Two external first-principles assessments of CORE were verified against code
line-by-line at 8f0ccfe3. What survived is entered; what failed is recorded in
the audit's negative space with the refuting file named, per the register's own
discipline.
Entered:
H-13 — the speculative-marker cache over-evicts shared tokens: promoting one
proposal to COHERENT pops tokens regardless of owner (pipeline.py:736-739,
:1045-1055), so a sibling proposal's still-SPECULATIVE material is served
without its marker. Honesty regression, served direction. Remedy: refcounted
cache, failing test first. (The source assessment described this seam with
the direction inverted — under-eviction; the code over-evicts. The check
that caught the inversion is what confirmed the bug.)
H-14 — _run_turn is 759 lines (pipeline.py:189-947) under a thin-wrapper
docstring, with finalize_turn_trace_hash x2 / finalize_turn_surface x1
back-stamps as the measured symptom. H-4's sibling: refactor ADR, PR-10's
byte-identical-trace bar, and the learn stage named stateful.
H-8e — inductive_closure.py's docstring claims a path-based cycle skip the
code does not perform (:106 vs :189-193) — and the code is the right side:
the monotone fixed point needs no path check, and adding one would refuse
sound derivations. path records only (a,b,c) for longer chains (:198), so
trace provenance is incomplete. Docstring fix is mechanical; extending path
changes operator_invocation bytes -> trace_hash, held to the trace-change bar.
PR-9 widened — the logos-authority bare except (pipeline.py:555) and the
three OOV-probe swallows (:605-657) join the count-the-swallow scope; same
remedy shape (record repr(e), keep the backstop), explicitly not the
narrow-catch alternative.
R-4 packet addition — first collapse candidate: composed_surface +
transitive_surface + transitive_max_depth -> chain_depth:int, justified by
ADR-0083's own docstring ladder; ruled in-lineage, not ad-hoc.
R-12a note — lived_life.json staleness recorded as a question; the proposed
PID-attestation fix rejected (refuses every reboot resume; PID reuse).
Cleared, with the refuting file named: EpistemicState compression
(vault/store.py, policy.py's ADR-0206 partition), the EpistemicState x
NormativeClearance product type (erases refusal evidence — H-3 rebuilt as a
type), PID attestation, path-based cycle skipping, the depth-enrichment cache
(pack_resolver.py:19 already lru_caches the cost), and the unified reasoning
engine as-refactor (trace_hash change + capability widening + discards the
ROBDD engine one merge after ADR-0265 ratified denial).
Register ranges updated to G-1..G-21 / H-1..H-14. Docs only; no runtime
behavior, no flag, no test changed.
[Verification]: uv run pytest tests/test_adr_index.py
tests/test_adr_status_governance.py tests/test_adr_0252_s5_blindness.py -q —
327 passed at this tree.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Wcw2pnMBwyvmNyQg4uPEt4
The branch was re-created with SSH signatures before landing, which changed my
commit SHAs. Four citations of the pre-registration commit — the verdict's
header and closing note, G-1, and the plan's Track A section — pointed at
dfc394d2, which is not in main's history. They now point at 299c92be, which is.
Same tree, same message, same ordering, signature added. The claim the verdict
rests on is unchanged and checkable at 299c92be: that commit contains the
thresholds and no results. Recorded as a note in the verdict document rather
than swapped silently, because a document citing a commit absent from its own
repository's history is precisely the failure mode its §1 catalogues — and this
one would have been self-inflicted.
Docs only.
[Verification]: uv run pytest tests/test_adr_index.py
tests/test_adr_status_governance.py tests/test_adr_0252_s5_blindness.py -q —
327 passed.
Track A of docs/assessment/50-execution-plan.md §6, executed under its own
protocol. Criterion pre-registered at dfc394d2 (that commit carries the
thresholds as importable constants and NO results); this commit carries the run.
VERDICT: NO-GO. Full credit by ADR-0252 §5.4's own terms.
docs/research/sme-experiment-verdict-797ebad5.md
evals/structure_mapping/adr0252_s5/results/report-797ebad5.json
deterministic_digest b3d9d27592e213104c51bcace7415fd819d722a1b06f7d0a5ca65bd5a234e4ec
53 cases, 1378 pairs, 0.0% non-convergence — no exception contributed to any
number. RS-A (structure-only) separates perfectly, AUC 1.0000, margin +0.0867,
and fails structure-sensitivity. RS-B (attribute-bearing) fails all three.
The mechanism, measured rather than argued: the similarity quotient that would
deliver attribute-invariance is the same quotient that annihilates structural
contrast. An add-vs-subtract minimal pair — one entity, identical numbers, one
relation kind changed — aligns at residual exactly 0.0, its two configurations
being related by a PROPER rotation about e1. Sweeping the attribute weight
(committed as diagnostic_sweep), structure-sensitivity fails at every setting,
and every regime where the SME property survives is a regime where attributes
contribute nothing: AUC 1.00 -> 0.97 -> 0.83 -> 0.69 as they begin to matter.
