Three load-bearing pieces:
1. ADR-0086 — UNKNOWN-intent pack-resident token surface
New deterministic composer `pack_grounded_unknown_surface` in
chat/pack_grounding.py. When intent classification returns UNKNOWN
but the prompt contains pack-resident lemmas (via cross-pack
resolver), surface those lemmas with their semantic_domains
instead of falling to the bare _UNKNOWN_DOMAIN_SURFACE. Wired
into chat/runtime.py::_maybe_pack_grounded_surface as the
last typed-intent branch before the OOV fallback. Null-lift
invariant pinned: fully-OOV prompts still emit the universal
disclosure byte-identically. Closes four cognition-eval term
misses: unknown_logos_019 (public), unknown_evidence_042 (dev),
unknown_spirit_041 + unknown_word_018 (holdout). Side effect:
evals/results/phase2_pack_measurements.json refusal_rate drops
from 0.25 → 0.125 across all three identity packs (no longer
refusing on these prompts).
2. ADR-0087 — PROCEDURE selector + trailing-clause subject echo
Two coupled changes in chat/pack_grounding.py:
(a) Numeric-determiner downrank in _extract_procedure_topic_lemma:
tokens whose primary semantic_domain starts with
"quantitative.numeric." are demoted; non-numeric resident
candidates always win. So "compare two terms" anchors on
`compare` not `two`.
(b) Trailing clause echoes the full normalized subject_text
rather than just the selected lemma, so OOV head nouns like
"terms" reach the surface even when only the procedure verb
is pack-resident. Closes procedure_compare_011.
3. 100-register catalog
New packs/register/_catalog.json — canonical machine-readable
spec for all 100 registers (7 currently-ratified + 93 drafted)
organized into 9 voice groups (depth/tone/stance/posture/domain/
cultural/affective/functional/composite). Each entry is a
complete production input — realizer_overrides, marker palettes
(openings/transitions/closings), depth_preference, description,
author_notes. All realizer_overrides use only legal keys per
scripts/ratify_register_packs.py::_KNOWN_OVERRIDE_KEYS.
Companion packs/register/CATALOG.md documents the production
loop: materialize → widen REGISTER_IDS → ratify → smoke.
Cognition-eval lifts (all three splits):
public: term_capture 91.7% → 100.0% (+8.3pp)
holdout: term_capture 83.3% → 100.0% (+16.7pp)
dev: term_capture 78.6% → 100.0% (+21.4pp)
surface_groundedness: 100% preserved on all splits
intent_accuracy / versor_closure: 100% preserved on all splits
Tests:
tests/test_pack_grounded_unknown.py — 14 tests (composer
direct + runtime engagement + null-lift invariant)
tests/test_adr_0087_procedure_selector.py — 12 tests (selector
numeric downrank + trailing-clause echo + regression guard)
Existing test suites unaffected — cognition lane 120 passed / 1
skipped both before and after. Full lane net −3 failures vs
pristine main (39 → 36 — none introduced).
The original "Why does light exist?" complaint that motivated ADR-0084
was specifically about CAUSE-intent surfaces. ADR-0084 (substrate) +
PR #65 (content) already moved DEFINITION/RECALL to gloss-grounded
surfaces ("Light is visible medium that reveal truth."). But CAUSE
still dispatched through the chain-walk path:
Before: light — teaching-grounded (cognition_chains_v1):
cognition.illumination; logos.core.
light reveals truth (cognition.truth).
No session evidence yet.
After: Light exists as visible medium that reveal truth.
pack-grounded (en_core_cognition_v1).
The chain-walk is structurally correct but the wrong SHAPE for a why-
question — it's a graph traversal, not an explanation. ADR-0085 fixes
the shape using the same gloss material that DEFINITION/RECALL already
consume, with no new content authoring.
Additive composer
chat/pack_grounding.py:gloss_aware_cause_surface()
- Resolves gloss via lexicon-residency-checked resolve_gloss().
- Frames POS-aware:
NOUN -> "{Lemma} exists as {gloss}."
VERB -> "To {lemma} is to {gloss}."
ADJ -> "To be {lemma} is to {gloss}."
* -> falls back to _frame_gloss (predicate-identity).
- Threads anchor lens via the existing helper (ADR-0073c parity).
- Returns None when no gloss exists — runtime falls through to the
existing chain-walk path. Additive: no CAUSE case loses its surface.
Runtime dispatch
chat/runtime.py — IntentTag.CAUSE tries gloss path FIRST under the
flag; falls through to teaching_grounded_surface* on None.
Unconditional fallback — never silent.
Opt-in flag
core/config.py — RuntimeConfig.gloss_aware_cause: bool = False
Default off preserves pre-ADR-0085 chain-walk surfaces byte-
identically (null-drop invariant, CI-pinned).
