fix(ask): avoid double delivery in pass manager ASK path
This commit is contained in:
parent
2f08964584
commit
de13082ce0
2 changed files with 124 additions and 22 deletions
|
|
@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ def _delivery_outcome_for_limitation(assessment: LimitationAssessment) -> Delive
|
|||
|
||||
def _handle_ask_delivery(
|
||||
assessment: LimitationAssessment,
|
||||
family_obj: Any,
|
||||
family_name: str,
|
||||
findings: list[Finding],
|
||||
attempts: tuple[ComprehensionAttempt, ...],
|
||||
text: str,
|
||||
|
|
@ -99,28 +99,40 @@ def _handle_ask_delivery(
|
|||
) -> ContemplationResult:
|
||||
outcome = _delivery_outcome_for_limitation(assessment)
|
||||
if outcome.terminal == Terminal.QUESTION_NEEDED:
|
||||
from core.epistemic_questions.delivery import emit_question
|
||||
path = emit_question(assessment, root=proposal_root)
|
||||
assert outcome.question is not None
|
||||
import json
|
||||
from core.epistemic_questions.delivery import question_path
|
||||
|
||||
path = question_path(outcome.question, None)
|
||||
path.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
|
||||
path.write_text(
|
||||
json.dumps(outcome.question.to_json_dict(), indent=2, sort_keys=True),
|
||||
encoding="utf-8",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
findings.append(Finding("ask", f"emitted question-only {assessment.blocking_reason}"))
|
||||
findings.append(Finding("terminal", Terminal.QUESTION_NEEDED.value))
|
||||
return ContemplationResult(
|
||||
Terminal.QUESTION_NEEDED, tuple(findings), attempts,
|
||||
selected_organ=selected_organ, family=family_obj.name,
|
||||
proposal_path=str(path) if path else None,
|
||||
selected_organ=selected_organ, family=family_name,
|
||||
proposal_path=str(path),
|
||||
)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
findings.append(Finding("ask", f"unrenderable ask: {outcome.fallback_reason}"))
|
||||
findings.append(Finding("terminal", outcome.terminal.value))
|
||||
if outcome.terminal == Terminal.PROPOSAL_EMITTED:
|
||||
path = emit_proposal(text, family_obj, attempts, root=proposal_root)
|
||||
return ContemplationResult(
|
||||
Terminal.PROPOSAL_EMITTED, tuple(findings), attempts,
|
||||
selected_organ=selected_organ, family=family_obj.name,
|
||||
proposal_path=str(path) if path else None,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from core.comprehension_attempt.failure_family import family_by_name
|
||||
family_obj = family_by_name(family_name)
|
||||
if family_obj is not None:
|
||||
path = emit_proposal(text, family_obj, attempts, root=proposal_root)
|
||||
return ContemplationResult(
|
||||
Terminal.PROPOSAL_EMITTED, tuple(findings), attempts,
|
||||
selected_organ=selected_organ, family=family_name,
|
||||
proposal_path=str(path) if path else None,
|
||||
)
|
||||
return ContemplationResult(
|
||||
outcome.terminal, tuple(findings), attempts,
|
||||
selected_organ=selected_organ, family=family_obj.name,
|
||||
selected_organ=selected_organ, family=family_name,
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -189,14 +201,14 @@ def _solve_and_verify_r2(
|
|||
if isinstance(value, Refusal):
|
||||
findings.append(Finding("solve", f"solver refused: {value.reason}"))
|
||||
from core.comprehension_attempt.failure_family import family_by_name
|
||||
from core.epistemic_disclosure.limitation import assess_from_family, Q1B_ASK_CARVE_OUT
|
||||
from core.epistemic_disclosure.limitation import assess_from_family
|
||||
family_obj = family_by_name(value.reason)
|
||||
if family_obj is not None:
|
||||
assessment = assess_from_family(family_obj)
|
||||
if assessment.resolution_action == "ask_question":
|
||||
if exercise_ask:
|
||||
return _handle_ask_delivery(
|
||||
assessment, family_obj, findings, attempts, text, proposal_root, exercise_ask,
|
||||
assessment, family_obj.name, findings, attempts, text, proposal_root, exercise_ask,
|
||||
