Measuring the holonomy tri-language resonance (intended for a Studio proof-card)
showed it is NOT a robust proof: the engine's own holonomy_similarity (CGA inner
product) anti-correlates, and the Euclidean 'aligned closer than misaligned'
claim passes only via averaging in the close Hebrew distance + one cherry-picked
negative (1.3% margin) — the aligned Greek clause is itself farther than the
negative, and the verdict flips ±20-55% under other negatives. Decoration, not
proof (CLAUDE.md, Schema-Defined Proof Obligations).
- docs/analysis/holonomy-resonance-proof-not-robust-2026-06-14.md: the rigorous
finding (numbers), why a Holonomy proof tab cannot be built honestly yet
(stays missing_evidence), and bounded research questions.
- Downgrade the two clause-resonance decoration tests to honest tripwires that
assert the true state and fail (pointing to the doc) if the resonance becomes
real. Token-pair cga_inner tests left intact + flagged as a separate, un-audited
claim.
70 holonomy-adjacent tests pass.
Key issues fixed:
- `CORE_BACKEND=numpy` was ignored, so tests mixed Python CGA embedding with Rust metric behavior.
- Dense construction seeds were being rejected by strict `unitize_versor()`, while sparse dirty inputs still needed to fail closed.
- Holonomy needed a construction-boundary path for raw/dense vocab fixtures and rare null final accumulators.
- Proposition storage polluted vault recall by storing the live field instead of the proposition’s subject versor.
- Dialogue qualitative frames rendered the same surface as assertive copular frames.
- Repeated session prompts could collapse into the same deterministic response path.
- Two proof fixtures were stale: one hand-built a non-null “null” vector, and one alignment proof omitted the English “with” anchor used by the resonance proof.
Verification:
`CORE_BACKEND=numpy CORE_STRICT_MLX_ON_APPLE=0 uv run core test -- -q`
Result: `277 passed in 59.52s`
