Merge pull request #411 from AssetOverflow/feat/contemplation-ratifiable-claims
feat(brief-B): enrich contemplation payload — composition_reclassification directly ratifiable
This commit is contained in:
commit
a092d2e8c2
2 changed files with 448 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -125,6 +125,21 @@ def audit_problem_to_evidence(
|
|||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Enriched payload for composition_reclassification groups. Each entry maps
|
||||
# missing_operator → (composition_category, surface_pattern) so the proposal
|
||||
# payload is directly ratifiable without operator-side design.
|
||||
_COMPOSITION_ENRICHMENT: dict[str, tuple[str, str]] = {
|
||||
"quantity_extraction": (
|
||||
"multiplicative_composition",
|
||||
"bound(count) × bound(unit_cost)",
|
||||
),
|
||||
"multi_quantity_composition": (
|
||||
"additive_composition",
|
||||
"bound(qty_a) + bound(qty_b)",
|
||||
),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Widened dispatch (ADR-0172 tightening follow-up #2): the original
|
||||
# single-key heuristic (refusal_reason only) collapsed every audit_brief_11
|
||||
# group to injector_sub_shape because the reader's actual refusal_reasons
|
||||
|
|
@ -206,10 +221,18 @@ def _modal_anchor_payload(
|
|||
refusal_reason: str,
|
||||
missing_operator: str,
|
||||
evidence: tuple[MathReaderRefusalEvidence, ...],
|
||||
change_kind: str,
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Build a deterministic, JSON-safe placeholder payload for the group."""
|
||||
"""Build a deterministic, JSON-safe payload for the group.
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
For ``composition_reclassification`` groups the payload is enriched with
|
||||
``surface_pattern``, ``composition_category``, and ``polarity`` so the
|
||||
operator can call ``apply_composition_claim()`` directly without any
|
||||
field synthesis. All other change kinds retain the base evidence-
|
||||
aggregation payload.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
payload: dict = {
|
||||
"evidence_count": len(evidence),
|
||||
"group_key": {
|
||||
"missing_operator": missing_operator,
|
||||
|
|
@ -217,6 +240,14 @@ def _modal_anchor_payload(
|
|||
},
|
||||
"modal_sub_type": evidence[0].sub_type,
|
||||
}
|
||||
if change_kind == "composition_reclassification":
|
||||
enrichment = _COMPOSITION_ENRICHMENT.get(missing_operator)
|
||||
if enrichment is not None:
|
||||
composition_category, surface_pattern = enrichment
|
||||
payload["composition_category"] = composition_category
|
||||
payload["surface_pattern"] = surface_pattern
|
||||
payload["polarity"] = "affirms"
|
||||
return payload
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _build_reasoning_trace(
|
||||
|
|
@ -327,6 +358,7 @@ def _build_proposal_for_group(
|
|||
refusal_reason=refusal_reason,
|
||||
missing_operator=missing_operator,
|
||||
evidence=evidence,
|
||||
change_kind=change_kind,
|
||||
)
|
||||
trace = _build_reasoning_trace(
|
||||
refusal_reason=refusal_reason,
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
414
tests/test_contemplation_ratifiable_payload.py
Normal file
414
tests/test_contemplation_ratifiable_payload.py
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,414 @@
|
|||
"""Brief B — Ratifiable payload tests for contemplation proposals.
|
||||
|
||||
Pins that ``decompose_audit`` emits ``proposed_change_payload`` fields that
|
||||
satisfy ``apply_composition_claim()`` preconditions directly, with no
|
||||
operator-side field synthesis.
|
||||
|
||||
Coverage:
|
||||
1. quantity_extraction group → payload carries composition_category,
|
||||
surface_pattern, polarity.
|
||||
2. multi_quantity_composition group → payload carries the additive fields.
|
||||
3. Legacy fields (evidence_count, group_key, modal_sub_type) still present
|
||||
(backward-compat schema regression).
|
||||
4. Non-composition change kinds (matcher_extension, injector_sub_shape,
|
||||
frame_reclassification) do NOT get the enriched fields.
|
||||
5. Enriched payload fields satisfy apply_composition_claim preconditions.
|
||||
6. Round-trip: real audit composition proposal → apply_composition_claim
|
||||
without any field synthesis.
|
||||
7. polarity is always "affirms" in the enriched payload.
|
||||
8. Determinism: payload is identical across reruns.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import json
|
||||
import shutil
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
|
||||
import pytest
|
||||
|
||||
from generate.comprehension import lexicon as comprehension_lexicon
|
||||
from generate.comprehension import lifecycle
|
||||
from teaching.math_composition_ratification import (
|
||||
SAFE_COMPOSITION_CATEGORIES,
|
||||
apply_composition_claim,
|
||||
)
|
||||
from teaching.math_contemplation import decompose_audit
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
REPO_ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]
|
||||
PACK_ROOT = REPO_ROOT / "language_packs" / "data" / "en_core_math_v1"
|
||||
REAL_AUDIT_PATH = (
|
||||
REPO_ROOT / "evals" / "gsm8k_math" / "train_sample" / "v1" / "audit_brief_11.json"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
# Helpers
|
||||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _case(
|
||||
*,
|
||||
case_id: str,
|
||||
refusal_reason: str,
|
||||
missing_operator: str,
|
||||
token_text: str = "x",
|
||||
) -> dict:
|
||||
return {
|
||||
"case_id": case_id,
|
||||
"outcome": "refused",
|
||||
"refusal_reason": refusal_reason,
|
||||
"missing_operator": missing_operator,
|
||||
"refusal_detail": "",
|
||||
"sentence_index": 0,
|
||||
"token_index": 0,
|
||||
"token_text": token_text,
|
||||
"recognized_terms": [],
|
||||
"skipped_frame": None,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def _write_audit(tmp_path: Path, per_case: list[dict]) -> Path:
|
||||
audit = {
|
||||
"schema_version": 1,
|
||||
"brief": "synthetic-ratifiable-payload-test",
|
||||
"case_count": len(per_case),
|
||||
"per_case": per_case,
|
||||
}
|
||||
target = tmp_path / "audit.json"
|
||||
target.write_text(json.dumps(audit), encoding="utf-8")
|
||||
return target
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.fixture()
|
||||
def pack_copy(tmp_path: Path) -> Path:
|
||||
target = tmp_path / "en_core_math_v1"
|
||||
shutil.copytree(PACK_ROOT, target)
|
||||
(target / "compositions").mkdir(exist_ok=True)
|
||||
# ensure additive_composition.jsonl exists for round-trip
|
||||
(target / "compositions" / "additive_composition.jsonl").write_text(
|
||||
"", encoding="utf-8"
|
||||
)
|
||||
comprehension_lexicon._CACHE.clear()
|
||||
lifecycle._get_lexicon.cache_clear()
|
||||
yield target
|
||||
comprehension_lexicon._CACHE.clear()
|
||||
lifecycle._get_lexicon.cache_clear()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
# 1. quantity_extraction payload
|
||||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_quantity_extraction_payload_has_ratifiable_fields(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
||||
"""quantity_extraction group payload carries composition_category, surface_pattern, polarity."""
|
||||
audit = _write_audit(
|
||||
tmp_path,
|
||||
[
|
||||
_case(
|
||||
case_id="qe-001",
|
||||
refusal_reason="incomplete_operation",
|
||||
missing_operator="quantity_extraction",
|
||||
),
|
||||
_case(
|
||||
case_id="qe-002",
|
||||
refusal_reason="incomplete_operation",
|
||||
missing_operator="quantity_extraction",
|
||||
),
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
proposals = decompose_audit(audit)
|
||||
assert len(proposals) == 1
|
||||
payload = proposals[0].proposed_change_payload
|
||||
assert isinstance(payload, dict)
|
||||
assert payload["composition_category"] == "multiplicative_composition"
|
||||
assert payload["surface_pattern"] == "bound(count) × bound(unit_cost)"
|
||||
assert payload["polarity"] == "affirms"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
# 2. multi_quantity_composition payload
|
||||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_multi_quantity_composition_payload_has_ratifiable_fields(
|
||||
tmp_path: Path,
|
||||
) -> None:
|
||||
"""multi_quantity_composition group payload carries the additive fields."""
|
||||
audit = _write_audit(
|
||||
tmp_path,
|
||||
[
|
||||
_case(
|
||||
case_id="mqc-001",
|
||||
refusal_reason="incomplete_operation",
|
||||
missing_operator="multi_quantity_composition",
|
||||
),
|
||||
_case(
|
||||
case_id="mqc-002",
|
||||
refusal_reason="incomplete_operation",
|
||||
missing_operator="multi_quantity_composition",
|
||||
),
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
proposals = decompose_audit(audit)
|
||||
assert len(proposals) == 1
|
||||
payload = proposals[0].proposed_change_payload
|
||||
assert isinstance(payload, dict)
|
||||
assert payload["composition_category"] == "additive_composition"
|
||||
assert payload["surface_pattern"] == "bound(qty_a) + bound(qty_b)"
|
||||
assert payload["polarity"] == "affirms"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
# 3. Legacy fields preserved (backward-compat schema regression)
|
||||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_composition_payload_preserves_legacy_fields(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
||||
"""evidence_count, group_key, modal_sub_type must still be present."""
