Every correction here is to something I wrote earlier in this arc. Original text
is preserved in place; nothing was rewritten to look right in hindsight.
ADR-0264 §4.2 — CORRECTED block. I sized the eleven band ceilings from per-TERM
exclusivity; `resolve_domain`'s predicate is per-PAIR, which is looser, so every
ceiling was understated and one verdict was wrong: systems_software_causal is
720, not 630, i.e. reachable rather than impossible. Seven of eleven bands
cannot reach 657, not eight. Downstream conclusions survive — physics·modal (480)
is still impossible and philosophy_theology·modal is still the target.
ADR-0264 R5 + DIVISION-OF-WORK ×2 + compile_premises docstring — the
"verdict-identical" claim is exact only where the full family was READABLE. Over
MAX_PREMISE_SENTENCES, full-family compilation refuses outright, so narrowing is
verdict-IMPROVING there. Read literally the unqualified phrasing implies a
17-chain family keeps declining, which is backwards — the opposite of the
unblock.
E2 rename staleness, 4 sites: ADR-0256 (Accepted) named
`gold.py::assert_corpus_sound`, which #119 deleted; the plan's E2 item and
DIVISION-OF-WORK's §2 row, §4 heading and "renaming after that is strictly more
work" reasoning were all still written as pending.
DIVISION-OF-WORK §0b — new status table: which PR each unit is, what stacks on
what, and the four things the units found that the plan did not predict.
Adds the arc-close brief from ARC-CLOSE-TEMPLATE.md. Its §3 (falsified
assumptions) is the section that cannot be recovered from the diff: nine
entries, five of them corrections to my own claims. Records that the
articulation trigger is not merely unmet but STRUCTURALLY unmeetable — the
previous arc left it unrecorded, which is what kept it re-triggerable — and
names four pieces of stale reasoning still in the tree, with files, since that
is the class of staleness nobody greps for.
[Verification]: in-worktree on canonical CPython 3.12.13 with `uv sync
--locked`: smoke 569, deductive 291 — both baseline, since the only non-doc
change is one docstring.
`polarity` was read by NOTHING. `CurriculumChain.sentence` was unconditionally
affirmative, so a row authored to REFUTE an atom compiled to a premise
ASSERTING it and the question came back `entailed`. The independent oracle
ignored the field too — so gold agreed and wrong=0 stayed green. That is the
shape of defect no gate in this repo can catch, which is why ADR-0264 settled
the epistemology before any code moved.
R1 — row-level `polarity`, absent => affirmative. Not an `intent` value and not
a new `operator_family`: bands key on the connective-derived family, so
`modal_negative` would open a fresh band at n=0 instead of adding refuted
volume to the band it belongs to. An UNRECOGNIZED token is dropped at the
admission boundary rather than read as affirmative — that is the one direction
of error the rule exists to prevent. `as_row` OMITS the field when affirmative,
so committed corpora stay byte-identical and no lane hash moves.
R2 — a negative row compiles under the sentential-negation prefix the argument
reader already parses, so `(¬p, therefore p)` is a tautological refutation.
R3 — `atom_sentence` is polarity-independent, which IS the rule: a negative row
must mint the SAME propositional atom. Demonstrated, not just asserted —
`test_r3_a_different_connective_would_silently_fail_to_refute` shows a negated
paraphrase returning UNKNOWN, i.e. a taught refutation that quietly fails to
refute with nothing going red.
R4 — one atom cannot hold both polarities; rejected at ratification, naming
both polarities and the consequence. Left to serve time it would surface as
INCONSISTENT_PREMISES: the band silently going dark across the whole family
instead of the authoring mistake being named. Duplicate-edge and contradiction
stay distinguishable failures.
R8 — the oracle learns polarity INDEPENDENTLY (its own constants, its own row
reader; asserted at source level that it imports nothing from
teaching.curriculum_premises) and EXCLUDES negatives from the reachability
adjacency, because a denial supplies no step from subject to object.
NO negative row is committed — authoring curriculum is Phase F and Shay's. So
the shipped gold mix is still entailed 72 / unknown 4968, zero refuted, and
Phase C's `test_gold_mix_has_no_refuted_class` stays green with its message
retargeted from "unimplemented" to "no content yet".
Also adds `--polarity` to `core proposal-queue ratify`, so the mechanism is
reachable from the operator surface rather than only from Python.
The end-to-end tests repoint BOTH loaders at a temp corpus instead of writing
the committed one. An earlier draft appended to physics_chains_v1.jsonl and
restored it, which is safe under smoke/deductive (serial) but NOT under `full`,
which injects `-n auto`: a parallel worker reading mid-mutation would see an
uncommitted row and the failure would look like a corpus problem rather than
test isolation. Each loader is still redirected separately at its own module
constant and still parses with its own code, so R8's independence is untouched.
[Verification]: in-worktree on canonical CPython 3.12.13 with `uv sync
--locked`: smoke 593 (571 + 22), deductive 332 (310 + 22). curriculum_serve
lane unchanged at n=32 correct=32 wrong=0 anti_recall=5; all 11 lane SHA pins
match; committed corpora untouched (git status clean under
teaching/domain_chains/). Mutation-checked all three load-bearing rules: R2
sentence ignoring polarity -> 5 red; R8 negatives back in the adjacency -> the
exclusion test red; R4 check removed -> both R4 tests red. The R8 test has an
affirmative control proving the 2-hop path is real when the row is positive,
so `depth == 0` cannot pass vacuously.
compile_premises emitted every chain in a family, and read_verb_argument
refuses past MAX_PREMISE_SENTENCES=16 — a 17-chain family answered nothing
at all, which meant no curriculum band could ever earn a license regardless
of corpus size (ADR-0264 §4.1).
compile_premises now accepts an optional query=(subject, connective, obj)
and scopes compilation to it: the default is term incidence (chains whose
subject or object is one of the query's two terms), narrowing further to
the exact query-atom rows only if term incidence would still exceed the
cap. Both scopes are verdict-identical to full-family compilation, because
every compiled premise mints one independent propositional atom that no
other atom in the argument can constrain (ADR-0264 R5) — verified over all
8,520 routable questions in the four served domains: 0 mismatches, 4,494
empty scopes all confirmed `unknown` under full-family compilation.
decide_curriculum_question (the only production caller) now distinguishes
an empty SCOPE (open-world UNKNOWN, R6) from an empty FAMILY (the existing
`empty_curriculum` refusal) — getting this wrong would have flipped most
of the question space from unknown to declined. premise_count keeps
reporting family size for the user-visible surface (R7); the compiled
scope size is carried separately on a new `scope_size` field.
Physics gold is unchanged: entailed 14 / unknown 12 / declined 6, lane
report byte-identical, SHA pin unchanged.
[Verification]: smoke suite 569 passed (140.5s), deductive suite 291
passed (50.5s, +6 new tests in tests/test_curriculum_serve.py), warmed_session
lane 10 passed (146.0s), curriculum_serve lane wrong=0 (n=32), all on
canonical Python 3.12.13 with uv sync --locked.
Phase 2 of the generalization arc, implementing the plan's §4
curriculum-entailment gold contract. "Does force cause acceleration?" is
answered from the ratified physics chain corpus and nothing else; "Does
gravity cause acceleration?" is declined because gravity is in no pack
CORE has been taught; "Does force cause motion?" is unsettled even though
the curriculum contains both links, because nothing ratified says
causation composes.
Path (flag-gated, default off): closed question grammar -> subject routing
by ratified vocabulary -> family-scoped premise compilation from reviewed,
pack-resident chains -> the SAME argument bands (ADR-0260/0261) -> the
ROBDD engine. Zero subject-specific decision code: physics differs from
philosophy only in which rows load.
Epistemology enforced mechanically, not by convention:
- gold is a function of (curriculum, question); cases pin chain ids and
the runner FAILS a case whose pinned chain is absent or unratified;
- untaught => UNKNOWN, never "no" (open-world; silence is not denial);
- an independent oracle (own loader, ratification predicate, family table,
agreement rules, verdict rule) re-derives every gold — it disagreed once,
on "entropy reveals energy" vs "entropy causes energy", and the ORACLE
was the side that was wrong;
- anti-recall probes are a lane GUARD: a split without >=3 true-but-untaught
probes refuses to run.
Findings recorded rather than worked around (ADR-0262 §5):
- every curriculum band is UNEARNED and every answer is hedged. A band needs
n>=657 with a real outcome mix; physics teaches 7 causal + 9 modal
relations, so at most 16 questions in the subject can ever be ENTAILED.
A balanced band needs ~219 taught relations per subject×family — a ~25x
gap that only ratified curriculum content closes. Phase 2's blocker is
curriculum volume, not machinery.
- REFUTED is unreachable from present corpora (every chain is positive).
- there is NO biology domain-chain corpus; the biology OOD lane measures
fluency, not truth. The four subjects with ratified chains and mounted
packs are physics, mathematics_logic, systems_software,
philosophy_theology — the composer serves all four.
[Verification]: curriculum lane 32/32 wrong=0 with 5 anti-recall probes and
all three contract guards passing; tests/test_curriculum_serve.py 20 passed;
core test --suite deductive 252 passed; lane pinned as curriculum_serve_v1.
