Commit graph

9 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Shay
60b40d3e3a feat(comprehension): inverse reader frame — base of a more/fewer-than (PR-7b / R2 C0)
r1-07 now reads setup-correct and answers 6 — 'Nia has 9 more beads than Omar. Nia has 15. -> Omar = 6'. The reader binds the unknown base's unit FROM the relation when its subject is a known fact and its referent is the otherwise-ungrounded query target, so the equation is admissible; the answer oracle reverse-solves it (PR-7a). Bounded: single base == query target (no chains), known subject value, base not otherwise grounded, <=1 inverse (multiple_inverse_bases else), never over times/divide.

R1 setup 6/0/4 -> 7/0/3; R1 answers -> 7 correct / 0 wrong; 15-case 15/0/0; setup_wrong stays 0. Off-serving. Refreshes the R1 ledger to 7/0/3 (R1 closed; the 3 remaining refusals are wrong=0 boundaries).
2026-06-07 07:06:26 -07:00
Shay
ef06923866 feat(comprehension): additive aggregate query variants — 'altogether' / 'in total'
Widen the aggregate-query recognizer so a multi-part total may be asked with a
trailing qualifier after 'have': 'How many X do A and B have altogether?' and
'... in total?'. The qualifier is stripped and honored ONLY for the multi-part
(sumquery) form — a single-entity query carrying it refuses, guarded by
'not aggregate'.

Phrasing-only: no new arithmetic, no new relation kind, no inverse solving, no
distractor/pronoun handling. The parts still flow through the existing sum_of;
an ungrounded part (unit unbound) or a unit-incompatible part (unit mismatch) is
refused downstream by the REAL admissibility check, so the recognizer cannot
over-read. Off-serving organ only (no generate.derivation / reliability_gate).

Flips r1-03 (more+altogether -> 25) and r1-04 (fewer+in total -> 34):
  R1 setup   6 / 0 / 4    R1 answers 6 / 0 / 4  (setup_wrong 0, gold_error 0)
  15-case 15 / 0 / 0      29 quant tests, 102 affected-file tests green

Tests are meaningful-fail: the single-entity-qualifier, ungrounded-part, and
unit-incompatible-part refusals each fail loudly if their guard is removed.
2026-06-07 05:49:28 -07:00
Shay
f9ef9e56a4 feat(comprehension): aggregate-then-divide partition frame — "split equally into N boxes" (PR-6d)
PR-6d adds the partition frame: combine all parts into a total, then split that
total equally into N containers. r1-06-subtotal-reused moves refused → correct —
the FIRST case where the divisor applies to a DERIVED symbol (the total), not a
directly given fact. That is real progress toward GSM8K setup comprehension,
where intermediate quantities are the norm.

Scope (kept narrow on purpose):
  No new relation kind.
  No new arithmetic operation.
  No rational support.
  No rounding/flooring.
  No serving path touched.

The frame reuses the already-ratified pieces — SumOf(parts) + Div(Symbol(total),
Literal(N)) → divide_by — so this PR is reader-only (no IR / admissibility /
oracle / signature change).

Frame grammar:
  "They combine their <unit> and split them equally into N <containers>."
  + "How many <unit> are in each <container>?"
  -> total = sum(all facts); per_<container> = total / N; ask per_<container>.

wrong=0 boundaries:
- Exact-divisibility still gates the ANSWER, now over a derived total: 5+6=11,
  11/3 is non-exact -> the setup reads correctly but the answer REFUSES (never
  floors). Setup comprehension and answer exactness are cleanly separated.
- Partition/query coherence: a partition is read ONLY together with its
  "in each <container>" query (and vice versa); container mismatch (box vs jar)
  refuses. Prevents over-reading a story detail into an unused derived value.
  Meaningful-fail verified: disabling the guard makes a dangling partition
  wrongly comprehend.

Gates:
  R1 setup:   4 correct / 0 wrong / 6 refused
  R1 answers: 4 correct / 0 wrong / 6 refused / setup_wrong 0 / gold_error 0
  15-case setup: 15 / 0 / 0
  97 PR-6d tests + 99 relational/invariant tests green. Reader is off-serving
  (no generate.derivation / core.reliability_gate import).
2026-06-06 21:07:19 -07:00
Shay
0951d80e04 feat(comprehension): the divisive comparative frame — "half as many" as exact integer division (PR-6c)
PR-6c adds the divisive comparative frame: "half as many" read as EXACT INTEGER
DIVISION. It is the divisor twin of PR-5c's multiplicative frame, and moves the
independent R1 gold's r1-02-half from refused → correct.

No serving path touched. No rational/fractional answer support added. Non-exact
division refuses.

Design (ADR-0134 amended — divide made symmetric with multiply):
- `_check_divide` now admits a SINGLE-DEP divide-by-dimensionless-literal
  (item / dimensionless = item), the exact twin of single-dep multiply. The
  2-dep rate-divide path is untouched. This keeps the IR's "literal operands
  are not deps" invariant (proven in PR-6a) uniform across Mul AND Div, so the
  reader builds both without a per-op special case and WITHOUT synthesizing a
  divisor symbol that would pollute the setup-oracle's unit signature.
- `Div(Symbol, Literal)` IR node: "ref / divisor", operation_kind "divide",
  projects to `divide_by`. Divisor-only contract mirrors the scalar-only one.
- Reader: `_DIVISOR_WORDS={half:2}` slots into the same 8-token "<WORD> as many"
  template as the factor words; graph carries only the two entities.
- Gold reconciliation: r1-02 placeholder `times_as_many factor 0.5` → exact
  `divide_by divisor 2` (gold 4). Makes the INDEPENDENT gold integer-faithful.

The wrong=0 boundary — exact divisibility:
  the oracle admits `divide_by` only when `base % divisor == 0`. An odd base
  halved REFUSES (gold_error), never floors to a wrong integer. Divisor must be
  a nonzero int (0, 0.5, 1.5, bool all refuse); divisor=1 is intentionally the
  identity (pinned). admissibility proves DIMENSION; the oracle proves EXACT VALUE.

Meaningful-fail (CLAUDE.md Schema-Defined Proof Obligations), both verified red:
- drop the `% divisor` guard → test_oracle_refuses_non_exact_division fails (returns 3).
- disable the single-dep divide branch → the admissibility test AND the reader's
  `half` test fail (admissibility refuses → reader refuses → half stays refused).

Gates:
  R1 setup:   3 correct / 0 wrong / 7 refused
  R1 answers: 3 correct / 0 wrong / 7 refused / setup_wrong 0 / gold_error 0
  15-case setup: 15 / 0 / 0
  91 PR-6c tests + 60 relational lanes + 56 architectural invariants + 502
  binding-graph/proof-chain/adapter tests green. All 8 SHA-content lanes match
  (serving unmoved; admissibility has no generate.derivation/reliability_gate consumer).
2026-06-06 20:18:39 -07:00
Shay
e9cbe65d77 feat(comprehension): the multiplicative comparative frame — first R1 capability (PR-5c)
The first capability slice on the R1 arc, gated by the setup-oracle: turn the
"twice / N times as many" reading from REFUSED into a correct setup, without a single
misread. Builds on the typed IR (PR-4) and the R1 gold (PR-5b).

- IR: a Mul(symbol, literal-factor) node — to_canonical_string "ref * factor",
  operation_kind "multiply", dependencies {ref}, to_relation -> times_as_many. The
  product keeps the symbol's unit (count * scalar = count), admitted by the REAL
  check_admissibility multiply path (the literal factor is dimensionless, not a dep).
- Reader: a multiplicative template "Y has <factor> as many <unit> as X" (factor word:
  twice/double/triple/quadruple) and "Y has <N> times as many <unit> as X", checked
  BEFORE the digit gate (the factor may be a word). 'half' (a /2) is deliberately
  deferred — divide-by-literal is a separate admissibility path.
- setup-oracle: relation_signature now canonicalizes times_as_many.