Scope stated narrowly: this refutes H1 for embeddings that encode role-structure
as point positions aligned by conformal Procrustes under similarity. The
argument is about the quotient, so it generalises across that class; it does not
refute every Cl(4,1) representation, and it does not touch the symbolic
structure-mapping lane already in evals/structure_mapping/.
Two findings that were on nobody's list:
N-8 — the experiment was NOT unrun. rnd/sme-experiment-v2 @ 96e5f468 is titled
"Verdict: GO" and rnd/structure-mapping-experiment @ fc9d0c14 carries an earlier
one. Neither survives inspection: attempt 1 leaked the S1-S4 label into the
embedding; attempt 2 was blind and then took its separability from
`except ValueError: res = 1000.0` — a solver exception counted as a distance —
on a corpus 46/51 of which is outside holdout_dev/v1 with nothing marked, with
duplicate graphs, colliding ids, and an extractor that was never committed. The
register, the plan and the ADR all read the same absence and inherited the same
error for nine days. A branch tip is not a record.
G-21 — the math reader returns a selected graph for 5 of 500 holdout_dev/v1
cases (1.0%), all one skeleton; 24/150 on the public lane. That is why §5.1's
four-structure corpus is not extractable, and it is a sharper measurement of the
comprehension frontier than G-3's construction count.
Registers updated: G-1 carries the verdict, H-10 confirmed and discharged, G-21
added, plan §0 gains N-8, Track A closed, synthesis frontier 2 rewritten.
Pins: tests/test_adr_0252_s5_blindness.py, each observed red before green
(label leak and duplicate-graph sabotage both caught).
Off-serving — evals/structure_mapping/adr0252_s5/ is imported by no serving
path, emits no answers, and changes no flag.
[Verification]: 797ebad5 + this branch — `uv run core test --suite smoke -q`
641 passed in 199.76s; `uv run ruff check` clean; report regenerated after lint
with an unchanged digest.
scripts/hooks/pre-push — the automation of the AGENTS.md local-first protocol
— opens by describing its own step 1 as "the smoke suite — exact CI-gate
parity". It runs 23 files; the CI gate runs 13. That is the second in-repo
assertion of a parity that does not hold, the first being core/cli_test.py's
audio block, and it is the strongest evidence available that the drift was
never intended rather than a deliberate narrowing.
Phase 6 of the holistic assessment: what follows from it, and what it needs
ruled before anything else can be sequenced.
`50-execution-plan.md` — five waves (scrub/rule → delete → simplify/enforce →
accelerate evidence loops → automate last) plus five frontier tracks, covering
every G-1…G-20 and H-1…H-12 entry, with four hard dependency gates and nine
risks stated before they are incurred.
`50-rulings.md` — R-1…R-14. One decision per section: the evidence verified at
ed06dd64, the options enumerated, a recommendation with its reasoning, and the
exact diff that follows from each choice, so ruling costs one word. Nothing in
it recommends reversing a ratified decision; R-12 amends two ADRs' records
without touching either decision.
§0 of the plan carries SEVEN corrections to the assessment, all found by
reading code, workflows and ADR supersession banners — none by re-reading
documents. Four change planned work:
- N-3 (new) the local smoke suite (23 files) and smoke.yml (13) have diverged
by 10 files. Severity is LOWER than this plan's first draft stated: AGENTS.md
makes the in-worktree run the merge gate and CI secondary observability, and
the local gate is the superset — so nothing is unguarded. What is real is one
in-code comment claiming an equality that does not hold, and the push that
skipped the local gate, for which CI is the only automatic check.
- N-4 the L10 soak HAS been run — 5000 beats, reboot at 2500, all four gates
pass (contract.md, landed aed273b1). G-5's "never produced an artifact" is
wrong. The debt is the ceremony: no committed report, no pinned
deterministic_digest (the contract's own unmet closing instruction), no
cadence. Prose with no pinned digest is testimony, not evidence.
- N-5 G-10's blocker does not exist. ADR-0264 §4.1 carries a self-supersession
banner: R5 removed the 16-premise cap on 2026-07-26, and four bands would
earn SERVE the moment a ledger is sealed. PR-13 is WITHDRAWN and the whole
throughput frontier reduces to one ruling (R-8).
- N-7 the flag count is 28 of 32 RuntimeConfig booleans, not seventeen.
Plus N-1 (the orphan scan artifact: TEST_SUITES["full"] is a directory),
N-2 (the L10 pins run twice a day, post-merge and nightly), and N-6 (H-8 has a
fourth instance inside the code — two flag docstrings assert a production
profile the production profile does not have, which moves R-3 decisively
toward "incomplete flag set").
Docs only. No runtime behavior, no flag, no test changed.
