# ADR-0136.S.4 — Novel Initial-Form Subject-Slot Widenings

**Status:** Accepted — *regex patterns scheduled for removal under [ADR-0164](./ADR-0164-incremental-comprehension-reader.md) Phase 3; closed-set vocabulary preserved as lexicon seed*
**Parent:** ADR-0136 (Statement Layer Corridor) — see [ADR-0136 §Amendment 2026-05-26](./ADR-0136-statement-layer-corridor.md)
**Date:** 2026-05-23

## Context

The v3 refusal taxonomy (post-S.3 rescan) identified 5 cases with
`novel_initial_form` as their primary barrier. These cases have initial-state
sentences that the existing `_INITIAL_HAS_RE` and `_INITIAL_THERE_ARE_RE`
cannot parse because the subject slot uses a form neither pattern admits.

The 5 cases and their S.4 disposition:

| Case | Primary Barrier | S.4 Target Shape | Secondary Barriers | S.4 Result |
|------|-----------------|------------------|--------------------|------------|
| 0028 | novel_initial_form | — | rate_price + temporal_frequency | No change (multi-clause) |
| 0030 | novel_initial_form | — | compound_comparative | No change (impersonal "It" subject) |
| 0038 | novel_initial_form | Shape B (prep-prefix existential) | compound_comparative on sentence 2 | Barrier shift |
| 0045 | novel_initial_form | — | rate_price | No change (rate-price shape) |
| 0046 | novel_initial_form | Shape A (indefinite-article subject) | fraction_operand on sentence 2 | Barrier shift |

Only 2 of the 5 cases are single-shape targets addressable by S.4. The
remaining 3 have load-bearing secondary barriers that S.4 cannot resolve:

- **0028**: "It cost $100,000 to open a bakery" — impersonal "It" subject +
  rate_price + temporal_frequency. All three barriers must fall together.
- **0030**: "It takes 2 times as many" — impersonal "It" + compound_comparative.
- **0045**: Sentence 1 is actually a rate-price shape ("The price of 1 orange is
  $0.50"), misclassified as novel_initial_form in v2; S.4 does not target it.

## Decision

### Two sibling regexes, not a widened `_ENTITY`

`_ENTITY = r"(?:[A-Z]\w+|[Tt]he\s+\w+)"` is used by many patterns across the
file. Widening it to include indefinite-article forms would cascade through all
regex sites, breaking the closed-grammar discipline of every shape that depends
on it.

Instead S.4 adds two sibling patterns (`_INITIAL_HAS_INDEF_RE` and
`_INITIAL_THERE_ARE_PREFIX_RE`) with their own entity slots, applied in
dedicated extractor functions that are wired at the end of
`extract_initial_candidates`. All other regex sites are unchanged.

### Shape A — indefinite-article subject

```
^[Aa]\s+<noun>\s+has\s+<N>(?:\s+<adjective>)?(?:\s+<unit>)?(?:\s+of\s+<substance>)?\.$
```

**Restrictions:**
- `[Aa]\s+` — capital or lowercase "A" followed by whitespace only. "An" is
  deliberately excluded: `[Aa]` does not match the "n" that follows in "An",
  so the `\s+` fails. This avoids collision with money-amount or other shapes
  that may start with "an".
- Anchor: `has` only (singular third-person). "A school have" is ungrammatical;
  widening to "have/had" is deferred until a real GSM8K case requires it.
- Entity stored as the bare noun, lowercased (e.g., "school", "factory").
- All existing value-slot widenings (`_VALUE`) and substance qualifiers apply.

**gsm8k-0046 sentence 1**: "A school has 100 students."
→ `InitialPossession(entity="school", quantity=Quantity(100, "students"))`

### Shape B — prepositional-prefix existential

```
^In\s+[Aa]\s+<place>,?\s+there\s+(?:are|were|is|was)\s+(?:a\s+)?<N>\s+<unit>
(?:\s+on\s+the\s+\w+(?:-floor)?)?(?:\s+\w+ing)?\.$
```

**Restrictions:**
- Prefix: `In\s+[Aa]\s+` — "In a" or "In A" only. Other prepositions ("At a",
  "On a") are deferred.
- `(?:a\s+)?` before the value slot: handles the "a hundred" construction where
  "a" is an article for the numeral phrase. The article is consumed without being
  captured; the value group sees "hundred" which resolves via WORD_NUMBERS.
- Ordinal-floor qualifier (`on the first-floor`) and participial phrase
  (`studying`, `shelving`) are optional and discarded.
- Entity stored as the bare place noun, lowercased (e.g., "building").
- Participial pattern `\w+ing` matches present participles only; past
  participles ("shelved") are not matched — consistent with the only GSM8K
  target sentence (gsm8k-0038 uses "studying").