Setup-oracle R1 result: 2 setup_correct (r1-01 twice; r1-05 the multi-step chain
ivy/jon=3*ivy/kim=jon+2), 0 setup_WRONG, 8 setup_refused. Every hard negative stays a
safe refusal: missing-base (Rosa ungrounded), ambiguous referent, distractor, inverse,
partition, 'altogether'/'in total' phrasings, and 'half' (divide). wrong=0 held through
the first capability addition.

Gates green: setup-oracle R1 setup_wrong=0; 15-case setup gate 15/15 setup_wrong=0;
relational_metric answer lane 15/15 wrong=0; binding-graph admissibility + realize +
architectural invariants + chat-runtime + pipeline (122+). No serving path touched (this
reader feeds the relational_metric / setup-oracle lanes, not the candidate-graph serving).
2026-06-06 17:29:23 -07:00
Shay
06450928c9 refactor(comprehension): typed expression IR as the source of meaning (PR-4)
Internal hygiene + future-proofing. No serving path, no new capability — the 15-case
reader is structurally cleaner and the projection no longer recovers meaning by
re-parsing a string.

- New generate/quantitative_expr.py: a typed Expr IR (Literal/Symbol/Add/Sub/SumOf) with
  to_canonical_string (BYTE-IDENTICAL to the legacy "ref + delta" / "ref - delta" / "a + b"
  format), dependencies, operation_kind, and to_relation (the structured projection).
- The reader builds the Expr per equation as the SOURCE OF MEANING; rhs_canonical,
  dependencies, and operation_kind are all DERIVED from it (BoundEquation stays a string —
  the binding-graph's deliberate decoupling layer is untouched). QuantComprehension carries
  the IR as equation_exprs.
- to_relational_metric reads the IR via to_relation — the rhs_canonical string-reparse is
  GONE. An unhandled equation shape refuses (None).
- The dead _rhs string builder is removed.

Gates held: relational_metric answer lane 15/15 wrong=0; setup-oracle 15/15 setup_wrong=0;
malformed-target refusals intact; realize-binding-graph + architectural invariants green
(95). rhs_canonical is byte-identical, so the binding-graph + downstream hashes are
unchanged. No model change.

This is the foundation PR-5's R1 frames build on — structured equations, not string parsing
— and only after independent R1 gold is hand-authored.
2026-06-06 16:57:53 -07:00
Shay
0d32a655f1 refactor(comprehension): drop QuantQuery — consumers read the target from graph.unknowns (PR-3)
Completes the PR-1 migration. The question target now has a single source of truth:
the binding-graph's sole BoundUnknown. The sidecar QuantQuery dataclass + the
QuantComprehension.query field are DELETED.

- New helper single_unknown(graph) -> BoundUnknown | None: returns the sole target, or
  None on a graph that does not carry exactly one. Zero unknowns (no question) and
  multiple unknowns (ambiguous) both REFUSE — the consumer must never pick one.
- to_relational_metric reads the query from single_unknown(graph) (refuses on None).
- realize_quantitative reads the asked symbol from single_unknown(bg) (NotRealized on None).
- Tests: the .query assertions move to single_unknown; new malformed-graph tests prove
  0 and >1 unknowns REFUSE rather than pick one (the wrong=0 boundary).

Byte-identical where it matters: relational_metric answer lane 15/15 wrong=0, setup-oracle
15/15 setup_wrong=0, realize-binding-graph + architectural invariants green. No serving
path touched. No dangling QuantQuery reference remains.
2026-06-06 16:49:09 -07:00
Shay
59974865ef feat(comprehension): question target in the graph (PR-1) + setup-oracle lane (grade the reading)
Two coupled, additive, off-serving changes toward the typed math-comprehension organ.
No serving path touched; the relational_metric answer lane stays 15/15 wrong=0.

PR-1 — QuantQuery → BoundUnknown. comprehend_quantitative now emits the question
target as a BoundUnknown INSIDE the binding-graph (symbol_id, state_index="terminal",
question_form "count"|"total", expected_unit), so the graph is a real question-bearing
mathematical object and its canonical serialization carries the target. The external
QuantQuery is RETAINED, consistent-by-construction, so the two consumers
(to_relational_metric, realize/quantitative) are byte-identical; a follow-up rewires
them onto graph.unknowns and drops the duplicate field.

Setup-oracle lane (evals/setup_oracle) — grade the READING, not the answer. The
relational_metric lane scores answers, which can bless a semantically-wrong derivation
that coincidentally lands on the right number (the exact hazard the held-out
measurements + the 2/87 resolve_pooled probe exposed). The setup-oracle compares the
reader's comprehended STRUCTURE — a span-free signature of facts + typed equations +
the BoundUnknown target — against the INDEPENDENT gold structure (the relational_metric
cases' own relations/query, authored separately from the binding-graph reader). A
structural mismatch is setup_wrong, the wrong=0-critical count, even when the answer
would be right. v1 grades structure (units deferred — covered by admissibility). The
reader reads all 15 cases with the gold structure (setup_wrong=0); a meaningful-fail
test proves the oracle catches a right-answer/wrong-structure reading (it is not
decoration). `python -m evals.setup_oracle` exits nonzero iff setup_wrong > 0.

This is the measurement rig BEFORE investing in frame families: setup_wrong=0 is the
gate; serving must not move while setup_wrong > 0. It is the first milestone of the
math-comprehension organ, not a path to "solve GSM8K".

Verified: setup-oracle 15/15 setup_correct wrong=0; quantitative + setup-oracle unit
tests (17); realize-binding-graph + binding-graph + architectural invariants (183).
2026-06-06 16:40:15 -07:00
Shay
a005a92fed feat(comprehend): arithmetic word-problems via binding_graph (5th domain, real admissibility)
The binding-graph's FIRST comprehension consumer (doctrine-aligned: quantities live
in binding_graph, NOT the MeaningGraph). generate/quantitative_comprehension.py
reads arithmetic prose into SymbolBinding/BoundFact/BoundEquation and runs the REAL
check_admissibility (shell -> verify -> rebuild with the actual UnitProof) — there
is NO stamped "admitted": an equation is admitted only if its operand units verify.
Then to_relational_metric projects the binding-graph to the independent
relational_metric oracle for the verdict.

Templates (digits only; non-digit quantity REFUSES):
  "<X> has <N> <unit>"                 -> BoundFact(X = N)
  "<Y> has <N> more <unit> than <X>"   -> BoundEquation(Y = X + N)  op=add
  "<Y> has <N> fewer <unit> than <X>"  -> BoundEquation(Y = X - N)  op=subtract
  "How many <unit> does <Y> have"      -> ask Y
  "How many <unit> do <X> and <Y> have"-> total = X + Y; ask total

Unit modelling (honest, not faked): a noun the closed en_units_v1 pack knows is
used verbatim (dollars -> dollar/money); an UNKNOWN sortal noun (stickers, coins)
is a count of discrete objects -> the existing 'item' lemma (dimension count). So
admissibility stays a REAL check: count+count admits, count+money (a mixed-unit
sum) REFUSES with unit_mismatch — verified to bite.

comprehension_relational_metric: 15/15 wrong=0 (full coverage). Located OUTSIDE
generate/meaning_graph (it targets binding_graph, not the MeaningGraph) so INV-28
neutrality stays intact; oracle imports none of the SUT (new INV-25 lane).
Capability index breadth 7->8, score 0.928622 -> 0.937258, wrong_total 0, digest
50e0675b…

Tests: reader templates + count/known-unit modelling + admissibility-bite (mixed
unit refuses) + non-digit refusal; end-to-end full-coverage wrong=0; arithmetic
added to the structure-preservation generative panel (projected relations+query ==
ground truth); capability breadth 7->8; INV-25 arithmetic lane. 93 targeted + 90
smoke green; lane SHAs 8/9 (sole miss = public_demo env flake; deductive_logic +
math_teaching unchanged -> no GSM8K coupling).
2026-06-06 00:43:16 -07:00