From 45835987b90077a3962da8c5d5cf85dbdcfa6a9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shay <assetoverflow@icloud.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 10:06:36 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] feat(verified): add default-dark VERIFIED serving gate helper

Adds a default-dark verified_serving_enabled helper with focused tests. The helper is unwired: no runtime integration, no verify.py wiring, no eval producer imports, no served VERIFIED behavior, and no CLAIMS/metric movement.
---
 core/epistemic_disclosure/serving_gate.py | 33 ++++++++++
 tests/test_verified_serving_gate.py       | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 107 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 core/epistemic_disclosure/serving_gate.py
 create mode 100644 tests/test_verified_serving_gate.py

diff --git a/core/epistemic_disclosure/serving_gate.py b/core/epistemic_disclosure/serving_gate.py
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..531f926c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/core/epistemic_disclosure/serving_gate.py
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+"""VERIFIED serving gate helper — default-dark, no served-surface wiring.
+
+This module centralizes the future kill-switch predicate for VERIFIED serving.
+It is default-dark / fail-closed: if the config field is missing or malformed,
+it must evaluate to False.
+
+This helper only centralizes the future kill-switch predicate so that future serving code
+has one audited predicate. It does not wire any served-surface or implement served
+VERIFIED behavior. Missing field means False.
+
+Note that eval-gold-backed producers (such as the verification producer in
+evals/constraint_oracle/verified_producer.py) are not serving-eligible.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+from typing import Any
+
+from core.config import DEFAULT_CONFIG, RuntimeConfig
+
+
+def verified_serving_enabled(config: RuntimeConfig | Any | None = None) -> bool:
+    """Return whether served VERIFIED delivery is explicitly enabled.
+
+    Missing attribute means False. This is the load-bearing dark-gate invariant:
+    the served VERIFIED path cannot light merely because the helper exists or because
+    an older RuntimeConfig instance lacks the future field.
+    """
+    cfg = DEFAULT_CONFIG if config is None else config
+    return bool(getattr(cfg, "verified_serving_enabled", False))
+
+
+__all__ = ["verified_serving_enabled"]
diff --git a/tests/test_verified_serving_gate.py b/tests/test_verified_serving_gate.py
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..4535c778
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/test_verified_serving_gate.py
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+"""VERIFIED serving gate — default-dark invariant.
+
+This proves the post-scoping kill-switch predicate is dark unless an
+operator/config object explicitly opts in.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import ast
+from dataclasses import dataclass
+from pathlib import Path
+from typing import Any
+
+from core.config import DEFAULT_CONFIG, RuntimeConfig
+from core.epistemic_disclosure.serving_gate import verified_serving_enabled
+
+
+@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
+class _LegacyConfig:
+    """A pre-field config shape: absence of the flag must mean dark."""
+
+    unrelated: bool = True
+
+
+@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
+class _OptInConfig:
+    """Config with the verified_serving_enabled field."""
+
+    verified_serving_enabled: bool | None
+
+
+def test_default_runtime_config_keeps_verified_serving_dark() -> None:
+    assert verified_serving_enabled(DEFAULT_CONFIG) is False
+    assert verified_serving_enabled(RuntimeConfig()) is False
+
+
+def test_missing_flag_is_dark_for_legacy_config_shape() -> None:
+    assert verified_serving_enabled(_LegacyConfig()) is False
+
+
+def test_gate_only_lights_on_explicit_truthy_opt_in() -> None:
+    assert verified_serving_enabled(_OptInConfig(False)) is False
+    assert verified_serving_enabled(_OptInConfig(True)) is True
+    assert verified_serving_enabled(_OptInConfig(None)) is False
+
+
+def test_none_uses_default_config_and_stays_dark() -> None:
+    assert verified_serving_enabled() is False
+
+
+def test_verified_serving_gate_has_no_eval_or_runtime_imports() -> None:
+    path = Path(__file__).parent.parent / "core/epistemic_disclosure/serving_gate.py"
+    tree = ast.parse(path.read_text(encoding="utf-8"))
+
+    forbidden = {
+        "evals",
+        "evals.constraint_oracle",
+        "evals.constraint_oracle.verified_producer",
+        "verify",
+        "chat.runtime",
+        "generate.contemplation.pass_manager",
+    }
+
+    for node in ast.walk(tree):
+        if isinstance(node, ast.Import):
+            for name in node.names:
+                for banned in forbidden:
+                    assert name.name != banned, f"Forbidden import: {name.name}"
+                    assert not name.name.startswith(banned + "."), f"Forbidden import: {name.name}"
+        elif isinstance(node, ast.ImportFrom):
+            if node.module:
+                for banned in forbidden:
+                    assert node.module != banned, f"Forbidden import from: {node.module}"
+                    assert not node.module.startswith(banned + "."), f"Forbidden import from: {node.module}"