docs(planning): expand authority substrate outreach plan and checklists with full content
This commit is contained in:
Shay
parent
518e9ebd1c
commit
dda4cddfda
3 changed files with 471 additions and 17 deletions
|
|
@ -1,7 +1,127 @@
|
||||||
# Anthropic Authority Substrate Checklist
|
# Anthropic Authority Substrate Readiness Checklist
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Status: Planning / execution checklist
|
Status: Active
|
||||||
Date: 2026-06-11
|
|
||||||
Parent index: `docs/planning/AUTHORITY-SUBSTRATE-OUTREACH-PLAN.md`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This checklist organizes the Anthropic-facing execution path around the merged Claude-to-CORE Hybrid Verification Demo. The goal is to produce an evidence-backed packet that can be reviewed by Anthropic safety, agent infrastructure, MCP,
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Phase 1 — Proof Capture
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Final #687 post-merge verification report
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Capture:
|
||||||
|
- merge SHA
|
||||||
|
- CI checks
|
||||||
|
- smoke status
|
||||||
|
- lane SHA status
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Create proof-stack summary for:
|
||||||
|
- #684
|
||||||
|
- #685
|
||||||
|
- #686
|
||||||
|
- #687
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Freeze demo artifacts
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Phase 2 — Demo Evidence
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Capture verified scenario
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Capture refused disagreement scenario
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Capture ASK scenario
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Capture outside-envelope refusal scenario
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Capture invalid smuggling scenario
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Save terminal outputs
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Save screenshots
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Produce evidence packet
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Phase 3 — Documentation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Update executive deck
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Update whitepaper
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Update security architecture
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Update partnership memo
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Create executive summary
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Phase 4 — Research Paper
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Claim audit
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Related work expansion
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] SaaS/on-prem section
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] #687 implementation artifact section
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Future demo roadmap
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] arXiv packaging
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Phase 5 — Outreach
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Daniela email final
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Technical reviewer email
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Follow-up sequence
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Contact package assembled
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Phase 6 — Red Team
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Anthropic Safety review
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] MCP review
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] IPO/legal-risk review
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Skeptical academic review
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Overclaim audit
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Phase 7 — Next Demo
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Tool Authority Demo design
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Tool Authority Demo implementation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Tool Authority Demo review
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Tool Authority Demo evidence packet
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Exit Criteria
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Ready when:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Packet complete
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Demo evidence complete
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Paper complete
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Objections answered
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Outreach package assembled
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -1,8 +1,238 @@
|
||||||
# Authority Substrate Outreach Plan
|
# CORE Authority Substrate Outreach Plan
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Status: Planning / execution checklist
|
Last Updated: 2026-06-11
|
||||||
Owner: AssetOverflow CORE
|
|
||||||
Date: 2026-06-11
|
|
||||||
Scope: Anthropic readiness, xAI/Tesla-adjacent readiness, robotics/embodied-authority readiness, and shared CORE authority-substrate evidence.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This document is the master index for the CORE authority-substrate outreach and demo strategy after the merged Claude-to-CORE Hybrid Verification Demo. It intentionally does **not** create
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Mission
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Prepare CORE for serious engagement with:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. Anthropic
|
||||||
|
2. xAI
|
||||||
|
3. Tesla
|
||||||
|
4. SpaceX-adjacent AI organizations
|
||||||
|
5. Frontier-model safety researchers
|
||||||
|
6. Infrastructure and agent-platform teams
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The goal is not marketing.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The goal is to demonstrate that:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- stochastic intelligence does not require stochastic authority
|
||||||
|
- frontier models can remain semantic engines
|
||||||
|
- deterministic authority boundaries can govern verification, refusal, ASK, tool use, and future embodied actions
|
||||||
|
- replayable traces provide auditable evidence of the decision path
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Core Thesis
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
CORE is not competing with frontier models.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
CORE is a deterministic authority substrate.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The model proposes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The substrate decides.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The trace proves.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Current Demonstrated State
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## PR #684
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Semantic-state ledger reland.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Proves:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- semantic-state representation separated from authority surfaces
|
||||||
|
- behavior-preserving refactor
|
||||||
|
- verifier/pool remain sole commit authority
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## PR #685
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Candidate-source boundary.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Proves:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- ledger-to-candidate generation isolated behind a formal boundary
|
||||||
|
- future semantic-state work can proceed without authority leakage
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## PR #686
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Replay/provenance equivalence harness.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Proves:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- 937-problem canonical trace artifact
|
||||||
|
- replay-faithfulness checks
|
||||||
|
- authority-violation detection
|
||||||
|
- durable equivalence evidence
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## PR #687
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Claude-to-CORE Hybrid Verification Demo.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Proves:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- model proposal can be separated from authority
|
||||||
|
- verified / refused / ask / invalid outcomes
|
||||||
|
- deterministic artifact validation
|
||||||
|
- tamper-sensitive behavior
|
||||||
|
- no proposer execution authority
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Outreach Tracks
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Track A — Anthropic
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Focus:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- safety
|
||||||
|
- trust
|
||||||
|
- MCP
|
||||||
|
- agent reliability
|
||||||
|
- authority boundaries
|
||||||
|
- auditable traces
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Deliverables:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- executive summary
|
||||||
|
- updated deck
|
||||||
|
- hybrid verification demo packet
|
||||||
|
- research paper
|
||||||
|
- objections and responses
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Track B — xAI
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Focus:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- truth-seeking AI
|
||||||
|
- epistemic states
|
||||||
|
- deterministic verification
|
||||||
|
- local authority boundaries
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Deliverables:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- xAI one-pager
|
||||||
|
- truth-seeking framing memo
|
||||||
|
- epistemic-state demo roadmap
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Track C — Tesla / Embodied Systems
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Focus:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- embodied authority
|
||||||
|
- local execution authority
|
||||||
|
- deterministic action gating
|
||||||
|
- replayable transitions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Deliverables:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- embodied-authority research memo
|
||||||
|
- simulation-only authority demo
|
||||||
|
- transition-admission model
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Demo Roadmap
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Completed:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Hybrid Verification Demo (#687)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Planned:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. Tool Authority Demo
|
||||||
|
2. Embodied Authority Simulation Demo
|
||||||
|
3. SaaS-Control / On-Prem-Authority Demo
|
||||||
|
4. Domain Admission Demo
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Research Roadmap
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. Authority substrates
|
||||||
|
2. Tool authority
|
||||||
|
3. Epistemic-state systems
|
||||||
|
4. Embodied authority
|
||||||
|
5. Distributed authority boundaries
|
||||||
|
6. Human-in-the-loop authority transitions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Documentation Roadmap
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. Executive summary
|
||||||
|
2. Research paper v0.2
|
||||||
|
3. Demo evidence packet
|
||||||
|
4. Security architecture update
|
||||||
|
5. Anthropic packet
|
||||||
|
6. xAI packet
|
||||||
|
7. Embodied authority memo
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Model Allocation Strategy
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Fable:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- architecture
|
||||||
|
- red-team review
|
||||||
|
- multimodal planning
|
||||||
|
- embodied authority design
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Sonnet:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- implementation
|
||||||
|
- documentation
|
||||||
|
- reviews
|
||||||
|
- verification
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Opus:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- audits
|
||||||
|
- deep reviews
|
||||||
|
- merge recommendations
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
ChatGPT:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- strategy
|
||||||
|
- packet shaping
|
||||||
|
- outreach framing
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Success Criteria
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Anthropic:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- technical review conversation
|
||||||
|
- partnership exploration
|
||||||
|
- research discussion
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
xAI:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- technical review
|
||||||
|
- truth-seeking discussion
|
||||||
|
- embodied-authority interest
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Research:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- arXiv-quality paper
|
||||||
|
- reproducible demos
|
||||||
|
- auditable artifacts
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -1,11 +1,115 @@
|
||||||
# xAI / Tesla Embodied Authority Checklist
|
# xAI / Tesla Embodied Authority Checklist
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Status: Planning / execution checklist
|
Status: Active
|
||||||
Date: 2026-06-11
|
|
||||||
Parent index: `docs/planning/AUTHORITY-SUBSTRATE-OUTREACH-PLAN.md`
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This checklist organizes the xAI, X, Tesla, and robotics-adjacent outreach lane. The center of this lane is truth-seeking AI, epistemic authority, local authority boundaries, and careful embodied-systems safety framing. It is not a deployment plan for a robot controller.
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## 1. Core Thesis
|
# Mission
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Primary
|
Prepare a second outreach lane focused on:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- truth-seeking AI
|
||||||
|
- epistemic authority
|
||||||
|
- tool authority
|
||||||
|
- embodied authority
|
||||||
|
- local execution authority
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Phase 1 — Positioning
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Create xAI one-pager
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Create truth-seeking memo
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Create local-authority memo
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Create embodied-authority memo
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Phase 2 — Research
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Formalize embodied authority definition
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Formalize transition admission model
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Define authorized / ask / refused / safe-stop states
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Define replayable transition traces
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Define local authority boundary
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Phase 3 — Demo Design
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Simulation only.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
No robotics controller claims.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
No deployment claims.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Design embodied-authority demo
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Define scene-state schema
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Define proposed-action schema
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Define authority outcomes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Define trace artifact format
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Define tamper-evidence checks
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Phase 4 — Demo Scenarios
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Authorized low-risk transition
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Confirmation-required transition
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Unsafe transition refusal
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] State-conflict refusal
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Invalid authority smuggling
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Phase 5 — Documentation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] xAI packet
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Tesla packet
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Research memo
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Demo evidence packet
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Phase 6 — Outreach
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] xAI outreach draft
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Technical reviewer draft
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Objection handling
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] FAQ
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
# Exit Criteria
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Ready when:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Research complete
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Demo complete
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Evidence packet complete
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[ ] Outreach package complete
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue