Document language pack manifold contract
This commit is contained in:
parent
dbdc606937
commit
58092112c3
1 changed files with 133 additions and 0 deletions
133
docs/decisions/ADR-0015-language-packs-and-holonomy-resonance.md
Normal file
133
docs/decisions/ADR-0015-language-packs-and-holonomy-resonance.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
|
|||
# ADR-0015 — Language Packs as Compiled Linguistic Manifolds
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** Accepted
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-05-13
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Context
|
||||
|
||||
CORE's language philosophy is not localization. English, Hebrew, and Koine Greek
|
||||
serve distinct architectural roles in CORE-Logos:
|
||||
|
||||
| Language | Role |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| English | Operational base and articulation surface |
|
||||
| Hebrew | Depth-root language: root morphology, semantic compression, creation-word density |
|
||||
| Koine Greek | Depth-relation language: Logos precision, case/aspect/voice/mood, clause relation |
|
||||
|
||||
The existing `sensorium/adapters/text.py` scaffold mounted `en`, `he`, and `grc`,
|
||||
but the packs were only token lookup wrappers. That is insufficient for CORE.
|
||||
A language pack must not be a dataset or a translation table. It must be a
|
||||
compiled linguistic manifold.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
A CORE language pack is a deterministic, checksummed, compiled linguistic
|
||||
manifold containing:
|
||||
|
||||
- a manifest with language role, script, normalization policy, source manifest,
|
||||
determinism class, checksum, gate state, and OOV policy;
|
||||
- lexical entries and morphology entries;
|
||||
- grammar attractors;
|
||||
- cross-language resonance edges;
|
||||
- holonomy alignment cases proving that aligned clauses produce coherent field
|
||||
path resonance.
|
||||
|
||||
## Terminology Boundary
|
||||
|
||||
This distinction is mandatory:
|
||||
|
||||
| Term | Meaning |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Vocabulary point / manifold point | Position in the field; surface token entry |
|
||||
| Transition rotor | Operator between points, constructed by algebra |
|
||||
| Persona motor | Field-bias operator |
|
||||
| Grammar attractor | Structural pressure seeded from recurring linguistic form |
|
||||
|
||||
Vocabulary entries are not transition rotors. Conflating point and operator is
|
||||
an algebraic category error. The vocabulary may store multivectors/null points;
|
||||
rotor construction belongs to the algebra layer.
|
||||
|
||||
## OOV Policy
|
||||
|
||||
Unknown surfaces must not silently collapse to a shared point.
|
||||
|
||||
| Pack role | OOV behavior |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| English operational/articulation | Tagged fallback may be used during early operation |
|
||||
| Hebrew depth-root | Fail closed during and after seeding unless explicit expansion path is active |
|
||||
| Koine Greek depth-relation | Fail closed during and after seeding unless explicit expansion path is active |
|
||||
| Post-seeding expansion | OOV creates a vocab-expansion proposal; it is not projected silently |
|
||||
|
||||
Returning the same `e1` point for every unknown Hebrew or Greek form erases the
|
||||
distinctions those languages exist to preserve; it is anti-Logos.
|
||||
|
||||
## Morphology / Semantics / Alignment
|
||||
|
||||
Morphology is operator composition. Semantic domain is attractor geometry.
|
||||
Alignment is resonance. These must not be collapsed into one multiplication.
|
||||
|
||||
For Hebrew, composition order is load-bearing:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
V_surface = (((V_root · M_stem) · M_inflection) · M_affix_chain)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
For Koine Greek, the pack should compose lemma anchors with case/aspect/voice/
|
||||
mood/clause-role operators. The grammar relation is structural, not metadata.
|
||||
|
||||
Semantic domains seed attractors rather than becoming opaque morphology factors.
|
||||
Cross-language alignment is a weighted graph, not a translation table.
|
||||
|
||||
## Crown Proof: Holonomy Resonance
|
||||
|
||||
Token-level alignment is necessary but insufficient. The decisive proof of the
|
||||
three-language design is dynamic:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
holonomy(hebrew canonical clause)
|
||||
resonates with
|
||||
holonomy(koine greek canonical clause)
|
||||
and maps coherently to
|
||||
holonomy(english articulation clause)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Aligned clauses should produce nearby/coherent holonomies without flattening
|
||||
their distinctions. Unrelated clauses should remain geometrically distinct.
|
||||
Word-order changes should change holonomy. This is the CORE-Logos proof that
|
||||
language packs preserve ordered field paths rather than merely mapping tokens.
|
||||
|
||||
The first holonomy alignment cases should be small and exact: Logos, beginning,
|
||||
light, life, spirit, truth, covenant, grace, kingdom, creation.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
**Positive:**
|
||||
- Prevents future agents from treating language packs as datasets.
|
||||
- Gives Hebrew and Koine Greek concrete architectural roles.
|
||||
- Prevents silent OOV collapse in depth languages.
|
||||
- Establishes holonomy-level resonance as the validation gate.
|
||||
|
||||
**Negative:**
|
||||
- Requires a real Supervised Seeding Epoch before Hebrew/Greek gates engage.
|
||||
- Requires deterministic morphology and grammar scaffolds before depth packs are
|
||||
operational.
|
||||
- Requires carefully pinned canonical texts and checksums for D0 ingestion.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Order
|
||||
|
||||
1. Terminology and schema foundation (`language_packs/schema.py`).
|
||||
2. Pack roles and OOV policy in `sensorium`.
|
||||
3. Split text adapters into English, Hebrew, Koine Greek specializations.
|
||||
4. Add grammar scaffold artifacts.
|
||||
5. Add tri-language resonance graph.
|
||||
6. Add holonomy resonance proof cases.
|
||||
|
||||
No LLM extraction may feed the gate. Structural segmentation only.
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue