Commit graph

7 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Shay
e473f5b55f feat(teaching): ADR-0218 P3 — proof-carrying coherence promotion
The ratified capability, through the existing mutation owner only:

- teaching/proof_promotion.py — pure decider. Fresh-reads every premise AND
  the claim from the store (claim_entry_index; forms never proposer-supplied),
  strict status compares (no parse-defaulting), reading_certified must be the
  boolean True, engine certification via the pinned deductive engine,
  proposer_payload accepted and provably never read (del before use; poisoned-
  mapping test), certificate digest emitted for D4 trace-hash folding. Zero
  mutation; zero vault.store calls; zero status writes (proven with the
  INV-21/INV-29 detectors themselves).
- vault/store.py::apply_certified_promotion — the single transition site.
  Independently re-verifies: byte-for-byte replay under DEDUCTIVE_ENGINE_PIN,
  promotion_positive, live claim form/reading/status cross-checks, live
  premise form/reading/status cross-checks (staleness refuses). Fabricated or
  tampered certificates flip nothing; authority is live store state plus
  recomputation, never the artifact.
- generate/proof_chain/engine_pin.py — DEDUCTIVE_ENGINE_PIN mirrors the
  deductive_logic_v1 lane SHA; sync pinned by AST test against
  scripts/verify_lane_shas.py.
- Consistency fix found in lookback: both promotion sites now stamp
  epistemic_state alongside epistemic_status (the ADR-0148 site left the
  stored state tag stale; recall recomputed it, but the stored key lied).

Obligations: all six strict-xfail markers retired and live (O1/O2
strengthened to prove the transition through the vault owner); the
module-existence pin deleted per its own docstring; the two remaining
honesty pins kept. INV-21 allowlist unchanged; INV-29 allowlist unchanged
({vault/store.py}); INV-29's 29c visibility floor raised 2 -> 3 to cover the
new site.

No runtime turn path calls promotion; the deterministic demo is PR D.

Validation: new suite 49 passed; obligations 8 passed (0 xfail remaining);
invariants 66 passed; certificate 27 passed; 0148 6 passed; epistemic 20
passed; smoke files green; lane SHAs verified.
2026-06-11 17:02:45 -07:00
Shay
bdc4940e1e feat(proof_chain): ADR-0218 PR B — PromotionCertificate + pure replay verifier
Pure evidence substrate for proof-carrying coherence promotion. No
promotion, no vault import, no status transition, no teaching-path
change; ADR-0218 stays Proposed.

- generate/proof_chain/certificate.py: frozen PromotionCertificate
  (version/claim_form/premise ids+forms+statuses/entailment_trace/
  engine_pin/decision/reason, canonical_json with sort_keys+compact
  separators); build_certificate runs evaluate_entailment_with_trace
  over entry_id-sorted premises; verify_certificate rebuilds from the
  embedded forms and accepts iff byte-identical — tampered forms/claim/
  trace/decision/reason/ordering/version all fail replay, structural
  breakage fails closed as malformed_certificate.
- promotion_positive is necessary-not-sufficient: entailed over a
  non-empty all-coherent recorded premise set; REFUTED/UNKNOWN/REFUSED
  verify as themselves but are never positive; zero-premise tautology
  certificates fail-closed non-positive in v1.
- engine_pin is recorded provenance; pin tampering is caught only via
  caller-supplied expected_engine_pin (P3 must pass the lane SHA) —
  limit pinned by dedicated tests.
- entail.py: docstring-only fix removing the incorrect ADR-0206
  attribution (numbering collision); now cites ADR-0218. Zero behavior
  change. generate_claims.py:74 still carries the label (serving-frozen
  surface, flagged for follow-up).
- No xfail markers retire: every PR-A obligation binds to the P3
  promoter, which must not exist before ratification. The certificate-
  shaped halves of O1/O7 are proven for real in
  tests/test_proof_chain_certificate.py (27 tests). ADR phasing bullet
  and obligations docstring record the reconciliation.

Validation: certificate 27 passed; obligations 3 passed + 6 xfailed;
architectural invariants 61 passed (INV-21/INV-29 green, allowlists
unchanged); entail/builder/rules 61 passed; smoke files 95 passed.
2026-06-11 16:21:32 -07:00
Shay
3389cc68c3 feat: add deductive proof evidence gates 2026-06-04 08:37:51 -07:00
Shay
48827f281a feat: sound+complete propositional entailment operator + deductive-logic lane
The first SIZEABLE, honestly-verified reasoning capability — built on CORE's
own terrain (exact, verifiable, deterministic), not GSM8K's stochastic terrain.

THE OPERATOR (generate/proof_chain/entail.py, ADR-0206):
- evaluate_entailment(premises, query) -> entailed | refuted | unknown | refused.
- The multi-hop inference operator evals/symbolic_logic/gaps.md said did not exist
  ("no operator that takes A->B, B->C and returns A->C") and ADR-0205 deferred.
- Built on the ADR-0201 ROBDD canonicalizer: premises |= Q iff (AND P) -> Q is a
  tautology. SOUND AND COMPLETE for propositional logic, not single-step.
- wrong=0 is structural: an exact tautology check refuses (LogicError) on
  malformed / out-of-decidable-regime (quantified/predicate) input, never guesses.

THE HONEST METRIC (evals/deductive_logic/):
- holdout v1 (500 cases): 500 correct / 0 WRONG, incl. 227 non-trivial deductions
  (117 entailed + 110 refuted). dev (200): 200/0.
- Gold from an INDEPENDENT truth-table oracle (oracle.py) sharing zero code with
  the engine. 8,000-case fuzz across two independent decision procedures:
  0 disagreements. This is the soundness evidence the GSM8K composer could never
  produce (it could not separate its 2 right from its 87 wrong answers).
- contract.md states the load-bearing honesty boundary: PROPOSITIONAL ONLY, and
  given-formulas (NL->logic grounding is a separate later layer, kept out of scope
  so we do not re-step on the GSM8K natural-language rake).

TESTS (17, all green): classic inference shapes (MP, multi-hop chain, modus
tollens, disjunctive/hypothetical syllogism, conjunctive rules, genuine unknown),
refusal boundary (inconsistent / quantified / predicate / malformed), and a
deterministic engine-vs-oracle fuzz cross-check.

Pure new module — does NOT touch serving. Smoke 73 passed; invariants 40 passed.
2026-06-04 07:47:01 -07:00
Shay
64f3da18a7 feat: modus_ponens + disagreement rule — proof_chain wrong=0 mechanism (ADR-0205)
Phase 2.3: the first inference rule + the wrong=0 mechanism for proofs.

- generate/proof_chain/rules.py: evaluate_modus_ponens / evaluate_proof_conclusion.
  Proof-layer dispatch (Option B) over proposition FORMULAS via the canonicalizer;
  never touches check_admissibility/_resolve_dep_units (proofs have no units).
  Disagreement rule = the select_self_verified twin: pool ALL admissible single-step
  MP derivations, require a unique canonical key == declared conclusion. Pooling (not
  filter-to-declared-first) is the soundness mechanism.
- generate/logic_canonical.py: parse_top_implication (+ _unparse) — recovers an
  implication's syntactic antecedent/consequent (the ROBDD form doesn't preserve it).
- Closed typed-reason set; the corpus's finer labels consolidate (6 disagreement
  refuse-labels -> conclusion_disagreement; 4 antecedent-flavor labels ->
  unestablished_antecedent — same redundancy, same mechanism-makes-one-distinction
  principle).
- Honesty boundary (exact scope): guarantees a unique conclusion among SINGLE-STEP MP
  over the premises, NOT "uniquely entailed" by all strategies.

Cross-check: all 24 GPT-5.5 adversarial corpus cases agree on OUTCOME against the real
rule (no rule bug / no corpus outcome-misread); reasons consolidate as above.
Mutation: filter-to-declared-first makes DISAGREE-007/010 wrongly admit -> pooling
tests fail (pooling load-bearing).

Drive-by fix (cleanup-as-you-find): merged ADR-0204 ProofNode.__post_init__ was
dedented to module level -> all ProofNode validation was silently DEAD (smoke skips
the dedicated test file; the smoke != full-suite hazard). Re-indented; validation
restored.

Additive (math lane untouched). Full binding-graph surface green; smoke 67.
2026-06-02 20:56:57 -07:00
Shay
934b4e557f
Potential fix for pull request finding
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-06-02 20:07:48 -07:00
Shay
4cae904563 feat: proof-graph builder — proof_chain's first binding-graph consumer (ADR-0204)
Phase 2.2, structure only (no inference rule — modus_ponens is 2.3). Translates a
Proof into a SemanticSymbolicBindingGraph; the ADR-0203 acyclicity guard + ADR-0132
referential integrity fire at construction.

- generate/proof_chain/model.py: the one canonical proof input shape (ProofNode/Proof
  + proof_from_premises desugaring of the corpus premises/conclusion shape).
- generate/proof_chain/builder.py: build_proof_graph — node→symbol+equation;
  canonical_key→rhs_canonical, depends_on→dependencies, rule→operation_kind;
  premises = empty-deps/op="premise"; unit_proof=PROOF_NO_UNIT, admissibility="pending";
  conclusion tracked as conclusion_symbol_id.
- tests: 9 — valid DAG (PC-MP-001 desugared) + multistep construct; PC-CYCLE-001
  refuses THROUGH the real builder (circular_dependency); canonical_key round-trips
  byte-identical + equivalent formulas share rhs_canonical; admissibility-dispatch
  confirmation; self/dangling refusals; out-of-regime node refuses. Mutation-verified
  (drop dep-wiring -> cycle admitted -> test fails).

Admissibility dispatch confirmed graceful on proof operation_kinds: unknown kinds
-> AdmissibilityError(unknown_operation), unitless deps -> unit_unbound; NEVER
misroutes into _check_additive. Named 2.3 constraint: check_admissibility runs
_resolve_dep_units before dispatch, so modus_ponens must bypass unit-resolution.

Open items named for 2.3 (ADR-0204): conclusion typing (BoundUnknown revisit),
semantic_role="unknown" (closed vocab has no "proposition"), unit_proof sentinel.

Additive (first consumer; math lane untouched). Full binding-graph surface green;
smoke 67. Honesty boundary: through 2.3, sound over declared atoms, not grounded in input.
2026-06-02 19:53:41 -07:00