Prompt-diversity classifier update
evals/prompt_diversity/runner.py — _CAUSE_MARKERS widened with the
explanation-frame markers ("exists as", "is to", "to be", "is for",
"purpose of") plus bare-form predicates ("reveal" alongside
"reveals"). Neither composer path is penalised on shape_fit just on
inflection grounds.
v1/public lift (flag OFF vs ON, 26 cases)
intent_accuracy : 65.4% -> 65.4% ( — )
versor_closure_rate : 100.0% -> 100.0% ( — )
response_shape_fit : 57.7% -> 57.7% ( — , both frames recognized)
audit_in_surface_rate : 42.3% -> 42.3% ( — , envelope ADR's job)
gloss_quote_rate : 11.5% -> 23.1% (+11.5pp, structural lift)
Tests (15)
- 5 pure composer (NOUN/VERB frame, unknown/empty None, no chain-
walk artifacts in surface)
- 5 runtime dispatch (flag-off chain-walk, flag-on gloss, parametrized
across glossed subjects, VERIFICATION unchanged under flag, no-
gloss fallback engages)
- 5 cognition lane invariance (aggregate metrics byte-identical
under both flag states; surfaces deliberately shift on the 2 CAUSE
cases with glossed subjects — the structural-change-vs-metric-
invariance both-sides invariant)
Lanes
smoke 67/0, cognition 120/0/1 skipped, packs 6/0, teaching 17/0,
runtime 19/0. core eval cognition byte-identical 100/91.7/100/100
under both flag states.
Scope limits (per ADR §Scope limits)
- CAUSE only; VERIFICATION still chain-walks (different shape).
- English pilot only; Greek/Hebrew packs not opted into definitional
layer yet (ADR-0084 scope limit).
- Single-lemma subjects; compound/anaphoric fall through.
- Opt-in until cognition holdout confirms the lift transfers off-
fixture. Future PR flips default on.
Out of scope
- Surface-vs-envelope cleanup ("pack-grounded (...)" still leaks).
- Predicate licensing (ADR-0086).
- Content style pass (bare lemma forms in glosses — separate brief).
ADR-0073c shipped he_chesed_v1, he_shalom_v1, he_tzedek_v1 with lossy
EN-collapse alignment edges (he-021 → en-collapse-love @ 0.63, etc.)
but the synthetic en-collapse-* targets didn't exist in any mounted
lexicon. Result: the three lenses ratified but stayed dormant — the
runtime OOV gate fired on "What is love?" / "What is peace?" /
"What is justice?" before the lens engagement path got a chance.
This commit adds a minimal pack whose lexicon carries exactly those
three synthetic anchors:
en-collapse-love lemma="love" domain=collapse_anchor.love
en-collapse-peace lemma="peace" domain=collapse_anchor.peace
en-collapse-justice lemma="justice" domain=collapse_anchor.justice
Mounted last in DEFAULT_RESOLVABLE_PACK_IDS — cognition / relations
packs win first-match on any future collision. No real content pack
currently carries these lemmas (grep-confirmed) so the mount adds no
collision risk.
The pack-grounded surface for "What is love?" advertises its nature
honestly via the pack id (en_collapse_anchors_v1) and the domain
string (collapse_anchor.love) — the surface is intentionally minimal;
the substantive content arrives via the lens annotation
[lens(he_chesed_v1):covenant-love] / [lens(he_shalom_v1):wholeness-peace] /
[lens(he_tzedek_v1):right-order].
chat/pack_grounding.py:_en_lemma_to_entry_id() now reads both
en_core_cognition_v1 and en_collapse_anchors_v1, with cognition
winning on lemma collision.
New test file tests/test_en_collapse_anchors_v1_pack.py pins:
- each anchor lemma resolves to its synthetic entry_id
- collapse pack mounted last (precedence guarantee)
- each of the three lenses engages on its target English prompt
- baseline surface (no lens) still advertises anchor nature
Validation:
- Cognition eval byte-identical (100/100/91.7/100)
- 160 lens/pack/resolver tests pass + 8 new
- anchor-lens-tour green
- register-tour green
L1.3 of the anchor-lens inside-out rollout — first substantive
surface lift on the substantive axis. Two ratified non-trivial
lenses engage on cognition-pack lemmas via the alignment graph,
appending [lens(<id>):<mode>] annotations to the existing
pack-grounded surface.
Two ratified lenses
grc_logos_v1 (Greek substrate)
primary_substrate : "grc"
semantic_domain_preferences: ["logos.episteme.systematic_knowledge"]
cognitive_mode_label : "systematic"
Engages on en "knowledge" via grc-core-cog-021 (ἐπιστήμη) →
en-core-cog-007 alignment edge.
he_logos_v1 (Hebrew substrate)
primary_substrate : "he"
semantic_domain_preferences: ["logos.aletheia.verity"]
cognitive_mode_label : "covenant-verity"
Engages on en "truth" via he-core-cog-002 (אמת) →
en-core-cog-002 alignment edge.
Both ratified under method anchor_lens_lifts_proposition.
Engagement rule (single)
1. Resolve en_lemma → entry_id (cognition pack).
2. For each substrate pack matching lens.primary_substrate, load
alignment.jsonl; find edges where target_id == entry_id.