|
||||
audit = _write_audit(
|
||||
tmp_path,
|
||||
[
|
||||
_case(
|
||||
case_id="leg-001",
|
||||
refusal_reason="incomplete_operation",
|
||||
missing_operator="quantity_extraction",
|
||||
),
|
||||
_case(
|
||||
case_id="leg-002",
|
||||
refusal_reason="incomplete_operation",
|
||||
missing_operator="quantity_extraction",
|
||||
),
|
||||
_case(
|
||||
case_id="leg-003",
|
||||
refusal_reason="incomplete_operation",
|
||||
missing_operator="quantity_extraction",
|
||||
),
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
proposals = decompose_audit(audit)
|
||||
assert len(proposals) == 1
|
||||
payload = proposals[0].proposed_change_payload
|
||||
assert isinstance(payload, dict)
|
||||
assert payload["evidence_count"] == 3
|
||||
assert payload["group_key"] == {
|
||||
"missing_operator": "quantity_extraction",
|
||||
"refusal_reason": "incomplete_operation",
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert "modal_sub_type" in payload
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_multi_qty_payload_preserves_legacy_fields(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
||||
"""multi_quantity_composition also preserves legacy fields."""
|
||||
audit = _write_audit(
|
||||
tmp_path,
|
||||
[
|
||||
_case(
|
||||
case_id="mql-001",
|
||||
refusal_reason="incomplete_operation",
|
||||
missing_operator="multi_quantity_composition",
|
||||
),
|
||||
_case(
|
||||
case_id="mql-002",
|
||||
refusal_reason="incomplete_operation",
|
||||
missing_operator="multi_quantity_composition",
|
||||
),
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
proposals = decompose_audit(audit)
|
||||
assert len(proposals) == 1
|
||||
payload = proposals[0].proposed_change_payload
|
||||
assert "evidence_count" in payload
|
||||
assert "group_key" in payload
|
||||
assert "modal_sub_type" in payload
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
# 4. Non-composition kinds do NOT get enriched fields
|
||||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
|
||||
"refusal_reason,missing_operator",
|
||||
[
|
||||
("unexpected_category", "pre_frame_filler_sentence"),
|
||||
("unexpected_category", "multi_subject_sentence"),
|
||||
("narrowness_violation", "multi_quantity_composition"),
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
def test_non_composition_payload_not_enriched(
|
||||
tmp_path: Path, refusal_reason: str, missing_operator: str
|
||||
) -> None:
|
||||
"""Non-composition change kinds must not carry composition_category etc."""
|
||||
audit = _write_audit(
|
||||
tmp_path,
|
||||
[
|
||||
_case(
|
||||
case_id="nc-001",
|
||||
refusal_reason=refusal_reason,
|
||||
missing_operator=missing_operator,
|
||||
),
|
||||
_case(
|
||||
case_id="nc-002",
|
||||
refusal_reason=refusal_reason,
|
||||
missing_operator=missing_operator,
|
||||
),
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
proposals = decompose_audit(audit)
|
||||
assert len(proposals) == 1
|
||||
payload = proposals[0].proposed_change_payload
|
||||
assert isinstance(payload, dict)
|
||||
assert "composition_category" not in payload
|
||||
assert "surface_pattern" not in payload
|
||||
assert "polarity" not in payload
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
# 5. Enriched fields satisfy apply_composition_claim preconditions
|
||||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_enriched_fields_satisfy_apply_composition_claim_preconditions(
|
||||
tmp_path: Path,
|
||||
) -> None:
|
||||
"""Each enriched composition_category is in SAFE_COMPOSITION_CATEGORIES."""
