`polarity` was read by NOTHING. `CurriculumChain.sentence` was unconditionally
affirmative, so a row authored to REFUTE an atom compiled to a premise
ASSERTING it and the question came back `entailed`. The independent oracle
ignored the field too — so gold agreed and wrong=0 stayed green. That is the
shape of defect no gate in this repo can catch, which is why ADR-0264 settled
the epistemology before any code moved.
R1 — row-level `polarity`, absent => affirmative. Not an `intent` value and not
a new `operator_family`: bands key on the connective-derived family, so
`modal_negative` would open a fresh band at n=0 instead of adding refuted
volume to the band it belongs to. An UNRECOGNIZED token is dropped at the
admission boundary rather than read as affirmative — that is the one direction
of error the rule exists to prevent. `as_row` OMITS the field when affirmative,
so committed corpora stay byte-identical and no lane hash moves.
R2 — a negative row compiles under the sentential-negation prefix the argument
reader already parses, so `(¬p, therefore p)` is a tautological refutation.
R3 — `atom_sentence` is polarity-independent, which IS the rule: a negative row
must mint the SAME propositional atom. Demonstrated, not just asserted —
`test_r3_a_different_connective_would_silently_fail_to_refute` shows a negated
paraphrase returning UNKNOWN, i.e. a taught refutation that quietly fails to
refute with nothing going red.
R4 — one atom cannot hold both polarities; rejected at ratification, naming
both polarities and the consequence. Left to serve time it would surface as
INCONSISTENT_PREMISES: the band silently going dark across the whole family
instead of the authoring mistake being named. Duplicate-edge and contradiction
stay distinguishable failures.
R8 — the oracle learns polarity INDEPENDENTLY (its own constants, its own row
reader; asserted at source level that it imports nothing from
teaching.curriculum_premises) and EXCLUDES negatives from the reachability
adjacency, because a denial supplies no step from subject to object.
NO negative row is committed — authoring curriculum is Phase F and Shay's. So
the shipped gold mix is still entailed 72 / unknown 4968, zero refuted, and
Phase C's `test_gold_mix_has_no_refuted_class` stays green with its message
retargeted from "unimplemented" to "no content yet".
Also adds `--polarity` to `core proposal-queue ratify`, so the mechanism is
reachable from the operator surface rather than only from Python.
The end-to-end tests repoint BOTH loaders at a temp corpus instead of writing
the committed one. An earlier draft appended to physics_chains_v1.jsonl and
restored it, which is safe under smoke/deductive (serial) but NOT under `full`,
which injects `-n auto`: a parallel worker reading mid-mutation would see an
uncommitted row and the failure would look like a corpus problem rather than
test isolation. Each loader is still redirected separately at its own module
constant and still parses with its own code, so R8's independence is untouched.
[Verification]: in-worktree on canonical CPython 3.12.13 with `uv sync
--locked`: smoke 593 (571 + 22), deductive 332 (310 + 22). curriculum_serve
lane unchanged at n=32 correct=32 wrong=0 anti_recall=5; all 11 lane SHA pins
match; committed corpora untouched (git status clean under
teaching/domain_chains/). Mutation-checked all three load-bearing rules: R2
sentence ignoring polarity -> 5 red; R8 negatives back in the adjacency -> the
exclusion test red; R4 check removed -> both R4 tests red. The R8 test has an
affirmative control proving the 2-hop path is real when the row is positive,
so `depth == 0` cannot pass vacuously.
Builds the producer `chat/curriculum_serve_license.py` already named as the
only writer of the ledger it reads — `evals.curriculum_serve.practice.runner
.seal_ledger` — which did not exist. Until now, authoring curriculum could
not earn a license at any volume.
A band's case space is ENUMERATED, not authored: every exam question that
routes to that subject (resolve_domain) whose relation is in that family, one
committed case per distinct query atom. So `committed == distinct` is not a
property the generator maintains, it is the same fact twice — the structural
form of ADR-0264 R9, and why this producer cannot develop the deduction
producer's exposure (CASES_PER_BAND=720 filled from spaces as small as 28).
CASES_PER_BAND=660 follows `evals/determination_estimation` per
DIVISION-OF-WORK §4: a ceiling on committed volume, not a quota.
11 bands, wrong=0, inflation 1.0 everywhere.
THE LEDGER IS DELIBERATELY NOT COMMITTED. The plan's Phase-1 exit criterion
asked for "a real (still-unearned) ledger"; that state is unreachable.
Reliability is commitment precision and a correct UNKNOWN is a commitment, so
conservative_floor(660,660)=0.990046 clears theta_SERVE on non-commitments
alone. Sealing today licenses FOUR bands on evidence that is 99.0%-99.98%
correct non-commitment — which ADR-0262 §5.1 rules unacceptable and which
ClassTally structurally cannot see (no verdict axis). Writing the artifact is
therefore a ratification and belongs to Phase D's explicit human-run verb.
The open outcome-mix ruling is now blocking, not academic.
Two corrections to my own earlier records, both measured:
- ADR-0264 §4.2 sized bands from per-TERM exclusivity; the router's predicate
is per-PAIR, which is looser. Every ceiling was understated, and
systems_software_causal is 720 not 630 — flipping it from "cannot reach
657" to "can". 4 of 11 bands can reach the floor, not 3. Now pinned as
measured values in BAND_ATOM_SPACE.
- `then` and `therefore` are taught philosophy_theology lemmas AND control
words of the argument reader (`therefore` is the conclusion marker). 164
routable atoms refuse compiled_premises_unreadable — coverage misses, never
wrongs — in the band Phase F retargets to. The vocabulary boundary is not
screened against the reader's grammar; a pack teaching and/or/not/if would
open a much larger hole the same way. Recorded, not fixed (§6.5), pinned as
a two-lemma bound.
Registers curriculum_serve in AUDIT_SOURCES, retiring the declared `None`
that was Phase C's forcing function, and adds the producer to `deductive`.
[Verification]: in-worktree on canonical CPython 3.12.13 with `uv sync
--locked`: smoke 571 (569 + 1 test + 1 parametrization), deductive 310
(291 + 19). Mutation-checked: injecting the deduction padding pattern into
band_cases turns 5 tests red including the R9 audit and the seal guard.
curriculum_serve lane unchanged at n=32 correct=32 wrong=0 anti_recall=5;
all 11 lane SHA pins match; no ledger written, so no serving change.
Two unrelated functions shared the name assert_corpus_sound: the
practice-corpus soundness check in evals/deduction_serve/practice/gold.py
(no args) and the curriculum lane's case-contract check in
evals/curriculum_serve/runner.py (domain, cases). Renamed to
assert_practice_gold_sound and assert_lane_cases_sound respectively so
each name states what it validates, and updated all call sites, the
gold.py __all__ export, and two prose mentions that named the function.
[Verification]: uv run --python 3.12.13 core test --suite smoke -q → 569
passed; --suite deductive -q → 285 passed.
The curriculum composer committed on question SHAPE — any `Does …?` text —
and then, being fail-closed, always returned a surface. With the flag on,
"Does the build pass?" would have been taken away from the rest of dispatch
and answered "I haven't been taught the or pass"; "Does anyone know the
time?" likewise. Found by checking the flag's readiness before recommending
ratification; never live, since the flag is default-off.
The asymmetry is the lesson: the deduction composer may commit on shape
because a sentence-initial "therefore" IS a signal of intent — text shaped
that way is an argument. `Does …?` is one of the most common ways to open
any English question and signals nothing. A fail-closed composer is only as
safe as its commit gate is narrow.
The gate is now `is_curriculum_question`: claim the turn only when the
question parses to three tokens AND its terms are vocabulary a served
subject actually teaches. Everything past the gate stays fail-closed —
including `ambiguous_reading` (both terms taught, two subjects claim them)
and `out_of_curriculum` (terms taught, relation unknown), which are real
curriculum questions with honest answers. The DECIDER is unchanged, so the
lane still records untaught-vocabulary probes as declined: the curriculum
path declines them AND does not speak for them.
[Verification]: tests/test_curriculum_serve.py 28 passed (+8: five ordinary
`Does …?` questions pass through untouched, three routable ones still
answered); core test --suite deductive 268 passed; curriculum lane 32/32
wrong=0 with its pinned report SHA unchanged.
Phase 2 of the generalization arc, implementing the plan's §4
curriculum-entailment gold contract. "Does force cause acceleration?" is
answered from the ratified physics chain corpus and nothing else; "Does
gravity cause acceleration?" is declined because gravity is in no pack
CORE has been taught; "Does force cause motion?" is unsettled even though
the curriculum contains both links, because nothing ratified says
causation composes.
Path (flag-gated, default off): closed question grammar -> subject routing
by ratified vocabulary -> family-scoped premise compilation from reviewed,
pack-resident chains -> the SAME argument bands (ADR-0260/0261) -> the
ROBDD engine. Zero subject-specific decision code: physics differs from
philosophy only in which rows load.
Epistemology enforced mechanically, not by convention:
- gold is a function of (curriculum, question); cases pin chain ids and
the runner FAILS a case whose pinned chain is absent or unratified;
- untaught => UNKNOWN, never "no" (open-world; silence is not denial);
- an independent oracle (own loader, ratification predicate, family table,
agreement rules, verdict rule) re-derives every gold — it disagreed once,
on "entropy reveals energy" vs "entropy causes energy", and the ORACLE
was the side that was wrong;
- anti-recall probes are a lane GUARD: a split without >=3 true-but-untaught
probes refuses to run.
Findings recorded rather than worked around (ADR-0262 §5):
- every curriculum band is UNEARNED and every answer is hedged. A band needs
n>=657 with a real outcome mix; physics teaches 7 causal + 9 modal
relations, so at most 16 questions in the subject can ever be ENTAILED.
A balanced band needs ~219 taught relations per subject×family — a ~25x
gap that only ratified curriculum content closes. Phase 2's blocker is
curriculum volume, not machinery.
- REFUTED is unreachable from present corpora (every chain is positive).
- there is NO biology domain-chain corpus; the biology OOD lane measures
fluency, not truth. The four subjects with ratified chains and mounted
packs are physics, mathematics_logic, systems_software,
philosophy_theology — the composer serves all four.
[Verification]: curriculum lane 32/32 wrong=0 with 5 anti-recall probes and
all three contract guards passing; tests/test_curriculum_serve.py 20 passed;
core test --suite deductive 252 passed; lane pinned as curriculum_serve_v1.
Shay