Two-pronged self-documentation pass so reviewers / investors / the
future team can revisit any artifact cold and immediately understand
what it tests, what to expect, and what to do if the numbers shift.
Inline preambles (`core demo`):
Before each demo's results table, print a structured preamble:
- WHAT THIS DEMO TESTS mechanism + corpus shape
- WHAT TO EXPECT IF WORKING concrete pass numbers
- WHAT TO LOOK FOR specific signals on regression
- WHEN TO TWEAK falsifiability + corpus authoring rules
Suppressed under --json so machine-readable output is uncluttered.
Wired into:
core demo phase5 (5-family stratified mechanism-isolation)
core demo phase6 (3-condition head-to-head vs baseline)
core demo all (combined; both preambles + a "what this means"
summary after the combined table)
Per-directory READMEs:
evals/forward_semantic_control/results/README.md
- Inventory of every JSON report with headline metrics
- Per-report interpretation guide ("when to look here")
- Per-case schema reference
- "When something looks wrong" troubleshooting tree
- Cross-links to ADRs, runtime_contracts, findings docs
evals/forward_semantic_control/public/v2_phase5/README.md
- The five failure-mode families, geometric construction, and
expected behaviour per mode
- Case schemas (single-step + chained) with field semantics
- How cases were geometrically mined (phase5_mine.py)
- Authoring rules: add cases, never relax assertions
evals/forward_semantic_control/public/v2_phase6_demo/README.md
- The three conditions with case counts and what each proves
- Why the baseline is in-system (not a transformer LLM) — table
- Case schema with the `condition` field
- Authoring rules: surface specific asymmetry, never relax predicate
evals/forward_semantic_control/public/inner_loop_benign/README.md
- Why this corpus exists (replaces adversarial-by-accident v1/dev)
- The Cl(4,1) signature quirk (23/85 tokens with negative
self-cga_inner) and the 0.25 self-score authoring filter
- Expected exhaustion_rate per condition
- How to verify a new case before committing (one-liner snippet)
New contract tests (tests/test_cli_demo.py::TestDemoPreambles + ::TestResultsReadme):
- Phase 6 preamble explains C1/C2/C3 and the in-system baseline rationale
- Phase 5 preamble explains all five families AND that δ is falsifiable
- Preamble suppressed under --json (parseable JSON from byte 0)
- `demo all` runs both preambles + a "what this means" summary
- results/README.md mentions every phase report file
- All three corpus READMEs exist
Tests: 1107 passed, 2 skipped (+8 from preceding baseline).
No mechanism changes — all additions are documentation surface.
Closes the 6-phase ADR-0024 chain with a focused comparative demo
that distinguishes CORE (inner-loop + margin + typed refusals) from
the in-system boundary-only baseline (ADR-0023 ablation).
Three conditions, all passing under contract tests:
C1. Replay determinism
baseline: 8/8 stable across 5 reruns
CORE: 8/8 stable across 5 reruns
CORE additionally folds refusal_reason into trace hash so
refusal events are replayable evidence.
C2. Traced rejection
baseline emits forbidden: 3/3 (admits=False but walk continues)
CORE corrects-or-refuses: 3/3
CORE rejection in trace: 3/3
Demonstrates that inner-loop is causally responsible for the
selection difference between baseline and CORE.
C3. Coherent refusal
baseline typed refusals: 0/3 (never raises typed refusal)
baseline emits inadmissible: 3/3
CORE typed refusals: 3/3 (all INNER_LOOP_EXHAUSTION)
Demonstrates that typed refusal with rejected_attempts evidence
is new in CORE, not present in boundary-only.
Why in-system baseline (not LLM):
A transformer-LLM comparison would be non-deterministic by
construction, could not be CI-enforced, and would be apples-to-
oranges (different corpus / training / sampling). The honest
comparison is the ablation: same codebase with the Phase 2-5
additions disabled.
