First step of the cohesion-directive arc (docs only; no code).
- docs/adr/ADR-0244-…md: committed Proposed, verbatim from the R&D export
(matching the ADR-0241/2/3 landing convention), plus a clearly-marked
governance annotation holding two items open for the D4 implementation plan:
(1) §2.3 Q_top is likely vacuous — central I5 in odd Cl(4,1) collapses the
charge on versor states (the #19 pseudoscalar failure mode); it must not be an
egress gate without an empirical discriminating counterexample; (2) §4's
conformed implementation contradicts §2.1-2.2 (per-axis resonance vs.
Gram-projection/leakage-norm/ManifoldConditioningError), references a dangling
ADR-0245, and uses a bare assert for the byte-order guard.
- docs/analysis/engineering_cohesion_refactoring_directive.md: the technical
directive moved to its own canonical path, verbatim (content byte-identical).
- docs/analysis/adr-0244-cohesion-directive-audit-2026-07-17.md: the code-level
audit of all 7 mandates vs. main@24078b11 — per-mandate verdicts, the six
spec-level wrinkles, the amended mandate→work-item mapping, the missing sixth
acceptance criterion (Mechanical-Sympathy gain), and the five decisions (Q1-Q5).
Notable finding: the default=str + 24-char-digest drift the directive flags was
replicated into Lane C (biography_wiring.py) AFTER the directive was written —
raising the priority of the D1 semantic-rigor batch.
[Verification]: docs-only; ADR governance provenance-guard green (unchanged).