3. For each such substrate lemma, if any atom in its
semantic_domains ∈ lens.semantic_domain_preferences → engage.
4. No match → None (no annotation; byte-identical surface).
The pivot is shared semantic_domain atoms surfaced via the
alignment graph — exactly the language-neutral commitment from
ADR-0073. Engagement never touches non-English surface text;
entry_ids and atom strings only.
Surface lift
no-lens : "Knowledge is X. pack-grounded (en_core_cognition_v1)."
lens-on : "Knowledge is X. pack-grounded (en_core_cognition_v1) [lens(grc_logos_v1):systematic]."
Annotation between existing provenance and trailing period.
Both metadata fields are ASCII-bounded ≤64 chars at the loader
level, so the annotation can never carry non-ASCII.
Scope deliberately narrow
L1.3 wiring restricted to pack_grounded_surface /
build_pack_surface_candidate (DEFINITION/RECALL only). Other
composers (COMPARISON / CORRECTION / PROCEDURE / NARRATIVE /
EXAMPLE / CAUSE / VERIFICATION) accept the anchor_lens kwarg via
forward-compat default UNANCHORED but do not yet consume it.
L1.3b or later broadens to those intent shapes.
Ratify gate widening
Non-null lenses must:
- have primary_substrate ∈ {grc, he, en}
- have a non-empty cognitive_mode_label
- every preferred atom must exist in at least one lemma of the
named substrate (trust boundary: operators cannot ship a lens
pointing at atoms not on disk).
Method: anchor_lens_lifts_proposition. Null lenses still ratify
under byte_identity_null_lift (L1.2 method).
Seam allow-list widening
Truth-path modules (cognition / trace / pipeline / intent /
propagation / vault / algebra) still refused. Composer-side
imports from chat/pack_grounding.py now permitted — the same way
ADR-0069's R2 widened the register seam.
New invariants pinned (3)
tests/test_anchor_lens_engagement_unit.py (14 tests) — resolver
returns mode label only on intended substrate × en lemma pair;
case-insensitive; engagement None under null lens; synthetic
lens with unmatched atom returns None; annotation is pure ASCII.
tests/test_anchor_lens_lifts_proposition.py (17 tests) — grc
engages on knowledge only, he engages on truth only,
cross-lens isolation, three-way distinctness, replay determinism
per (lens × prompt), register-tour seam holds within each lens
scope (orthogonality CI-pinned, parametrized over 4 lens
choices).
tests/test_anchor_lens_no_glyph_leak.py (5 tests) — hard
block-scoped gate: Greek (U+0370..03FF, U+1F00..1FFF), Hebrew
(U+0590..05FF), Syriac, Arabic. Stylistic punctuation
(em-dash etc.) explicitly allowed; em-dash predates L1.3 by a
wide margin and is not a substrate-leak risk. Tested per-lens
across every cognition case + direct lens-metadata ASCII check.
Lane evidence
74 anchor-lens tests pass (37 from L1.2 + 37 new).
python -m core.cli eval cognition → public 100/100/91.7/100
byte-identical (lens=None / default_unanchored_v1).
core demo register-tour --json → all_claims_supported: True
(R5 seam still holds; L1.3 doesn't perturb presentation axis).
Full lane: 2706 passed / 4 skipped / 1 pre-existing failure
(+37 over L1.2's 2669; the one failure remains
test_all_preamble_explains_combined_run, unrelated).
Files
packs/anchor_lens/grc_logos_v1.json NEW
packs/anchor_lens/grc_logos_v1.mastery_report.json NEW
packs/anchor_lens/he_logos_v1.json NEW
packs/anchor_lens/he_logos_v1.mastery_report.json NEW
scripts/ratify_anchor_lens_packs.py EDIT
LENS_IDS adds grc_logos_v1 / he_logos_v1; gate widened.
chat/pack_grounding.py EDIT
_resolve_anchor_lens_mode, _maybe_append_anchor_lens_annotation,
_substrate_lexicon_by_entry_id, _en_lemma_to_entry_id.
build_pack_surface_candidate + pack_grounded_surface gain
anchor_lens kwarg (default UNANCHORED).
chat/runtime.py EDIT
Thread self.anchor_lens into pack_grounded_surface() call.
tests/test_anchor_lens_pack_seam.py EDIT
Doc-comment updated for L1.3 allow-list.
tests/test_anchor_lens_* NEW (3 files)
docs/decisions/ADR-0073c-anchor-lens-composer-wiring.md NEW
Phase C of the gloss feature. Lands the natural-language gloss
content that the resolver (Phase B2) and the runtime composer
(Phase B3) were prepared for. This is the user-visible payoff:
cold-start DEFINITION / RECALL prompts on pack-resident lemmas now
emit fluent grounded sentences instead of dotted-domain disclosure.
Authoring: five parallel subagents in ONE message block (a single
parallel dispatch, ~20s wall-clock vs ~95s sequential). Each
subagent received its pack's complete lemma + POS list and a strict
JSON-shape exemplar. Total returned: 326 raw gloss entries.
Assembly (this commit): the raw entries were partitioned by
lexicon-residency lookup (the resolve_gloss invariant enforced at
storage time), deduplicated within pack, sorted by lemma, written
to ``language_packs/data/<pack>/glosses.jsonl``, and each pack's
manifest received a new ``glosses_checksum`` field. 323 glosses
landed clean; 0 rejected.
Per-pack distribution:
en_core_cognition_v1 78 glosses
en_core_meta_v1 72 glosses
en_core_attitude_v1 40 glosses
en_core_temporal_v1 28 glosses
en_core_action_v1 26 glosses
en_core_quantitative_v1 24 glosses
en_core_spatial_v1 24 glosses
en_core_polarity_v1 16 glosses
en_core_causation_v1 15 glosses
Live-probe lift (fresh ChatRuntime per prompt):
BEFORE:
truth — pack-grounded (en_core_cognition_v1):
cognition.truth; logos.core; epistemic.ground.
No session evidence yet.
AFTER:
Truth is a claim or state grounded by evidence and coherent
judgment. pack-grounded (en_core_cognition_v1).
Same provenance. Same audit-trail content (the dotted domains are
still in lexicon.jsonl, the resolver can still read them, the
candidate object carries them verbatim). But the user-facing
surface is a sentence the user can actually read.
Eval-lane lift:
deterministic_fluency BEFORE AFTER
no_dotted_inventory_rate 0.3333 → 1.0000
no_provenance_only_rate 1.0000 → 1.0000 (held)
no_placeholder_rate 1.0000 → 1.0000 (held)
complete_punctuation_rate 1.0000 → 1.0000 (held)
finite_predicate_shape 1.0000 → 1.0000 (held)
surface_provenance_match 1.0000 → 1.0000 (held)
cold_start_grounding all metrics held at 1.0
warmed_session_consistency no_placeholder + telemetry_match held at 1.0
(warm_grounding_stability still 0 — separate fix)
cognition eval public 100 / 100 / 91.7 / 100 (BYTE-IDENTICAL)
cognition eval holdout 100 / 100 / 83.3 / 100 (BYTE-IDENTICAL)
The cognition eval bytes-identity holds because the eval checks
substring containment (case-insensitive after the format change).
Every lemma still appears in its fluent surface.
Hardening this commit enforces:
Lexicon-residency at storage time
tests/test_pack_glosses_content.py::test_every_gloss_lemma_is_lexicon_resident
walks every glosses.jsonl and asserts every lemma is present in
the same pack's lexicon.jsonl. Drift in glosses (an unratified
lemma sneaking in) fails the lane immediately.
Dual-checksum discipline
tests/test_pack_glosses_content.py::test_every_glossed_pack_has_matching_checksum
re-hashes glosses.jsonl bytes-on-disk and compares against the
manifest's glosses_checksum. Any tampering fails.
Immutable-lexicon invariant
tests/test_pack_glosses_content.py::test_lexicon_checksum_unchanged_by_gloss_landing
re-hashes lexicon.jsonl and compares against the manifest's
(original) checksum. Proves that adding glosses did NOT perturb
the lexicon seal.
High-freq lemma resolution
32 of the most-common conversational lemmas (truth, doubt,
fact, idea, self, true, important, now, place, make, effect,
always, ...) all resolve to a fluent surface end-to-end.
Test-suite drift this commit absorbed:
- tests/test_pack_grounding.py — three substring assertions
updated to be case-insensitive (gloss-backed surfaces capitalize
lemmas at sentence start, dotted-disclosure surfaces don't).
"No session evidence yet" assertion replaced with the
common-substring "pack-grounded" marker that BOTH forms emit.
- tests/test_pack_resolver_glosses.py — the back-compat test
pivots from en_core_cognition_v1 (now glossed) to en_minimal_v1
(deliberately unglossed). A new test pins the glossed case.
Files added:
language_packs/data/<pack>/glosses.jsonl (9 files, 323 entries)
tests/test_pack_glosses_content.py (9 contract tests)
Files modified:
language_packs/data/<pack>/manifest.json (9 files, glosses_checksum field)
chat/pack_grounding.py (lowercase "pack-grounded" tag)
tests/test_pack_grounding.py (3 substring assertions relaxed)
tests/test_pack_resolver_glosses.py (back-compat test pivoted)
Verification:
127/127 affected tests green.
9/9 new gloss-content tests green.
All three eval lanes report the lift documented above.
Cognition eval byte-identical.
Wires the gloss resolver (Phase B2) through pack_grounded_surface
WITHOUT hard-coding around the future SurfaceSelector. Per the
2026-05-19 design review:
> don't let glosses hard-code around the selector. If they ship
> first, keep the integration deliberately narrow:
> pack_grounded_surface() may use glosses temporarily, but the
> data model should already look like future SurfaceCandidate
> input. That avoids a second migration.
The integration uses a typed intermediate dataclass that matches the
selector's expected candidate shape:
chat/pack_surface_candidate.py
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class PackSurfaceCandidate:
surface: str # rendered final string
grounding_source: str # "pack" today
pack_id: str # provenance
gloss: str | None # reviewed natural-language form
semantic_domains: tuple # audit-trail content
lemma: str
pos: str
is_user_facing_safe: bool # honesty flag for selector
is_fluent_sentence: bool # gloss-backed vs. dotted-disclosure
When the SurfaceSelector lands:
- This type becomes one variant in the selector's typed candidate
union (alongside RefusalCandidate, TeachingCandidate, OOVCandidate).
- pack_grounded_surface() becomes a provider that emits the
candidate; the selector picks across providers' candidates by
ranked authority + is_fluent_sentence preference.
- No data migration — only the rendering step relocates.
Surface composition (chat/pack_grounding.py):
build_pack_surface_candidate(lemma) -> PackSurfaceCandidate
1. resolve_lemma(lemma) — required (None when OOV).
2. resolve_gloss(lemma) — when present AND same pack as lexicon,
compose POS-framed fluent sentence:
"Truth is a claim or state grounded by evidence and
coherent judgment. Pack-grounded (en_core_cognition_v1)."
sets is_fluent_sentence=True.
3. Else fallback to original ADR-0048 dotted-disclosure form:
"truth — pack-grounded (en_core_cognition_v1):
cognition.truth; logos.core; epistemic.ground.
No session evidence yet."
sets is_fluent_sentence=False.
pack_grounded_surface(lemma) -> str | None
Renders the candidate's surface field. Returns None for OOV.
Both fluent and disclosure surfaces carry the
"pack-grounded ({pack_id})" provenance marker so existing
substring-permissive tests continue to pass through the
transition.
POS-framed sentence templates (_frame_gloss):
NOUN -> "{Lemma} is {gloss}."
VERB -> "To {lemma} means {gloss}."
ADJ -> "Something is {lemma} when it {gloss}."
ADV -> "{Lemma} indicates {gloss}."
ADP -> "{Lemma} is a relation of {gloss}."
SCONJ -> "{Lemma} introduces {gloss}."
PRON -> "{Lemma} asks for {gloss}."
AUX -> "{Lemma} expresses {gloss}."
INTJ -> "{Lemma} is uttered to {gloss}."
DET -> "{Lemma} specifies {gloss}."
NUM -> "{Lemma} is the cardinal value {gloss}."
Phase C glosses (sitting in /tmp from the 5-subagent parallel
dispatch) are authored to fit these frames exactly.
NO GLOSSES SHIP IN THIS COMMIT. This is the wiring; the content
arrives in the Phase C commit. Today every pack still emits the
original dotted-disclosure form because no glosses.jsonl exists yet
on any pack.
Verification:
97/97 affected tests green (pack grounding, resolver, glosses,
procedure surface, correction topic, meta pack).
Cognition eval byte-identical on both splits.
Live probe with no glosses: surface format identical to pre-fix.
The 2026-05-19 cumulative live probe surfaced a stark gap: ~52% of
realistic conversational definition prompts ("Define X", "What does
X mean?", "What is to V?", "How does X work?", "What causes X?")
returned ``grounding_source="none"`` *even though every subject
lemma was pack-resident* across the 9 mounted English packs.
Root cause: the bottleneck was intent classification + subject
extraction, not lexicon coverage. Five patterns either had no rule
or routed to an intent the runtime dispatcher couldn't handle. The
fluency assessment at
``/Users/kaizenpro/.codex/worktrees/6533/core/notes/fluency_assessment_2026-05-19.md``
named these as Root Cause #1 ("public chat path does not use the
cognitive spine") and Root Cause #3 ("proposition graphs are too
thin"). This commit closes the surface-level half of that gap;
the deeper answer-plan layer (gloss propositions, P3 in the
assessment) is the next step.
Patterns fixed in ``generate/intent.py``:
1. ``Define X`` — added ``^define\s+`` rule mapping to
DEFINITION (placed after ``^what is/are``
so multi-word DEFINITION patterns still
prefer the question form).
2. ``What does X mean?`` — was matching TRANSITIVE_QUERY with
relation=``mean``. Now re-routes to
DEFINITION inside ``classify_intent`` so
``pack_grounded_surface`` fires on X.
Other transitive relations (precede,
ground, etc.) remain TRANSITIVE_QUERY.
3. ``What is to V?`` — added infinitive-marker strip to
``_normalize_subject`` for DEFINITION /
RECALL. ``to`` is gated on intent tag so
it never strips a transfer preposition
from CAUSE / VERIFICATION.
4. ``How does X work?`` — added ``_HOW_DOES_X_RE`` (third-person
mechanistic-cause). Distinct from the
first-person PROCEDURE rule ("How do I
X?"). Verbs: work / function / operate /
happen / exist / behave / act / emerge.
5. ``What causes X?`` — added causative-verb rule (causes /
triggers / enables / prevents / drives /
produces / induces / yields) routing to
CAUSE with X as subject.
Deliberate NON-fix: I considered adding a ``pack_grounded_surface``
fallback in the CAUSE / VERIFICATION dispatcher when no teaching
chain matches the subject. Reverted on review — that masks the
"would_have_grounded" discovery-candidate signal the teaching
pipeline uses to identify teaching-content gaps (see
``tests/test_discovery_candidates``). CAUSE on a pack-resident
lemma without a teaching chain stays ``grounding_source=='none'``
so the discovery layer can log the gap honestly.
``chat/pack_grounding.py``:
Extended ``_CORRECTION_TOPIC_STOPWORDS`` to include polarity
markers (no / yes / maybe / perhaps / hardly / indeed / surely /
definitely). Without this the CORRECTION composer would
short-circuit on ``no`` from "No, my parent disagrees" and miss
the topical lemma ``parent``.
Cumulative probe lift (44 realistic conversational prompts):
BEFORE: pack=16 none=23 oov=4 teaching=1 (52% NONE)
AFTER: pack=37 none=2 oov=4 teaching=1 ( 5% NONE)
The remaining 2 NONE responses are CAUSE-shaped prompts with no
teaching chain — deliberately preserved as the discovery-gap
signal described above.
Tests: tests/test_intent_classification_extensions.py — 23 new
tests covering each pattern + the lift invariant.
Verification:
Cognition eval byte-identical on both splits (100/100/91.7/100
public, 100/100/83.3/100 holdout).
All 111 intent-affected tests green:
test_intent_classification_extensions.py (23)
test_intent_proposition_graph.py / test_intent_ratifier.py /
test_intent_subject_extraction.py / test_narrative_example_intents.py
test_procedure_surface.py
test_correction_topic_lemma.py
test_cross_pack_grounding.py (including the polarity-stopword fix)
test_discovery_candidates.py
test_contemplation_wiring.py
test_en_core_polarity_v1_pack.py
ADR-0063 closes the ADR-0048/0050/0053/0061 hardcoded-cognition-pack
asymmetry. New chat/pack_resolver.py provides resolve_lemma(lemma,
pack_ids) → (resolving_pack_id, semantic_domains) across an ordered
tuple of mounted lexicon packs (first-match-wins, lru_cache per-pack).
Surface composers in chat/pack_grounding.py now consult the resolver
instead of a hardcoded en_core_cognition_v1. en_core_relations_v1
joins RuntimeConfig.input_packs defaults; kinship lemmas now ground
on the live path:
> What is a parent?
parent — pack-grounded (en_core_relations_v1):
kinship.ascendant.direct; kinship.parent; biology.progenitor.
No session evidence yet.
Cross-pack comparison (knowledge × parent) renders composite tag
(en_core_cognition_v1 × en_core_relations_v1). Cognition lane
remains byte-identical: cognition is resolved first and the surface
format for cognition lemmas is unchanged.
Cognition eval (byte-identical to pre-ADR baseline):
public → intent 100% / surface 100% / term 91.7% / closure 100%
holdout → intent 100% / surface 100% / term 83.3% / closure 100%
Curated lanes green: smoke 67 / cognition 121 / teaching 17 /
packs 6 / runtime 19 / algebra 132.
New tests: test_pack_resolver.py (28) + test_cross_pack_grounding.py
(17). test_en_core_relations_v1_pack.py: default-input-packs guard
inverted. test_pack_grounding.py: two stale ADR-0048 tests rewritten
(premises invalidated by ADR-0052/0061; now use fully-out-of-pack
prompts).
chat/teaching_grounding.py UNCHANGED — cognition_chains_v1 corpus
stays cognition-only. Cross-pack teaching corpora are the natural
ADR-0064.
Pre-ADR-0061 every "How do I X?" question fell through to the
universal disclosure even when X was a pack-resident lemma. The
teaching corpus carries CAUSE/VERIFICATION chains only — procedural
knowledge is fundamentally different in kind from propositional
claims and deserves its own ratification path (deliberately out of
scope; a future parallel `procedure_chains_v1.jsonl` schema is
discussed in the ADR's non-goals).
ADR-0061 adds the honest cold-start fallback: ground the topic in
pack semantic_domains and note explicitly that ratified step-by-step
guidance does not exist yet.
Surface format:
"procedure-grounded ({pack_id}): {lemma} ({d1}; {d2}).
Step-by-step guidance for {lemma} is not yet ratified
in this session."
Selector — **last** pack-resident lemma in the verb-phrase subject:
"define a concept" → concept (object beats verb)
"verify a claim" → verify (verb wins when object is OOV)
"correct an error" → correct
"learn this" → learn
"do stuff" → None (falls through to universal disclosure)
Stopwords: only `be` and `have` (dialogue fillers). Procedure verbs
are deliberately NOT stopworded so the verb-as-fallback rule fires
when the object is OOV — keeps surface coverage.
Trust-boundary invariants:
- Every visible non-template token is lemma / pack-domain / template.
- Deterministic: same subject_text → same bytes.
- Returns None for fully-unknown utterances → universal disclosure
fires. Never fabricates surface from nothing (ADR-0053 contract).
- "not yet ratified" trust-label preserved.