Files:
evals/forward_semantic_control/phase6_demo.py
evals/forward_semantic_control/public/v2_phase6_demo/cases.jsonl (8 cases)
evals/forward_semantic_control/results/phase6_demo_report.json
tests/test_phase6_demo.py (17 passing)
docs/evals/phase6_comparative_demo.md
Tests: 1085 passed, 2 skipped (+17 from Phase 5 baseline).
This closes the ADR-0024 6-phase chain:
Phase 1 — pack-grounded fixture + architectural finding (3940290)
Phase 2 — typed refusals + trace fold (310793a)
Phase 3 — ADR-0026 ranked-with-margin (639e107)
Phase 4 — ADR-0025 rotor / frame admissibility (542e13d)
Phase 5 — stratified 5-family mechanism-isolation (b664984)
Phase 6 — comparative demo (this commit)
Authors a 20-case corpus stratified across five geometric failure-mode
families and a separate 10-case benign corpus for the
EXHAUSTION_CEILING lane:
A. near_forbidden_correct_endpoint (6 cases, gaps 0.002 to 0.55)
B. near_equal_admissible (5 cases, diffs ≤ 0.01)
C. no_admissible_path (3 cases, honest refusal)
D. multi_step_admissibility (3 chained cases)
E. heterogeneous_relation (3 chained cases, blade-switching)
phase5_runner runs each case under BOTH threshold and ADR-0026 margin
modes and reports per-family pass_rate, refusal_rate, and (for Family
A) rejection_traced_rate + boundary_overridden_rate.
Headline:
pass_rate_threshold = 1.00 (20/20)
pass_rate_margin = 1.00 (20/20)
mechanism_isolated = true (both modes, all five families)
replay determinism = byte-identical across 3 reruns
Family C refuses with RefusalReason.INNER_LOOP_EXHAUSTION in both
modes (load-bearing evidence for ADR-0024 Phase 2 typed refusals).
Family B refuses under margin mode (validates ADR-0026 δ=0.4 gate).
Benign inner-loop corpus for EXHAUSTION_CEILING ≤ 0.05 gate:
boundary_only: exhaustion 0.00, pass 1.00
null_control: exhaustion 0.00, pass 1.00
inner_loop_t0: exhaustion 0.00, pass 1.00
inner_loop_tpos: exhaustion 0.00, pass 1.00 (threshold 0.25)
Geometric finding documented while authoring the benign corpus:
23 of 85 pack tokens have negative self-cga_inner under Cl(4,1).
Tokens with self-score ≤ 0 cannot serve as single-token expected
endpoints in threshold mode — the algebra's Lorentzian signature
forbids this geometrically. Phase 5 benign corpus draws expected
endpoints from the 62-token positive-self-score subset. This is
consistent with Phase 4 characterization: no static threshold
delivers separation_quality ≥ 0.8 — the margin lane survives
because margin compares differences, not absolute scores.
Files:
evals/forward_semantic_control/public/v2_phase5/cases.jsonl
evals/forward_semantic_control/public/inner_loop_benign/cases.jsonl
evals/forward_semantic_control/phase5_runner.py
evals/forward_semantic_control/phase5_mine.py
evals/forward_semantic_control/results/phase5_report.json
evals/forward_semantic_control/results/phase5_benign_inner_loop_report.json
tests/test_phase5_corpus.py (20 passing)
docs/evals/phase5_stratified_findings.md
Tests: 1068 passed, 2 skipped (+20 from Phase 4 baseline).
Rewrite v1+dev FSC cases with pack-grounded tokens drawn from
en_core_cognition_v1. Closes the 9/9 region-construction failure
recorded in Phase 4 (chain_tokens alpha/beta/gamma/delta/etc. were
ungrounded in the active pack).
Token mappings preserve each case's test pattern:
* alpha→beta→gamma→delta → tone→evidence→memory→wisdom (causes)
* mu→nu→omicron → voice→memory→wisdom (means)
* pi→rho→sigma→tau → question→answer→understanding→wisdom (precedes)
* upsilon→phi→chi → word→discourse→narrative (part_of)
* eta/theta/zeta + means-distractors → symbol/word/meaning + image/light
Result post-rewrite:
* skipped_count: 9/9 → 0/9 (region constructible)
* causal_attribution_valid: True (preserved)
* code_path_residual: 0.0 (preserved)
* inner_loop_t0 hash stability: 1.0 (preserved)
* best_separation_quality: 0.0 → 0.056 (still below 0.8 gate)
The rewrite exposes a deeper architectural finding documented in the
ADR addendum: v1/dev case schema (prime + chain_tokens) probes
teaching-driven walk (ADR-0022/0023), not the inner-loop's
blade-admissibility mechanism (ADR-0024). The Phase 2 corpus-
observation runner's reuse of v1/dev was a categorical error.
v1/dev belong to the boundary-walk lane (runner.py); v2 belongs to
the inner-loop lane (v2_runner.py). Phase 5 will author the benign
inner-loop corpus the EXHAUSTION_CEILING gate was designed against.
Tests pinning new state:
* TestV1ChainBladeUngrounded → TestV1ChainBladePostGrounding
(assertions inverted: skipped_count == 0; separation_quality < 0.5)
* TestPhase2 (unchanged) continues to assert causal_attribution_valid
and hash stability; exhaustion remains a finding, not an invariant.
Phase 2 — Corpus observation runner (inner_loop_runner.py):
- Four-condition matrix: boundary_only / null_control / inner_loop_t0 / inner_loop_tpos.
- Added `inner_loop_force_admit` to generate() — exercises the inner-loop
code path but force-breaks on first candidate. Eval-only null control:
isolates rejection as the causal factor for any pass-rate delta.
- Metrics: pass_rate, mean_rejection_count_per_turn,
non_empty_rejected_attempts_rate, exhaustion_rate (gated at 5%),
mean_admissibility_checks_per_turn, mean/p95 added_latency_ms,
trace_hash_stability across 5 reruns per case.
- Finding on v1+dev: causal_attribution_valid=True, code_path_residual=0.0,
but exhaustion_rate=0.33 at t=0 — chain outer-product blade is
geometrically blind to the active pack.
- Tests (tests/test_inner_loop_phase2.py, 5 pass): pin
causal-attribution and live-corpus trace-hash stability invariants.
Phase 3 — Mechanism-isolation v2 corpus (5 cases, v2_runner.py):
- Synthetic adversarial cases with controlled geometry — each case
specifies seed_token, admissible_tokens, relation_blade_token, and
admissibility_threshold. Field state is constructed directly from
the seed token versor, not via priming.
- For every case: boundary-only selects the forbidden decoy and
inner-loop selects the expected endpoint with the forbidden token
appearing in rejected_attempts.
- Result: mechanism_isolated=true on 5/5. boundary_decoy_rate=1.0,
rejection_traced_rate=1.0. Inner-loop rejection is demonstrably
doing causal semantic work on real packs.
- Tests (tests/test_inner_loop_phase3.py, 8 pass): GATE on
mechanism_isolated.
Phase 4 — Threshold characterization (threshold_characterization.py):
- Distribution mapping per-case AND globally on v1+dev, v2, combined.
- Per-threshold sweep over [-1.0, -0.5, 0.0, 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0].
- Finding: per-case geometry separates cleanly (correct_min > incorrect_max
on every v2 case), BUT no global static threshold passes the
separation_quality >= 0.8 gate. Blade norms vary ~10x across cases.
- Static thresholds (global, relation-typed, or constant frame-derived)
are geometrically insufficient. Per-case-normalized thresholds
(e.g. fraction of blade self-score) are the recommended next step.
- v1 chain-token outer-product cases all skipped — the corpus's chain
tokens (alpha, beta, gamma, delta) are not grounded in the active
pack. Load-bearing finding for ADR-0025 region construction.
- Tests (tests/test_inner_loop_phase4.py, 5 pass): pin the finding
diagnostically (not gated).
Phase 5 — ADR-0025 design note (draft):
- No code changes proposed. Scopes three architectural questions:
(1) home (algebra/versor.py vs field/propagate.py vs generate/) —
preliminary stance: algebra/versor.py.
(2) threshold scheme (blade-normalized fraction recommended over
static; learned/adaptive rejected for determinism).
(3) teaching-loop boundary — Stance A confirmed: rejections are
runtime hygiene only, no entanglement with teaching/*.
- Decisions to be closed before Draft → Accepted.
Phase 1 acceptance criteria from previous commit (7fccf36) carry
forward: wired, deterministic-when-wired, legacy hash preserved.
Suite: 1014 passed, 0 failed, 2 skipped.
Extends ADR-0022 with inspection/telemetry surfaces that turn the
forward-semantic-control claim from "mechanism exists" into "mechanism
is causally load-bearing, isolated, and replayable."
Changes (zero runtime semantics change beyond a pipeline bug fix):
- AdmissibilityTraceStep + GenerationResult.admissibility_trace —
per-transition record of region label, candidates before/after,
selected destination, and the typed AdmissibilityVerdict.
- ChatResponse + CognitiveTurnResult expose admissibility_trace,
admissibility_trace_hash, ratification_outcome,
region_was_unconstrained.
- hash_admissibility_trace + compute_trace_hash fold the new fields
only when they carry non-default values, so pre-ADR-0023 turn
hashes remain byte-preserved.
- Same-path ablation leg in evals/forward_semantic_control/runner.py:
generate(..., region=None) vs generate(..., region=R) on the same
runtime/vocab/field/persona/prompt — isolates the region as cause.
- Lane expansion: 8 dev cases across 4 relation axes (cause, means,
precedes, part_of) including 2 adversarial distractor cases.
- Lane metrics now report region_only_constrained_rate /
region_only_gap / ratified_rate / demoted_rate / passthrough_rate /
passthrough_on_scored.
- Bug fix surfaced by the new accounting: _ratify_intent looked up
runtime.vocab (always None) instead of runtime.session.vocab —
every production turn was silently PASSTHROUGH. Fixed; ratifier
now actually gates intent classification.
- tests/test_admissibility_trace.py: hash determinism +
pre-ADR-0023 byte-preservation tests.
Lane evidence (dev, 8 cases):
- constrained_pass_rate=0.80, causality_gap=0.80
- region_only_gap=1.00 (5/5 with region, 0/5 without — same path)
- ratified_rate=1.00, passthrough_on_scored=false
- overall_pass=true
Bench: 9.41s / 20 turns (~470ms/turn), well inside the +5% budget.
Full pytest: 922 passed, 1 pre-existing failure
(test_language_pack_cache, unrelated to ADR-0023).
Resolves all 5 TBDs and closes all 8 acceptance gates for ADR-0022.
TBD-1 (intent oracle): regex seed + field ratification —
generate/intent_ratifier.py. RATIFIED / DEMOTED / PASSTHROUGH
outcomes; DEMOTED routes through honest refusal.
TBD-2 (region intersection algebra): generate/admissibility.py.
Token-set composition via sorted set intersection; blade composition
via outer product with zero-blade as neutral element; rotor
composition via sandwich conjugation routed through
algebra.backend.versor_apply (Rust parity preserved by construction).
Empty intersections preserved — no silent relaxation.
Wiring: propose() and generate() accept an AdmissibilityRegion
(default None preserves legacy behavior); pipeline ratifies intent
at step 1b.i before graph construction.
Eval lane: evals/forward_semantic_control/ — both legs run against
CognitiveTurnPipeline (constrained) vs bare ChatRuntime.chat()
(unconstrained baseline). Dev (3 cases) and public/v1 (1 case) both
report overall_pass=true, causality_gap=1.0, coincidence_rate=0.0.
Chain-endpoint probe surfaces 'delta' only under forward semantic
control.
Bench cost (30 turns): -2.8% wall-clock (within +5% budget the ADR
set for the ratification gate on every turn). 138x cheaper than
Sonnet 4.5; main was 142x.
Tests: 33 new (25 admissibility + 8 ratifier). Full suite 912/913
pass — the single failure is pre-existing pack-size drift on main,
unrelated.
Shay