCandidate wiring — 🟢 done | #20 (math #26; wiring #31) | | Trajectory invariants + ADR-DAG embedding — 🟢 Python surfaces | #21 | | Wave-field substrate + operator subsumption (W1–W6) — 🟢 on branch | ADR-0241 | | `core_ha` deprecation — 🟢 no live tree + hygiene pin | ADR-0241 / deprecation plan | | Durable holographic vault spectrum — deferred | ADR-0241 follow-on | Closing a gap = flip its `xfail` in `tests/test_third_door_blueprint_fidelity.py` (or the ADR-0241 suite) to a passing behavioral test and delete the matching characterization lock. That is the definition of "done right" here.