**gsm8k-0038 sentence 1**: "In a building, there are a hundred ladies on the
first-floor studying."
→ `InitialPossession(entity="building", quantity=Quantity(100, "ladies"))`

### No short-circuit path

Both extractors produce `CandidateInitial` objects that flow through the
existing graph machinery. No bypass route is added in `parse_and_solve`.

## Per-Case Impact

| Case | Pre-S.4 Barrier | S.4 Shape | S.4 Effect | Post-S.4 Barrier |
|------|-----------------|-----------|------------|-----------------|
| 0028 | novel_initial_form | — | No change | novel_initial_form + rate_price + temporal_frequency |
| 0030 | novel_initial_form | — | No change | novel_initial_form (impersonal "It") |
| 0038 | novel_initial_form | Shape B | **Shifted** | compound_comparative (sentence 2: "three times that many") |
| 0045 | novel_initial_form | — | No change | rate_price (misclassification; sentence 1 is a rate-price shape) |
| 0046 | novel_initial_form | Shape A | **Shifted** | fraction_operand (sentence 2: "Half of the students are girls") |

Barrier shifts: **+2** (0038 → compound_comparative; 0046 → fraction_operand).

## GSM8K Admission Count

| Metric | Pre-S.4 | Post-S.4 |
|--------|---------|---------|
| Admitted (correct) | 3 | 3 |
| Wrong | 0 | 0 |
| Refused | 47 | 47 |
| Barrier shifted | — | 2 (0038, 0046) |

Direct admission delta: **0**. Both 0038 and 0046 shift their barrier from
sentence 1 to sentence 2, which introduces a barrier that S.4 does not address.

## Axis Lane

20 curated cases at `evals/math_capability_axes/S4_novel_initial_form/v1/`:

| Category | Count | Gate |
|----------|-------|------|
| indefinite_article_canonical | 4 | answer == expected |
| indefinite_article_substance | 3 | answer == expected |
| prep_prefix_canonical | 4 | answer == expected |
| prep_prefix_ordinal_participial | 3 | answer == expected |
| refusal_missing_unit | 2 | answer is None |
| refusal_indefinite_quantity | 2 | answer is None |
| refusal_definite_article_regression | 2 | answer == expected (regression gate) |

**wrong == 0** across all 20 cases.

The `refusal_definite_article_regression` category verifies that definite-article
subjects ("The school has 100 students.") still resolve through the existing
`_INITIAL_HAS_RE` path and are not blocked by the new sibling regex.

## Deferred

- **Impersonal "It" subjects** — "It cost $100,000 to open." The subject slot
  "It" is not a named entity; resolving it requires coreference or a special
  implicit-entity rule. Cases 0028 and 0030 have this form.
- **"An" article prefix** — "An apple has 10 seeds." Excluded from `[Aa]\s+` to
  avoid collision with money-amount or other shapes; no GSM8K target requires it.
- **Global `_ENTITY` widening** — cascade-unsafe; every shape depending on
  `_ENTITY` would need independent testing.
- **Multi-clause cases** — 0028 has rate_price + temporal_frequency as
  co-barriers; addressing them requires S.1-level rate-parsing and multi-clause
  composition, both out of S.4 scope.
- **Other preposition prefixes** — "At a school, there are..." / "On a floor,
  there are..." — no GSM8K targets require them in the current 50-case sample.

## PR Checklist Answers

- **Capability added:** Two closed subject-slot widenings for initial-state
  sentences; 20-case axis lane with wrong == 0.
- **Invariant:** `versor_condition(F) < 1e-6` is field-level; this change is
  pure parser — no algebra path touched.
- **CLI lane:** S.4 axis runner + S.3 + S.1 + rescan-v3 gates all pass.
- **No hidden normalization:** No drift repair, no approximate recall, no
  stochastic fallback introduced.
- **Trust boundary:** User-supplied text enters via `parse_and_solve` (existing
  boundary). Both new patterns are closed-grammar (no wildcards); unmatched
  sentences refuse, not wrong.