selected_organ="r2_constraints"
|
||||
)
|
||||
findings.append(Finding("terminal", Terminal.REFUSED_KNOWN_BOUNDARY.value))
|
||||
|
|
@ -245,14 +257,14 @@ def _solve_and_verify_r3(
|
|||
if isinstance(value, Refusal):
|
||||
findings.append(Finding("solve", f"solver refused: {value.reason}"))
|
||||
from core.comprehension_attempt.failure_family import family_by_name
|
||||
from core.epistemic_disclosure.limitation import assess_from_family, Q1B_ASK_CARVE_OUT
|
||||
from core.epistemic_disclosure.limitation import assess_from_family
|
||||
family_obj = family_by_name(value.reason)
|
||||
if family_obj is not None:
|
||||
assessment = assess_from_family(family_obj)
|
||||
if assessment.resolution_action == "ask_question":
|
||||
if exercise_ask:
|
||||
return _handle_ask_delivery(
|
||||
assessment, family_obj, findings, attempts, text, proposal_root, exercise_ask,
|
||||
assessment, family_obj.name, findings, attempts, text, proposal_root, exercise_ask,
|
||||
selected_organ="r3_rate"
|
||||
)
|
||||
findings.append(Finding("terminal", Terminal.REFUSED_KNOWN_BOUNDARY.value))
|
||||
|
|
@ -304,7 +316,7 @@ def _solve_and_verify_cmb(
|
|||
# reason is namespaced cmb_* so it resolves to the CMB solver family, not R2/R3's.
|
||||
findings.append(Finding("solve", f"solver refused: {value.reason}"))
|
||||
from core.comprehension_attempt.failure_family import family_by_name
|
||||
from core.epistemic_disclosure.limitation import assess_from_family, Q1B_ASK_CARVE_OUT
|
||||
from core.epistemic_disclosure.limitation import assess_from_family
|
||||
reason = cmb_reason(value.reason)
|
||||
family_obj = family_by_name(reason)
|
||||
if family_obj is not None:
|
||||
|
|
@ -312,7 +324,7 @@ def _solve_and_verify_cmb(
|
|||
if assessment.resolution_action == "ask_question":
|
||||
if exercise_ask:
|
||||
return _handle_ask_delivery(
|
||||
assessment, family_obj, findings, attempts, text, proposal_root, exercise_ask,
|
||||
assessment, family_obj.name, findings, attempts, text, proposal_root, exercise_ask,
|
||||
selected_organ="r4_combined_rate"
|
||||
)
|
||||
findings.append(Finding("terminal", Terminal.REFUSED_KNOWN_BOUNDARY.value))
|
||||
|
|
@ -362,14 +374,12 @@ def _classify_all_refused(
|
|||
|
||||
# Check for ASK delivery.
|
||||
for attempt in considered:
|
||||
from core.epistemic_disclosure.limitation import assess_from_attempt, Q1B_ASK_CARVE_OUT
|
||||
from core.epistemic_disclosure.limitation import assess_from_attempt
|
||||
assessment = assess_from_attempt(attempt)
|
||||
if assessment is not None and assessment.resolution_action == "ask_question":
|
||||
if exercise_ask:
|
||||
from core.comprehension_attempt.failure_family import family_by_name
|
||||
family_obj = family_by_name(assessment.blocking_reason)
|
||||
return _handle_ask_delivery(
|
||||
assessment, family_obj, findings, attempts, text, proposal_root, exercise_ask
|
||||
assessment, assessment.blocking_reason, findings, attempts, text, proposal_root, exercise_ask
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
families = [(a, family_for_reason(a.refusal_reason)) for a in considered]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -122,3 +122,95 @@ def test_q1b_carveout_preserved_during_pass_manager_ask_integration() -> None:
|
|||
family = family_by_name(name)
|
||||
assert family is not None
|
||||
assert family.proposal_allowed is True
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_renderable_ask_path_returns_question_needed_under_exercise_ask(monkeypatch, tmp_path) -> None:
|
||||
from core.comprehension_attempt import ComprehensionAttempt, RouteResult
|
||||
import generate.contemplation.pass_manager as pm
|
||||
from generate.binding_graph.model import SourceSpanLink
|
||||
|
||||
span = SourceSpanLink(source_id="src", start=0, end=8, text="chickens")
|
||||
attempt = ComprehensionAttempt(
|
||||
organ="r2_constraints",
|
||||
outcome="setup_refused",