|
||||
for missing_operator, refusal_reason in [
|
||||
("quantity_extraction", "incomplete_operation"),
|
||||
("multi_quantity_composition", "incomplete_operation"),
|
||||
]:
|
||||
sub = tmp_path / missing_operator
|
||||
sub.mkdir()
|
||||
audit = _write_audit(
|
||||
sub,
|
||||
[
|
||||
_case(
|
||||
case_id=f"{missing_operator}-p-001",
|
||||
refusal_reason=refusal_reason,
|
||||
missing_operator=missing_operator,
|
||||
),
|
||||
_case(
|
||||
case_id=f"{missing_operator}-p-002",
|
||||
refusal_reason=refusal_reason,
|
||||
missing_operator=missing_operator,
|
||||
),
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
proposals = decompose_audit(audit)
|
||||
assert len(proposals) == 1
|
||||
payload = proposals[0].proposed_change_payload
|
||||
assert isinstance(payload, dict)
|
||||
assert payload["composition_category"] in SAFE_COMPOSITION_CATEGORIES
|
||||
assert payload["polarity"] in {"affirms", "falsifies"}
|
||||
assert payload["surface_pattern"].strip()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
# 6. Round-trip: real audit composition proposal → apply_composition_claim
|
||||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_round_trip_composition_proposal_into_apply_composition_claim(
|
||||
pack_copy: Path,
|
||||
) -> None:
|
||||
"""First composition_reclassification proposal from real audit → apply_composition_claim
|
||||
without operator-side field synthesis."""
|
||||
assert REAL_AUDIT_PATH.exists(), REAL_AUDIT_PATH
|
||||
|
||||
proposals = decompose_audit(REAL_AUDIT_PATH)
|
||||
comp_proposals = [
|
||||
p
|
||||
for p in proposals
|
||||
if p.proposed_change_kind == "composition_reclassification"
|
||||
]
|
||||
assert comp_proposals, "real audit must produce at least one composition_reclassification proposal"
|
||||
|
||||
proposal = comp_proposals[0]
|
||||
payload = proposal.proposed_change_payload
|
||||
assert isinstance(payload, dict)
|
||||
|
||||
# All fields needed by apply_composition_claim come straight from the payload
|
||||
composition_category: str = payload["composition_category"]
|
||||
surface_pattern: str = payload["surface_pattern"]
|
||||
polarity: str = payload["polarity"]
|
||||
|
||||
# Use the first evidence pointer's backing record
|
||||
evidence_record = proposal.evidence_pointers[0]
|
||||
|
||||
# apply_composition_claim must succeed without exception
|
||||
receipt = apply_composition_claim(
|
||||
claim=evidence_record,
|
||||
composition_category=composition_category,
|
||||
polarity=polarity,
|
||||
reviewer="test_round_trip",
|
||||
surface_pattern=surface_pattern,
|
||||
pack_root=pack_copy,
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert receipt.composition_category == composition_category
|
||||
assert receipt.polarity == polarity
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
# 7. polarity is always "affirms" in enriched payload
|
||||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_composition_payload_polarity_is_always_affirms(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
||||
"""polarity must be 'affirms' in all auto-generated composition payloads."""
|
||||
for missing_operator in ("quantity_extraction", "multi_quantity_composition"):
|
||||
sub = tmp_path / missing_operator
|
||||
sub.mkdir(exist_ok=True)
|
||||
audit = _write_audit(
|
||||
sub,
|
||||
[
|
||||
_case(
|
||||
case_id=f"pol-{missing_operator}-001",
|
||||
refusal_reason="incomplete_operation",
|
||||
missing_operator=missing_operator,
|
||||
),
|
||||
_case(
|
||||
case_id=f"pol-{missing_operator}-002",
|
||||
refusal_reason="incomplete_operation",
|
||||
missing_operator=missing_operator,
|
||||
),
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
proposals = decompose_audit(audit)
|
||||
assert len(proposals) == 1
|
||||
assert proposals[0].proposed_change_payload["polarity"] == "affirms"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
# 8. Determinism: payload is identical across reruns
|
||||
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_enriched_payload_deterministic_across_reruns(tmp_path: Path) -> None:
|
||||
"""Same audit → byte-identical payload across 5 reruns."""
|
||||
audit = _write_audit(
|
||||
tmp_path,
|
||||
[
|
||||
_case(
|
||||
case_id="det-001",
|
||||
refusal_reason="incomplete_operation",
|
||||
missing_operator="quantity_extraction",
|
||||
),
|
||||
_case(
|
||||
case_id="det-002",
|
||||
refusal_reason="incomplete_operation",
|
||||
missing_operator="quantity_extraction",
|
||||
),
|
||||
],
|
||||
)
|
||||
first = decompose_audit(audit)
|
||||
first_payload = json.dumps(
|
||||
first[0].proposed_change_payload, sort_keys=True, separators=(",", ":")
|
||||
)
|
||||
for _ in range(4):
|
||||
rerun = decompose_audit(audit)
|
||||
rerun_payload = json.dumps(
|
||||
rerun[0].proposed_change_payload, sort_keys=True, separators=(",", ":")
|
||||
)
|
||||
assert rerun_payload == first_payload
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue