Neutralize tool authority demo public wording
This commit is contained in:
parent
5de774ea63
commit
26a5e9721f
1 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions
|
|
@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
|
|||
# Claude-to-CORE Tool Authority Demo
|
||||
# Frontier-Proposer-to-CORE Tool Authority Demo
|
||||
|
||||
This demo proves one narrow boundary:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Claude/Grok-style proposer suggests a digital action.
|
||||
A model-style proposer suggests a digital action.
|
||||
CORE alone decides authorized | ask | refused | invalid.
|
||||
The output is a deterministic authority artifact.
|
||||
Nothing executes.
|
||||
|
|
@ -34,17 +34,17 @@ network access, subprocess launch, `eval`, or `exec` path exists in the demo.
|
|||
|
||||
## Why this is MCP-shaped, not production MCP
|
||||
|
||||
The payload is structured like a tool invocation so Anthropic and xAI/Tesla
|
||||
lanes can hand the same kind of typed request to CORE. This remains a local
|
||||
demo contract: no server transport, session handling, production adapter, or
|
||||
real side-effecting tool substrate is present.
|
||||
The payload is structured like a tool invocation so future proposer lanes can
|
||||
hand the same kind of typed request to CORE. This remains a local demo
|
||||
contract: no server transport, session handling, production adapter, or real
|
||||
side-effecting tool substrate is present.
|
||||
|
||||
## Relation to #687
|
||||
|
||||
#687 proved the earlier reasoning boundary:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Claude/Fable-style System 1 proposal
|
||||
System 1-style proposal
|
||||
-> CORE deterministic System 2 verification/refusal/ask/invalid
|
||||
-> audited envelope
|
||||
-> deterministic trace artifacts
|
||||
|
|
@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ Claude/Fable-style System 1 proposal
|
|||
This demo advances the same doctrine one layer outward:
|
||||
|
||||
```text
|
||||
Claude/Grok-style proposer
|
||||
model-style proposer
|
||||
-> proposes digital actions
|
||||
-> CORE authorizes/refuses/asks/invalidates
|
||||
-> inert licensed action artifact only when authorized
|
||||
|
|
@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ It therefore proves digital tool/action authority before any embodied-authority
|
|||
## Honesty ledger
|
||||
|
||||
* Real: closed schema validation, local authority evaluation, deterministic trace hashing, expected artifact pinning, double-run determinism.
|
||||
* Simulated: the proposer side is static fixture data standing in for Claude or Grok.
|
||||
* Simulated: the proposer side is static fixture data standing in for a model-style proposer.
|
||||
* Not claimed: production MCP, runtime authority integration, external side effects, or any broader guarantee than this fail-closed local envelope.
|
||||
|
||||
## Example commands
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue