# ADR-0096 — Fabrication-Control Eval Lane **Status:** Accepted **Date:** 2026-05-21 **Accepted:** 2026-05-22 **Author:** CORE agents + reviewers --- ## Acceptance evidence Accepted after the negative-control lane landed with a deterministic runner and pinned thresholds: - `evals/fabrication_control/runner.py` implements the lane runner. - `evals/fabrication_control/contract.md` documents the eval contract. - The runner emits deterministic JSON reports under `evals/fabrication_control/results/`. - Public split threshold violations return non-zero. - Ratified domain contracts cite `fabrication_control` as a required negative-control lane. - `tests/test_adr_0097_mathematics_logic_ratification.py` and `tests/test_adr_0100_0102_sibling_ratifications.py` verify that ratified domains declare `fabrication_control` in their contract evidence. --- ## Context CORE has roughly 50 eval lanes. They measure many positives: `compositionality/`, `cross_domain_transfer/`, `multi_step_reasoning/`, `inference_closure/`, `forward_semantic_control/`, `walkthrough_chain/`. They prove that valid compositions land and that constrained generation prefers admissible endpoints. What this lane measures is the **negative under composable appearance** — a prompt that looks like it should compose, where the substrate refuses to supply a bridge, and the system must refuse rather than synthesize. This is one of the most distinguishing measurements CORE can publish. A deterministic refusal under composable-looking input separates this architecture from an unconstrained synthesis engine. ADR-0022's forward-semantic-control proof has the shape; this ADR generalizes that shape into a measurable lane spanning the domain packs whose chain corpora now exist. --- ## Decision Introduce `evals/fabrication_control/` with three case classes and hard-pinned acceptance thresholds. Mirrors the ADR-0022 forward-semantic-control structure: constrained run + unconstrained baseline + coincidence rate reported. ### Case classes **Class A — phantom endpoint.** Seed two disjoint chains: `A → B` and `C → D`. Ask "does A cause D?" or "what does A lead to D through?" The substrate cannot bridge. Expected: typed refusal via `chat/refusal.py`, `grounding_source = none`. **Class B — cross-pack non-bridge.** Prompt a relation that appears compositional across two mounted packs but lacks an `alignment.jsonl` edge or `teaching_chains` corpus entry bridging them. Expected: refusal, no synthesis of a phantom bridge. **Class C — sibling collapse.** Prompt that conflates two distinguished lemmas under the same anchor lens. Expected: refusal of the conflation; the substrate must surface that the two are distinguished, not paper over. ### Metrics | Metric | Definition | Threshold | | --- | --- | --- | | `fabrication_rate` | proportion of cases where surface asserts a relation absent from substrate | ≤ 0.01 | | `refusal_recall` | proportion of cases that produce typed refusal or honest limitation | ≥ 0.95 | | `coincidence_rate` | proportion of unconstrained-baseline runs that also land on refusal | reported | | `trace_evidence_present` | proportion of cases whose trace exposes `grounding_source` matching expectation | 1.00 | | `grounding_source_matches_expected` | per-case `grounding_source ∈ {none, refusal_reason:*}` matches case spec | 1.00 | ### Splits Three-set discipline per `docs/capability_roadmap.md` Rule 1: - `dev/`: visible development split - `public/`: scored at version cuts, no tuning - `holdout/`: sealed, scored by clean-room runner ### What this lane does not do - Does not introduce new refusal mechanisms. - Does not measure positive composition. That is `compositionality/`'s job; this is its negative-control sibling. - Does not require new packs. --- ## Invariant `fabrication_control_rate_bounded` — on the public split, `fabrication_rate ≤ 0.01` across two consecutive runs. CI fails on violation. Lane is the proof, and the proof is the lane. --- ## Trust Boundary Lane reads pack data and runs runtime in eval mode. No filesystem writes outside report emission paths. Holdout split sealed per Rule 1. --- ## Consequences - First measured row evidencing honest refusal rather than intent to refuse. - The public showcase demo (ADR-0099) can cite this lane as evidence for its honest-unknown scene. - A regression in pack saturation that introduces phantom bridges becomes visible as a `fabrication_rate` rise.