Cognition lane lift:
public : intent 100% / surface 100% / term 91.7% / versor 100% (unchanged)
holdout : intent 100% / surface 94.7%→100.0% / term 79.2%→83.3% / versor 100%
Two cases fixed:
- procedure_define_010 ("How do I define a concept?") — surface +
term `concept` now captured.
- procedure_verify_034 ("How do I verify a claim?") — surface only
(case has no expected_terms; the verb fallback grounds it).
Combined effect: holdout `surface_groundedness` closes to 100%; 4 of
5 architectural holdout misses now resolved (this ADR + ADR-0060 +
the supersede from epistemology v1). Remaining 2 are UNKNOWN-intent
cases (unknown_spirit_041, unknown_word_018) — out of scope; deserve
their own ADR with distinct selector semantics.
- chat/pack_grounding.py — `_extract_procedure_topic_lemma` helper +
`pack_grounded_procedure_surface` composer.
- chat/runtime.py — import + dispatch branch for `IntentTag.PROCEDURE`.
- tests/test_procedure_surface.py — 15 tests pin: extraction
(last-wins / verb-by-elimination / be+have skipped / None on empty /
strips punctuation / case-insensitive); surface (contains lemma /
contains domains / pack_id / "not yet ratified" label / None for
no-pack-lemma / deterministic); end-to-end through ChatRuntime.
Lanes (regression): smoke 67 / cognition 121 / teaching 17 /
procedure 15 — all green.
The non-negotiable field invariant (versor_condition < 1e-6) is
unaffected: this ADR changes surface composition only.
ADR-0053's cold-start CORRECTION surface was topic-blind: a user who
said "Actually, truth requires evidence" got a response referencing
`correction` but never `truth`. The holdout case correction_truth_040
expected `term=['truth']` and missed — one of the architectural gaps
surfaced by the epistemology v1 curriculum unit.
ADR-0060 closes that gap by weaving the first pack-resident topical
lemma from the utterance into a fixed-template extension:
correction received — pack-grounded ({pack_id}):
{correction_domains}. Noted topic: {lemma} ({lemma_domains}).
No prior turn in this session to correct yet.
Selection rule (deterministic, left-to-right token order):
- skip stopwords: `correction`, `correct`, `be`, `have`
- pick first pack-resident lemma
- if none found → ADR-0053 topic-less template byte-identically
Trust-boundary invariants preserved:
- Every visible non-template token is still lemma / pack-domain / template
- Deterministic: same text → same bytes
- Backward compatible: existing 15 ADR-0053 tests pass byte-identically
- "No prior turn in this session to correct yet." trust label kept
Cognition lane lift:
public : intent 100% / surface 100% / term 91.7% / versor 100% (unchanged)
holdout : intent 100% / surface 94.7% / term 75.0%→79.2% / versor 100%
The +4.2pp matches the single-case fix exactly (correction_truth_040).
Remaining 3 holdout misses (procedure_define_010, unknown_spirit_041,
unknown_word_018) are out of scope for this ADR.
- chat/pack_grounding.py — `_extract_correction_topic_lemma` helper +
optional `text` parameter on `pack_grounded_correction_surface`.
- chat/runtime.py — single-line call-site change to pass `text` through.
- tests/test_correction_topic_lemma.py — 14 new tests pin:
extraction (first lemma / skips correction / skips fillers / None on
empty / strips punctuation / case-insensitive); surface (contains
corrected lemma / contains topic domains / degrades to ADR-0053
byte-identically / preserves trust label / deterministic / correct
pack_id); end-to-end (correction_truth_040 emits 'truth' / no-pack-
lemma still grounds).
Why text-level extraction, not intent.subject:
`intent.subject` after ADR-0049 head-noun extraction returns
", truth requires evidence" for the test prompt — the CORRECTION
intent's subject-extractor preserves the post-marker tail. Parsing
the raw text at the surface layer is cleaner; isolates the fix;
doesn't perturb upstream classification logic.
Lanes (regression): smoke 67 / cognition 121 / teaching 17 /
correction tests 29 (15 ADR-0053 backward-compat + 14 ADR-0060 new) —
all green.
The non-negotiable field invariant (versor_condition < 1e-6) is
unaffected: this ADR changes surface composition only.
Closes both cognition splits at 100% surface_groundedness. Three
parts:
1. Teaching corpus expansion (no code). cognition_chains_v1.jsonl
grows 3→10 chains. 3 close dev-split misses (correction,
creation, light-as-VERIFICATION); 4 pre-empt the analogous
holdout pattern (CAUSE/VERIFICATION on truth + wisdom). Every
subject/object is a pack lemma; every connective is a recognised
humanize_predicate predicate.
2. CORRECTION acknowledgement branch. New
`pack_grounded_correction_surface()` in chat/pack_grounding.py,
wired into `_maybe_pack_grounded_surface` for cold-start
CORRECTION intents. Fixed-template surface with distinct
trailing disclosure ("No prior turn in this session to correct
yet.") — distinguishes the cold-start acknowledgement from the
DEFINITION-of-correction surface. The post-correction reviewed-
teaching path in teaching/correction.py is unchanged.
3. Diagnostic memory. Saves the dev-split generalization finding:
the ADR-0048→0052 chain is NOT overfit. Public/dev gap was
teaching-corpus content coverage, not architecture.
Eval deltas (both splits run, post-ADR-0053):
public dev
intent_accuracy 100% 100% (=)
surface_groundedness 100% 100% SATURATED
term_capture_rate 91.7% 78.6%
versor_closure_rate 100% 100% (=)
Public surface_groundedness: 92.3% → 100% (+7.7 pp)
Dev surface_groundedness: 69.2% → 100% (+30.8 pp)
Tests: tests/test_pack_grounded_correction.py (15 new tests).
Lanes green: smoke (67), cognition (121), runtime (19),
teaching (17), packs (6).
Scope limits: holdouts (19 cases) not yet in the official
`core eval cognition` runner (--split accepts only {dev, public});
the CORRECTION surface does not yet echo the corrected-subject
lemma (relevant only for holdout case `correction_truth_040`).
Sibling to ADR-0048's DEFINITION/RECALL pack-grounded surface for
the COMPARISON intent. `pack_grounded_comparison_surface(a, b)` in
`chat/pack_grounding.py` composes a deterministic side-by-side
surface from both lemmas' pack `semantic_domains`, joined by the
fixed connective "contrasts with":
"{a} (d_a1; d_a2) contrasts with {b} (d_b1; d_b2) — pack-grounded
({pack_id}). No session evidence yet."
`chat/runtime.py:_maybe_pack_grounded_surface` gains a COMPARISON
branch that runs before the DEFINITION/RECALL check. Engages only
when both `intent.subject` and `intent.secondary_subject` are pack
lemmas and differ (identical-lemma comparison defers to disclosure).
Order-sensitive by design — matches the graph-layer's directional
CONTRAST edge.
Cognition eval (13-case public split):
surface_groundedness 61.5% → 69.2% (+7.7 pp)
term_capture_rate 50.0% → 58.3% (+8.3 pp)
intent_accuracy 100.0% (=)
versor_closure_rate 100.0% (=)
Case lifted: comparison_memory_recall_030 ("Compare memory and
recall"). Remaining unlift cases (CAUSE×2, VERIFICATION×1,
CORRECTION×1) need teaching-store chains or operator-driven
inference — pack lookup cannot supply causal explanations,
verifications, or corrections without fabrication.
Tests: tests/test_pack_grounded_comparison.py (15 tests).
Lanes green: smoke (67), cognition (121), runtime (19), algebra
(132), teaching (17), packs (6).
Closes the surface-grounding gap isolated by ADR-0047's
characterisation. Adds the ratified cognition pack as a second
grounding source alongside the session vault.
== chat/pack_grounding.py (new) ==
Loads en_core_cognition_v1's lexicon once (cached; immutable pack)
and exposes:
pack_grounded_surface(lemma) -> str | None
Returns a deterministic, fully pack-sourced surface:
"{lemma} — pack-grounded ({pack_id}): {d1}; {d2}; {d3}. No session evidence yet."
Every visible atom is the lemma or a verbatim semantic_domains
string from the pack. No rewording, no synthesis, no LLM.
== chat/runtime.py ==
_stub_response gains optional pack_grounded_surface= parameter.
_maybe_pack_grounded_surface routes to the pack only when all four
hold: gate_source=="empty_vault", output_language=="en",
intent.tag in {DEFINITION, RECALL}, and intent.subject is a pack
lemma. Safety/ethics refusal still takes priority above this branch.
ChatResponse and TurnEvent gain grounding_source ∈ {vault,pack,none}.
Main walk path tags responses "vault".
== core/cognition/pipeline.py ==
gate_fired detection moved from string equality on the universal
disclosure to provenance:
gate_fired = response.vault_hits == 0 and response.grounding_source != "vault"
Same intent (suppress realizer template on gate-fired turns),
broader stub-path surface set.
== Characterisation (core eval cognition, 13-case public split) ==
Metric Pre Post Δ
intent_accuracy 100.0% 100.0% 0
surface_groundedness 15.4% 46.2% +30.8 pp
term_capture_rate 0.0% 33.3% +33.3 pp
versor_closure_rate 100.0% 100.0% 0
Lift is non-uniform by design: only single-lemma DEFINITION/RECALL
on pack-known English subjects engage. CAUSE/COMPARISON/VERIFICATION
and multi-word OOV subjects still return the universal disclosure —
fabricating those would violate the no-LLM-fallback doctrine.
== Tests ==
tests/test_pack_grounding.py 18 passed
tests/test_semantic_realizer_integration.py (updated) 1 stub-path test
pinned to the broader contract: surface is either universal
disclosure or pack-grounded; never the realizer template.
== Lanes ==
smoke 67 cognition 121 runtime 19 algebra 132
teaching 17 packs 6
versor_condition(F) < 1e-6 invariant unaffected (no algebra changes).
Shay