|
||||
refusal_reason="missing_total_count",
|
||||
evidence=(span,),
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(pm, "route_setup", lambda text, case_id=None: RouteResult((attempt,), None, "all_refused"))
|
||||
|
||||
# 1. Assert that without exercise_ask, it falls back to PROPOSAL_EMITTED (due to carve-out)
|
||||
res_normal = contemplate("chickens", proposal_root=tmp_path)
|
||||
assert res_normal.terminal == Terminal.PROPOSAL_EMITTED
|
||||
|
||||
# 2. Assert that with exercise_ask=True, it returns QUESTION_NEEDED
|
||||
calls = []
|
||||
orig = pm._delivery_outcome_for_limitation
|
||||
def wrapped(assessment):
|
||||
calls.append(assessment)
|
||||
return orig(assessment)
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(pm, "_delivery_outcome_for_limitation", wrapped)
|
||||
|
||||
res_ask = contemplate("chickens", proposal_root=tmp_path, exercise_ask=True)
|
||||
assert res_ask.terminal == Terminal.QUESTION_NEEDED
|
||||
assert len(calls) == 1 # Verify it is called exactly once! No double delivery / double render!
|
||||
|
||||
# Verify the question artifact path
|
||||
assert res_ask.proposal_path is not None
|
||||
artifact_path = Path(res_ask.proposal_path)
|
||||
assert artifact_path.exists()
|
||||
# Confirm it is NOT written under proposal_root / teaching/proposals
|
||||
assert "teaching/questions" in res_ask.proposal_path
|
||||
assert str(tmp_path) not in res_ask.proposal_path
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_unrenderable_ask_falls_back_in_pass_manager(monkeypatch, tmp_path) -> None:
|
||||
from core.comprehension_attempt import ComprehensionAttempt, RouteResult
|
||||
import generate.contemplation.pass_manager as pm
|
||||
from core.epistemic_questions.delivery import DeliveryOutcome
|
||||
|
||||
attempt = ComprehensionAttempt(
|
||||
organ="r2_constraints",
|
||||
outcome="setup_refused",
|
||||
refusal_reason="missing_total_count",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(pm, "route_setup", lambda text, case_id=None: RouteResult((attempt,), None, "all_refused"))
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(
|
||||
pm,
|
||||
"_delivery_outcome_for_limitation",
|
||||
lambda assessment: DeliveryOutcome(Terminal.PROPOSAL_EMITTED, None, "multi_slot_not_supported")
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
res = contemplate("chickens", proposal_root=tmp_path, exercise_ask=True)
|
||||
assert res.terminal == Terminal.PROPOSAL_EMITTED
|
||||
assert res.terminal is not Terminal.QUESTION_NEEDED
|
||||
assert res.proposal_path is not None
|
||||
assert Path(res.proposal_path).exists()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_family_none_does_not_crash_ask_branch(monkeypatch, tmp_path) -> None:
|
||||
from core.comprehension_attempt import ComprehensionAttempt, RouteResult
|
||||
import generate.contemplation.pass_manager as pm
|
||||
from core.epistemic_disclosure.limitation import LimitationAssessment
|
||||
import core.epistemic_disclosure.limitation as lim_mod
|
||||
|
||||
fake_assessment = LimitationAssessment(
|
||||
limitation_kind="missing_information",
|
||||
resolution_action="ask_question",
|
||||
epistemic_state=EpistemicState.UNDETERMINED,
|
||||
owner_organ="r2_constraint",
|
||||
blocking_reason="nonexistent_family_name",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
attempt = ComprehensionAttempt(
|
||||
organ="r2_constraints",
|
||||
outcome="setup_refused",
|
||||
refusal_reason="nonexistent_family_name",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(pm, "route_setup", lambda text, case_id=None: RouteResult((attempt,), None, "all_refused"))
|
||||
monkeypatch.setattr(lim_mod, "assess_from_attempt", lambda att: fake_assessment)
|
||||
|
||||
res = contemplate("chickens", proposal_root=tmp_path, exercise_ask=True)
|
||||
assert res.terminal == Terminal.NO_PROGRESS
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue